PWS_LCWS_12Jul10Rev12.pdf

PDF 74 KB Posted

Attached to
Loadmaster Crashworthy Seats (LCWS)
Solicitation number
FD2060-10-21507
Issued by

About this file

Performance-Based Work Statement dated 12 July 2010

View the file

Other files

Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Rev 12

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their Contractors (Administrative or Operational Use; 14 November 2007). Other requests for this document shall be referred to 572ACSG/GFLBA, Robins

AFB, GA 31098.

Performance-Based Work Statement

For

Loadmaster Crashworthy Seat Modification Support

DATE:

12 July 2010

Prepared by:

580th Aircraft Sustainment Group 572nd Aircraft Sustainment Squadron

226 Cochran Street Robins AFB GA 31098

PR Number: FD2060-10-21507 Program Manager: Capt Holly Jaenz/Lt Samantha Wilson

Loadmaster Crashworthy Seat i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 DESCRIPTON OF SERVICES

2.0 SERVICE DELIVERY SUMMARY

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, SERVICES, AND

INFORMATION

4.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

5.0 APPENDICES

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

The MC-130H/W, HC-130P and EC-130J aircraft require Load Master Crashworthy Seats (LCWS) to facilitate optimal mission effectiveness and survivability. The LCWS kit will include two seats with associated mounting mechanisms and hardware. For the purpose of this task, the seat and frame will be manufactured IAW drawings 200812110 (Troop Seat Assembly) and 200811254 (Seat Frame Assembly), developed under contract FA8509-05-D-0004-0014, for all aircraft configurations. The contractor will update the drawing package to include a designed tie-down strap to secure the seat and frame in the stowed position. The contractor shall provide the following for each aircraft configuration:

i) MC-130W (Basic) The contractor shall manufacture 11 LCWS kits and install using contract field team (CFT). The first production kit shall be used to validate installation by a CFT and finalize the drawing and Tech Order data package developed under contract F8509-05-D-0004-0014. Installation of the kits will be IAW drawing 200811254 (Seat Mounting Installation) developed under contract F8509-05-D-0004-0014.

ii) MC-130H (Basic) The contractor shall develop engineering drawings of the seat-aircraft interface for the MC- 130H. The contractor shall develop a TCTO for aircraft modifications and a Commodity Technical Order for the seat and mounting mechanism. The contractor shall fabricate and install one Trial Installation and one Kitproof LCWS kit. The contractor shall manufacture and install 20 each production kits.

iii) EC-130J (Basic) The contractor shall develop engineering drawings of the seat-aircraft interface for the EC-130J The contractor shall develop a TCTO for aircraft modifications and a Commodity Technical Order for the seat and mounting mechanism. The contractor shall fabricate and install one Trial Installation and one Kitproof LCWS kit. The contractor shall manufacture and install 2 production kits.

iv) HC-130P (HC-130P Option) The contractor shall develop engineering drawings of the seat-aircraft interface for the HC-130P The contractor shall develop a TCTO for aircraft modifications and a Commodity Technical Order for the seat and mounting mechanism. The contractor shall fabricate and install one Trial Installation and one Kitproof LCWS kit. The contractor shall manufacture and install 6 each production kits.

v) HC-130P (HC-130P AF RESERVE Option) This option will produce and install 5 HC-130P production kits. The development of engineering drawings as well as Trial kit and Kit proof will be preformed under the HC-130P Option and is not expected to be accomplished under this option.

The warfighter will benefit by having a survivable crashworthy seat for the loadmaster in the event of an aircraft emergency.

2.0 SERVICE SUMMARY

SERVICES SUMMARY PR# FD2060-09-24976

Table 1: Service Delivery Summary

Performance

Objective

PWS

Para

Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

The contractor shall adhere to all schedule performance parameter as describe in the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

4.11.1 The contractor shall remain within 10

working days of schedule paramaters set for in the IMS. If the IMS is revised, and approved by the government, the contractor shall be held to the same 10 working day standard

Periodic surveillance will be performed on a quarterly basis by Government PM via review of monthly status reports.

Data Deliverables Quality

4.1.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.2.1, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.4, 4.6.10, 4.6.10.1, 4.6.10.2, 4.7.3, 4.10.5, 4.11.1, 4.11.2, 4.11.3, 4.12.1.1, 4.12.1.2, 4.12.2.2, 4.12.2.3, 4.12.2.4, 4.12.2.6, 4.12.2.7, 4.12.2.8, 4.12.3.3, 4.12.5

Each Data Deliverable will be reviewed by the applicable government person and meet the requirements of its Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). Only one rejection letter shall be allowed for each deliverable. The contractor shall have 5 working days to correct any deficiency after receipt of rejection letter.

Quarterly inspection of data deliverables by the responsible Government organization listed on the

CDRL.

Trial Install

4.7.3 The LCWS shall pass all verification

and functional testing in 2 or less attempts. In the event of two failed attempts, the contractor will provide the Government a written report, within 2 working days, of actions to be taken to correct the deficiency. The contractor will have 15 working days after Government acceptance of corrective action to reinstall the LCWS.

100% inspection by the responsible Government engineer at time of test.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, SERVICES, AND INFORMATION

3.1 The contractor shall be required to have access to the JEDMICS data base and access to the Technical Order (T.O.) library.

4.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

4.1 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS

The contractor shall be responsible for the completion of all tasks required by this PWS. These tasks include the following:

o Non-recurring Engineering - MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P o Technical Data Package - MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P o Technical Orders – MC130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P o Trial Installation Kit and labor to install - MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P o Kit Proof Kit and labor to install MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P o Production Kit Manufacture (MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P).

The contractor shall implement all plans required by this PWS and shall not deviate from an approved document without explicit written permission by a Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO). Existing data, documentation, reports, or other data that apply to this program shall be used to the fullest extent possible as authorized by the procuring activity.

4.1.1 Design Package: The contractor shall develop/produce/maintain a (TDP) that accurately depicts the final installation of the MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P LCWS kits. The contractor shall revise drawing 200811251 and all associated drawing that accurately depicts the final installation with any changes resulting from the MC-130W Kitproof. The TDP shall provide the design, engineering, manufacturing, testing, and quality assurance information necessary to enable the manufacture or procurement of Group A items defined by the TDP, without additional non-recurring engineering effort or recourse to the original design activity.

Product data shall reflect the approved,tested,and accepted configuration of the defined delivered item. All engineering product definition data created as a result of this contract shall be considered a part of the TDP.This data includes but is not limited to CAD data, models and model based definition data sets, and Gerber data. The TDP shall provide a kit appropriate for each configuration of aircraft identified in this PWS. The Contractor shall attend a Government kickoff meeting and requirements review upon initiation of the program as outlined in the PWS.

The Contractor shall conduct a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and a Critical Design Review (CDR) for aircraft MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P with the Government to obtain design approval and issue resolution as outlined in the paragraphs herein. (DI-SESS-81000D/T)

4.1.1.1 Engineering Data Updates and Revisions: The contractor shall (and shall cause subcontractors and vendors to) update and maintain engineering data for the item(S) designed/developed/modified/produced by this contract for the life of this contract and shall incorporate all changes in accordance with the following:

a. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data within 90 days after engineering release/Government concurrence or at intervals of five changes, whichever occurs first, except a change involving safety, which shall be incorporated immediately.

b. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of the data for review.

c. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of final media (this includes all Engineering Orders (EO) generated as a result of the preliminary data review).

4.2 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS: Not Applicable to LCWS.

4.3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS (MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P)

4.3.1 Transportability: When installed on the MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P the LCWS will not alter existing cargo handling procedures without specific concurrence of the lead and using commands and approval via modification from the PCO.

4.3.2 Safety: The safety criteria and considerations set forth in MIL-STD-882D shall be used to establish system safety design features. Warning notices shall be provided where applicable for high voltage electrical sources, noise and explosive devices. Special attention shall be given during the design process to prevent injury during installation This data shall be submitted as a risk assessment. (DI-SAFT-80101B, DI-MISC-80711A)

4.3.2.1 System Safety and Hazard Analysis (SSHA): A SSHA shall be performed in accordance with MIL-STD-882D. The analysis shall cover all electrical, mechanical, and human interfaces affected by the modification. This analysis shall consider safety hazards associated with installation, removal, and normal use. (DI-SAFT-80101B)

4.4 SYSTEM QUALITY (MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P)

The contractor’s quality system shall meet the requirements of SAE AS9100B, Quality Management Systems Aerospace Requirements, or ANSI/ASQC 9001 and the cognizant Government representative will approve. A calibration system program shall be established and maintained IAW ANSI/NCSL Z540-1, or IS0 10012-1 or equivalent. The contractor shall also include the following quality aspects in the design process.

4.4.1 Reliability: The system shall be designed to consistently perform reliably throughout its expected life, maximize reliability, and the contractor shall provide a list of sub-system components with their estimated Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF). The contractor shall identify any anticipated high failure items.

4.4.2 Maintainability: The system shall be designed for ease of servicing and maintenance.

4.4.3 Durability

4.4.3.1 Structural Life: Castings, housings and other non–wearing parts shall have unlimited life. Where wearing parts such as press fit bushings are installed, the bosses shall be provided with sufficient material to permit four (4) such reworks and installation of oversize bushings.

4.4.3.2 Fatigue Life: Parts that are subjected to Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) loads, in addition to High Cycle Fatigue (HCF) loads, shall be designed considering the effect of LCF damage on the material HCF life.

4.4.3.3 Damage Tolerance: The LCWS shall incorporate material, stress levels, and structural configurations that will minimize the probability of loss of the system due to damage of a single structural element or due to propagation of undetected flaws, cracks, or other damage. Designs to maximize slow crack growth, crack arrestment, and redundant load paths shall be used to achieve this capability.

4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS (MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P)

4.5.1 Climatic Requirements: Maximum protection shall be provided to prevent damage due to temperature, humidity, dust, sand, rain, and saltwater spray. This protection shall not interfere with the efficient operation of the equipment.

4.5.2 Temperature: The system shall perform satisfactorily from –59.8F to 140F.

4.6 DESIGN AND CONTRUCTION (MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P)

The contractor shall perform a design stress analysis of the areas affected by the modification.

The contractor shall address, as a minimum, the aircraft structure, attaching structure, control systems, and installation changes. The contractor shall utilize an approach to airworthiness certification of the final aircraft configuration that complies with the intent of AFPD 62-6. The contractor shall develop a modified airworthiness certification criteria (MACC) IAW MIL- HDBK-516A for each effected MDS to identify the specific certification criteria that apply to the modified aircraft. The contractor shall deliver Airworthiness Verification Plans and Airworthiness Substantiation Report that documents the certification process. The Government will then accomplish the Airworthiness Certification. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.1 Site Survey: The contractor shall travel and perform aircraft site surveys to the following locations to adequately document and photograph all key technical details pertaining to the installation of the LCWS.

MC-130W –Cannon AFB, NM MC-130H – Hurlburt Field, FL EC-130J –Harrisburg International Airport, PA HC-130P – Moody AFB, GA

The Contractor shall furnish a digital picture book of the survey and deliver pictures, in .jpg format, on CD-ROM. The contractor shall prepare a site survey report after completion of the surveys IAW with CDRLs. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.2 Materials and Processes: All materials and processes used in the seat-aircraft interface design shall be of suitable quality and type so as to ensure the other requirements in the specification are not jeopardized. Materials shall be selected and specified in accordance with Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS) DOT/FAA/AR- MMPDS. Materials not referenced in MMPDS may not be used without written Government approval.

4.6.3 Value Engineering: When appropriate, the contractor shall implement value engineering to reduce cost and improve quality and performance of the system.

4.6.4 Static/Dynamic and Crash Loads:

The seat system has been designed to static/dynamic and crash loads to meet the requirements of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 14 CFR Part 25.561 and 26.562 except that an occupant weight of 300 lbs (240 lb occupant + 60 lbs equipment) shall be used in lieu of 170 lbs stated in Part 25. The loads found in Part 25.561 and 25.562 are ultimate loads. The contractor shall design the aircraft-seat interface so the seat system will maintain the approved loads listed in this paragraph. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.4.1 Factor of Safety: The seat system has been designed to meet a minimum margin of safety of 1.5 for all except ultimate loads. Design of the aircraft-seat interface shall not change or deviate from the approved margin of safety.

4.6.4.2 Strength and Deformation: The seat system has been designed to be able to support limit loads without detrimental permanent deformation. Design of the aircraft-seat interface shall not cause detrimental deformation within limit loads.

4.6.4.3 Margin of Safety: The seat system has been designed that the minimum acceptable margin of safety shall be non-negative. Design of aircraft-seat interface shall not deviate from the minimum margin of saftely.

4.6.5 Corrosion Protection: The seat system has been designed to be corrosion resistant per guidelines set forth in MIL-STD-889B and FED-STD-595B (1). The aircraft-seat interface shall be designed to maintain the same corrosion resistant guidelines.

4.6.6 Drain Holes: The seat system has been designed to prevent the accumulation and retention of liquids. The design of the aircraft-seat interface shall not block the drain holes from performing their intended purpose.

4.6.7 Lubrication: Means of lubrication of all moving parts shall be provided. All required lubrication points shall be easily accessible and long-term lubrication shall be provided wherever practicable.

4.6.8 Electrical Equipment: Not Applicable.

4.6.9 Human Factors: The seat system has been designed IAW the guidelines established in MIL-STD-1472F, Human Engineering. The aircraft-seat interface shall not cause deviation from the guidelines of MIL-STD-1472F and not affect crew egress or survivor insertion/extraction operations.

4.6.10 Weight and Balance (MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P): The Contractor shall perform an initial weight and balance analysis prior to the MC-130H/P and HC-130P kit installation. This analysis shall identify any impact of changes to the original design and update aircraft weight and balance data as required. Final aircraft weight and balance shall be documented IAW T.O 1-1B-50 and be within the constraints defined in the designated aircraft

TO. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.10.1 Weight and Balance Report(MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P): The contractor shall develop basic weight and balance information for this modification per the MC-130E/H and HC-130P aircraft TO(s). This data shall be summarized and presented at the Critical Design Review (CDR) for government concurrence, and shall be sufficient for inclusion in the Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO) and the aircraft Form “F” and Chart “C”. Contractor shall ensure the aircraft weight and balance will not be outside the flight manual gross weight and center of gravity envelope. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.10.2 Stress Analysis Report: The contractor shall perform and document a complete stress analysis of the areas affected by the MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P modification. The contractor shall perform and document a complete stress analysis of the LSCS including aircraft structure, attaching structure, and installation surfaces affected by this design. The contractor shall determine that the existing aircraft structure used as installation surfaces is of sufficient strength to carry any modifications required by the System mounted thereon under the maximum acceleration expected in the aircraft under all normal and emergency operating conditions of the subject aircraft. The analysis shall verify that the installation structure can withstand normal flight loads and crash loads in accordance with the Aircraft Specification for each fixed wing aircraft. The structural integrity of the aircraft shall not be degraded by the design structural changes. All parts of the LSCS design and modified aircraft structure require substantiation and documentation through analysis (either classical and/or Finite Element Analysis (FEA)). If used, the FEA shall be validated by classical methods. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.6.11 Wiring: Any temporary wiring relocation required by the installation shall be accomplished IAW SAE AS50881.

4.6.12 Design Deficiencies: The contractor shall correct all MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P Trial Installation kit deficiencies and drawing changes that are revealed by the trial installation at no additional cost to the government.

4.7 TRIAL KIT AND KIT PROOF INSTALLATION SUPPORT

The contractor shall provide technical and engineering support during the trial installation and the kit proofing on the MC-130H, MC-130W (Kitproof Only), EC-130J and HC-130P aircraft.

The contractor shall perform operational checkout of the loadmaster crashworthy seats following trial install and kit proof. Trial installation and kit proof will be accomplished at the following locations:

MC-130W Cannon MC-130H Hurlburt EC-130J Harrisburg HC-130P Moody HC-130P Patrick

4.7.1 Trial Install Kit (TI): The contractor shall be responsible for the manufacture, inspection, and installation of trial installation kits. The contractor shall provide on-site support for the installation and testing of the TI kit. A TI (2 seats per kit) shall be accomplished on the MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P using the contractor’s technicians, proposed technical data in section 4.10.6, and a kit provided by the contractor. The contractor shall be responsible to provide the installation team, kits, tools and equipment, and AFTO 781 documentation in accordance with TO 00-20-1 and AFI 21-101 for this effort. All installed interface connections for the LSCS shall be inspected by direct measurement (coordinate measurement machine or equivalent) to ensure they are located within drawing tolerances.

4.7.2 Kit Proof (KP)/Production Kits: The contractor shall be responsible for the manufacture, inspection, and installation of kits for kit proof. The contractor shall be responsible for retrofitting the trial install kit to the production configuration upon completion of kit proof. The first production kit will be used for kit proof and the contractor shall support the installation of the kit proof kit on the MC-130H/W, EC-130J and HC-130P. The contractor shall be responsible for the manufacture and installation of kits and AFTO 781 documentation in accordance with TO 00-20-1 and AFI 21-101 for kit proof and subsequent production kits as defined in this PWS.

4.7.3 Installation Test Plan/Procedures and Reports: The contractor shall prepare a ground test procedure for the purpose of accepting the kit installation. The content of the test procedure shall include Pre-Mod and Post-Mod operational ground-tests to be performed by 18th Flight Test Squadron at Hurlburt Field. The test procedure shall cite existing operational checks contained in the appropriate Maintenance TOs to verify proper installation and functionality of the System and disturbed existing systems. Results of the testing shall be documented in a final test report.

All parts of the seat kit design require substantiation through testing. (DI-NDTI-80809B)

4.7.4 Engineering Support: The contractor shall provide engineering support during the trial installation, kit proofing, operational assessment, all testing described within this PWS, and perform the systems operational and maintenance checkout for the modification after trial installation. The contractor shall provide engineering support for production installations at the given location.

4.7.5 Installation: The contractor shall be required to install all group A and group B parts and ensure seats are properly functioning after each installation.

4.8 PRODUCTION KIT MANUFACTURING AND INSTALLATION

a) MC-130W (Basic)

The contractor shall manufacture and install 1 LCWS kit to be used as a kit proof. The contractor shall Manufacture and install using a CFT, 10 LCWS kits to be installed in aircraft and 1 LCWS kit to be installed a Fuselage Trainer (FuT). Additionally, the contractor shall install one LCWS seat group B, provided by the Governement as GFP to be installed in aircraft number 88-1303. The contractor is responsible for installation of a total of 12 full LCWS kits and one LCWS group B at Cannon AFB, NM.

b) MC-130H (Basic) The contractor shall manufacture and install 1 LCWS kit as a trial installation and 1 LCWS kit as a kit proof. Additionally, the contractor shall Manufacture and install using a CFT, 18 LCWS kits to be installed in aircraft and 2 LCWS kit to be installed a Fuselage Trainer (FuT). The contractor is responsible for installation of a total of 22 LCWS kits at the following locations:

Hurlburt AFB, FL – 9 Aircraft/1 FuT Kirtland AFB, NM – 3 Aircraft/1 FuT Kadena AFB, Japan – 4 Aircraft RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom – 4 Aircraft

c) EC-130J (Basic) kit as a kit proof. Additionally, the contractor shall Manufacture and install using a CFT, 2 LCWS kits. The contractor is responsible for installation of a total of 4 LCWS kits at Harrisburg IAP, PA.

d) HC-130P (HC-130P Option) kit as a kit proof. Additionally, the contractor shall Manufacture and install using a CFT, 6 LCWS kits. The contractor is responsible for installation of a total of 8 LCWS kits at the following locations:

Moody AFB, GA – 8 Aircraft

e) HC-130P (HC-130P AF Reserve Option) The contractor shall manufacture and install 5 HC-130P LCWS kits at Patrick AFB, FL using a CFT.

4.9 KIT PACKAGING, HANDLING, SHIPPING, AND TRANSPORTATION

The contractor shall be responsible for the kit packaging, handling, shipping, and transportation IAW the following paragraphs.

4.9.1 Packaging/Handling: The contractor shall package and mark the kits per the guidelines as specified on Form AFMC 158 as include in basic order. To facilitate the installation, the kits shall be packaged by individual installation drawing with the appropriate parts/hardware, and a packing list of comprised material in each installation sub-kit.

4.9.2 Shipping/Transportation: The contractor shall ship the production kits in place and store in a secure area until the Government provides direction that shipment to the installation site is required. The contractor shall be responsible for transporting the production kits to the scheduled locations provided by the Government for installation.

4.9.3 Identification Plates and Markings: Each major component or sub-assembly shall have a permanent part number marked in accordance with MIL-STD-130L.

4.10 LOGISTICS

4.10.1 Interchangeability/Obsolescence:

All parts having the same manufacturer’s part number shall be functionally and dimensionally interchangeable and replaceable with each other. Any deviations shall be discussed and agreed upon by contractor and the government engineer.

4.10.2 Material or Manufacturing Obsolescence: Contractor shall be responsible for the identification, description and recommended replacement or alternate solutions for the items affected by obsolescence that are required to accomplish the crashworthy seat modification.

4.10.3 Parts Selection: The seat system shall retain the same material selected for the MC- 130H/P and HC-130P seat system in the following precedence:

National Stock Listed (NSL) parts common with the platforms discussed in Section 1.0 Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS)

Reverse engineering

(NOTE: Any deviations from the above shall be approved by the Government engineer.)

4.10.4 Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS): The contractor shall purchase COTS hardware when required for execution of this modification.

4.10.5 Provisioning: The contractor shall identify and recommend logical spare/repair parts for the seat, seat frame, and aircraft-seat interface, sufficient to meet the system/equipment operation and supportability in accordance with the Air Force Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS). MIL-PRF-49506 should be used as a guide. Format must be consistent with existing Government Provisioning data system (D220). (DI-ALSS-81529 and DI-ALSS- 81557)

4.10.6 Support Equipment Requirement: (Reserved)

4.10.7 Configuration Control: Contractor shall be responsible for documenting and maintaining configuration control for any item affected by this modification. The contractor shall update existing technical data (drawings, drawing trees, etc) affected by this modification. When optional requirements are exercised, the contractor shall also provide configuration control as associated with the exercised option(s). Configuration Control is defined as any change to form, fit, and function of hardware or software.

4.11 SPECIFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS

4.11.1 Technical Requirements Document (TRD): The contractor shall document all requirements and issues for the MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P seat system presented at the guidance conference and requirements review discussed in paragraphs herein. The contractor shall prepare, for government approval, a TRD that defines the required system installation, functionality, aircrew operation, system limitations, and level of integration with existing aircraft systems. (DI-MISC-80711A)

4.11.2 Technical Data: The contractor shall develop/produce/maintain a Technical Data Package (TDP) that accurately depicts the final MC-130H, EC-130J and HC-130P product. The TDP shall provide the necessary design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and quality assurance requirements information necessary to enable the procurement or manufacture of an item essentially identical to the original item. The product shall be defined to the extent necessary for a competent manufacturer to produce an item, which duplicates the physical, interface, and functional characteristics of the original product, without additional design engineering effort or recourse to the current design activity. Product data shall reflect the approved, tested, and accepted configuration of the defined delivered item. [DI-SESS- 81000D/T]

4.11.3 Technical Data Package (TDP) Drawing Changes: The contractor shall (and shall cause subcontractors and vendors to) update and maintain engineering data for the item(s) designed/developed/modified/produced by this contract for the life of this contract and shall incorporate all changes in accordance with the following:

a. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data within 90 days after engineering release/Government concurrence or at intervals of five changes, whichever occurs first, except a change involving safety, which shall be incorporated immediately.

b. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of data for review.

c. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of final media (this includes all EO’s generated as a result of the preliminary data review). [DI-SESS-81000D/T]

4.11.4 Technical Orders (TOs): The Contractor shall develop the TO change pages necessary for the operation, maintenance, and support of the modification in accordance with the requirements of TM-86-01M and IAW TO 00-5-1. The Government will retain the right of approval of the final TOs/IETMS through the Certification and Verification process and the pre-pub review. The government will provide the contractor with a current version of TO 1C-130-2- WA-2, and a current version of the IETM Database Tool. The contractor must first order the tool and technical order through the PCO. While delivery of the populated tool does not constitute final delivery, that data delivered will be parsed into the database and made available in IETM format (standalone CD) to support government verification of data. Additionally, the contractor is responsible for technical accuracy through verification. (TM-86-01M).

4.11.4.1 Operational Technical Orders: The contractor shall review the applicable SOF/CSAR Operational Technical Orders and prepare properly formatted data IAW the TM 86- 01M, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR). (TM-86-01M)

4.11.4.2 Maintenance Manuals: The contractor shall review the applicable SOF/CSAR Maintenance Technical Orders and prepare properly formatted data IAW the TM 86-01M, Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR). (TM-86-01M)

4.11.5 Certification/Verification: The government will be permitted to witness Data Certification. The contractor shall notify the government two weeks prior to Certification beginning. A Certification shall be conducted on the Trial Installation aircraft, and Air Force Verification of hands-on procedures shall be conducted on the Kit proof aircraft. The contractor shall provide support in all areas prescribed by the government for the Verification phase.

4.11.6 Time Compliance Technical Order: The contractor shall develop a new routine TCTO to document the final configuration of the modification and instructions for removal of the existing systems (if required). The TCTO shall be prepared in accordance with TO 00-5-15, MIL-PRF-38804C, and the applicable Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Form 873. The TCTO Verification shall be accomplished during Kit Proof installation. (TM-86-01M)

4.11.7 Security: The security level of contractor personnel shall be at the highest level of the security classification listed in the Security Classification Guides of the systems listed in this PWS. The contractor shall be required to safeguard equipment and/or information classified up to the level of SECRET. Specific security requirements will be specified on DD 254 incorporated in the basic contract.

4.12 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The contractor shall establish a formal project organization responsible for both development and production phases of the program. The contractor shall identify and maintain throughout the contract period a list of key personnel who have management and task accomplishment responsibilities, including key personnel of any major subcontractors. The contractor shall have the responsibility for the management, administration, financial control, engineering, manufacturing, procurement, testing, and quality assurance activities associated with this effort.

The contractor shall serve as the point of contact on all contractual and technical matters. All program management requirements of the contract shall extend to the effort required by this

PBWS.

4.12.1 Documentation: In accordance with DoD policy, every effort shall be made to provide paperless copies. All data shall be delivered on electronic media in an approved version of a Microsoft Office product format. All Final data deliverables will be accompanied by two (2) hard copies. Other formats are acceptable upon prior approval of the government via modification to order.

4.12.1.1 Program Schedules and Milestones: Program performance will be in accordance with an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), approved at kick off meeting and updated at Program Management Reviews (PMRs). The IMS shall be updated to show progress against the baseline and submitted with the Status Report each month. Any change to the Program Master Schedule (PMS) and milestones shall require concurrence from both the Government and contractor. (DI-

MGMT-81650)

4.12.1.2 Status/Financial Reports: The contractor, in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), shall prepare and submit status reports in accordance with the CDRLs that detail work performed the previous month. The contractor shall identify tasks to be performed during the next reporting period in each status report. The status report shall include financial expenditure information (burn rate). The financial status shall be reported as both cumulative and for the specific reporting month. This report should compare program progress with the program schedule milestones and shall identify problems/risks and propose effective solutions. (DI-MGMT-80368 and DI-FNCL-80331A).

4.12.2 Meetings: The contractor shall be responsible to attend/host meetings IAW the following paragraphs. All travel, both CONUS and OCONUS, must be concurred by the 572ACSS/GFLB Program Manager (PM) and approved by the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO), five (5) days in advance of the travel. Contractor personnel agree that while flying commercial air travel allocable to this contract, to use air coach, tourist class, or similar accommodations to the extent consistent with the successful and economical accomplishment of the mission for which the travel is being made. All travel by the contractor in support of this PWS shall be performed IAW the Joint Travel egulation (JTR).

4.12.2.1 Kickoff Meeting: A kickoff meeting shall be at the contractor’s facility or a location deemed necessary by the Government no later than 30 days after order award. The purpose of the kickoff meeting is to review and evaluate the contractor's interpretation of the basic contractual requirements and to provide necessary direction and guidance.

4.12.2.2 Program Reviews: The Government and the contractor will participate in Program Reviews as defined in the Program Master Schedule. At a minimum, these meetings shall occur quarterly. If possible, the Program Reviews and technical meetings will be combined at a location deemed necessary by the Government at task order level. The contractor shall conduct program reviews for the purpose of presenting program status to the Government. The contractor shall be responsible for distributing agenda topics, recording minutes, and recording action items for all hosted meetings, conferences, reviews, and/or audits.

The contractor’s program management team, including appropriately cleared personnel from the contracts, quality assurance, data/ configuration management, engineering, reliability and maintainability, system safety and integrated logistics system (ILS) organizations shall be available for all formally scheduled program status reviews conducted at the contractor’s facility.

For meetings conducted at the Government facility, only the required contractor personnel will attend. Contractor representatives at these meetings, conferences, reviews, and audits shall include at least one person with authority to commit the contractor. The minutes shall be recorded by the contractor and include significant questions, deviations from the agenda, conclusions and action items resulting from the reviews. The minutes shall constitute the review report and shall require approval of the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) prior to distribution. (DI-ADMN-81249A and DI-ADMN-81250A)

4.12.2.3 Guidance Conference: The contractor shall attend a combined engineering data, technical data, and provisioning guidance conference at the contractor’s facility or a location deemed necessary by the Government at task order level. The guidance conference will be held within thirty days of contract award. The meeting will be held in conjunction with the kickoff meeting of paragraph 4.11.2.1. The contractor shall prepare an agenda and record the minutes of the Guidance Conference. The contractor shall address, discuss, and provide status on the following: [(DI-ADMN-81249A and DI-ADMN-81250A)]

a. Understanding of all CDRL requirements, applicable DIDs, specifications and standards.

b. TDP review requirements and schedules.

c. TDP delivery requirements and schedules.

d The contractor's quality assurance procedures relating to TDP documents, including quality control of subcontractor and vendor data.

e. The role of subcontractors and vendors who may deliver TDP documents under this contract.

f. The contractor's configuration management system, including methods for releasing documents, approving documents, and incorporating changes into documents.

g. Digital Technical Data Package (TDP) deliverables.

4.12.2.4 Engineering Reviews: The contractor shall host, support, and co chair (at his facility) an IPR of the engineering drawings and associated lists and other documentation to be included in the TDP. The contractor shall have a copy of all data available at IPR. The IPR will be conducted only after the contractor's quality assurance personnel have completely reviewed the data and provided a written determination that data are of sufficient quality that Government time will be effectively utilized during the review. IPR may be scheduled when data has reached the 50% percent completion point and shall be held, when possible, in conjunction with other reviews (i.e., PDR, CDR). The contractor shall notify 542 MSUG/GBMUCA a minimum of 30 days prior to the anticipated date of completion point. The IPR shall focus on the contractor's progress in the preparation of the TDP. The contractor shall support and provide the necessary resources, i.e., meeting agenda, conference room, applicable data, minutes, and appropriate personnel available to answer any questions to perform the IPR effectively. The contractor shall correct all discrepancies identified in the IPR at no additional cost to the government. All subcontractor/vendor data shall be made available for review. If the quantity of subcontractor/vendor data is of sufficient magnitude, the government may schedule a separate IPR at the subcontractor's/vendor's facility. [DI-ADMN-81249A, DI-ADMN-81250A]

4.12.2.5 Interface Control Working Group (ICWG): Not Applicable.

4.12.2.6 Technical Interchange Meetings: The Government and the contractor will participate in technical meetings and integration efforts as defined in the Program Master Schedule. At the least, these meetings shall occur quarterly. If possible, the Program Reviews and technical meetings will be combined. The contractor shall be responsible for distributing agenda topics, recording minutes, and recording action items for all hosted meetings, conferences, reviews, and/or audits. The location of these meetings will be determined by the Government. (DI-ADMN-81249A and DI-ADMN-81250A)

4.12.2.7 Preliminary Design Review (PDR):

Contractor shall conduct a PDR at the Contractor facility to present the preliminary design, integration and installation approach for the LCWS. This shall be co-chaired by the Government and Contractor Program Manager. Following PDR, Contractor shall complete the work necessary to ensure compliance with the mutually agreed to PDR exit criteria. The system level PDR shall be approved by the Government. The contractor shall support and provide the necessary resources, i.e., meeting agenda, conference room, applicable data, and minutes, with appropriate personnel available to answer any questions to perform the PDR effectively. (DI-

ADMN-81249A, DI-ADMN-81250A)

4.12.2.8 Critical Design Reviews (CDR)

Contractor shall conduct a CDR at the Contractor facility to present the critical design, integration and installation approach for the LCWS. This shall be co-chaired by the Government and Contractor Program Manager. Following CDR, Contractor shall complete the work necessary to ensure compliance with the mutually agreed to CDR exit criteria. The system level CDR shall be approved by the Government. The contractor shall support and provide the necessary resources, i.e., meeting agenda, conference room, applicable data, and minutes, with appropriate personnel available to answer any questions to perform the CDR effectively.(DI-

ADMN-81249A, DI-ADMN-81250A)

4.12.2.9 Systems Orientation/Familiarization: The contractor shall identify familiarization requirements if needed, and shall obtain or develop crashworthy seat system orientation/familiarization programs. The contractor shall develop familiarization manuals and other familiarization manuals and other familiarization documentation or aids as required.

Electronic familiarization applications such as video-teleconferencing and computer-based familiarization shall be employed to enhance the effectiveness or familiarization materials and courses when cost-effective. The contractor shall be capable of conducting initial familiarization for Government personnel to ensure proper operation maintenance, repair, and testing of equipment and systems.

4.12.3 Change Management: Change control will be processed as defined herein.

4.12.3.1 Configuration Conformity: The contractor’s quality assurance and manufacturing procedures shall ensure each item, as-built, delivered, and installed conforms to applicable engineering standards.

4.12.3.2 Class I/II changes: Any proposed Class I/II change shall be submitted to the Government for concurrence/approval on the class of the change.

4.12.3.3 Engineering Change Proposal: The Contractor shall provide Class I or Class II Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) to address changes to the TDP as required. (DI-CMAN- 80639C and DI-CMAN-80642C)

4.12.4 Interim Contract Support (ICS): The contractor shall provide ICS for the system from Trial Installation completion through TO fielding. ICS shall be available 24/7 (24 hours a day, 7 days a week). ICS shall consist of, but not be limited to, on call technical and material support for the system.

4.12.5 Deviations and Waivers: The contractor shall document deviations and waivers to established configuration baselines. The contractor shall prepare Request for Deviations and Waivers for end items or components that incorporate a known departure from the approved TDP and present for government approval. (DI-CMAN-80640C)

4.12.6 Relationship of Contractor with Subcontractors/Vendors: The contractor shall levy on subcontractors/vendors the same requirements as are levied on them by this contract. This requirement shall be flowed down to the lowest tier subcontractor/vendor associated with the program.

4.12.7 Order of Precedence:

Priority I Documents mandated for use by law or regulation pursuant to law.

Priority II Performance Oriented Documents: (a) Non-Government Standards; (b) Commercial Item Descriptions; (c) Federal Specifications and Standards; (d) Military Specifications and Standards.

Priority III Design Based Documents: (a) Non-Government Standards; (b) Federal Specifications and Standards; (c) Military Specifications and Standards

Priority IV Standards, specifications and related publications issued by the Government outside the military or federal series for the non-repetitive acquisition of developmental items.

Priority V Company Specifications

4.13 Performance During Crisis

In accordance with DoDI 3020.37, Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crisis, Functional Director has determined that this effort is not considered mission essential and will not continue in the event of a crisis. The Functional Director has determined that the contractor shall not continue to work during a crisis.

4.14 INSPECTION OF SERVICES:

FAR 52.246-4 Inspection of Services - Fixed Price (or FAR 52.246-6 Inspection - Time and Material and Labor - Hour) will be invoked when and if contractor fails to perform as required by PWS.

5.0 APPENDICES

Appendix A – TOs and DIRECTIVES

5.1 Applicable Documents

The documents listed in subheadings 5.1.1 (Military Specifications), 5.1.2 (Military Standards),

5.1.3 (Military Handbooks), and 5.1.4 (Other) form a part of this PWS to the extent specified herein and are provided as guidance only. The contractor is free to propose alternative commercial standards and solutions to achieve the Government’s “Best Value” performance requirements.

5.1.1 Military Specifications:

JSSG-2010-7 DoD Joint Service Specification Guide - Crew Systems Crash Protection Handbook

5.1.2 Military Standards:

MIL-PRF-38804C Performance Specification, TCTO Preparation MIL-STD-129P Military Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-130L Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property MIL-PRF-49506 Logistics Management Information MIL-STD-882D System Safety MIL-STD-889B(3) Dissimilar Metals MIL-STD-1472F(1) Human Engineering (Para 5.6 and 5.7)

MIL-STD-2073-1D DoD Standard Practice for Military Packaging MIL-STD-2219 Fusion Welding for Aerospace Applications

5.1.3 Military Handbooks:

MIL-HDBK-516A Airworthiness Certification Criteria (Ch 9)

5.1.4 Other:

ASME Y-14.24 Types and Applications of Engineering Drawings

ASME Y-14.34M Associated Lists ASME Y-14.35M Revision of Engineering Drawings and Associated Documents SAE AS550881 Wiring Aerospace Vehicle DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS Metallic Materials Properties Development and

Standardization (MMPDS) TO 1-1A-8 Structural Hardware TO 1-1A-14 Aircraft Electric and Electronic Wiring

TO 1-1-691 Aircraft Weapons System Cleaning and Corrosion Control

TO 00-5-1 Air Force Technical Order System TO 00-5-15 Air Force Time Compliance Technical Order Process

TO 1-1B-50 Basic TO for USAF Aircraft Weight and Balance (Para 4)

TM-86-01M Air Force Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR) AFPD 62-6 USAF Aircraft Airworthiness Certification (Para 2.8) DoDI 3020.37 Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During

Crises SAE-AMS-9100B Quality Management System-Aerospace-Requirements ANSI/ASQ 9001 Quality Management System Requirements

ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 Calibration Laboratories and Measuring and Test Equipment, General Requirements

FED-STD-595B(1) Colors used in Government Procurement ISO 10012-1 Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment

NOTE: Entire document is applicable unless otherwise specified. Latest change notices and amendments to all documents listed in paragraphs 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, and 5.1.4 shall apply.

Change notices and amendments are expected during the life of this PWS.

5.1.5 Order of Precedence: In the event of a conflict between the text of this PWS and the reference cited herein, (except for associated detail specifications, specification sheet or military standards), the text of this PWS shall take precedence. Nothing in this PWS, however, shall supersede applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

5.2 Acronyms

ACA Associate Contractor Agreement AFMC Air Force Material Command CDR Critical Design Review CDRL Contract Data Requirements List CFR Code of Federal Regulations CFT Contract Field Team

CLR Combat Loss Replacement COTS Commercial-Off-The-Shelf CSAR Combat Search And Rescue CSWG Crew Station Working Group DID Data Item Description DoD Department of Defense ECP Engineering Change Proposal ECO Engineering Change Order FRR Flight Readiness Review HCF High Cycle Fatigue-Life IAW In Accordance With ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICS Interim Contractor Support ICWG Interface Control Working Group ILS Integrated Logistics System IMDG International Maritime Dangerous Goods IMS* Integrated Master Schedule IPPS Initial Provisioning Performance Specification JEDMICS Joint Engineering Data Management Information & Control System JTR Joint Travel Regulation KP Kit Proof LCF Low Cycle Fatigue-Life LCWS Loadmaster Crashworthy Seat LMI Logistics Management Information MACC Modified Airworthiness Certification Criteria MMPDS Metallic Materials Properties Development & Standardization MTBF Mean Time Between Failures NOR Notice of Revision NSL National Stock Listed PCO Procurement Contracting Officer PDR Preliminary Design Review PM Program Manager PMR Program Management Review PMS* Program Master Schedule PWS Performance Work Statement QT&E Quality Test and Evaluation SDFP Supplemental Data For Provisioning SERD Support Equipment Requirements Document SSHA System Safety Hazard Analysis SOF Special Operations Forces TCTO Time Compliance Technical Order TDP Technical Data Package T/I Trial Install TIS Test Information Sheet TMCR Technical Manual Contract Requirements TO Technical Order

TPWG Test Plan Working Group TRD Technical Requirements Document

* IMS and PMS are used interchangeably.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .