Atch_21_RFI_Log_B861_July_11.pdf

RFI No. Date Received Question / Comment SME Response Publish

Action

R0001 26‐Jun‐18

The SF1442 & Proposal Checklist has conflicting due dates and RFI submission dates.

Revised Propsal checklist to match the dates of the

SF1442

13‐Jul‐18

R0002 27‐Jun‐18

There are several references to SBA 8(a) certification in the documents, though

FBO lists the project as a Total Small

Business Set‐Aside. Can you please clarify if this solicitation is intended to be an 8(a) Set‐Aside, or if it is Total Small

Business?

This is a Total Small Business

Set‐Aside 13‐Jul‐18

R0003 5‐Jul‐18

SF 1442 Section 13.A states the proposal is due at 1:00 PM July 25, 2018.

Attachment 20‐Proposal Checklist originally stated the proposal is due at

1:00 PM July 29, 2018 (this is a Sunday).

Amendment 2 revised the proposal checklist and omitted the proposal due information. Please clarify what the proposal due date is.

The proposals are due at

1:00 PM July 25, 2018.

13‐Jul‐18

R0004 9‐Jul‐18

Are CAD files available for the building? If so, could you please provide so that they can be utilized for our technical proposal?

Yes, CAD files are available 13‐Jul‐18

R0005 9‐Jul‐18

Please clarify as to whether the

Superintendent can also perform the duties of the SSHO.

Please refer to FAR 52.236‐

6 ‐‐ Superintendence by the

Contractor

13‐Jul‐18

R0006 9‐Jul‐18

Please clarify as to whether the

Superintendent can also perform the duties of the Quality Control Manager or if a QC Manager is required with no other duties.

Please refer to FAR 52.246‐

12‐‐ Inspection of

Contarction

13‐Jul‐18

R0007 9‐Jul‐18 Please clarify as to whether this project sales tax exempt?

Yes, this is sales tax exempt 13‐Jul‐18

R0008 9‐Jul‐18

Attachment 20 – Proposal Checklist states that Blocks 30A, 30B and 30C should be filled out for the proposal. Should these blocks be filled out for the proposal or by the successful offeror at award, please clarify.

These are to be filled in, signed and dated when submitting your proposal.

Also, must check block 28.

13‐Jul‐18

R0009 9‐Jul‐18 Will the past performance questionnaires be due at the site meeting or with the bid

Past Performance

Questionnaires will be due with the proposal

13‐Jul‐18

Request for Information (RFI) Subject Matter Expert

R0010 10‐Jul‐18

Paragraph 2 for the Pre‐Phase Section in the Scope of Work states the contractor needs to perform an analysis of the exterior walls to determine the extent of termite damage. There is already such a report in the bid package complied by

KDG. Is the contractor expected to do a second analysis as a part of their scope?

The report provided identifies the areas that have termite damage and an idea of the severity but the overall scope of the damage is somewhat unknown. Per the

“Proposed Solution Report” section, page 2 “Exterior

Façade Repairs” – “Remove the existing faux brick, sheathing, batt insulation, all damaged sill plates and wood stud wall framing on framing on all exterior walls.” The contractor does

NOT need to do a second analysis but should bid according to the information provided in the report.

13‐Jul‐18

R0011 10‐Jul‐18

Section Detail 4, Sheet A4‐1 calls for the contractor to assume that 25% of the exterior wall studs will be replaced due to termite damage. However the individual removal sheets designated certain areas where this applies (Keyed Note 9.2).

Which applies, the entire perimeter or just the designated sections?

Assume 25% replacement of the entire perimeter wall studs.

13‐Jul‐18

R0012 10‐Jul‐18 What code is to be used on the project

2015 or 2018 IBC?

2015 13‐Jul‐18

R0013 10‐Jul‐18

On page A3‐1 of the solicitation key note states “For bidding purposes contractor shall assume in base bid replacement of approximately 25% of all exterior 2X6 wall studs due to existing damage as required”. Shall the design and construction assume all interior finishes in affected rooms be replaced with like kind finishes?

yes 13‐Jul‐18

R0014 10‐Jul‐18

How is the contractor to address the code required threshold for full building refit for seismic if reached?

R0015 10‐Jul‐18

Per the termite damage/ structural integrity assessment it appears that windows and door openings are compromised. If an exterior window or door must be fully removed this would trigger under UFC 4‐010‐01, AT/FP compliant windows and doors with supporting structural frame work to meet the criteria. Confirm how may openings of each window and door conditions are to be anticipated in the base bid.

Per the “Proposed Solution

Report” section, page 2

“Exterior Façade Repairs” –

“Removal of the existing windows or doors will be determined by the extent of damage to the window or door opening framing.”

Without extensive demolition the exact number of windows and doors to be replaced in unknown. For bidding purposes assume 3 single doors, 5 double doors and

20 windows.

13‐Jul‐18

R0016 10‐Jul‐18 What is the Seismic Site Class for this building location?

R0017 10‐Jul‐18 What is the Seismic Risk Category for the building?

Comment: Seismic Site

Class and Seismic Risk

Category, along with location, will dictate Seismic

Design Category. This in turn will dictate per IEBC whether the project is excepted from seismic evaluation and repair.

Reference IEBC 606.2.2, exception 1.

13‐Jul‐18