FA8902-08-R-1003-0004

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24 OCT 2008

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY 77 AESG/PSK CODE FA8902 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND

77 AESG/PSK

7980 LINDBERGH LANDING

BROOKS CITY BASE TX 78235-5119

ALFORT BELIN III 210 536-4892

alfort.belin@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA8902-08-R-1003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X )

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Integrated Aircrew Ensemble (IAE)

The hour and date specified for receipt of offers remain unchanged at 4:00 pm CDT on 03 Nov 2008

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print). 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

ALICE P. SANDERS

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 6.10.7 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 Created 24 Oct 2008 3:16 PM

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES

FA8902-08-R-1003 0004

BLOCK 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT: This amendment is issued to incorporate the changes as cited below:

1. Section L, Clause YA-L001, Proposal Preparation Instructions - Information To Offerors (ITO), Paragraph 4.1, Design, first paragraph is changed to read:

"Offeror(s) shall describe in detail their proposed design. Offeror(s) shall use the Government provided Performance Specification (PS) to develop their technical solution. The Offeror(s) technical solution, based on the Government's Performance Specification will be put on contract at time of award. Offeror(s) shall specifically explain how their design will meet the Key Performance Parameter (KPP) and Key System Attribute (KSA) thresholds. KPP and KSA thresholds cannot be traded off. If the Offeror is proposing tradeoffs to eliminate or reduce Other System Attributes (OSA) threshold requirements, those requirements that were eliminated or reduced must be identified. Offeror(s) will describe how their proposal incorporates tradeoffs in an effort to minimize risk and/or reduce life cycle costs. Offeror(s) shall also provide the rationale which substantiates the decision(s) to trade the requirement(s). Offeror(s) shall explain how technologies selected in the design are procurable and producible, to include a listing of the technologies and available sources. The offeror(s)' design must incorporate Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 6+ or greater technologies. TRL 6 is defined as:"

2. Section L, Clause YA-L001, Proposal Preparation Instructions - Information To Offerors (ITO), Paragraph 4.3, Total Life Cycle Cost is changed to read:

"Offeror(s) shall describe how their design will minimize Total Life Cycle Cost. Assume that 75,568 garments will be procured through 2030."

3. Section M, Clause YA-M002, Evaluation Criteria, Paragraph (1), Subfactor 1.1, Design Approach, Paragraph (a) is changed to read:

"a. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors and their Relative Order of Importance Award will be made to the offeror(s) proposing the combination most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. Four factors will be used in this evaluation: Mission Capability, Proposal Risk, Past Performance, and Cost/Price. The first three factors are of equal importance. Cost/Price, although an important factor, is of less importance. In accordance with FAR 15.304(e) - Evaluation Factors and Significant Subfactors, the evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price, however cost/price will contribute substantially to the selection decision. Within both the Mission Capability factor and the Proposal Risk factor, Subfactors are listed in descending order of importance."

4. Section M, Clause YA-M002, Evaluation Criteria, Paragraph (1), Subfactor 1.1, Design Approach, subparagraph (e) is changed to read:

"(e) Has a design approach that minimizes Total Life Cycle Costs."

5. The Request For Proposal (RFP) remains as written except for the changes indicated above.