Attachment 8 - QASP 18-R-0081.pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SATCOM CB ISEA Support
- Solicitation number
- N65236-18-R-0081
About this file
This is a quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) for a federal contract to provide In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) support for Satellite Communications (SATCOM) systems. The contractor will support the Fleet across the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) enterprise and the Fleet Readiness Directorate (FRD) 100 in support of Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (PEO C4I) PMW/A 170 Office. The QASP outlines acceptable quality levels and surveillance methods for evaluating contractor performance across quality of product categories including contract data requirement list (CDRL) documents, hardware goods, installations and equipment removal, and software development. Schedule and cost control categories are also included, with methods to assess retention of key personnel, customer satisfaction, and cost variance. Ratings will be entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System on a monthly basis.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (Rev. 11/18)
CMID#: SSCA_20_TEMPL_00018_QASP_2.0
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO) CONTRACTOR NAME
TBD
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO)/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) SHORT TITLE
SATCOM CB ISEA Support
CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE (COR) NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #1/CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
(CDRL) DOCUMENTS
CDRL documents (data deliverables) weights vary depending on the value to the government. If CPARS Draft Approval Document (CDAD) CDRL exists in the basic contract, it must be included in the task order and in the QASP. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
CDRL documents that are complete; have no flawed information, analyses, assumptions or conclusions; and have a minimum number of minor grammatical errors (i.e., errors in less than 10% of the pages).
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% Review by
COR
COR will review within 10 working days of receipt and log results of all reviews (i.e.
CDRL Documents accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
(CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee
ONE/R One time with
Test and Inspection Plan (A017
ASREQ As required*Quality DocumentationA016
MTHLY MonthlyIntegrated Program ManaA015
Contract Work BreakdowA014
See PWSContract statusA007-A013
See PWSTechnical CDRLA001-A006
ASREQ As required*
ASREQ As required*Systems Security Plan (SSA018
See PWSContractor’s Record of TiA019
See PWSMaterial Tracking CDRLA020,A021
Failure Status Repair Rep Specified in TOA022
See PWSOCONUS Deployment PaA023
Total
CDRL # EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DESCRIPTIONCPARS
GROUP WEIGHT
Total weight of
Documents that comply with
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the
Govt's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
90-100% contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of
Documents that comply with AQL is
76 -89% does not meet some requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective action.
Total weight of Documents that contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events
Quality of Product
#1
PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO) COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #2/HARDWARE GOODS
(e.g., Fabricated items, Repairs, Refurbishment, etc.). Hardware goods weights vary depending on the value to the government. Hardware goods of most value are those which affect cost, schedule, and critical path.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All items meet applicable requirements for standards of workmanship as indicated in the SOO and/or PWS.
100% inspection by the COR.
COR will log results of all inspections
(i.e., hardware goods accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
Total weight of Hardware
Goods that comply contractual requirements and recovery is not which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that meet some contractual reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government' s benefit.
Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the benefit.
rating, identify significant events.
CPARS
GROUP NUMBER DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY WEIGHT METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product
#2
Total
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All aspects of installation and equipment removal conform to the following work standard.
Aspects to be inspected include: grounding and bonding methods, space, hull and equipment penetration, welds, cable routing and supports, connectorization, bracing, equipment accessibility, shock mounts, and applicable TEMPEST equipment and classification requirements.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #3/INSTALLATION AND EQUIPMENT REMOVAL
Installations and equipment removal weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP NUMBER DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY WEIGHT METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product
#3
Total weight of Installations / Equipment
Removals that contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of
Installations / Equipment Removals that comply contractual requirements and exceeds some to the s benefit rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment
Removals that rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of
Installations / Equipment Removals meet some contractual reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment
Removals that contractual requirements and recovery is not which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
by the COR.
inspections
(i.e., installations/ equipment removals accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #4/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Software Development task weights vary depending on the value to the government. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All functionality of the "Product/Program", works as designed with a maximum of 5% minor problems (i.e., problems which do not affect results (each product)). Product relates to coding during development, modeling, simulation, etc.)
CPARS
GROUP NUMBER DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY WEIGHT METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product
#4
Total weight of Software
Development tasks that contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Software
Development tasks that contractual requirements and exceeds some to the s benefit rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software
Development tasks that rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software
Development tasks that meet some reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Software
Development tasks that comply with contractual requirements and recovery is not which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
by COR.
inspections
(i.e., software development tasks accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
Total
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
Documents are delivered "on time" in accordance with official schedules and milestones (not counting excusable delays).
SCHEDULE #1/DOCUMENTS
CDRL document weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP CDRL # DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY WEIGHT METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #1
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Document deliveries contractual requirements and exceeds some to the s benefit.
rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries that rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries meet some reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Document deliveries that contractual requirements and recovery is not which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
CDRL document deliveries (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
Total
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
(CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS PCO to negotiate "consideration" to reduce adverse impact to mission
A023
A022
A020,A021
A019
A018
A017
A016
A015
A014
A007-A013
A001-A006
OCONUS Deployment Pa
Failure Status Repair Rep
Material Tracking CDRL
Contractor’s Record of Ti
Systems Security Plan (SS
Test and Inspection Plan (
Quality Documentation
Integrated Program Mana
Contract Work Breakdow
Contract status
Technical CDRL
See PWS
Specified in TO
See PWS
See PWS
ASREQ As required*
ASREQ As required*
ASREQ As required*
MTHLY Monthly
ONE/R One time with
See PWS
See PWS
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
REMEDY IF AQL IS NOT MET
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
SCHEDULE #2/DELIVERY OF SCHEDULED MILESTONES
(e.g., Installations, Equipment Removal, Program Reviews, Testing, Deliver, etc.). Milestone schedule weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Weight of values must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
On time scheduled delivery is defined as meeting the task order scheduled delivery dates (not counting excusable delays).
CPARS
GROUP NUMBER DESCRIPTION FREQUENCY WEIGHT METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #2
Total weight of meeting
Milestone Schedule that contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule contractual requirements and exceeds some to the
Govt's rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting
Milestone Schedule that rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule meet some reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of meeting Milestone
Schedule that contractual requirements and recovery is not which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
milestone schedule events (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCEAPPLICABLEOBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)TASKCPARS
GROUP
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is less than 80%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is more than five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/
DO/TO
throughout the contract period is between 80% and
99%, round to closest %.
Turnover of identified
(named) key personnel is between four and five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is three.
Turnover of identified
(named) key personnel is between two and one.
Turnover of identified
(named) key personnel is zero.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/
DO/TO
throughout the contract period is 100%.
Some key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Many key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
100% review by
COR.
and maintain log of all key positions and instances of vacancies throughout task order period.
100% review by
COR
and maintain log of all identified (named) key personnel and identify turnover throughout task order period.
Yes
Yes
Percent (%) of qualified key personnel required by the task order throughout the task order period. Vacancies for vacation or daily sickness will not be included, extended sickness and absences will be included.
Retention of identified (named) key personnel throughout the period of the task order.
Retention of Key Personnel
Percent of Key Personnel
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
Management of
Key Personnel
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
NOT APPLICABLE
COR SIGNATURE
ORDERING OFFICER SIGNATURE
CPARS
GROUP TASK OBJECTIVES ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL) APPLICABLE UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Cost Control
Yes
Any increase in negotiated labor rates greater than 20%. Yes
Identifies an hourly fully burdened per person labor charge in any labor category in excess of
Yes
SIGNATURE DIRECTION:
The COR is required to sign the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) once a final bid and/or a formal contractor submission (PWS, Proposal, QASP) has been accepted and is ready to be funded. The Ordering Officer will enter in the task order/contract number (as applicable) and sign the QASP, which will lock it. The QASP will be used as a reference by the contractor when completing the monthly CDAD and by the COR when reviewing the monthly CDAD and entering the final CPARS.
Any changes to the QASP after award require a modification.
If the cumulative amount of Other Direct Costs (ODCs) will exceed 10% of the original ODC total (for any given period of performance). Unless total is less than pre-award threshold (10% of Labor or
$3 Million).
Any Instances/Overruns require a Post Award ODC Service Contracting Performance
Metrics Memorandum signed by COR and forwarded to Contracting Officer (KO).
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Post Award Service
Contracting Performance
Metrics (Formerly Tripwire)
Monitoring
Cost Variance
Cost overrun of more than 10%
Round to closest %.
Cost overrun of 2 - 10%
Round to closest %
Plus or minus 1% of estimated cost
Round to closest
Savings to the government of
2 - 10%
Savings to the government of more than 10%
Accurate forecasting, managing and controlling cost.
Yes
Business Relations
Customer Satisfaction
External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written complaint (including email)
Verbal concerns expressed by external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent)
No external customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) complaints received
Verbal compliments received from external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent)
External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written compliments
(including email)
Customer satisfaction is based on the number of positive or negative responses COR receives from customers.
Note: Does not include "policy" comments.
Yes
DATE
Apr 15, 2019
COR NAME (Last, First, MI) DeGuzman, Raymond, S
DELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
$200.00
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD MONTHLY CPARS DRAFT APPROVAL DOCUMENT (CDAD)
REPORTING MONTH DATEDELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
CPARS
GROUP TASK MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE RATIONALE
Quality of Product or Service
Documents
Weight of Documents Due
% Weight of AQL Compliant Documents
Comments Comments Weight of AQL
Documents Delivered
Installations and
Equipment Removal
(I/ER)
Weight of I/ER Due % Weight of AQL Compliant I/ER
Weight of AQL I/ER Delivered
Weight of SW Dev Due
% Weight of AQL Compliant SW Dev
Weight of AQL SW Dev Delivered
Hardware Goods
Software Development
(SW Dev)
Weight of Hardware Goods Due
% Weight of AQL Compliant Hardware
Goods
Weight of AQL Hardware Goods
Delivered
*KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
KO ADJUDICATION*
Schedule
Documents
Milestone Schedule
Weight of Docs Scheduled
Weight of Docs Delivered on Time
% Weight of AQL Compliant Documents
Comments Comments
Weight of Baseline (Master Plant)
Milestone Scheduled Tasks
Weight of Milestone Tasks on Time
% Weight of AQL Compliant Tasks
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
EMAIL FORM
Cost Control
Comments Comments
Percent of Key
Personnel
Retention of Key
Personnel
Required Number of Key Personnel
Turnovers in Current Month % of TurnoverNumber of
Key Personnel
% of Key Personnel on Task
Actual Number of Key Personnel
Mgmt of
Key Personnel
Customer Satisfaction
Comments
Business Relations
Actual Cost % Overrun (O) or Savings (S)
Baseline (Master Plan) Cost
Cost Variance
Comments
Comments Comments
Comments
KO Adjudication* DeGuzman, Raymond, S
REPORTING MONTH DATEDELIVERY ORDER/TASK ORDER NUMBER (DO/TO)CONTRACT NUMBER
N65236-18-R-0081
CPARS
GROUP TASK MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE RATIONALE
*KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
Page of
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #1/CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
(CDRL) DOCUMENTS
CDRL documents (data deliverables) weights vary depending on the value to the government. If CPARS Draft Approval Document (CDAD) CDRL exists in the basic contract, it must be included in the task order and in the QASP. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
CDRL documents that are complete; have no flawed information, analyses, assumptions or conclusions; and have a minimum number of minor grammatical errors (i.e., errors in less than 10% of the pages).
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% Review by COR
COR will review within 10 working days of receipt and log results of all reviews (i.e. CDRL Documents accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
CDRL #
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
FREQUENCY
DESCRIPTION
CPARS
GROUP
WEIGHT
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Govt's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective action.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events
Quality of Product #1
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #2/HARDWARE GOODS
(e.g., Fabricated items, Repairs, Refurbishment, etc.). Hardware goods weights vary depending on the value to the government. Hardware goods of most value are those which affect cost, schedule, and critical path.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All items meet applicable requirements for standards of workmanship as indicated in the SOO and/or PWS.
100% inspection by the COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., hardware goods accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #2 8.2.1.4029.1.523496.503679
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All aspects of installation and equipment removal conform to the following work standard. Aspects to be inspected include: grounding and bonding methods, space, hull and equipment penetration, welds, cable routing and supports, connectorization, bracing, equipment accessibility, shock mounts, and applicable TEMPEST equipment and classification requirements.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #3/INSTALLATION AND EQUIPMENT REMOVAL
Installations and equipment removal weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #3 Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by the COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., installations/equipment removals accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #4/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Software Development task weights vary depending on the value to the government. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All functionality of the "Product/Program", works as designed with a maximum of 5% minor problems (i.e., problems which do not affect results (each product)). Product relates to coding during development, modeling, simulation, etc.)
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #4 Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., software development tasks accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
Documents are delivered "on time" in accordance with official schedules and milestones (not counting excusable delays).
SCHEDULE #1/DOCUMENTS
CDRL document weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP
CDRL #
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #1 Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all CDRL document deliveries (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
SCHEDULE #2/DELIVERY OF SCHEDULED MILESTONES
(e.g., Installations, Equipment Removal, Program Reviews, Testing, Deliver, etc.). Milestone schedule weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Weight of values must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
On time scheduled delivery is defined as meeting the task order scheduled delivery dates (not counting excusable delays).
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #2 Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Govt's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all milestone schedule events (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
APPLICABLE
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
TASK
CPARS
GROUP
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is less than 80%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is more than five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/ DO/TO throughout the contract period is between 80% and 99%, round to closest %.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between four and five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is three.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between two and one.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is zero.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/ DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Some key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Many key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
100% review by COR.
COR will review and maintain log of all key positions and instances of vacancies throughout task order period.
100% review by COR
COR will review and maintain log of all identified (named) key personnel and identify turnover throughout task order period.
Percent (%) of qualified key personnel required by the task order throughout the task order period. Vacancies for vacation or daily sickness will not be included, extended sickness and absences will be included.
Retention of identified (named) key personnel throughout the period of the task order.
Retention of Key Personnel Percent of Key Personnel Management of Key Personnel
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
OBJECTIVES ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
APPLICABLE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Cost Control Any increase in negotiated labor rates greater than 20%.
Identifies an hourly fully burdened per person labor charge in any labor category in excess of
SIGNATURE DIRECTION:
The COR is required to sign the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) once a final bid and/or a formal contractor submission (PWS, Proposal, QASP) has been accepted and is ready to be funded. The Ordering Officer will enter in the task order/contract number (as applicable) and sign the QASP, which will lock it. The QASP will be used as a reference by the contractor when completing the monthly CDAD and by the COR when reviewing the monthly CDAD and entering the final CPARS. Any changes to the QASP after award require a modification.
If the cumulative amount of Other Direct Costs (ODCs) will exceed 10% of the original ODC total (for any given period of performance). Unless total is less than pre-award threshold (10% of Labor or $3 Million).
Any Instances/Overruns require a Post Award ODC Service Contracting Performance Metrics Memorandum signed by COR and forwarded to Contracting Officer (KO).
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Post Award Service Contracting Performance Metrics (Formerly Tripwire) Monitoring Cost Variance Cost overrun of more than 10%
Round to closest %.
Cost overrun of 2 - 10%
Round to closest % Plus or minus 1% of estimated cost
Round to closest % Savings to the government of 2 - 10%
Round to closest % Savings to the government of more than 10%
Round to closest % Accurate forecasting, managing and controlling cost.
Business Relations Customer Satisfaction External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written complaint (including email) Verbal concerns expressed by external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) No external customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) complaints received Verbal compliments received from external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written compliments (including email) Customer satisfaction is based on the number of positive or negative responses COR receives from customers.
Note: Does not include "policy" comments.
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD MONTHLY CPARS DRAFT APPROVAL DOCUMENT (CDAD)
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT
COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE
RATIONALE
Quality of Product or Service Documents Installations and Equipment Removal
(I/ER)
Hardware Goods Software Development (SW Dev) *KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
Schedule Documents Milestone Schedule Cost Control Percent of Key Personnel Retention of Key Personnel Mgmt of Key Personnel Customer Satisfaction Business Relations Cost Variance
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT
COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE
RATIONALE
*KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
| CurrentPage: |
| PageCount: |
| Button1: |
| contNum: N65236-18-R-0081 |
| doToNum: |
| contName: TBD |
| date: 2019-04-15 |
| sooPWS: SATCOM CB ISEA Support |
| corName: DeGuzman, Raymond, S |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ONE/R One time with revisions |
| desc6: Test and Inspection Plan (TIP) |
| cdrl6: A017 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc5: Quality Documentation |
| cdrl5: A016 |
| wtt2: |
| wtt3: |
| wtt4: |
| wtt5: |
| wtt6: |
| wtt7: |
| wtt8: |
| wtt9: |
| wtt10: |
| wtt11: |
| wtt12: |
| wtt13: |
| wtt14: |
| wtt15: |
| wtt16: |
| wtt17: |
| wtt18: |
| totWt20: 100 |
| totWt20: 100 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: MTHLY Monthly |
| desc4: Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) |
| cdrl4: A015 |
| desc3: Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) |
| cdrl3: A014 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: See PWS |
| desc2: Contract status |
| cdrl2: A007-A013 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: See PWS |
| desc1: Technical CDRL |
| cdrl1: A001-A006 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc7: Systems Security Plan (SSP) and associated Plans of Action |
| cdrl7: A018 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: See PWS |
| desc8: Contractor’s Record of Tier 1 Level Suppliers |
| cdrl8: A019 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: See PWS |
| desc9: Material Tracking CDRL |
| cdrl9: A020,A021 |
| desc10: Failure Status Repair Report |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: Specified in TO |
| cdrl10: A022 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: See PWS |
| desc11: OCONUS Deployment Package |
| cdrl11: A023 |
| desc12: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| cdrl12: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| desc13: |
| cdrl13: |
| desc14: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| cdrl14: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| desc15: |
| cdrl15: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| desc16: |
| cdrl16: |
| descTot: Total |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| desc17: |
| cdrl17: |
| notAppHard: 1 |
| num1: |
| num2: |
| num3: |
| num4: |
| num5: |
| num6: |
| num7: |
| num8: |
| num9: |
| num10: |
| num11: |
| num12: |
| num13: |
| num14: |
| num15: |
| num16: |
| num17: |
| num18: |
| descr18: |
| num19: |
| descr1: |
| descr2: |
| descr3: |
| descr4: |
| descr5: |
| descr6: |
| descr7: |
| descr8: |
| descr9: |
| descr10: |
| descr11: |
| descr12: |
| descr13: |
| descr14: |
| descr15: |
| descr16: |
| descr17: |
| hardwt1: |
| hardwt2: |
| hardwt3: |
| hardwt4: |
| hardwt5: |
| hardwt6: |
| hardwt7: |
| hardwt8: |
| hardwt9: |
| hardwt10: |
| hardwt11: |
| hardwt12: |
| hardwt13: |
| hardwt14: |
| hardwt15: |
| hardwt16: |
| hardwt17: |
| hardwt18: |
| hardwt19: |
| hardwt20: |
| totWt2: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| notAppInstall: 1 |
| notAppInstall: 1 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 1 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| descrTot: Total |
| descrTot: Total |
| descrTot: Total |
| hardwt21: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| sched1Remedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS PCO to negotiate "consideration" to reduce adverse impact to mission |
| DropDownList1: Yes |
| DropDownList1: Yes |
| ApprovalSign: |
| orderOffSig: |
| DropDownList2: Yes |
| DropDownList4: Yes |
| DropDownList3: Yes |
| costVarApp: Yes |
| bizRelApp: Yes |
| preAwardTrip: $200.00 |
| forMonth: |
| datenobinding: |
| docB: |
| docC: |
| Weight: |
| docA: |
| ierB: |
| ierC: |
| ierA: |
| swB: |
| swC: |
| swA: |
| hardB: |
| hardC: |
| hardA: |
| KOAdjudication: |
| docB2: |
| docA2: |
| docC2: |
| mileB: |
| mileA: |
| mileC: |
| perB: |
| retenA: |
| retenC: |
| retenB: |
| perC: |
| perA: |
| costA: |
| costC: |
| costB: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .