Attachment_J.8_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Transportation Security Equipment Deployment Services (TEDS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Transportation Security Equipment Deployment Services (TEDS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_J_3_-_Question_and_Answer_Sheet_A00003.pdf PDF
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049_-_SF_30_A00003.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.3_-_Question_and_Answer_Sheet_Amendment_A00002.pdf PDF
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049_-_SF_30_A00002.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.10_-_Pricing_Worksheets_CENTRAL_A00002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049_Amendment_A00002.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.11_-_Pricing_Worksheets_WEST_A00002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.9_-_Pricing_Worksheets_EAST_A00002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.5_-_Task_Order_02.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.4_-_Task_Order_01.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.10_-_Pricing_Worksheets_CENTRAL_A00001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.13_-_TSA_Information_Assurance_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.9_-_Pricing_Worksheets_EAST_A00001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.17_OST_OA_Test_and_Evaluation_Policy.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.15_-_OST_Test_and_Evaluation_Guidebook.pdf PDF
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049_Amendment_A00001.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.7_-_Past_Performance_Statement.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J.11_-_Pricing_Worksheets_WEST_A00001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049_-_SF_30.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.3_-_Question_and_Answer_Sheet_A00001.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.14_-_DHS_4300A_Sensitive_Systems_Handbook.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.16_-_OST_Test_and_Evaluation_Guide.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.4_-_Task_Order_01.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.7_-_Past_Performance_Statement.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J.11_-_Pricing_Worksheets_WEST.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.2_-_SCA_DBA_Spreadsheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.9_-_Pricing_Worksheets_EAST.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.10_-_Pricing_Worksheets_CENTRAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.12_-_Pricing_Worksheets_ALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.6_-_DHS_Subcontracting_Plan_Review_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.5_-_Task_Order_02.pdf PDF
Attachment_J.3_-_Question_and_Answer_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J.1_-_FED_Map.pdf PDF
HSTS04-14-R-CT4049.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(Offeror to complete item II A. and II B. prior to issuing this questionnaire to the Evaluator.)

In order to assess potential vendors, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. The contract resulting from this procurement will provide TSA a wide range of information technology services. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. This is a critical acquisition being conducted by TSA and your support is sincerely appreciated. We thank you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire. The completed Questionnaire shall be submitted directly via email from the customer reference to TSATEDS@tsa.dhs.gov by the due date established for receipt of offers. The “subject” line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: “Company’s Past Performance” and the message shall originate from the Evaluator’s corporate or government email system.

1. GENERAL GUIDANCE

Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):

RATING
DESCRIPTION
Excellent
The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual or worthwhile features or benefits.
Satisfactory
The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements
Marginal
The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory
The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer’s expectations and/or contract requirements.

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. ORGANIZATION/AGENCY & RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:

1
Name & Title:
2
Organization:
3
Address:
4
Phone No.:
5
Fax No.:
6
E-mail:
7
Date:
8
Signature:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:

1
Type of Instrument (e.g. Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other):
2
Contract Identification Number:
3
Order Number (If applicable):
4
Project Title and Service Description (Add rows if needed):
5
Type of Contract (e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid):
6
Pricing Type (e.g. fixed price, cost reimbursement, other):
7
Competitive (Y/N):
8
Follow-on (Y/N):
9
Date of Award:
10
Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
11
Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
12
Period of Performance:
13
Place(s) of Performance:
14
Complexity of Work (e.g. difficult, routine):
15
Type and extent of subcontracting (add rows if needed):

C. GENERAL INFORMATION:

1
Has the Contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, etc.? If yes, explain.
2
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated? If yes, explain and identify type of termination (e.g. default, convenience).
3
Changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract are/were generally attributable to customer-issued Change Orders, Contractor-submitted claims, other Customer actions (please explain):

1. EVALUATION: How Would You Rate This Contractor With Respect To:

1. Compliance with the SOW/PWS/SOO and specifications; conformance to standards of good workmanship, and responsiveness to technical direction:

Rating
Excellent
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsat

Check

Comment: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Adherence to the contract delivery schedule:

Rating
Excellent
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsat

Check

1. Adherence to task order estimates; reasonableness of change order proposals; and completeness of billing:

Rating
Excellent
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsat

Check

1. Working relationship with Contracting Officer, COTR, and other points of contact:

Rating
Excellent
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsat

Check

1. Relationship with and satisfaction level of agency end-user of product or service required:

Rating
Excellent
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsat

Check

In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this contractor.

RFP HSTS04-14-R-CT4049

Attachment J.8 Page 1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .