N6247020R5003 0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment is issued to provide questions and answ ers in response to the solicitation.

The due date for submission of proposals remains 27 October 2020, 4 PM.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 28

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Oct-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247020R5003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Aug-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 6 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Oct-2020

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247020R5003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0005

The following are questions and answers regarding the solicitation and prior amendments.

The time for questions has now passed. Questions may be asked, but there is no quarantee that additional questions will be answered.

Question 92: The JL9 form does allow for information beyond 5 projects. Can you confirm that the JL9 form does not need to be completed for the additional projects allowed as part of amendment 003?

Answer 92: Attachment JL.9 is to be completed for all projects. Refer to revised JL.9 (Rev 1) issued with this amendment.

Question 93: With the opportunity to add three additional past performance projects, please advise if the Government will issue a revision for attachment JL9 - Historical SB Utilization to include additional numbered rows for those three projects.

Answer 93: Refer to Q&A # 92 in this amendment.

Question 94: We noticed the Solicitation indicated JL7 has formulas in it, but the only formulas we found were on the last tab which contemplates multiple offerors. Was the intent for the Base Year and Option Year tabs to all have formulas also?

Answer 94: The attachment JL.7 is correct as issued.

Question 95: Amendment 4, Revision 2 of the JL.8 reverted back to the numbering used in the original JL.8 that was modified in JL.8 Rev 1. Please confirm we are able to use the numbering utilized in Revision 1 of the JL.8 in our proposal that corrected the sequential numbering:

REV 2

7. Construction Project:

9. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. If design-build, include a description of the design-effort.

10. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:

11. Other Information:

REV 1

7. Construction Project:

8. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. If design-build, include a description of the design-effort.

9. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:

10. Other Information:

Answer 95: This was an oversight. Please see revised attachment JL.8 (Rev 3) included with this amendment.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment JL.1, List of Directives

Attachment JL.2, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates

Attachment JL.2A, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates Build-Up Form (Tab Within Attachment

JL.2)

Attachment JL.3, Identification of Uncompensated Overtime Ratios

Attachment JL.4, Proposed Distribution of Work (REV 1)

Attachment JL.5, Indirect Ceiling Rate and Award Fee Application Form

Attachment JL.5A, Indirect Ceiling Rates Build Up Form

Attachment JL.6, Proposed Historical and Year–To-Date Indirect Rates (REV 1)

Attachment JL.6A, Service Contract Labor Standards and Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) Ceiling Labor Rates

Attachment JL.7, Cost Model for CONUS and OCONUS locations for Base and Option Years

Attachment JL.7A, Summary Cost Model for Multiple Offerors (Tab Inside Attachment Within JL.7)

Attachment JL. 8, Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (REV 3)

Attachment JL.9, Historical Small Business Utilization (REV 1)

Attachment JL.10, Small Business Participation and Commitment Document (REV 1)

Attachment JL.11, Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Attachment JL.12, Award Fee Plan

Attachment JL.13, Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L-1 DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9.1, the Contracting Officer shall award contracts only to responsible vendors. No purchase or award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility.

To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The contracting officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor's current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangement that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase, or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources, or personnel.

Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s).

Prior to award, the Contracting Officer will review the information submitted in accordance with Appendix E under the Cost Proposal Submittal hereto for purpose of determining responsibility.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request additional information if needed.

L-2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SOLICITATION

All inquiries concerning the attached RFP must be received electronically at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. You may email your questions to:

amber.forehand@navy.mil and linda.stein@navy.mil

L-3 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

1. Time and Date for Receipt of Proposals

A. Technical and cost proposals shall be submitted no later than the date and time provided in Block 9 of the Standard Form 33 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award.” Proposals not received on or before the hour and date set forth will be handled in accordance with FAR provision 52.215-1 “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition.”

B. Proposals shall be submitted to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Mailroom, Attention: Amber Forehand-Hughes, Code ACQ35 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

Proposals will be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “N62470-20-R-5003 DO

NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM.”

NOTE: PLEASE BE MINDFUL OF DELIVERY TIMES AND PLAN ACCORDINGLY. PROPOSALS NOT

RECEIVED OR RECEIVED AND NOT DATE STAMPED AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS ON OR BEFORE

THE HOUR AND DATE SET FORTH FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS IN BLOCK 9 OF THE SF33 SHALL BE

SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF FAR 52.215-1(C), “SUBMISSION, MODIFICATION, REVISION AND

WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS.”

L-4. GENERAL INFORMATION

Below hereto is a description of the elements of the proposal, including specific instructions for its organization.

When evaluating your capability, the Government will consider how well you complied with these instructions. If you (1) fail or refuse to assent to any of the terms and conditions of this RFP; (2) propose additional terms or conditions; and/or (3) propose assumptions that take material exception to the requirements of the solicitation, the Government may consider your offer to be unacceptable and your offer may be rejected without further consideration.

Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted in accordance with this Provision. Proposals are to be neat, legible and orderly. Content is more important than quantity. Pages shall be numbered in accordance with the numbering conventions outlined in the solicitation. A concise and comprehensive proposal is desired. Organization, clarity, accuracy of information, relevance, and completeness are of prime importance. Statements such as “will comply” or “noted and understood” without supporting narrative to define compliance are not acceptable. Cursory responses or responses which merely reiterate or reformulate solicitation language will not be considered as satisfying the requirements of the RFP or as demonstrating the ability to perform. Elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired. Elaborate artwork and expensive visual or other presentation aids are not necessary.

The Non-Cost (Technical Factors and Past Performance) and Cost Proposals shall be submitted in separate binders, tabbed appropriately, and must include a cover page with the name of the prime contractor(s), DUNs number(s), addresses, phone number, email addresses, solicitation number and point of contact. Should there be a discrepancy between paper and electronic information provided, the paper copies shall govern. Offerors are requested to number the pages consecutively for each factor.

Joint Venture and Team Arrangements - FAR Subpart 9.6 defines contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangements mean (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractor under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

Offerors may not submit more than one offer as a prime contractor. Failure to comply with this limitation may result in disqualification of the offeror from contract award.

All offerors proposing team members (including a joint venture or subcontractor), or relying on resources of a parent company/subsidiary/affiliate/other entity shall submit the following information in the front of the non-cost and cost proposals:

1. Provide a listing of the team members’ corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, email address, DUNS Number, and Cage Code.

2. Submit a copy of the joint venture agreement, other teaming agreement, or binding letter of commitment from each team member. All joint ventures, teaming agreements, and letters of commitment shall: (1) clearly identify the expected relationship, role and responsibility between the firms or of the subcontractor or other entity (type and proportion of work to be performed); and (2) shall be signed by the appropriate individual(s) of each firm/entity.

Copies of joint venture agreements, teaming agreements, and letters of commitment shall not be applied against the overall 175 page limit. Joint Venture Agreements and letters of commitment should be provided in both the technical and cost proposal.

Contractors must submit required information for technical and cost proposals as follows:

Volume I: Non-cost (Technical Factors and Past Performance): Submit one (1) original, six (6) copies in 8-1/2 x 11 format, font size 11-12. Tables and charts can be in landscape format, font size 10. Proposals will be submitted in three ring binders and tabbed appropriately by major evaluation factor. Double-sided pages are encouraged to conserve paper. In addition, submit a complete copy of the non-cost proposal on CD (bookmark all sections the same as the tabs in paper copies). The document should be submitted as both an Adobe Acrobat file (.pdf) and as a Microsoft Word file. (Note: Cover page, letters of commitment, JV agreements, and past performance questionnaires may be submitted in Adobe only). Additionally, it is acceptable to have multiple Microsoft Word files that are organized on the CD by subfolders instead of submitting one Microsoft Word file.) Proposal submission is limited to 175 pages. Note that letters of commitment, Joint Venture/teaming/partnership agreements, CPARS evaluations, past performance questionnaires, Attachments JL.9 (REV 1), JL10 (REV 1), and JL.11 are not applied against the overall page limit. Further, tabs, introductory sheets (e.g. Table of Contents, List of Figures, List of Acronyms), a one-page coversheet to identify the contractor and the proposal, and the listings of team member’s corporate names and point of contact information are not applied against the overall page limit. There is no page limitation for the introductory sheets. All information provided on the introductory sheets is not evaluated. Offerors are requested to number the pages consecutively for each factor. Within the tabs for the factors, only the pages that are applied to the overall page limit should contain consecutive page numbers. If a form that is provided as a JL attachment in this solicitation is a form that is applied to the overall page number limit, a page number should be added to the form. Any pages in excess of the maximum limits stated herein shall be removed and not evaluated.

Non-Cost /Technical proposals shall not encompass any elements of cost and shall be organized in the general format as follows:

- Cover page

- Listing of team member corporate names and point of contact information

- Team member corporate name (no abbreviations)

- Address

- Point of Contact

- Phone number

- DUNS number

- CAGE Code

- Introductory Sheets (e.g. Table of Contents, List of Figures, List of Acronyms)

- Copies of letters of commitment from the team members

- Copies of joint venture agreements, or other teaming arrangement agreements

- Factor 1 – Corporate Experience

- Factor 2 – Safety

- Factor 3: Small Business Utilization and Participation

� Historical Small Business Utilization (required for both Large and Small Business Offerors)

� Small Business Participation Commitment Document (required for both Large and Small Business Offerors)

� Small Business Subcontracting Plan (required for Large Business Offerors)

- Factor 4: Past Performance

� Past Performance Questionnaires

VOLUME I: NON-COST PROPOSAL

NON-COST EVALUATION FACTORS

(a) Non-cost/price Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience :

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors (Prime/JVs) shall provide the following:

• A maximum of five (5) projects similar in size, scope and complexity to the work anticipated under this contract and completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Each project must be valued at $10 million or more.

• A maximum of three (3) projects, similar in scope and complexity to the work anticipated under this contract and completed, or substantially completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Substantially completed means that the majority of the substantive work (approximately 75% or more) is completed.

The project descriptions should explain the relevance of each project, including the extent to which the project demonstrates experience in planning, team-forming, managing, coordinating, and executing construction emergency/contingency recovery work requiring rapid mobilization and/or new construction, renovations, and repairs in a wide array of geographical locations world-wide (continental United States, overseas, and remote locations); federal cost contracting experience; and incidental services experience. Incidental services are those in support of the construction effort that may be required to provide initial Base Operating Support (BOS) Services, i.e., set up of base operating office/camp to provide services for military and contractor staff as necessary at a disaster or remote location.

At least one project must be performed at a location other than the United States or its territories.

A project is defined as work performed under a single task order or standalone contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole should not be submitted as a project;

rather, Offerors should submit work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment JL.8 (REV 3)) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. This form is set at 10 pt font and the font size shall not be altered by the Offeror. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed five (5) pages (either five (5) single sided pages or two (2) double sided pages and a single page). All pages addressing Attachment JL.8 (REV 3) are included in the overall 175 page limitation.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), at least one of the relevant projects should be submitted for the JV entity. If the JV does not have shared relevant experience, at least one project shall be submitted for each JV partner.

Offerors who fail to submit a relevant project for either the JV as an entity or for each of the JV partners will be found unacceptable. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. If the offeror does not specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV member offering on this contract, the project will not be evaluated.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF33), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

A key subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor that performed major and/or critical aspects of work submitted as a project under this factor. The Offeror may utilize experience of a key subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a signed letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

(2) Factor 2: Safety

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include five previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists.

If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: For the five previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015). If unable to submit OSHA DART rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: For the five previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015). If unable to submit OSHA TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two double-sided pages.

(3) Factor 3, Small Business Utilization and Participation

It is the policy of the Government to provide maximum practicable opportunities in its acquisitions to Small Business (SB) concerns, including Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and other small business concerns. Further, it is the policy of the Government that such concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance.

(i) (i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. All Offerors (both Other than Small Businesses (OTSB) AND SBs shall use Attachment JL.9 (REV 1)

(Historical Small Business Utilization) to demonstrate their historical utilization of SBs. Attachment JL.9 (REV 1) shall be provided for each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience.

Failure to submit Attachment 9 (REV 1) for each project submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, or the failure to fully complete Attachment JL.9 (REV 1) may result in a deficiency.

2. All Offerors (both OTSBs and SBs) shall use Attachment JL.10 (REV 1) (Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SPCD)) to submit the following required information for evaluation of this factor:

• To demonstrate commitment to use small business concerns in the performance of this contract, identify all planned subcontractors by name that will be used to support each specific small business category (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB). Identify the type and complexity of product/service to be subcontracted, the estimated subcontract value, and the type of commitment (i.e., teaming agreement, letter of commitment, etc.) with each subcontractor.

• To demonstrate maximum practicable participation of small businesses, identify (in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total contract value) the Offeror’s proposed small business participation.

The minimum required small business participation (i.e. work to be performed by small business as the prime contractor and/or work to be performed by small business subcontractors) is 20%. All Offerors who are not able to meet the minimum total small business participation requirement of 20% (of the total contract value) shall provide a detailed explanation why the minimum total small business participation requirement cannot be achieved.

Large business Offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation requirement through subcontracting to small businesses.

Small business Offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation requirement through their own performance/participation as a prime and also through a joint venture, teaming arrangement, and/or subcontracting with other small business concerns.

Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business categories (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB) consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors are required to provide a detailed explanation for the methods used to develop the small business participation requirements.

Offerors simply proposing a 20% total small business participation requirement without describing the methods used may be rated lower.

If the Offeror does not intend to subcontract, provide a detailed explanation why subcontracting would not result in efficient contract performance.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (April 2020)

In accordance with FAR 19.7, all other than small businesses shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP) utilizing the template provided as Attachment JL.11. Acceptability of the SBSP will be considered a responsibility matter. The SBSP will not be evaluated or rated by the SSEB, but reviewed by a Small Business Professional/Authorized Representative and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. The SBSP shall be negotiated and/or accepted within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to negotiate an acceptable subcontracting plan within the time limit prescribed by the Contracting Officer will render the offeror ineligible for award of the contract. The SBSP will be incorporated into the resulting contract.

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging, small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition consistent with efficient and effective performance of the contract. These targets are based on a percentage of total planned subcontract dollars.

Small Business (SB) 40% Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 5% HUBZone SB 3% Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) 9%

Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) 3% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 3%

The SBSP shall be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (Attachment JL.10 (REV 1)). In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c)(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, those small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in the SBSP.

Please note that SBSP goals and the participation requirements provided in the Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) WILL NOT be the same. The participation requirements within the SBPCD are provided as percentages of the total contract value; subcontract plan goals are provided as a percentage of planned subcontracting dollars. While the percentages will differ, the types of products/services identified in the SBSP, should be the same as those products/services identified in the SBPCD. Likewise, the planned small business subcontract dollars in the SBSP will be equal to (or in some cases greater than) the extent of small business participation identified in the SBPCD.

(4) Factor 4. Past Performance:

The Government will evaluate the Offerors’ and proposed team members’ past performance on the work experience identified in Factor 1 (Corporate Experience). IF A COMPLETED CONSTUCTION CONTRACTOR APPRAISAL

SUPPORT SYSTEM (CCASS) EVALUATION OR CONTRACTOR PERFROMANCE ASSESSMENT

REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CCASS OR CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR

SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CCASS OR CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

The blank Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation (Attachment JL.13) is provided for the offeror to submit for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience, up to a total of five (5) questionnaires for which no CCASS or CPARS is available. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Offerors should provide completed PPQs with their proposal.

If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment JL.13), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the two Government’s point of contact, Linda Stein, via email at linda.stein@navy.mil, and Amber Forehand-Hughes, via email at amber.forehand@navy.mil, prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CCASS/CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information requested. However, offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

Offerors should provide an explanation of any past performance problems that may have developed on these projects and corrective action taken. The offerors can submit their explanations of any past performance problems that may have developed on the projects submitted under Factor 1 in a narrative. The narrative will be page counted and should be submitted after the past performance questionnaire.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last ten (10) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition for Factor 1, Corporate Experience projects only. For performance recognition documents to be considered under this factor they are required to be dated and contain the signature and position of the individual signing. Further, performance recognition documents solicited especially for the purposes of this factor may be considered less favorably than documents contemporaneously received for the work performed.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

Volume II COST PROPOSAL:

Organization of Volume II – Cost Proposal

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit one original and one (1) copy of the cost proposal in a three ring binder, tabbed appropriately. In addition, submit two (2) complete copies of the cost proposal on CD. Offerors should submit only one original hard copy of the Pre-Award Survey. Spreadsheets should be in Microsoft Excel. Electronic documents should be fully compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 and fully editable to allow Government evaluators to make cost analysis adjustments. Do not submit Adobe Acrobat files except for the cover page, SF30, SF33, JV/Mentor Protégé Agreements, representations and certifications, copies of audits/indirect rate agreements and financial statements. Adobe Acrobat files are acceptable for Section III, Appendices. There is no page limit for Volume II.

All cost and pricing information shall be furnished in Volume II - Cost Proposal: The Government will not be responsible for cost or pricing information provided in the Non-Cost Proposal but not included in the cost proposal. “Data Other than Certified Cost or Pricing Data” shall be submitted by the Offeror to support cost realism, price reasonableness, and the completeness of the proposal. All “Data Other than Certified Cost or Pricing Data” submitted pursuant to this section is for the exclusive use of the Government.

Volume II should include a cover page that contains the following information:

Listing of team member corporate names and POC information:

Team member corporate name (no abbreviations) Address

POC

Phone DUNS Number CAGE Code

The content and format for submitting cost data shall be in accordance with general format outlined above and as stated below:

SECTION I - STANDARD FORM 33

Tab 1 - Signed and completed SF33 (solicitation, offer, and award) and SF30’s (if issued). Indicate period of validity of the offeror’s proposal in block 12 (at least 240 days) and the following information:

a. CAGE Code, DUNS, and tax ID numbers for prime contractor and all cost reimbursable subs. For joint ventures the cage code for each member of the joint venture, as well as the joint venture should be provided.

b. Date of Last Equal Employment Opportunity Report (EEO-1) certified filing for prime contractor and all cost reimbursable team subs and each member of a joint venture.

c. Copy of latest VETS-4212 “Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report” for the prime contractor and all cost reimbursable team subs and each member of a joint venture.

Tab 2 - Reminder: When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 33 unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. TAB 2 shall include a copy of the joint venture agreement (if applicable). Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If the joint venture is subject to the SBA Mentor-Protégé Program, a copy of the SBA approval of the joint venture arrangement shall be included. Additionally, Tab 2 shall contain Copies of letters of commitment from the team members.

Tab 3 - Completed Representations and Certifications (see Solicitation Section K)

SECTION II - COST AND RELATED INFORMATION

Tab 1 - COST PROPOSAL WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

The Cost Submission shall include the following:

• Attachment JL.2, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates

• Attachment JL.2A, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates Build-Up Form

• Attachment JL.3, Identification of Uncompensated Overtime Ratios

• Attachment JL.4 (REV 1), Distribution of Work

• Attachment JL.5, Indirect Ceiling Rates Form

• Attachment JL.5A, Indirect Ceiling Rates Build Up Form

• Attachment JL.6 (REV 1), Proposed Historical and Year–To-Date Indirect Rates

• Attachment JL.6A Service Contract Labor Standards and Wage Rate Requirements

(Construction) Ceiling Labor Rates

• Attachment JL.7, Cost Model for CONUS and OCONUS locations for Base and Option Years

• Attachment JL.7A, Summary Cost Model for Multiple Offerors

The proposal shall include information for SUBCONTRACTORS THAT WILL PERFORM COST REIMBURSABLE WORK, in the same level of detail as provided by the Offeror. Cost reimbursable subcontractors will not be evaluated unless a signed letter of commitment has been provided or their proposed rates will not be included in the resultant contract.

Subcontractor information may be submitted separately for proposal purposes. However, it is noted that the cost reimbursable hourly ceiling rates for Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates Form (JL.2), and Indirect Ceiling Rates Form (JL.5), for each subcontractor that will perform cost reimbursable work will be incorporated into any resulting contract.

If the offeror is a joint venture, and the joint venture partners are proposing separate rates, information must be provided in the same level of detail for each member of the joint venture team. The Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates Form (Attachment JL.2), Indirect Ceiling Rate Form (Attachment JL.5) for each Joint Venture partner proposed will be incorporated into any resulting contract. One submittal may be submitted for the Joint Venture (JV) entity only if the JV has an established separate cost center for the JV entity with an adequate accounting system for a cost reimbursable contract.

If the offeror (or member of a joint venture) will utilize multiple cost centers in the performance of this contract, information must be provided in the same level of detail for each cost center. The Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates Form (Attachment JL.2), Indirect Ceiling Rate Form (Attachment JL.5) for each cost center proposed will be incorporated into any resulting contract.

Some attachments do not contain formulas in order to allow offerors to structure formulas to accommodate their specific rate structures. The completed electronic submittals of forms for the offeror, each member of a Joint Venture entity, each cost reimbursable subcontractor, and each cost center, shall contain proper formulas.

Offerors shall not deviate from the basic format of the forms identified in Section J of the RFP. However, offerors may adjust columns, rows, and cost elements under Attachments JL.5, JL.5A, and J.L.6 in order to be consistent with their cost accounting systems. The cost proposal shall include the completed mandatory rate forms and supporting information in the general format outlined below.

The cost proposal shall be a complete and detailed breakdown of all cost elements and other cost information required herein. Offerors shall submit proposals consistent with the structure of their established and disclosed accounting practices. The composition of indirect expense pools and bases thereof (Overhead, General and Administrative, Material Handling, etc.) shall be consistent with those actually being utilized by the company.

Proposed rates shall be based on recent history and/or budgetary projections. Pool expenses shall not include any of those expenses identified in FAR Part 31 as unallowable. The cost and pricing information shall be completed in accordance with the following:

a. COST REIMBURSABLE DIRECT LABOR RATE SUBMISSION-ATTACHMENTS JL.2, JL.2A, JL.3

A separate rate sheet shall be submitted by the prime and each cost reimbursable subcontractor. Note:

If the offeror is a joint venture, and the joint venture partners are proposing separate rates, separate rate sheets must be provided by each member of the joint venture. Additionally, if the offeror (or member of a joint venture) will utilize multiple cost centers in the performance of this contract, information must be provided in the same level of detail for each cost center. ONE RATE SHEET MAY BE

SUBMITTED FOR THE JV ENTITY ONLY IF THE JV HAS AN ESTABLISHED SEPARATE

COST CENTER FOR THE JV ENTITY WITH AN ADEQUATE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM FOR A

COST REIMBURSEMENT CONTRACT.

(1) Offerors shall propose hourly ceiling rates for direct (unburdened-no overhead, G&A, etc.) labor for all labor categories listed in Attachment JL.2, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rates (*in accordance with the notes on JL.2), for the base year and each option year. Each required labor category in the solicitation shall be provided by the prime contractor (including individual JV members) and cost reimbursable subcontractors. The ceiling rates proposed will be the maximum allowable rates that can be proposed or charged under task orders issued during the ordering period of any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. The labor categories and labor rates identified in Attachment JL.2 will become part of the contract. These are not bid rates. Labor rates proposed for individual task orders may be less and should be in accordance with the offeror’s disclosed estimating system practices and, if applicable, forward pricing rate agreements. Labor rates proposed for task orders shall not exceed the maximum ceiling rates established in the contract under JL.2.

(2) Labor categories listed on Attachments JL.2 and JL.2A are for exempt employees. Service Contract Labor Standards (SCA) or Wage Rate Requirements Construction (DBA) categories are not included. As applicable, DBA Wage Determinations will be included in individual task orders. However, it is recognized that the administrative assistant and accounting technician labor categories included in JL.2 could be classified as SCA labor categories under an individual task order, when a Service Contract Labor Standards Wage Determination is incorporated into the task order. The SCA and DBA rates used for proposals and billing purposes under individual task orders SHALL REFLECT THE MINIMUM RATES set forth on the applicable wage determination, unless a higher rate is otherwise approved by the Contracting Officer for use under the respective task order(s). the higher rate shall not exceed the SCA or DBA rate plus the applicable wage determination ceiling percent proposed under Attachment JL.6A (incorporated into the contract), for the particular trade ,unless an exception is made in accordance with Section H6-Service Contract Labor Standards and Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) Base and Ceiling.

(3) Each contractor, JV member and cost reimbursable subcontractor shall provide individual or average direct labor rates (including any adjustment for uncompenstated overtime-see attachment JL.3) and ceiling labor rates for ALL LABOR CATEGORIES listed on attachment JL.2 and JL.2A, regardless of whether the offeror currently employs personnel in every labor category or intends to rely on team members/subcontractors for the particular labor categories. If the contractor/subcontractor does not currently employ an employee(s) under the listed labor category, a market rate shall be provided. All labor categories listed on JL.2 shall be tied to an internal labor category.

(4) Offerors shall provide information on and discuss how the proposed labor rate ceilings were derived for Attachment JL.2. Provide information on the basis of the base rates used to arrive at the ceiling rates, such as whether the base rates were based on actual individual rates for personnel, average or weighted average rates for current employees, forward pricing rates, market sources such as Bureau of Labor Statistics or salary.com, etc. The Offeror should submit any information reasonably required to explain the estimating process, including the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the hourly rate estimate. If a composite labor rate is utilized or a labor rate is prorated over fiscal years, provide the specific details/calculations used to determine the rate. If forward pricing rates apply, provide a copy in Appendix B. Any deviation from forward pricing rates, current actual rates for individuals, etc.

shall be clearly documented. Provide a narrative supporting the percent mark-up used on the base rates to arrive at the proposed ceiling rates. Complete JL.2A showing the base rate for each labor category, percentage mark-up for each labor category, and base year ceiling rate.

(5) Offerors SHALL NOT ADD ADDITIONAL labor categories on JL.2. If it is determined that a labor category not listed on JL.2 is required for a task order, the Contract Administrator listed under Section G1-Contract Administration Data, paragraph (c), may approve the labor category and the corresponding ceiling rate for the specific task order and, if applicable, may incorporate the labor category into the basic contract. Additionally, where it is determined necessary to utilize a specific individual on a task order, whose actual labor rate exceeds the established ceiling for the respective labor category, the Contractor will be required to obtain prior written approval from the Contract Administrator listed under Section G1. In the event that such approval is not properly obtained, the Government will only be required to reimburse the Contractor at the ceiling rate established in the contract.

Shown below are sample entries for the JL.2A, Cost Reimbursable Direct Labor Hourly Ceiling Rate Build-Up Form.

Solicitation/Contract Labor Category

Company Equivalent Labor

Category (Do not list an individual name in this column)

Source Base Year Individual /

Average Direct

Labor Rate

Percent mark-up for Direct Labor Ceiling

Rate

Base Year Maximum

Ceiling Rate

Program Manager Program Manager I

Individual Rate (Jane Doe)

$000 0% $000

Sr Project Engineer Sr. Associate 2019 Avg. $000 0% $000

Engineer Rate Construction Site Manager Construction Site

Supervisor-3 and Construction Manager -2

2019 Average Rates

QC Manager Cost Sub $000 0% $000

*Rates for FFP subcontractors are not applicable

(6) If uncompensated overtime was used in calculating base individual and average labor rates for employees listed in Attachment JL.2, complete Attachment JL.3 (IDENTIFICATION OF UNCOMPENSATED OVERTIME RATIOS) for each affected labor category. Additionally, provide in Appendix C: (1) required information per FAR 52.237-10 Identification of Uncompensated Overtime (Oct 1997); (2) historical number of hours in excess of 40 hours per week for each labor category; and (3) evidence of the Defense Contract Audit Agency or Defense Contract Management Agency approval of the corporate policy addressing uncompensated effort.

Identification of Uncompensated Overtime Ratios shall be submitted for the Prime, each member of a JV entity, each cost reimbursable subcontract, and each cost center that will be utilized in the performance of the contract (if applicable).

For each labor category, the Offeror shall enter its escalation factors applied to the ceiling rates for each option period in Attachment JL.2. The offeror shall also provide the basis for any proposed/projected escalation and the assumptions used: forecast source (such as Global Insight), index used (index number and title), calculations (index values used: base and projected values), and dates used (month and year of applicable index numbers).

Offeror must support any proposed labor escalation factor with convincing and complete rationale, factual data, and other pertinent supporting data for out-year escalation projections. Supporting documentation may include management approved or human resources approved policy or memo relative to employee raise information, actual direct labor rates for at least three years, economic projection from an…