N6945023R0075-0006.pdf

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

PWD KINGSBAY

910 USS HUNLEY AVE

NSB KINGSBAY

KINGSBAY GA 31547

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6945023R0075, Kings Bay MFSS

See Page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Feb-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945023R0075

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Nov-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Feb-2024

CODE

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N69450

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945023R0075

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

This amendment is issued to make the following changes:

1. The proposal due date and time is extended to 2:00 PM EST, Friday, 8 March 2024.

2. Section C – The Section C attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section C is provided via attachment under file name N6945023R0075_SectionC_0006.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is as follows:

a. Annex 0100000 – General Information has been added.

b. Annex 0200000 – Management and Administration Spec Item 2.4.1 Government-Furnished Property (GFP) – Pages 7 & 15 of 131 Spec Item 2.4.1 Government-Furnished Facilities – Pages 7 & 15 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 2.4.3 Government-Furnished Vehicles and Equipment – Pages 7 & 16 of 131 Spec Item 2.4.2 Government-Furnished Utilities – Pages 7 & 16 of 131 Spec Item 2.6.1 Safeguarding Information – Page 17 of 131 Spec Item 2.6.2 Dissemination of Information – Page 18 of 131 Spec Item 2.6.3 Work Reception – Page 18 of 131 Spec Item 2.8.3 Passes and Badges – Page 27 of 131 Spec Item 2.9.4.4 Critical Lift Plan – Pages 9 & 34 of 131 Spec Item 2.9.4.4 Fall Prevention and Protection Plan – Pages 9 & 34 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 2.9.4.5 Pathogen Exposure – Pages 9 & 34 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 2.9.4.6 Control of Hazardous Energy (lockout/tagout) – Pages 9 & 35 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 2.10.2.2 Non-Regulated Waste – Page 41 of 131 Spec Item 2.10.2.3 Regulated Waste Disposal – Page 41 of 131 Spec Item 2.12.2 Notification to the Government for Work Above the Recurring Work Limitations

– Page 46 of 131

c. Sub-annex 1503010 – Custodial Spec Item 3.1.1.3 Low Area Cleaning – Page 56 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.3.1 Restroom Cleaning – Page 63 of 131

d. Sub-annex 1503020 – Pest Control Spec Item 3 Recurring Work – Page 74 of 131 Spec Item 3.1 Scheduled Pest Control – Page 75 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.3 Structure Damaging Pest Control – Page 78 of 131

Spec Item 3.1.5 Vegetation Management – Pages 69 & 79 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.5 Vertebrate Pest Control – Pages 69 & 79 of 131 Spec Item 3.2 Pest Control Service Orders – Page 82 of 131 Spec Item 3.3 Pest Management Reporting – Page 82 of 131 Spec Item 4 Non-Recurring Work – Page 83 of 131

e. Sub-annex 1503030 – Integrated Solid Waste Management Spec Item 2.3 Special Requirements – Page 86 of 131 Spec Item 3.1 Solid Waste Collection – Page 88 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.1 Residential – Pages 84 & 88 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.1.1 General Household Waste – Pages 84 & 88 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.2.2 Recyclable Waste – Pages 84 & 89 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.1.3 Bulky Items – Pages 84 & 89 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.2 Non-Residential – Page 84 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.2.1 General Waste – Page 84 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.2.2 Recyclable Waste – Pages 84 & 89-90 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.2.3 Bulky Waste – Page 84 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.1.2.4 Foreign Port Origin Waste – Pages 84 & 91 of 131 Spec Item 3.2 Solid Waste Disposal – Page 91 of 131 Spec Item 3.2.2 Recyclable – Pages 91-93 of 131 Spec Item 3.2.3 Foreign Port Origin Waste – Pages 84 & 93 of 131 Spec Item 3.3 Vehicles and Equipment – Pages 84 & 93 of 131 Spec Item 3.3 Solid Waste Containers – Pages 84, 93, & 95 of 131 Spec Item 3.3.1 Refuse – Pages 84 & 95 of 131 (Renumbered only) Spec Item 3.3.2 Recyclables – Pages 84 & 96 of 131 Spec Item 3.4.3 Residential – Pages 84 & 96-97 of 131 Spec Item 3.4.4 Foreign Port Origin – Pages 84 & 97 of 131 Spec Item 3.4 Compactors and Containers – Pages 84 & 97 of 131 Spec Item 3.5 Inert Landfill Operations – Pages 84 & 97-99 of 131 Spec Item 3.6 Integrated Solid Waste Service Orders – Pages 84 & 99 of 131

f. Sub-annex 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping

Spec Item 1.1 Concept of Operations – Page 105 of 131 Spec Item 2.3.1.3 Equipment – Page 107 of 131 Spec Item 2.3.1.4 Herbicides – Page 107 of 131 Spec Item 2.3.1.5 Pest Management Operations Reporting – Page 107 of 131 Spec Item 3 Recurring Work – Page 110 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.1.1 Mowing and Trimming – Page 111 of 131 Spec Item 3.1.7 Vegetation Control – Page 115 of 131

3. Section F – The Section F attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section F is provided via attachment under file name N6945023R0075_SectionF_0006.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is

a. Annex 0200000 – Management and Administration Spec Item 2.6.10 Property Management Plan – Page 3 of 17 Spec Item 2.10.1.1 Water Conservation Plan – Page 5 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503020/3 Contractor’s Work Plan – Page 10 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/2.3.1 Revenue Receipts – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/2.3.2 Weight Tickets – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/2.3.2 Monthly Tonnage – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/3.2.2 Revenue Sharing Receipts Report – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/3.4.2 Recycling Report Form – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/3.6 Landfill Operations Report – Page 13 of 17 Annex/Spec Item 1503030/3.7 Monthly ISWM Service Calls – Page 13 of 17

4. Section H – H.12 Security Requirements has been removed.

5. Section I – Contract Clauses is has been updated to include DFARS 252.225-7967, Prohibition Regarding

Russian Fossil Fuel Business Operations (Deviation 2024 – O0006).

6. Section J – The Section J attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are shown in red strikethrough for deletions and blue underline for additions. The revised Section J is provided via attachment under file name N6945023R0075_SectionJ_0006.pdf. A summary of the revised spec items is

a. Sub-annex 1503010 – Custodial Attachment J-1503010-05 Mandated Services Classes for Child Youth Program (CYP) Facilities – Attachment J-1503010-07 Historical Custodial Service Orders – Page 73 of 182

b. Sub-annex 1503020 – Pest Control Attachment J-1503020-02 Planned Pesticide Use Sheet – Pages 78-82 of 182 Attachment J-1503020-04 Service Level Standards – Page 87 of 182 Attachment J-1503020-08 Public Health Pest Requirements – Page 94 of 182 Attachment J-1503020-11 Vegetation Management – Pages 75 & 104 of 182 Attachment J-1503020-11 Vertebrate Pest Requirements – Pages 75 & 105-106 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503020-12 Termite Control Specifications – Pages 75 & 107-111 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503020-13 Historical Pest Control Service Orders – Pages 75 & 112 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503020-14 Sample New Pest Control Management Record – Pages 75 & 113 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503020-15 Sample Pest Management Operations Report – Pages 75 & 114 of 182

c. Sub-annex 1503030 – Integrated Solid Waste Management Attachment J-1503030-03 Service Level Standards – Page 119 of 182 Attachment J-1503030-04 Descriptions and Locations of Compactors, Waste, and Recycle Containers – Pages 122-124 & 129-134 of 182 Attachment J-1503030-05 Container and Compactor Painting, Marking, and Labeling – Page 135 of 182 Attachment J-1503030-08 Solid Waste and Recycling Historical Data – Page 138 of 182

d. Sub-annex 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping Attachment J-1503050-04 Service Standards (SLS) – Pages 146-149 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-05 Operational Areas Improved Grounds – Page 150 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-07 Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping Service Areas – Pages 152-153 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-10 Pest Group Sheets – Vegetation Management Requirements – Pages 140 & 165 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-11 Pest Management Operations Report – Pages 140 & 167 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-12 Planned Pesticide Use Sheets – Pages 140 & 169-174 of 182 Attachment J-1503050-11 Crab Island Operations – Pages 140 & 175 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503050-12 Shellman Bluff Area – Pages 140 & 176 of 182 (Renumbered only) Attachment J-1503050-13 Historical Grounds Maintenance Service Orders – Pages 140 & 177 of

e. Sub-annex 1503060 – Pavement Clearance Attachment J-1503060-02 Service Level Standards – Page 180 of 182 Attachment J-1503060-03 Pavement Clearance Description and Inventory – Page 181 of 182 Attachment J-1503060-04 Pavement Clearance Site Map – Pages 178 & 182 of 182

7. Section J – The Table of Contents has been revised as follows (changes are shown in red font):

a. The JL-1 Labor Hours spreadsheet has been updated and is provided as file name JL- 1_N6945023R0075_Labor Hours_0006.xlsx.

b. Attachment JL-8 DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification has been removed.

c. Reponses to Government Pre-award Inquiries (GPIs) have been added and are provided as file name JL-11_N6945023R0075_GPI_Responses_0006.pdf.

d. The Service Contract Wage Determination has been updated and is provided as file name

N6945023R0075_2015-4515(Rev.26)_0006.pdf.

e. The ELIN spreadsheet has been updated as follows:

i. Recurring Tabs are updated as follows (X indicates all periods of performance):

1. Sub-ELIN X001AE Spec Item updated to 3.1-3.4

2. Sub-ELIN X001AF Spec Item updated to 3.5

3. Sub-ELIN X001AG Spec Item updated to 3.6

4. Sub-ELIN X001AH Description updated to include Prestige

5. Sub-ELINs X001AF through X001AP has been re-lettered

6. Sub-ELIN X002AC Description updated to include Prestige

7. ELINs X004 updated to Naval Branch Health Clinic (NBHC)

8. Sub-ELIN X004AB Spec Item updated to 3.1-3.4

9. Sub-ELIN X004AC Description updated to include Prestige

10. ELINs X005 and X006 updated to Spec Item 3.1-3.4

11. Sub-ELINs X007AB updated to Spec Item 3.1-3.4

12. ELIN X010 Annex/Sub-annex updated to 1503030

13. ELIN X011 updated to Naval Branch Health Clinic (NBHC) and Annex/Sub-annex updated to 1503030

14. 52.217-8 OPT Recurring Tab updated six month extension date to 1 Oct 2029 –

31 Mar 2030

ii. Non-Recurring Tabs are updated as follows (X indicates all periods of performance):

1. ELINs/Sub-ELINs updated to X700 through X756

2. ELIN X701 updated the extended price to $105,000.00

3. ELIN X717 removed (EA = 1,000 SF)

4. ELIN X739 updated to after detonation

5. ELIN X740 updated to after demolition

6. ELINs X744, X745, and X747 updated Service Call to Service Order and CINC to CNIC

7. ELIN X746 updated Service Call to Service Order, CINC to CNIC, and Spec

Item 3.2 to 3.6

8. ELIN X751 updated to EA = 1 service of 8 CY

9. ELIN X752 updated to EA = 1 service of container sizes of 20 CY or 30 CY or

40 CY

10. ELIN X756 Foreign Source Garbage (FSG) Regulated Garbage has been added

11. 52.217-8 OPT Non-Recurring Tab updated F701 Estimated Quantity to 50000

The updated spreadsheet is provided as file name J-0200000-12_ELINs_0006.xlsx.

f. The Pavement Clearance Site Map has been added and is provided as file name J-1503060- 04_Pavement_Clearance_Site_Map_0006.pdf.

8. Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Bidders has been updated to include DFARS provision

252.225-7966, Prohibition Regarding Russian Fossil Fuel Business Operations – Representation.

9. Section M – M.4 Evaluation Factors, (4) Factor 4, Past Performance, Solicitation Submittal Requirements and Basis of Evaluation, have been updated to include past performance ratings for small business first-tier subcontractors.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 29-Feb-2024 02:00 PM to 08-Mar-2024 02:00 PM.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

This is a performance-based contract which incorporates performance-based specifications.

The files for Section C are provided as the following attachment posted on the SAM website at https://sam.gov:

N6945023R0075_SectionC_0006.pdf.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

F.5 DELIVERABLES

The files for SECTION F are provided as the following attachment posted on the SAM website at https://sam.gov:

N6945023R0075_SectionF_0006.pdf.

NOTE: Deliverables requirements under the contract should be submitted to the Government via Electronic format.

The file document(s) format shall be compatible with the most recent Government installed Microsoft Office version (currently 2016) and an unprotected version. The documents may be submitted via email as 'attachment(s)', file size permitting. Else, the deliverables should be submitted on a CD-ROM.

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been deleted:

H.12 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

DFARS 252.225-7967

252.225-7967 Prohibition Regarding Russian Fossil Fuel Business Operations (Deviation 2024-O0006).

As prescribed in Class Deviation 2024-O0006, use the following clause:

PROHIBITION REGARDING RUSSIAN FOSSIL FUEL OPERATIONS (DEVIATION 2024-O0006) (FEB 2024)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

“Business operations” means knowingly engaging in commerce in any form, including acquiring, developing, maintaining, owning, selling, possessing, leasing, or operating equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, personal property, real property, or any other known apparatus of business or commerce. The term does not include—

(1) Any shipment subject to price caps as specified in the—

(i) “Statement of the G7 and Australia on a Price Cap for Seaborne Russian-Origin Crude Oil”, issued on December 2, 2022, between member countries of that coalition; or

(ii) “Statement of the G7 and Australia on Price Caps for Seaborne Russian-Origin Petroleum Products Berlin, Brussels, Canberra, London, Ottawa, Paris, Rome, Tokyo, Washington”, issued on February 4, 2023, between such members, if such shipment complies with the applicable price caps; or

(A) Actions taken for the benefit of the country of Ukraine, as determined by the Secretary; or

(B) Actions taken to support the suspension or termination of business operations for commercial activities during the period beginning on the effective date and ending on December 31, 2029, including—

(1) Any action to secure or divest from facilities, property, or equipment;

(2) The provision of products or services provided to reduce or eliminate operations in territory internationally recognized as the Russian Federation or to comply with sanctions relating to the Russian Federation; and;

(3) Activities that are incident to liquidating, dissolving, or winding down a subsidiary or legal entity in Russia.

Fossil fuel company means an entity or individual that—

(1) Carries out oil, gas, or coal exploration, development, or production activities;

(2) Processes or refines oil, gas, or coal; or

(3) Transports, or constructs facilities for the transportation of, Russian oil, gas, or coal.

(b) Prohibition. In accordance with section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (Pub. L. 118-31), the Contractor is prohibited from entering into a subcontract or other contractual instrument for the procurement of products or services with any entity or individual that is known to be, or that is known to have fossil fuel business operations with an entity or individual that is, not less than 50 percent owned, individually or collectively, by—

(1) An authority of the government of the Russian Federation; or

(2) A fossil fuel company that operates in the Russian Federation, except if the fossil fuel company transports oil or gas—

(i) Through the Russian Federation for sale outside of the Russian Federation; and

(ii) That was extracted from a country other than the Russian Federation with respect to the energy sector of which the President has not imposed sanctions as of the date on which the contract is awarded.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts and other contractual instruments, including those for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the SAM website at https://sam.gov/ with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table. The TECHNICAL documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table or “all-inclusive” under filename:

N6945023R0075_SectionJ_0006.pdf.

Section J – Table of Contents

JL-1 JL-1 Labor Hours. Provided as file name JL-1_N6945023R0075_Labor_Hours_0006.xlsx.

JL-2 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF). Provided as file name JL-2_N6945023R0075_GPIF.xlsx.

JL-3 Site Visit Itinerary. Provided as file name JL-3_N6945023R0075_Site_Visit_Itinerary_0001.pdf.

JL-4 SECNAV 5512/1 Form for base access. Provided as file name JL-4_N6945023R0075_SECNAV5512.pdf.

JL-5 SECNAV 5512/1 Form Instructions. Provided as file name JL-5_N6945023R0075_SECNAV5512_Instructions.pdf.

JL-6 Visit Request Form. Provided as file name JL-6_N6945023R0075_Site_Visit_Request_Form.pdf.

JL-7 SWFLANT Visit Request. Provided as file name JL-7_N6945023R0075_SWFLANT_Visit_Request.pdf.

JL-8 DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification. Provided as file name JL-

8_N6945023R0075_DD254.pdf.

JL-9 Site Visit Brief. Provided as file name JL-9_N6945023R0075_Site_Visit_Brief_0002.pdf.

JL-10 Site Visit Sign-In Sheets. Provided as file name JL-10_N6945023R0075_Site_Visit_Sign-In_Sheets_0002.pdf.

JL-11 Responses to Government Pre-award Inquiries (GPIs). Provided as file name JL-

11_N6945023R0075_GPI_Responses_0006.pdf.

JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Provided as file name JM-1_N6945023R0020_Corporate_Exp.docx.

JM-2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Provided as file name JM-2_N6945023R0075_PPQ.doc.

J-0200000-02 Wage Determinations are provided as follows:

J-0200000-02-01 Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2021-132 between Mark Dunning Industries, Inc. and the Transport

Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Local 526, effective 10/1/2020 through 09/30/2025. Provided as file name N6945023R0075_CBA2021-132.pdf.

J-0200000-02-02 Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA-2021-404 between Government Contracting Resources, Inc. and the Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Local 526, effective 10/1/2021 through 09/30/2025. Provided as file name N6945023R0075_CBA2021-404.pdf.

J-0200000-02-03 Service Contract Act Wage Determination 2015-4515 (Rev.25). Provided as file name

N6945023R0075_2015-4515(Rev.26)_0006.pdf. Applies to all service employees (as defined in FAR 22.001) performing work on the contract in Camden County, GA.

J-0200000-06 Monthly On-Site Labor Report. Provided as file name J-0200000-06_Monthly_On-Site_Labor_Report.xlsx

J-0200000-10 Commander Navy Region Southeast Instruction 4101.1B CH-1. Provided as file name J-0200000-10_CNRSEINST_41011B.pdf.

J-0200000-12 Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) spreadsheet. Provided as file name J-0200000- 12_ELINs_0006.xlsx.

J-0200000-13 Kings Bay Site Map. Provided as file name J-0200000-13_Kings_Bay_Site_Map.pdf.

J-1503010-08 Custodial Floor Plans. Provided as file name J-1503010-08_Custodial_Floor_Plans.pdf.

J-1503030-09 Recycle Drop-off. Provided as file name J-1503030-09_Recycle_Drop-off.pdf.

J-1503050-06 Grounds Maintenance Map. Provided as file name J-1503050-06_Grounds_Maintenance_Map.pdf.

J-1503060-04 Pavement Clearance Site Map. Provided as file name J-1503060-04_Pavement_Clearance_Site_Map_0006.pdf.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

DFARS 252.225-7966

252.225-7966 Prohibition Regarding Russian Fossil Fuel Business Operations—Representation (Deviation 2024- O0006).

Use the following provision in solicitations that include the clause at 252.225-7967:

PROHIBITION REGARDING RUSSIAN FOSSIL FUEL BUSINESS OPERATIONS—REPRESENTATION (FEB 2024)

(a) Definitions. The terms business operations and fossil fuel company have the meanings given in the 252.225-7067 clause of this solicitation.

(b) Representation. By submission of an offer, the Offeror represents it is not, or that it does not knowingly have fossil fuel business operations with an entity or individual that is, 50 percent or more owned, individually or collectively, by—

(1) An authority of the government of the Russian Federation; or

(2) A fossil fuel company that operates in the Russian Federation, except if the fossil fuel company transports oil or gas—

(i) Through the Russian Federation for sale outside of the Russian Federation; and

(ii) That was extracted from a country other than the Russian Federation with respect to the energy sector of which the President has not imposed sanctions as of the date on which the contract is awarded.

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.4 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Technical Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion.

(iii) Submit pricing data (Section B and Section J ELINs) in hard copy and in electronic (Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the ELIN pricing data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total proposed price, which consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(v) And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1.

a. The Government will evaluate the price proposal for unbalanced pricing, and may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced and represent an unacceptable risk to the government.

In general, unbalanced pricing may be found when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, line pricing at any level, between functional annexes/sub-annexes, periods of performance, type of work, or otherwise may be relatively and significantly overstated or understated.

b. The Government will evaluate the price proposal for any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B and the Section J ELIN attachment.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require the submission of Experience Narrative and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $3,000,000.00 per year or greater that is either: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of initial proposals, or 2) completed within the last ten (10) years. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Multi-Function Support Services (MFSS) (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

o 1503010 – Custodial similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, servicing at least 50 buildings or 250,000 sq ft in an individual project);

o 1503020 – Pest Control similar to the requirements of the RFP;

o 1503030 – Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) similar to the requirements of the RFP;

o 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, maintaining grounds of at least 200 acres in an individual project); and o 1503060 – Pavement Clearance similar to the requirements of the RFP

Complexity will be determined based on the projects’ contract type, facilities serviced (size, quantity and type), and grounds maintained (size, quantity and type).

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall provide a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) examples of relevant projects to be documented only on Attachment JM-1, Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. Offerors shall not submit any information under Factor 1 unless submitted on Attachment JM-1 (with the exception of the information required for any corporate affiliate experience or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) experience submitted, to include the one-page narrative, organization chart, and teaming agreement/letter of commitment referenced below, which may be submitted in addition to the Attachment JM-1). The offeror shall clearly demonstrate recent, relevant experience as a prime contractor on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) of the RFP.

The offeror’s submitted projects must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing ALL of the following sub-annexes: 1503010 – Custodial similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, servicing at least 50 buildings or 250,000 sq ft in an individual project) and 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, maintaining grounds of at least 200 acres in an individual project).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), recent/relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have such experience, recent/relevant experience shall be submitted for each JV partner (except for offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration). JV offerors are still limited to a maximum total of five (5) recent and relevant projects.

If a project was performed by a JV and not all members from the prior JV are proposing on this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work on the submitted project was performed by the JV partner proposing on this solicitation.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits all of the following:

a. A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating that the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project;

b. An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates; and,

c. Teaming agreement/Letter of commitment.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of first-tier small business subcontractor(s) to demonstrate experience if the experience of the small business prime does not independently demonstrate the capabilities necessary for award, provided the offeror submits all of the following:

a. Specific identification of the proposed team of first-tier small business subcontractor(s); and

b. Teaming agreement/Letter of commitment.

For each project, the offeror shall complete Attachment JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet. All information shall be provided as requested on the form. Attachment JM-1 may be expanded and is not limited to the two (2) pages provided with the solicitation.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The assessment of the offeror’s recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of this solicitation.

The Government will consider the depth and breadth of the relevant experience, focusing on performance of technical specifications to be performed under this contract, to evaluate the level of risk of unsuccessful performance. The Government will review only five (5) projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) project limit will not be considered. Projects must be submitted on the required Attachment JM-1.

Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, predecessor companies, and parent companies) or first-tier small business subcontractor(s) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects performed by the offeror may be evaluated more favorably than those performed by affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD/member companies or subcontractors.

Projects submitted by JVs where the JV firms performed together may be evaluated more favorably than projects submitted in which the JV firms did not perform together.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a JV, each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience as indicated in the solicitation on at least one relevant project. If each member of the JV does not have at least one relevant experience project as indicated in the solicitation, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors who fail to aggregately demonstrate relevant experience in the following sub-annexes will be considered unacceptable: 1503010 – Custodial that is similar to the requirements in the RFP (at a minimum, servicing at least 50 buildings or 250,000 sq ft for an individual project) and 1503050 – Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping that is similar to the requirements in the RFP (at a minimum maintaining grounds of at least 200 acres for an individual project).

Offerors who also demonstrate relevant experience in sub-annexes 1503020 – Pest Control; 1503030 – ISWM; or 1503060 Pavement Clearance that is similar to the requirements in the RFP may be evaluated more favorably.

Offerors who demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) may be rated higher.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, the specific relevant single task order proposed, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

(2) Factor 2, Technical Approach:

a. Provide an organizational chart identifying the on-site organization, on-site staff, and corporate staff that will be used to perform this contract. The organization chart shall include the appropriate reporting paths and shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JL-1.

Provide a narrative describing the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, sub-annex area organizations, and subcontractors.

b. Provide labor hours by submitting a completed Attachment JL-1 Labor Hours worksheet (MS Excel, Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) for the total effort to include the prime contractor, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and all subcontractors for the base period of performance. Provide the number of labor hours proposed for performing each technical specification item as provided on Attachment JL-1.

Provide a narrative of your rationale for the Basis of Estimate (BOE) according to the base period total labor hours for each technical specification to include individual labor classifications. Explain the methodology used to develop the number of labor hours for the base period and state the estimate data source(s) (such as RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, CBRE Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, etc.).

Your narrative shall be organized in the same order in which the technical specifications are listed in the RFPand include how the proposed approach and labor hours will effectively achieve each performance objective and associated performance standard(s) for each technical specification while coordinating, managing, and supervising workforce personnel across all technical specifications simultaneously. The narrative shall describe the methodology for accomplishing all Recurring and Non-Recurring Work. Additionally, the narrative shall describe the methodology for the Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping sub-annex, including the approach to maintain the Grounds Maintenance during growing seasons and during the non-growing (dormant) seasons. The approach shall include a narrative of the proposed staffing for each season and describe how each performance objective and standard will be met with the proposed seasonal staffing for Grounds Maintenance. The methodology shall clearly demonstrate a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The methodology shall clearly demonstrate understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement for each of the following annexes/sub-annexes:

Annex 15 Facilities Support 1503010 Custodial

1503020 Pest Control 1503030 Integrated Solid Waste Management 1503050 Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping 1503060 Pavement Clearance

In addition, describe how you will staff the organization including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies, and subcontractors to include Spec Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 personnel.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

a. The Government will evaluate the Organizational Chart and narrative considering the degree to which the offeror demonstrates an effective and resource efficient approach to management of their workforce.

Any omission of the organizational chart and narrative submittal requirements will be considered unacceptable.

Any inconsistencies between the labor hours identified in Attachment JL-1, the organizational chart, or the Lines of Authority and management requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement may be considered unacceptable.

b. The Government will evaluate how well the offeror’s approach demonstrates adequate labor hours on an overall level, as well as for each technical specification (and each specification item) supported by a reasonable BOE, and demonstrates a reasonable understanding of all RFP requirements and the labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. The seasonal Grounds Maintenance staffing is consistent with proposed staffing identified in the Attachment JL-1. The approach demonstrates an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

Offerors who fail to provide a completed Attachment JL-1 Labor Hours worksheet for the total effort to include the prime contractor, affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies, and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors who propose labor hours without a logical explanation of how they will be able to perform at the proposed staffing level may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

Offerors who propose an approach which does not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the RFP may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

Approaches that exceed the Government’s requirement may be evaluated more favorably.

(3) Factor 3, Safety:

The offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2018, CY2019, CY2020, CY2021, and CY2022] worth of data (not an overall average). If the offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one

(1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk

(HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS

AVAILABLE FOR EACH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO FACTOR 1, IT SHALL BE

SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN

OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (provided as an attachment), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Courtney Peterson, via email at courtney.j.peterson3.civ@us.navy.mil (with a copy to Cari Fiebach at cari.l.fiebach.civ@us.navy.mil) prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition, if the offeror has relevant experience (as defined for Factor 1) performed as a first-tier small business…