05202020_FA8903-20-R-0010_Question 80 Clarification.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Central South Region Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA890320R0010
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding Solicitation Number FA890320R0010 for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Construction and Optimization Services (BECOS) Central South Region. Key details include questions about the scope of work at various Kelly Air Force Base sites under the contract, such as whether five-year review reports and permit renewals through 2030 are included, the process for abandoning monitoring wells, and requirements for sampling effluent and influent at specific PFAS sites. The document provides clarification that influent or effluent PFAS sampling is not required at two named sites, and that several PFAS sites were incorrectly included in the pricing model and site list attachments, which have been corrected. The solicitation is for the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation Contracting Agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMIZATION SERVICES (BECOS) Central South Region has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Q # | Document Reference | RFP QUESTIONS | DATE RCVD | Document Reference | GOV'T RESPONSE | RESPONSE DATE |
| 1 | TO 2 PWS Attachment 2 | Kelly Base Specific Req states that |
“The Contractor shall prepare a Five-Year Review Report for sites identified in Attachment 1. The next Five-Year Review is due June 2025.”
Question: Will the 2030 Five Year Review be also included in this contract?
| 2 | TO 2 PWS Attachment 2 | 1. Kelly Base Specific Req states that “The Contractor may be required to prepare and to obtain regulatory approval for modifications to existing Kelly AFB RCRA Permit based upon the Contractor’s proposed technical approach for achieving the objectives of this TO.” Question: Is 2029 renewal of RCRA Permit/Compliance Plan included in this contract? |
| 3 | TO 2 PWS Attachment 2 | Is renewal of Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit for Kelly AFB in 2025 and 2030 included in the contract? |
| 4 | TO 2 PWS Attachment 2 | Kelly Base Specific Req states that: |
“In addition to the requirements presented in this PWS, this scope includes the following:
Properly plug and abandon all former Kelly AFB shallow groundwater wells no longer regulatory required in Zones 2, 3, 4 and 5 and outside the former Kelly AFB’s base boundary and not needed for future PFC investigations. Question: (a) How will determination be made for abandonment of wells in offsite areas in Zone 4 and 5? Is the deciding factor in determining whether wells at one of these sites can be abandoned based on whether or not the site has reached SC? (b) Will sampling of wells be required before abandonment? (c) Please provide number of wells anticipated to be abandoned in each of Zones 2, 3, 4, and 5. (d) Please provide how many wells will need to be retained for PFAS investigation
| 5 | Pricing Model: | Performance Objective for Kelly AFB sites SS036 and SS050 is RA-O. Is AF anticipating in situ bioremediation injections to be performed as part of RA-O to expedite achievement of RC or SC, even though RC or SC are not Performance Objectives for these two sites under this contract? | ||||
| 80 | previous response to QAs #80 (see below from Amendment 01) | Inconsistency between on the responses to questions in Amendment 1; the Amendment 1 Task Order (2) Site List, and the latest version of the Task Order (2) pricing model provided in Amendment 2. This question specifically relates to Kelly AFB sites SS036 and SS036 (PFAS) and SS037 and SS037 (PFAS). Based on the responses to question 80, we are confused as to whether the SS036 (PFAS) and SS037 (PFAS) should have been removed from the Task Order (2) pricing model. If the pricing model is correct, then please confirm that the scope of work at SS036 (PFAS) and SS037 (PFAS) is monthly influent and effluent sampling and GAC change out as indicated on the Task Order (2) Site List. | 18-May-20 | TO2 PWS | No influent or effluent PFAS sampling is required at SS036 or SS037. The requirement is to sample, profile, and properly dispose of GAC. The GAC should be sampled for PFAS and other constituents for waste characterization and disposal determination. | 19-May-20 |
| 80 | Attachment 1 and TO2 Price Model | Several PFAS sites are included in the Base Year but the scope is not defined. For example, In Attachment 1 and in the TO2 Price Model, Kelly sites FT024, SS036 and SS037 are included for RA-O. Attachment 1 and the Price Model also include FT024 (PFAS), SS036 (PFAS), and SS037 (PFAS). We are not able to locate any other information about the PFAS sites. Please provide GFI, a scope, and performance objective for these sites, as shown in Attachment 1 for other sites. | previous | Attachment 1 and TO2 Price Model | FT024 (PFAS) was inadvertantly identified on TO2 Price model, this has been corrected. There are no PFAS elements included for FT024 under TO2. Note there is no RA-O for FT024 under TO2. | Amendment 01 |
FA8903-20-R-0010
Central South Region Questions and Answers &P
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .