ILS SOW 13 Apr 2011.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK

Modernization of the

Air Force Instrument Landing Systems (ILS)

13Apr 2011

Prepared by:

OC-ALC/GKAA

Tinker AFB, OK

SOW for Modernization of the ILS

13 April 2011 2

1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1.1. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

1.2. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

1.3. NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

1.4. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

1.4.1. INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

1.4.2. MEETINGS AND REVIEWS

1.5. EXISTING ILS CONFIGURATIONS

1.6. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

1.6.1. INTEGRATION OF ILS MODERNIZATION

1.6.2. ILS MODERNIZATION KITS

1.6.3. ILS SOFTWARE

1.6.4. ILS MODERNIZATION INSTALLATION

1.7. SYSTEM ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.7.1. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

1.7.2. TESTING & EVALUATION

1.7.3. SYSTEM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

1.7.4. LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

1.8. QUALITY ASSURANCE

1.9. OVER AND ABOVE

1.10. DATA REQUIREMENTS

1.10.1. DATA DELIVERABLES

1.10.2. DATA RIGHTS

1.11. SECURITY

1.12. TRAVEL

1.13. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

2. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

13 April 2011 3

1. Description of Services

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required for the modernization of the AN/GRN-29 Instrument Landing System (ILS). This effort involves a modernization that replaces existing obsolete ILS components with modern Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) equipment, integrates them into the existing infrastructure, and enables Remote Maintenance and Monitoring (RMM). A comprehensive data package (configuration management, maintenance, interfaces, and life cycle logistics support) shall be developed which will be verified and validated through functional and physical configuration audits, and first article testing and approval. Approval of deliverables shall be supported by disciplined and comprehensive system engineering, program management, risk management, and integrated logistics support plans, reviews, reports and analysis. The contractor shall provide all necessary qualified personnel, management, technical services, materials, equipment and contractor facilities to support the requirements of this SOW.

1.1. Applicable Documents

Following is a list of documents that are applicable to this SOW. In addition, all applicable documents listed within Section Two of the Performance Specifications for the ILS Modernization Program are applicable to this SOW.

1.2. Government Documents

Document Number Title Date MIL-DTL-31000C Technical Data Packages 7/9/2004 MIL-STD-2073-1E DOD Standard Practice for Military Packaging 5/23/2008 MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management 2/7/2001 200948528 Performance Specifications for the ILS

Modernization Program Latest

Revision

1.3. Non-Government Documents

Document Number Title Date ANSI/ISO/ASQC Q9001-2000 Quality Management Systems – Requirements

1.4. Program Management

The Contractor shall maintain a formal organization to manage the contract including program control, quality assurance, configuration management, management of Government furnished resources, if any, risk management, and security. The Contractor shall assign a Program Manager to organize, plan, schedule, implement, control, analyze, and report on all elements of the contract. The Program Manager shall be prepared to present and discuss the status of contract activities with the Government at any time during normal business hours.

CDRL A001: Program Management Plan CDRL A002: Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report

13 April 2011 4

1.4.1. Integrated Master Schedule

The Contractor shall establish and maintain an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) throughout this effort that maintains the requirements established by the contract. Once the baseline IMS is established, the Contractor shall perform all tasks on schedule per the baseline IMS with potential allowances granted for Government delays or other Government direction. All deviations to the IMS that may negatively impact the schedule shall be immediately reported to the Contracting Officer.

CDRL A003: Integrated Master Schedule

1.4.2. Meetings and Reviews

The Contractor shall conduct meetings and reviews in accordance with this SOW. When they are held at the Contractor's site, the Contractor shall provide appropriate facilities and office equipment (e.g., access to telephone, internet and fax). The Contractor shall provide the appropriate personnel, presentation materials, mockups and technical data. For each meeting or review, the Contractor shall prepare and deliver a Meeting Agenda and Meeting Minutes. Copies of presentation materials shall be prepared for all meeting participants. When appropriate, meetings and reviews shall be scheduled concurrently to reduce travel.

CDRL A004: Meeting Agenda CDRL A005: Meeting Minutes

1.4.2.1. Kickoff Meeting

The Contractor shall conduct a Kickoff Meeting within 14 calendar days after award of contract at the Contractor’s facility. An agenda shall be developed jointly between the Contractor and the Government.

1.4.2.2. Program Management Reviews/Technical Interchange Meetings

The first Program Management Review/Technical Interchange Meeting (PMR/TIM) shall be held in conjunction with the Kickoff Meeting. The following PMRs/TIMs shall be held quarterly until all First Articles have been accepted. PMRs/TIM’s will continue biannually or until the Government deems that regularly scheduled meetings are no longer necessary. The site for the PMRs/TIMs shall alternate between the Contractor's facility and Government facility. The purpose of the PMR is to discuss contract status, track and review outstanding action items, review potential and actual programmatic problem areas and proposed solutions, track and discuss planned versus actual for schedule and performance, and provide a forum for highlighting activities planned for the next period. The purpose of the TIM is to discuss specific technical activities, including action items, studies, test plans, test results, integration issues, technical decisions, and implementation concerns to ensure continuing visibility into technical progress. The Contractor shall provide a copy of the briefing package to the Government electronically at least 10 calendar days before each PMR/TIM.

13 April 2011 5

1.4.2.3. Technical Data Reviews

The Contractor shall conduct two formal Technical Data Reviews at Government facilities. The first review shall be held not later than 60 calendar days after award of contract. Its purpose will be to:

• Define the Functional Baseline (FBL) of the COTS products.

• Compare the current COTS baseline with the Government’s functional baseline.

• Establish the engineering approach for integration of the COTS equipment and identify risks and mitigation plans.

• Summarize the status of all deliverables and discuss any issues or concerns with documents which have been delivered.

The second review shall be held not later than 35 calendar days after the first review and may be combined with a PMR/TIM. Its purpose will be to:

• Define the Contractor's Allocated Baseline (ABL).

• Identify changes to the Contractor's allocated functional baseline as a basis for establishment of the ABL.

• Provide review of detailed integration data to ensure that the design was synthesized as presented in the first review.

• Provide a complete set of proposed and approved configuration changes from the FBL and ABL, including backup and supporting material.

• Establish and control the hardware/software baselines before start of testing.

• Summarize the status of all deliverables and discuss any issues or concerns with documents which have been delivered.

Prior to each Technical Data Review:

• All contract CDRLs scheduled up to the date of the review shall have been submitted and will be a part of the presentation material.

• The Contractor shall assemble specified data at its facility to be available for Government review.

• All key Contractor management and design engineering personnel having responsibility in the areas to be discussed shall be available to attend the reviews.

• The Contractor shall provide a copy of the review briefing package to the Government electronically at least 10 calendar days before the review.

1.5. Existing ILS Configurations

Each existing ILS includes an AN/GRN-30 Localizer Station, AN/GRN-31 Glideslope Station, shelter, remote control and status indicator and interlock control unit subsystems. There are multiple configurations of Localizer and Glideslope stations based on terrain or other site difficulties. This includes Dual-Frequency and Single-Frequency Localizer Stations, and Null Reference and Capture Effect Glideslope Stations. All ILS configurations are currently Category II Capable. There are also school-house ILS, which may be modernized. These school-house systems can be setup in any configuration, but do not include any antenna subsystems (dummy loaded).

13 April 2011 6

1.6. Technical Requirements

The Contractor shall provide all materials, personnel, services, equipment and facilities required to plan, produce, install and sustain modernizations to the existing AN/GRN-29 ILS.

1.6.1. Integration of ILS Modernization

The Contractor shall integrate COTS equipment and software to allow for modernization to all configurations of the existing AN/GRN-29 while maintaining each configuration’s capabilities and enabling RMM. The ILS modernization shall provide all hardware and software necessary for minimal remote status indication to be utilized by air traffic control. The modernized ILS shall meet or exceed all requirements defined within the ILS Modernization Specification (MS) and in no way degrade the current capabilities of the existing systems. It shall also remain compliant with the operational and performance parameters outlined in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) ANNEX 10 Chapter 3, FAA Order 8200.1C, and Air Force Technical Order (TO) 31R4-2GRN29-2, 31R4-2GRN30-2 and 31R4-2GRN31-2.

1.6.2. ILS Modernization Kits

Per the approved technical data, the Contractor shall fabricate and deliver ILS Modernization Kits as required to modernize the multiple configurations of the existing AN/GRN-29 ILS. It is expected that this will drive the requirement for 2 different kits for the localizer stations (Single and Dual Frequency) and 2 different kits for the glideslope stations (Null Reference and Capture Effect). Each system will require 1 type of localizer kit and 1 type of glideslope kit. These shall be designated as follows:

Kit Designation Configured For 5825K3122050A Single-Frequency Localizer Stations 5825K3122050B Dual-Frequency Localizer Stations 5825K3122050C Null Reference Glideslope Stations 5825K3122050D Capture Effect Glideslope Stations

1.6.2.1. First Article Kits

As First Article (FA) kits, the Contractor shall provide all equipment and materials required to perform the modernization of 2 ILS for testing and evaluation. The FA kits shall include one each of the 5825K3122050A/B/C/D kits. Acceptance by the Government shall be after successful test and evaluation and retrofit of the system to resolve any deficiencies found during testing and evaluation. With each FA kit, the Contractor shall supply one full year of sustainment support (ICS/warranty) from the time the modernized system is accepted by the Government.

This sustainment support shall provide for the same level of Contractor support as that which is described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

1.6.2.2. Production Kits

Upon successfully completing the testing and evaluation of the FAs, and with approval of the ACO, the Contractor shall deliver to the Government, production ILS modernization kits in the final approved configurations. Acceptance by the Government shall occur after successful

13 April 2011 7 installation and flight check by the Contractor. With each production kit, the Contractor shall supply one full year of sustainment support (ICS/warranty) from the time the modernized ILS is accepted by the Government. This sustainment support shall provide for the same level of Contractor support as that which is described in the PWS.

1.6.3. ILS Software

All equipment provided by the Contractor shall be loaded with the required software and/or firmware.

CDRL A006: Computer Software Product End Items CDRL A007: Software Version Description (SVD)

1.6.4. ILS Modernization Installation

1.6.4.1. ILS Site Survey

The Contractor shall perform a site survey of each ILS system. This shall be performed 6 to 8 months prior to the modernization installation unless there is not adequate time between contract award and installation. In these cases, the Contractor shall perform the site surveys as soon as possible after contract award. The purpose of each site survey shall be to perform a pre-installation inspection to determine if the existing ILS system meets design standards currently required of the system and shall be performed per the attached ILS Modernization Pre- Installation Survey. The Contractor shall prepare a report from each survey that includes the completed ILS Modernization Pre-Installation Survey Checklist, clear details on all discrepancies found and recommended actions to resolve discrepancies. Each discrepancy shall include the specific location(s) of the discrepancy within the ILS and indicate whether the discrepancy will have a direct impact on this modernization effort.

CDRL A027: Site Survey Report

1.6.4.2. First Article Installation

The Contractor shall perform two FA installations utilizing the kits described in paragraph

1.6.2.1. The first installation shall be performed after a successful Test Readiness Review (TRR).

The 2nd installation shall occur after Authorized Contracting Officer (ACO) approval to proceed.

The Contractor shall provide all resources required to perform these installations including personnel, documentation, FA kits, support equipment (if any), tools and ancillary equipment.

The installations shall be performed in accordance with the Contractor provided TCTO. Utilizing the Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan, the Contractor shall document any discrepancies or deficiencies that require changes to the installations. Government approval must be obtained before changes are performed to the baseline configuration established at the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). If changes are required to the baseline configuration, the Contractor shall incorporate all approved changes into the affected documentation as well as perform a retrofit to previous installations, as required.

13 April 2011 8

1.6.4.3. Production Installation

Upon successful completion of FA testing and evaluation, and with approval of the ACO, the Contractor shall perform the production ILS installations in accordance with the Government approved documentation. They shall provide all resources required to perform these installations including personnel, documentation, kits, support equipment (if any), tools and ancillary equipment. Utilizing the Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan, the Contractor shall document any discrepancies or deficiencies that require changes to the installations. Government approval must be obtained before changes to the Product Baseline are performed. If changes are required to the Product Baseline configuration, the Contractor shall incorporate all approved changes into the affected documentation as well as perform a retrofit to previous installations, as required.

1.7. System Engineering Management Plan

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) to produce, field, and sustain a safe and effective modernization to the ILS. While the SEMP shall address all aspects of system engineering, it shall particularly focus on configuration management, testing, system safety and logistics support as detailed below. The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications, and evaluations to ascertain conformance to the SEMP.

CDRL A008: System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP)

1.7.1. Configuration Management

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan which effectively demonstrates the Contractors’ processes and procedures for: documenting configurations, tracking changes, submission of Engineering Change Proposals, requests for deviations and waivers and other actions which may affect the configuration of the delivered system. For the purpose of this paragraph, Configuration Management includes the management of documentation, drawings, lists, etc. as well as hardware, firmware and software through the use of version, revision or modernization numbering/lettering schemes. The approved Product Baseline shall be established after successful completion of the Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)/Physical Configuration Audit (PCA), conducted using MIL-HDBK- 61A, Section 6 as guidance. The Contractor shall include a configuration audit plan for the FCA and PCA within the Configuration Management Plan.

CDRL A009: Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan

1.7.1.1. Configuration Change Control – Engineering Change Proposals & Request for Deviations or Waivers

The contractor shall submit for written Government approval all deviations, waivers and engineering change proposals IAW the approved Configuration Management Plan on an as needed basis, but in no case shall the contractor implement such changes prior to approval by the Government.

13 April 2011 9

CDRL A010: Engineering Change Proposal CDRL A011: Request for Deviation (RFD)

1.7.1.2. Functional Configuration Audit

A FCA shall be conducted for each FA installation using MIL-HDBK-61A, Section 8 as guidance and shall include all required configurations of the modernization. The purpose of the FCA is to validate that the actual performance of the modernized ILS meets the requirements stated in the Modernization Specification (MS). The Contractor shall provide all documentation and appropriate personnel to support the FCA. The Contractor shall develop a Configuration Audit Summary Report documenting the findings of each FCA and listing actions taken to correct deficiencies. Each FCA shall be considered complete when the Contractor has demonstrated that all FCA requirements have been successfully validated and no critical action items remain.

CDRL A012: Configuration Audit Summary Report

1.7.1.3. Physical Configuration Audit

With Government oversight, the Contractor shall conduct a PCA for each of the FA kits at the Contractor’s facility prior to the installation and testing of any FA kit. Each PCA shall be conducted using MIL-HDBK-61A, Section 8, as guidance. The purpose of the PCA is to ensure that the as-built product configuration documentation matches the as-delivered design. The Contractor shall provide a complete set of released drawings, indentured parts list, system diagrams, system configuration documentation, access to status accounting documentation and production processes, and the FA kits for the audit. The Contractor shall also ensure that appropriate personnel are available to support the PCA. The Contractor shall develop a Configuration Audit Summary Report documenting the findings of the PCA and listing actions taken to correct deficiencies. The PCA is considered complete when the Contractor has resolved all discrepancies identified during the audit.

CDRL A012: Configuration Audit Summary Report

1.7.2. Testing & Evaluation

Analysis, tests and/or demonstrations shall have already been performed on the inserted components/subsystems/software to validate that they will allow each requirement of the modernized ILS to be met or exceeded as required by this SOW and the Modernization Specification (MS). The Government may perform a verification of the Contractor’s test, analysis or demonstration documentation that supports these requirements.

1.7.2.1. Test Readiness Review

The Contractor shall schedule and conduct a Test Readiness Review (TRR) at the Contractor’s facility prior to the FA installations and Qualification Tests and Evaluations (QT&E) to ensure readiness of the kits and documentation. The success of the TRR is predicated on the Government's determination that the hardware and software baseline is stabilized, the appropriate kits are ready and available, and test plans and procedures form a satisfactory basis for

13 April 2011 10 proceeding. The Contractor shall also provide the support required for additional TRRs prior to the Qualification Operational Test and Evaluation (QOT&E) of each FA installation. It is expected that these will occur at the installation site.

1.7.2.2. Qualification Test and Evaluation

For each FA installation, the Contractor shall coordinate with the Government to establish QT&E Procedures that will be used to determine that the modernized ILS performs as is required per this SOW and the MS. This testing shall not only determine that the system operates as required but that the RMM capability appropriately alerts and diagnoses introduced faults. After each successful FA installation, the Contractor shall coordinate with the Government to perform QT&E of the modernized system in accordance with the approved QT&E Procedures. Any deficiencies found during QT&E shall be resolved by the Contractor and a retrofit of the FA installation performed. The Contractor shall perform additional QT&E of the FA installation if required after retrofit. All deficiencies found during QT&E shall be recorded and included within the QT&E Report as well as actions that were taken and changes that resulted from the deficiencies. If the deficiencies drive a change to the baseline configuration established at PCA, the Contractor shall obtain Government approval prior to performing changes. Upon approval, the Contractor shall utilize their Configuration Management Plan to update all affected documentation and retrofit any previous installations if required.

CDRL A013: QT&E Procedures CDRL A014: QT&E Report

1.7.2.3. Qualification Operational Test and Evaluation

The Contractor shall provide required support to the Government during the QOT&E of both FA installations. QOT&E shall consist of Government testing to ensure the ILS Modernization meets the requirements specified in the MS and SOW in an operational environment including FAA flight inspection. Acceptance of the FA kits and installations shall be after successful QOT&E of the modernized ILS. Any deficiencies found during QOT&E shall be resolved by the Contractor and a retrofit of the FA installation performed. The Contractor shall provide required support to the Government if additional QOT&E of the FA installation is required after retrofit.

If the deficiencies drive a change to the baseline configuration, the Contractor shall obtain Government approval prior to performing changes. Upon approval, the Contractor shall utilize their Configuration Management Plan to update all affected documentation and retrofit any previous installations if required. Government acceptance of each FA installation shall be after successful QOT&E including the FAA flight inspection performed by the Government on the modernized ILS in accordance with AFMAN 11-225 (FAA Order 8200.1B).

1.7.2.4. Functional Ground Testing of Production Systems

Immediately following the successful installation of each ILS production system, the Contractor shall perform a Functional Ground Test of the system to ensure that it functioning properly prior to flight check. The Contractor shall coordinate with the Government to establish a Functional Ground Test Procedure that will be used. If any deficiencies are found during this test, the Contractor shall resolve it and perform the testing again. Results of each Functional Ground Test

13 April 2011 11 shall be recorded and included within a Functional Ground Test Report. These reports shall include all deficiencies found during the test as well as the actions that were taken and changes that resulted from the deficiencies. If the deficiencies drive a change to the Product Baseline, the Contractor shall obtain Government approval prior to performing changes. Upon approval, the Contractor shall utilize their Configuration Management Plan to update all affected documentation and retrofit any previous installations if required. Government acceptance of each production installation shall be after successful Functional Ground Test and FAA flight inspection performed by the Government on the modernized ILS in accordance with AFMAN 11-225 (FAA Order 8200.1B).

CDRL A013: Functional Ground Test Procedures CDRL A014: Functional Ground Test Report

1.7.3. System Safety Requirements

The Contractor shall conduct a System Safety Assurance Program using MIL-STD-882D as a guideline. The Safety Assurance Program shall identify and evaluate safety risks associated with the modernization of the ILS, identify the safety requirements and risk controls applied in the design to verify the reliable implementation of safety requirements and risk controls, and to minimize risk of hazard to equipment and personnel. All documentation that comprises the System Safety Assurance Program shall be made available to the Government for review. The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications, and evaluations to ascertain conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the implementing procedures. In addition, the Contractor shall submit detailed reports specific to the ILS modernization per the CDRLs.

CDRL A015: System Safety Hazard Analysis Report CDRL A016: System Safety Program Plan (SSPP)

1.7.4. Life Cycle Management Support

The Contractor shall provide a comprehensive Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP) that details the designed service life, maintenance plan, and all sustainment elements needed to sustain the modernized ILS for the expected life of the system. Implementation of the ILSP shall allow the ILS to meet or exceed the required operational availability per the MS. The ILSP shall include but not be limited to the topics below and shall incorporate all the stated requirements.

CDRL A017: Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP)

1.7.4.1. Life Cycle Sustainment

The Contractor’s logistics plan shall be designed to minimize required spares, on-site personnel support, preventative maintenance and support equipment while maintaining the required operational availability. Using modern technology, the Contractor shall maximize the use of robust design, automated data capture, self diagnostics and the ability to control and sustain the ILS from off-site locations. For ease of maintenance and repair, the Contractor shall provide a system that maximizes the use of modular equipment with line replaceable unit (LRU) design.

13 April 2011 12

1.7.4.2. Maintenance Planning

The Contractor shall recommend system, sub-system, and LRU service life limits. The Contractor shall recommend reliability centered maintenance designed to sustain the system throughout the proposed system life cycle. The Contractor shall provide Depot Level Repair Instructions that enable a Contractor or Government maintenance activity to restore a system, sub-system, or LRU to a serviceable condition. These maintenance instructions shall include all support equipment, manpower type, unique processes/procedures/specifications, and anticipated flow-time days.

CDRL A018: Depot Level Repair Instructions

1.7.4.3. Spares

The Contractor shall develop and deliver a Provisioning Parts List (PPL) and a Proposed Spares Parts List (PSPL) that will be used to determine spare requirements. The Contractor shall deliver spare components as required by the Government upon ACO approval.

CDRL A019: Provisioning Parts List CDRL A020: Proposed Spare Parts List

1.7.4.4. Interim Contractor Support

Within the ILSP, the Contractor shall provide an Interim Contractor Support (ICS) program. The ICS program shall provide the Government with a full range of depot support services throughout the period of the contract. For additional details on the ICS effort, see the PWS.

1.7.4.5. Technical Data Package

The Contractor shall provide a Technical Data Package (TDP) which includes detailed design and interface drawings as well as any other documentation that is required to define the modernization to the ILS. The TDP shall be managed and updated IAW the Configuration Management Plan. The TDP shall accurately depict the “as built” configuration of the modernized ILS prior to acceptance and installation of any system. These drawings shall include all interface cabling and be in sufficient detail to allow the Government to reproduce or re-procure any LRU level component as well as the complete system. Parts lists shall fully describe the item and refer to the OEM part number and CAGE.

CDRL A025: Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

1.7.4.6. Technical Manuals

1.7.4.6.1. Time Compliance Technical Order

The Contractor shall develop and deliver Time Compliance Technical Order(s) (TCTO) per T.O.

00-5-15 for the ILS modernization. The Contractor shall prepare the TCTO(s) in accordance with MIL-PRF-38804. The Contractor shall refer to the Government completed AFMC Form 873 for

13 April 2011 13 requirements of this TCTO. The Contractor shall coordinate with the Government to complete and return AFMC Form 874 no later than the second Technical Data Review.

CDRL A021: Time Compliance Technical Order

1.7.4.6.2. Technical Order Updates

The Contractor shall develop and deliver updates for affected Technical Orders (TOs) per the attached Technical Manual Contractual Requirements (TMCR) document. This may include TO updates, replacement TOs if the majority of an affected TO require changes, or new TOs as may be required for added capabilities. Whatever the form of the updates, they shall fully incorporate the ILS modernization into the existing AN/GRN-29/30/31 ILS TOs. The Contractor shall support the Government’s validation/verification of the documents that will be performed per TO 00-5-3 during the FA installations.

CDRL A022: Technical Order Updates

1.7.4.7. Training

Within the ILSP, the Contractor shall provide a training program. For additional details on the Training effort, see the PWS.

CDRL A023: Training Material

1.7.4.8. Support Equipment

The Contractor shall provide a Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) which details all non-integrated test or support equipment required for the operation and maintenance of the modernized ILS. All test and support equipment shall be readily available with little to no lead-time required for procurement.

CDRL A024: Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD)

1.7.4.9. Interface Documentation

The Contractor shall provide an Interface Control Document (ICD) that accounts for all external and internal interface requirements including all hardware and software interfaces. In addition to the ICD, the Contractor shall provide copies of the actual interface information (such as drawings, diagrams, tables, and textual information) required to fully document the interface requirements of the modernization effort. The RMM portion of the interface documentation shall enable a third party software and hardware interface to utilize the RMM features from a remote location.

CDRL A026: Interface Control Document

1.8. Quality Assurance

13 April 2011 14

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a documented quality system that, as a minimum, is compliant with the requirements of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000, Quality Management Systems

– Requirements or equivalent. The quality system shall address the Contractor’s processes for ensuring quality services, documentation, hardware and software. The quality system procedures, planning, and all other documentation and data that comprise the quality system shall be made available to the Government for review. The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications, and evaluations to ascertain conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the implementing procedures. The Contractor shall provide a list of their Quality Design Standards at the kickoff meeting.

1.9. Over and Above

As required by the Government, the Contractor shall provide additional personnel support or other resources for the ILS Modernization as an over and above effort. Upon request by the Government, the Contractor shall submit a proposal for over and above efforts but no work shall be performed without approval of the ACO.

1.10. Data Requirements

1.10.1. Data Deliverables

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver complete and accurate data deliverables on schedule.

CDRL No. CDRL Title SOW Paragraph A001 Program Management Plan 1.4 A002 Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report 1.4 A003 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) 1.4.1 A004 Meeting Agenda 1.4.2 A005 Meeting Minutes 1.4.2 A006 Computer Software Product End Items 1.6.3 A007 Software Version Description (SVD) 1.6.3 A008 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) 1.7 A009 Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan 1.7.1 A010 Engineering Change Proposals 1.7.1.1 A011 Request for Deviation (RFD) 1.7.1.1 A012 Configuration Audit Summary Report 1.7.1.2 & 1.7.1.3 A013 Test Procedures

- Qualification Test and Evaluation Procedures

- Functional Ground Test Procedures

1.7.2.2 1.7.2.4

A014 Test Report

- Qualification Test and Evaluation Report

- Functional Ground Test Report

1.7.2.2 1.7.2.4

A015 System Safety Hazard Analysis Report 1.7.3 A016 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) 1.7.3 A017 Integrated Logistics Support Plan 1.7.4 A018 Depot Level Repair Instructions 1.7.4.2

13 April 2011 15

CDRL No. CDRL Title SOW Paragraph A019 Provisioning Parts List (PPL) 1.7.4.3 A020 Proposed Spare Parts List 1.7.4.3 A021 Time Compliance Technical Order 1.7.4.6.1 A022 Technical Order Updates 1.7.4.6.2 A023 Training Material 1.7.4.7 A024 Support Equipment Requirements Document (SERD) 1.7.4.8 A025 Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists 1.7.4.5 A026 Interface Control Document 1.7.4.9 A027 Site Survey Report 1.6.4.1

1.10.2. Data Rights

All Data Rights (i.e., technical and source) to the software and hardware design, developed at Government's expense, shall be conveyed to the Government. At minimum, the Government shall be granted Limited Rights to commercial data and restricted computer software or data for products developed at Contractor's expense. The Contractor may submit a Restricted Rights Notice for restricted computer software if preferred.

1.11. Security

The Contractor shall perform all activities required to meet the security requirements of DOD facilities they are required to access during the performance of this contract. The Contractor, when working in DOD facilities, shall wear identification badges on their outer garment in the chest area and abide by all rules, regulation, etc. of the DOD facility.

1.12. Travel

The Contractor shall be required to travel in support of this contract. The Government shall establish a not-to-exceed ceiling for this requirement and the Contactor shall not exceed this ceiling without prior Government consent. All travel shall be in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR) and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The Contractor shall provide documentation of their expenses and will be reimbursed at actual cost which shall not exceed the per diem rates of the JFTR. All travel by the Contractor shall be approved by the Government prior to departure.

1.13. Period of Performance

The ordering period for this contract may be up to 5 years. Contractor performance may extend past the five years to fulfill all orders.

2. Government Furnished Property

The Government shall provide the existing AN/GRN-29 ILS in a 100% operational state. The Government will also provide the required base support during installation and testing as well as FAA flight inspection. All of the existing TOs that are affected by this modernization will be provided to the Contractor in a read/print PDF format.

2. Government Furnished Property