Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SATCOM CB ISEA Support
- Solicitation number
- N65236-18-R-0081
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is for a competitive service contract to provide In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) support for Satellite Communications (SATCOM) systems to the Fleet across the SPAWAR enterprise in support of Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (PEO C4I) PMW/A 170 Office and the Fleet Readiness Directorate (FRD) 100. The questionnaire requests evaluation of a contractor's past performance on quality, schedule, cost control, management, and small business subcontracting for a reference contract. The completed questionnaire and any other pertinent past performance information must be submitted to the Navy by August 5, 2019.
The related federal contract opportunity is a sources sought notice for a potential small business set-aside solicitation seeking firms with expertise in SATCOM ISEA support. A draft PWS and evaluation factors are to be posted by March 6, 2019 in advance of an industry day event on March 13, 2019 to provide details on the requirement. Responses to the sources sought notice were initially due by June 1, 2018 but have since been extended. The notice states the requirement is for two separate contracts based on area of responsibility and discrete PWS requirements, with the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Pacific issuing a separate market survey for SATCOM support services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION N6523618R0081
ATTACHMENT 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Competition Sensitive N6523618R0081
[DATE]
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 1 of 4 |
| NIWC Systems Center – Atlantic |
| Lacey Flint, CODE 22120 |
CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,
P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022
TO: AGENCY:
PHONE: EMAIL:
INFORMATION REQUEST
PAST PERFORMANCE
This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:
a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;
b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;
c.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;
d.) Management - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;
e.) Small Business Subcontracting - Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, along with any other pertinent information, NOT LATER THAN 05 August 2019 to lacey.flint@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
| Respectfully, |
| Lacey Flint |
| Contract Negotiator |
N6523617R0008
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 2 of 4 |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:
Name (print)
Code
Phone
Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
(d) The Contractor’s work measured up to commonly accepted technical or professional standards.
2. SCHEDULE:
(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
(c) The Contractor met administrative milestone dates.
(d) The Contractor took corrective action of his own volition if the schedule slipped due to contractor’s fault or negligence.
(e) The Contractor furnished all deliverables on or ahead of schedule.
3. COST CONTROL:
(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
N6523618R0081
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 3 of 4 |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
| 4. MANAGEMENT: |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
(h) When applicable, the Contractor matched the qualifications of key personnel with the person who filled the position and supported them so they were able to work effectively.
(i) The Contractor took corrective action if key personnel did not perform well and did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.
5. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING:
(a) Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Subcontracting.
NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.
N6523618R0081
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 4 of 4 |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .