RFI-05-Solicitation Phase-TP.pdf
PDF 99 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Transportation/Paving IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA468624R0003
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) related to a federal contract opportunity for a Transportation/Paving Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.
The RFI provides clarification on several aspects of the solicitation, including: confirming the definition of "disciplines" in the evaluation criteria, acceptable types of contract award documentation, instructions for submitting past performance questionnaires, and whether teaming agreements should be included. It also notes that a Statement of Need/Statement of Work/Specifications is not required for Volume 3, and provides guidance on completing the cost worksheet, including instructions to use the updated version from Amendment 0002. The related federal contract opportunity is for a Transportation/Paving IDIQ with the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command, with a description of the required scope of work.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI Answer
Per Section M.5.6.1, projects are awarded points partially based on the number of disciplines they include. Please confirm that “disciplines” refer to the examples of tasks discussed in Specifications Section 1.1. Reference RFI-01-Solicitation Question 7
In Volume 3 – Relevant Experience, we are required to provide proof of contract award. The solicitation lists examples such as an FPDS-NG Car, SF 1442, SF 26, etc. However, what types of documents will be acceptable for a non-federal contract? Reference M.5.d.3
Pg. 6 Section L.3.5 Par.(a): If we deem it not necessary to include "Prime" backup documentation, reason being our contract data clearly states we were the prime and we have a narrative on Section L Experience form on #D, Will it be acceptable to leave the V5 folder empty and put N/A in the self scoring matrix under column G? Please include each of the 10 award documents in "Volume-5 Prime Contractor" for proposal continuity.
Contact: The 1442 lists Milton Vasquez, the SAM posting lists Makenna Watkins and Robert Watts. Please confirm who the final proposal should be emailed to. Please send all proposals to: makenna.watkins@us.af.mil and theodore.churchreeves@us.af.mil
Past Performance Questionnaires require allows contractors two choices either CPARs or the USAF PPQ (amendment 0002) “4.+VOL+4-PAST+PERFORMANCE-Last+4+Contract+Number-Company.” Is it permissible to utilize and submit as an appropriate submission, a third choice, via the NAVFAC/USACE Form PPQ-0?
NAVFAC/USACE forms with ratings provided for Quality, Schedule, Customer Satisfaction, Management, Financial Management, Safety, and General sections will be accepted.
The USAF PPQ (amendment 0002) “4.+VOL+4-PAST+PERFORMANCE-Last+4+Contract+Number-Company,” states for the client of each form filled out to email makenna.watkins@us.af.mil and 9CONS.LGCA.Construction@us.af.mil. Is this direction on the form required, or is the contractor to just include this into the proposal to streamline paperwork, and not have our clients email directly to the government?
This direction was to ensure contractors' clients had a direct POC to streamline paperwork or ask clarifying questions.
Please ensure all PPQ documentations are submitted with the final proposal.
Section M (M.5.b.1) (M.5.b.3). The evaluation mentions JVs and Partnership agreements. For classification is a teaming agreement considered a partnership? If so, is the government seeking an executed teaming agreement to be included in the proposal submission?
Yes, a teaming agreement/partnership is a specific contractual arrangement between two or more contractors to collaborate on a particular government contract opportunity. It outlines the roles, responsibilities, and obligations of each party in pursuing the contract.
Section M (M.5.b.1) (M.5.b.3). If executed teaming agreements are required to be submitted with the proposal, please advise if the Form GSA 527 Financials for our teaming agreement company is required to be submitted with the proposal? Reference L.3.2.a-b
Amendment 0001 Q/A No.5 states a DoD Link is an acceptable delivery for this proposal (due to folder categories required). Can the government provide the DoD link for submission, so the contactor can upload folder and files? DoD links are one-time use, if you need a link for submittal, email makenna.watkins@us.af.mil
The Document Verification Checklist – Volume 3 documents lists “Statement of Need, Statement of Work, or Specifications provided” as the second of 3 bullet points, however in Section L3.3(a) of the solicitation there are only 2 bullet points and does not include the SON/SOW/Specs requirement. Please clarify if the submission of SON/SOW/Specs is a requirement for Volume 3. SON/SOW/Specs is not a requirement for Volume 3 and will be removed from the Document Verification Checklist.
In the Cost Worksheet, please confirm that the only items we are required to enter are the hourly rates, overhead rate, and bond rate. Reference RFI-01 Question #8 and RFI-02 #5
In the Cost Worksheet, the tab entitled “Sheet1” does not include a line for profit, but the “EXAMPLE” tab does include a line for profit. Please clarify if profit should be listed separately, or if it should be included in our overhead rate. Reference updated cost worksheet from amendment 0002
Transportation and Paving IDIQ- Beale AFB
FA468624R0003
RFI's - 5.08.24
RFI's 4.29.24
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .