Attach 03 PPQ.rtf

05 JUNE 2009

FA5613-08-R-0001 ATTACHMENT 03 Page 1 of 4

SECTION J: ATTACHMENT 03: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR

SOLICIATION FA5613-08-R-0001, A. F. MULTIPLE-AWARD CONSTRUCTION IDIQ

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Point of Contact: ____________________

Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _______________________________________

Contract/Task Order Number: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $____________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance: __________________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Primary Alternate

* If anyone other than the respondent prepared the answers for the substance of this questionnaire, identify that individual by name and organization:_________________________

C. HAND-DELIVER OR EMAIL THE COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE FOLLOWING 2 PERSONS:

700 CONS/LGCA, Attn: Air Force Construction IDIQ Team, Am Opelkreisel, Rhine Ordnance Barracks (ROB) Geb 164 Room 311, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

Contracting Officer:

Mr Andreas Labuniak Local Phone: 0631-536-8446 From US Phone: 011-49-631-536-8446 Email: andreas.labuniak@ramstein.af.mil" andreas.labuniak@ramstein.af.mil

Contract Specialist:

Mr Peter Atkins Local Phone: 0631-536-6399 From US Phone: 011-49-631-536-6399 Email: peter.atkins@ramstein.af.mil" peter.atkins@ramstein.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY.

SOLICIATION FA5613-08-R-0001, A. F. MULTIPLE-AWARD CONSTRUCTION IDIQ

E. Sample items to discuss would be issues such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, liquidated damages, and numerous warranty calls. Also explain how contractor exceeded standards, finished projects early, found solutions to challenging problems, etc.

PERFORMANCE RATING

DEFINITION

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.

Neutral Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACT RELEVANCY: To assist with the determination of contract relevancy please indicate below the services the contractor has performed or is performing under this contract by marking the applicable box with an “X” (using the definitions matrix above).

The contractor:

E G S M U N 1.

Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2.

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3.

Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4.

Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5.

Followed approved quality control plan.

6.

Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7.

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8.

Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9.

Identified problems as they occurred.

10.

Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11.

Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12.

Developed realistic progress schedules.

13.

Met established project schedules.

14.

Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15.

Was responsive to contract changes.

16.

Provided adequate project supervision.

17.

Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

18.

Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

19.

Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

20.

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

21. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (General Business Practices):

aa

Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay.

bb

Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested realistic approaches to problems; displayed initiative to solve problems; and performed as a “Team Member”.

cc Contractor realigned performance schedules to meet customer needs when changes occurred.

dd Contractor responded to warranty issues and provided timely resolution of warranty defects as specified in the contract.

ee Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

ff Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

gg Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

22. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Pricing):

Contractor provided complete, supportable, accurate, and reasonable cost proposals that met the requirements of the project or modification. They were not over-inflated nor were they underestimated.

Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the magnitude specified.

Contractor submitted proposals that accurately represented the work required/requested.

23. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS (Site Management/Superintendence):

Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations.

Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.

dd Contractor completed all contract work prior to requesting a final inspection. Left no major discrepancies.

24. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS:

Adequacy of Safety Plan

Implementation of Safety Plan

25.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

26.

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

27.

Is the contractor rated in CPARS?

YES/NO

Additional Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________