Questions_1.pdf

PDF 36 KB Posted

Attached to
T53 Engine Overhaul and Repair
Solicitation number
FA8124-15-R-0005
Issued by

About this file

Responses 1

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions_3.pdf PDF
Questions_2.pdf PDF
Questions_1.pdf PDF
FA8124-15-R-0005-0002.pdf PDF
Questions_1.pdf PDF
FA8124-15-R-0005.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_C_to_PWS_-_Government_SubAssemblies.pdf PDF
FA8124-15-R-0005-0001.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D-1_to_PWS_-_CDRLS_-_ALL.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_B_to_PWS_-_Acryonyms.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_G_-_Evaluation_Factors_Rev_1 _26_Aug_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D_to_PWS_-_CDRLs_DIDs_Summary_30_Apr_15.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_F-1_to_PWS_-_SPI__T53_Engine_Can.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_A_to_PWS_-_Technical_Data_v1 _18_Dec_2014.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_H_-_Pricing_Matrix_Rev_1 _26_Aug_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D-2_to_PWS_-_DIDS_-_ALL.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_F_-_Instructions_to_Offerors_Rev_1 _26_Aug_2015.pdf PDF
T53_History_as_of_Dec_2014_Time_Remaining.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_A_-_PWS__Rev_1 _25_Aug_2015.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_E_-_Signed_Contract_Skills_Letter_25_Feb_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_F_to_PWS_-_SPI__T53_Engine.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_C_-_Safety_Specifications _25_Feb_2015.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_D_-_Vendor_Transportation_Instructions.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_B_-_CAV_AF_Government_Property_Management _5_Mar_2014.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_E_to_PWS_-_CEMs_Access_and_Security_Check_Process.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D-2_to_PWS_-_DIDS_-_ALL.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_A_-_PWS__v8 _30_Apr_15.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_D_-_Vendor_Transportation_Instructions.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_B_to_PWS_-_Acryonyms.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_A_to_PWS_-_Technical_Data_v1 _18_Dec_2014.pdf PDF
FA8124-15-R-0005.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_C_-_Safety_Specifications _25_Feb_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D_to_PWS_-_CDRLs_DIDs_Summary_30_Apr_15.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_H_-_Pricing_Matrix _10_Jun_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_F-1_to_PWS_-_SPI__T53_Engine_Can.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_E_to_PWS_-_CEMs_Access_and_Security_Check_Process.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_F_-_Instructions_to_Offerors _10_Jun_2015.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_F_to_PWS_-_SPI__T53_Engine.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_C_to_PWS_-_Government_SubAssemblies.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_B_-_CAV_AF_Government_Property_Management _5_Mar_2014.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_E_-_Signed_Contract_Skills_Letter_25_Feb_2015.pdf PDF
T53_History_as_of_Dec_2014_Time_Remaining.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_D-1_to_PWS_-_CDRLS_-_ALL.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_G_-_EvaluationFactors _10_Jun_2015.pdf PDF
Questions_3.pdf PDF
T53_APPENDIX_A_-_PWS__v6___20_Mar_15.pdf PDF
Questions_2.pdf PDF
T53_Attachment_A_to__PWS__-_Technical_Data_v1_18_Dec_2014.docx DOCX document
T53_Attachment_E_to_PWS_-_CEMs_Access_and_Security_Check_Process.pdf PDF
T53_helicopter_engine_can.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 63 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DRAFT RFP FA8124-15-R-0005

Questions #1

1. Upon review of the historical data provided on the life limit components, it would be beneficial to list the components to the engine serial number.

RESPONSE: Due to the sensitive nature of the requested information, the requested data will not be posted to FedBizOps. Instead, interested vendors in prep for bid pricing may receive access to the data at the component level serial numbers for remaining life by submitting an email request to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Ms. Gayle Little, gayle.little@us.af.mil beginning 20 March, 2015. Vendor email data access request to PCO should include a copy of vendor intent, proof of Honeywell Authorized Repair Certification, and Small Business designation along with vendor full mailing address and contact information.

2. Would it be possible to list the engine serial number on each CLIN, to help insure fair pricing, and reduce the burden on the contractor to assume what components are in each engine?

RESPONSE: No, requirements are flexible so no serial numbers will be provided for each

CLIN.

3. Corrosion was not addressed in the RFP, and with the age of these engines it might be something you should ask to be built in.

RESPONSE: PWS language for the CLINs contains statements that the work will be accomplished IAW Honeywell Technical Manuals and all work to return the engine to serviceability will be performed. Corrosion where applicable is addressed via the Honeywell manuals and is already considered as part of the CLIN work scope.

4. Would parts that were found to be out of conformity, and not furnished by the Air Force be considered Over & Above? For example, an engine is received in, and during the disassembly and inspection process, parts were noted to be out of conformity for the build of the engine model, or to be compliant with a 5,000 TBO. Would the correction of these parts be considered over and above?

RESPONSE: There are situations where the engine could come in for a scheduled inspection /repair CLIN, but teardown investigation presents an engine to be outside of the inspection workload technical data scope (i.e. FOD, dropped engine). In that situation, the engine would be worked as O&A. If actions found during teardown and investigation lead to maintenance compliant with a 5000 hour overhaul, then the government will make a determination whether that effort should receive the 5000 hour overhaul or be worked as Over & Above.

mailto:gayle.little@us.af.mil

5. Would rework of components not listed in the repair scope and not furnished by the Air Force be considered as Over & Above? For example, an engine is received in for a Hot Section Inspection, and during the pre-induction run to check performance and vibes, the tech notes an excessive leak from the FCU or the N1 Gear Box, or corrosion on the inlet.

These are just examples of things that could come up that are not part of a Hot Section Inspection. Would they be considered over and above?

RESPONSE: No. The rework of components such as the FCU, N1 Gear Box, or corrosion on the inlet would not be considered as Over & Above, but would facilitate further teardown actions per technical data, thus driving a possible inspection higher SubCLIN level change.

PWS language for the CLINs contains statements that the work will be accomplished IAW Honeywell Technical Manuals and all work and material to return the engine to serviceability will be performed. For example, if during the teardown and evaluation process, other parts or areas require maintenance attention, technical data would further direct teardown and repair actions that would fall into one of the levels of effort for the 1250 inspection repair CLIN. Therefore, the 1250 inspection and all repair actions would be priced accordingly based on the level of effort subCLIN for the inspection as directed by the technical data. Just because the engine generated for a hot section inspection, does not mean that following the technical data would not lead to teardown of additional areas to complete maintenance actions to return the engine as serviceable.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .