L-2_Vol_2_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Revised Proposal Due Date Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00019-15-R-0106
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

L-2 Volume 2 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Revised Proposal Due Date, newest first.
File Type Posted
N00019-15-R-0106_Amendment_0004.docx DOCX document
Q A_Posted_on_FBO_2015-10-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q A_Posted_on_FBO_2015-10-09.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q A_Posted_on_FBO_2015-09-30.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00019-15-R-0106_Amendment_0002.docx DOCX document
Q A_Posted_on_FBO_2015-09-24.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L-3_Vol_2_PP-1_Con_Data.xls XLS spreadsheet
L-1_Vol_1_ES_Tables.xls XLS spreadsheet
L-8_Vol_4_Price_Matrix.xls XLS spreadsheet
L-6_Vol_3_Tech_MP_Chart.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attach_4c_-_WD-05-2234.txt TXT text file
Attach_4f_-_WD-05-2394.txt TXT text file
Att_1_-_PWS_(2015-08-10).doc DOC document
Attach_4b_CBA_Redacted.pdf PDF
RFP_(2015-08-14).docx DOCX document
Q A_Posted_on_FBO_2015-08-05.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
UC-35_Parts_List_1_Sep_2014-30_Nov_2014rev1.pdf PDF
MCO_8023.3B.pdf PDF
DoD_4160.21-M.pdf PDF
DoD_8570.01-M.pdf PDF
UC-35_Parts_List_1_Jun_2014_-_31_Aug_2014rev1.pdf PDF
NA-01-C35CAA-1.pdf PDF
UC-35_Parts_List_1_Mar_2015_-_31_May_2015rev1.pdf PDF
UC-35_Aircraft_and_Engine_Depot_Schedule_FY16-FY18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DoD_Joint_Travel_Regulations.pdf PDF
DCMA-INST-8210-1C.pdf PDF
NAVAIR_01-1A-509-1.pdf PDF
UC-35_Aircraft_Top_10_Degraders.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DOD_4145.26-M.pdf PDF
UC-35_Aircraft_Historical_Flt_Hrs_and_MC_rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
UC-35_Parts_List_1_Dec_2014-28_Feb_2015rev1.pdf PDF
C-26_UC-35_pre-solic_brief_25June2015.pptx PPTX presentation
Pre-Solicitation_Conf_Attendee_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach_1_Appendix_J__Aircraft_Cleaning_Standard_(2015-05-05).doc DOC document
Att_2_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attach_1_Appendix_M__Publications_List_(2015-05-05).xls XLS spreadsheet
DRAFT_RFP_(2015-06-10)_.doc DOC document
Attach_1_Appendix_A__Ordnance_and_Aircraft_Survivability_Equipment_(2015-05-05).doc DOC document
L-1_Vol_1_ES_Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_1_-_PWS.doc DOC document
Exhibit_B_CDRL_Draft.pdf PDF
Att_3_-_QASP.pdf PDF
Attach_1_Appendix_L_UC-35_Paint_Specification_(2015-05-05).doc DOC document
L-6_Vol_3_Tech_MP_Chart.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L-3_Vol_2_PP-1_Con_Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L-4_Vol_3_Tech_CRM.docx DOCX document
Attach_1_Appendix_G__Government_Furnished_Facilities_(2015-05-05).doc DOC document
Attach_1_Appendix_E__Contract_Fund_Status_Report_Format_(2015-05-05).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A_CDRL_Draft.pdf PDF
Attach_1_Appendix_B__Commercial_Derivative_Aircraft_Airworthiness_(2015-05-05).doc DOC document
Show all 50

Revised Proposal Due Date has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

L-2 Vol 2 PPQ

SECTION L – VOLUME 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form via e-mail or fax to:

Attn:Deborah Karstens, Contract Specialist
email:Deborah.Karstens@navy.mil
fax:(301) 995-0743

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:_____________________________________________________________________________
b. Program Title:_____________________________________________________________________________
c. Contract Number:_____________________________________________________________________________
d. Type of Contract:________________________Percent Complete: ________________________
e. Award Fee (if applicable): __________________Percent of Award Fee Received: ______________

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a.Name:_____________________________________________________________________________
b. Agency:_____________________________________________________________________________
c. Position:_____________________________________________________________________________

d. Relation to Program: ____________________________________________________________________________

e. Phone Number:_____________________________________________________________________________
f. Fax Number:_____________________________________________________________________________
f. Email Address:_____________________________________________________________________________

g. Date Questionnaire Completed: ___________________________________________________________________

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program

___Maintenance support development
___Logistics support development
___Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Developmental Items (NDI) usage
___Aircraft Modifications
___Aircraft Field Maintenance at multiple sites in support of flight operations
___Directed subcontracts
___Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP)
___Aircraft Heavy Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking
___Operation, Development and Maintenance of Computerized Management Information Systems in support Aircraft Field and Heavy Maintenance requirements at multiple sites
___Configuration Management of Aircraft and Aircraft Components
___Aircraft Flight Operations on Military sites
___Engineering support for Field and Heavy Maintenance Activities supporting multiple aircraft sites
___Hazmat/Environmental Program Development, Control and Management
___Flight/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Field and Heavy Maintenance activities
___Corporate Oversight and Management of Aviation Maintenance Programs to include use of subcontract(s) in support of aircraft operating out of multiple sites
___Supply Support for Field and Heavy Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites
___Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites
___Obtaining Customs Clearances for export/import shipment of parts and material
___Aircraft Strip and Paint
___Engine Overhaul and Repair
___Landing Gear Overhaul
___Propeller Overhaul
___Support Equipment Maintenance
___Aviation Life Support Systems Maintenance and Issue
___Engineering Services

4.0 PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 Performance Grades (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 Questions

4.2.1 Technical and Quality Performance

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.2 Schedule Performance

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

4.2.3 Cost Performance

a. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _________

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

e. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

f. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.4 Management

4.2.4.1 Management Responsiveness

What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.4.2 Subcontract Management

What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.2.4.3 Program Management and Other Management

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.4.4 Small Business Utilization

If this contract contains a small business subcontracting goal, assess compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to Small Business participation (including FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (when required). Assess any small business participation goals which are stated separately in the contract Assess achievement on each individual goal stated within the contract or subcontracting plan including good faith effort if the goal was not achieved. Check one of the boxes below, noting however when applying the rating definitions for this assessment equate “small business goals” to requirements.

4.2.4.5 Overall Management Assessment

Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.

4.2.5 Other

Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

4.2.1 SUMMARY

If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one) _______ award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.

1) definitely would not,

2) probably would not,

3) might,

4) might not,

5) probably would,

6) definitely would

Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________

Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signator completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .