Vance RFP Questions 2 Mar 07
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 1 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 11.1.6 | 11.1.1 | none |
Discussion "A qualified Certified Barrier Maintenance personnel shall be on duty when the Airfield is open." (sic) Regardless of the fact that we were unable to find a notation that establishes set hours of operation for the airfield, if AETC reqires the Ai.rfield to be opened at abnormal hours for whatever reason, we would need to call-out a qualified CBM.
| Question | | | | | |
| A) What are the establishe dhours of operation for the Airfield? B) How frequently has the Command opened the Airfield outside of these established | | | | | |
| hours of operation over the last year? Three years? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 2 | Technical | Operations and | 11-1-1 and 11-1- | 11.1.1 | 11.2.14, 19.1.4, 13.1.9.3 |
| Maintenance | | | | | |
Discussion There is a considerable amount of time, space and detail in the discussion of responsibilities incumbant upon the Contractor in the perfromance of work relating to MFH. However, during the site visit (end of day 1) a question dealing with the status of MFH was responded to with an expression of assurance the MFH woiuld already be transfered to a private contractor by the time this contract start date is reached.
| Question | |
| If MFH will be in the transferred under the privitization program, whould we proceed to take the MFH requirements seriously? Why is it still part of | |
| the RFP? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 1 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 3 | Technical | Operations and | 11.1.4 | 11.2.8.1 | none |
| Maintenance | | | | | |
Discussion In the preceeding setion, the RFP clearly defines RWP as being the Recurring Work Program. However, when the IWP Programmer/scheduler is introduced in this section, the acronym "IWP" appears parantheically, but without any defining explanation.
| Question | | | | | |
| What does IWP stand for in this context? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 4 | Technical | Custodial | 19-1-1 | 19.1 | All Custodial manpower CLINS |
Discussion "The Contractor shall provied all.........services (custodial) ....as identified below for Vance AFB inaccordance with Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) commercila standards."
| Question | |
| BOMA commercial standards set a range of square footage per man-hour of labor, within which performance of custodial duties is to be targeted and | |
| achieved in order to produce results in keeping with other BOMA standards. Is this the intended meaning of the RFP language? Should we calculate all | |
| labor and productivity rates in accordance with this BOMA standard? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 2 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 5 | Technical | Ground and Site | 13-1-6 | 13.1.9.9 | All Military Family Housing. |
| Maintenance | | | | | |
Discussion The Contractor is required to pick up trash in the MFH areas.
| Question | | | | | |
| Will this requirement continue even after the MFH area is privatized? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 6 | Technical | Communications and | 7/1/2026 | 7.1.17.6.1 | Video Services |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion Paragraph states provide editing….
| Question | | | | | |
| What video editing software is used? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 7 | Technical | Communications and | 7/1/2026 | 7.1.17.5.5.9 | VTC Services |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion Provide Video telecommunication Conf. (VTC) services
| Question | |
| Are there any classified conf., if so, how many per year? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 3 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 8 | Technical | Communications and | 7/1/2001 | 7.1. | Description of Services |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion In the Vance AFB Site Visit folder under BITS it states that the service provider will maintain the mail delivery van (MDV)
| Question | | | | | |
| Will the government provide vehicles in support of this contract? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 9 | Technical | Communications and | 131 of 136 | 5.5.4.3 | Evaluation Criteria |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion Paragraph currently reads: “The effectiveness of the Offeror’s approach and methodology to meet cyclic and unique situations including the ability to meet peak workloads; overlapping or simultaneous taskings at Vance AFB such as weather to include high winds, lightning, hail and tornadoes priority transient alert support; plastic media blast for other organizations; base exercises; aging fleet; aircraft deicing; quiet hours; and increased off-station aircraft recovery.”
| Question | |
| The items “priority transient alert support; plastic media blast for other organizations;” and “aging fleet; aircraft deicing; quiet hours; and increased off- | |
| station aircraft recovery.” Have nothing to do with Communications and Information Technology. Were these items included in the referenced | |
| evaluation criteria by mistake? If intentional, please clarify their relevance to Comm & IT. | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 4 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 10 | Technical | Communications and | 7/1/2001 | 7.1. | Description of Services |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion In the Vance AFB Site Visit folder under Web Page Development/Design it states that the service provider will maintain Vance's Web site & Train.
There is no workload and description of this requirement in the RFP.
| Question | | | | |
| If there is a requirement please provide scope and workload data. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 11 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | Section L, Page | L-3.2.4.3; PWS |
| 3.1.26.3 | | | | |
Discussion Para. L-3.2.4.3 indicates that the contractor will perform plastic media blasting (PMB) "for other organizations (some unscheduled structural repairs)."
PWS Para 3.1.26.3 indicates PMB for stripping Vance aircraft will be performed at a facility away from Vance. PMB capabilities noted during the site visit were a cabinet unit in Structural Repair and an AGE paint stripping facility (Building 119). We assume these could be used in support of other organizations through local manufacturing procedures.
| Question | |
| Request the Government clarify the PMB support requirements for other organizations. | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 5 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 12 | Technical | Communications and | 7-3-1 | 7.3.1.2 | |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion The MCCC Reengineering in the Air Force and AETC is in various stages at different bases.
| Question | | | | |
| What is the status of the reengineering effort at VAFB? If it is not complete, does our staffing need to reflect an assumption that the reengineering will | | | | |
| be complete at CSD? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 13 | Technical | Communications and | 7-B-2 | 1.2.1.5 |
| Information Technology | | | | |
Discussion The PWS equipment list indicates hubs throughout the network. During the visit, old and outdated hubs were seen to be in use.
| Question | |
| What is the timeline for replacing the bubs with switches? Who will be responsible for their installation and initial configuration? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 6 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 14 | Technical | Communications and | 7B-24 | 1.2.1.8 | |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion Our experience shows that the CSA workload for an Operations Group is much higher than that listed in the workload.
| Question | | | | |
| Do the levels of workload indicate that there is a shared CSA responsibility in the Operations Group and Mission Support Group between the service | | | | |
| provider and government/military personnel? How many Civilian and Military CSAs are currently providing CSA support to these areas? If this is a | | | | |
| new requirement, how many military and Govt employees will also be providing CSA support to OG and MSG? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 15 | Technical | Communications and | 7-B-1 thru 7-B- | Entire Doc |
| Information Technology | | | | |
Discussion The workload provided in Appendix 7B seems limited and incomplete.
| Question | |
| Are there any cable locates for the Telephone Maintenance area? Is there any web services management workload | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 7 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 16 | Technical | Communications and | CBA | | |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion Within the CBA, (June 12, 2006 – Jun 7, 2009), there is no mention of Information Assurance or ADPE Equipment Control Officer duties within the job descriptions. Each of these areas has workload associated with them in the draft RFP.
| Question | | |
| Are IA personnel and those providing Wing ECO duties not covered under the CBA? Is so, what are there general | | |
| Response | | |
| 17 | Technical | Communications and |
| Information Technology | | |
Discussion It was apparent during the site visit that the Professional Staff of Civil Engineering use software to assist in the design of projects. (Software programs like AutoCad, etc.)
| Question | |
| Since this software is on equipment provided by the Air Force, will the software transfer to the service provider Contractor awarded the follow-on | |
| contract? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 8 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 18 | Technical | Operations and | 11-1-1, 11-1-7, | First | O& M "This service shall support |
| Maintenance | ….to include military family housing | | | | |
| …. &…Airfield." Military Famil | | | | | |
Discussion The items listed to the left are examples of the MFH requirements. At the site visit the attendees were informed that a MFH privatization contractor was in the process of being selected. It would seem prudent to delete this requirement prior to submission of our techanical and price proposals due to the myriad of tasks that are woven throughout these two sections as well as Section 10. Should these requirements not be removed it will cause considerable revision of both volumes.
| Question | | |
| At what point in the proposal process will the government remove the MFH requirements? | | |
| Response | | |
| 19 | Technical | Engineering Services |
Discussion It was apparent during the site visit that the Professional Staff of Civil Engineering use software to assist in the design of projects. (Software programs like AutoCad, etc.)
| Question | |
| Since this software is on equipment provided by the Air Force, will the software transfer to the service provider Contractor awarded the follow-on | |
| contract? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 9 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 20 | Technical | Communications and | | | |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion During the site visit to VAFB it was apparent that a multitude of different software applications were being utilized by contractor personnel.
| Question | | |
| What are the specific GFE commercial software programs that are installed on the various computers at VAFB for which the contractor is expected to | | |
| provide support, training, and maintenance services? | | |
| Response | | |
| 21 | Technical | Communications and |
| Information Technology | | |
Discussion During the site visit to VAFB it was apparent that a multitude of different software applications were being utilized by contractor personnel.
| Question | |
| What is the specific document management software program that is being used by VAFB to electronically manage Air Force and VAFB publications | |
| and forms? Is this software program GFE and is it desired by VAFB to continue being used? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 10 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 22 | Technical | Communications and | | | |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion During the site visit to VAFB it was apparent that a multitude of different software applications were being utilized by contractor personnel.
| Question | | |
| What is the specific software program(s) that are used at VAFB to manage the Web Development function? Is this software program GFE and is it | | |
| desired by VAFB to continue being used? | | |
| Response | | |
| 23 | Technical | Engineering Services |
Discussion Process of aquiring construction projects for the Civil Engineer construction programs. During the site visit on 21 Feb, it was noticed that in the Local purchase area of the current service contractor’s area a function was identified as construction.
| Question | |
| Are Civil Engineering construction projects advertised with bids received and awarded through the government procurement office or the service | |
| provider's procurement office? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 11 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 24 | Technical | Communications and | Page 5 of 136 of | CLIN Schedule B 0019 and Sub | |
| Information Technology | CLINS and PWS 7 | | | | |
Discussion The Para # in the PWS do not match up to the CLINS for Pricing except for 0019AB. 0019AD reference now states reserved and not assigend to Web Services Management. PWS does not have Para 7.1.3 any more it is 7.1.3.a and 7.1.3.b which conflicts with CLIN 001
| Question | | | | |
| What are the correct PWS refrences for each SUB CLIN under 0019 and option years? This is needed for correct pricing. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 25 | Technical | Communications and | 7B-26 and 27 | 1.3.5 thru 1.3.7 |
| Information Technology | | | | |
Discussion Appendix 7B is missing Para 1.3.6 which appears to be Web Services
| Question | |
| Where is Para 1.3.6? Should it be Web Services Work load data? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 12 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 26 | General | 1 of 136 to 136 | Complete SOL doc | | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion The SOL document posted is password protected
| Question | | | | |
| Will you unlock the SOL document for our use in preparing SF 33 and Schedule B? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 27 | Technical | Communications and | Page 5 of 136 | CLIN Schedule CLINS 0020 and 0021 |
| Information Technology | | | | |
Discussion PWS Para reference states only PWS 7 for both and does not drill down to individual Para levles
| Question | | | | |
| What are the correct PWS Para referenced for CLIN 0020 and 0021 and option years to provide correct staffing for each CLIN? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 28 | Technical | Operations and | Page 3 of 136 | CLIN Schedule 0007 |
| Maintenance | | | | |
Discussion PWS para reference 17.1.3.10 does not exist
| Question | |
| What is the correct Para reference so appropiate staffing is associated to CLIN 007 and option years? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 13 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 29 | Technical | Ground and Site | Appendix 13B | Appendix 13 B | |
| Maintenance | | | | | |
Discussion Pest Management was added to Section 13 between Draft and Final. In the Draft it was under PWS 16. No workload date was transferred to Section 13 or Attachment 13-B
| Question | | | | |
| What is the workload for Pest Management under PWS 13? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 30 | General | Applicable to all | N/A | Unknown |
| Contracting | Services | | | |
Discussion Numerous deadlines for various requriements are connected to "Contract Award Date" and "Pre-Performance Conference". Several documents and actions are driven by the pre-performance conference and the contract award dates.
| Question | |
| Can you give estimated dates for Contract Award Date and Pre-Performance Conference based on the 12 Feb 07 final RFP release date? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 14 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 31 | Technical | Applicable to All | 100 of 136 | 1.12 | |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion Technical reference excludes manpower matrices from the page count. Due to limits we request justification be handled the same..
| Question | | | | |
| Request required justification for manning matrices be excluded from required page count. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 32 | Technical | Housing Management | Section 10 | 10/1/2001 |
Discussion Current PWS contains no reference to housing privatization. During Site Visit this topic was addressed and comments indicated privatization would occur prior to contract award or start.
| Question | |
| Please clarify how you want contractors to address housing PWS and impact of privatization? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 15 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 33 | Price | Applicable to All | 8-9 of 136, 26-1-2 | Section B and | |
| Services | 26.1.1.11 | | | | |
Discussion Would like clarification regarding estimates provided for CLINs 0037, 0038, and 0039.
| Question | | | | |
| Does 26.1.1.11 apply to the amounts listed in CLIN 0037, 0038, and 0039? If a contractor utilizes a total-cost input method for computation of G&A, | | | | |
| this calculation could force a contractor into a violation of CAS 9904-401.40, 50, and 61. Please clarify | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 34 | Technical | Applicable to All | RFP Section L | Paragraph 1.8 |
| Services | | | | |
Discussion Reference provides a matrix for submission of Volume 3 Sub-factor 3 information. This information/data is essentually the same for Civil Eng, Logistics and Communication sections. The response/data will essentually be the same in each of the 3 sections
| Question | |
| Within Vol 3, will the government accept a full outline in the Civil Engineering Section and allow the Logistic and Communication sections to reference | |
| back to it where the data is the same? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 16 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 35 | Technical | Fire Protection | Appendix 18FB | N/A | |
Discussion Draft RFP listed essential mission critical equipment such as fire hoses, radios, and fire extinguishers in Appendix 18F. The final RFP does not list this equipment
| Question | | | | |
| Can the government clarify what GFE is provided for the fire department? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 36 | Technical | Fire Protection | Appendix 18FB | N/A |
Discussion Drfat RFP listed essential equipment in appendix 18F that is not included in final RFP.
| Question | |
| Will government provide a detailed listing of all PPE, HAZMAT, Rescue and other standard furnishings of those vehicles identified in Appendix 18 | |
| FF? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 17 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 37 | Technical | Fire Protection | Appendix 18FB | N/A | |
Discussion Draft RFP Appendix 18F listed essential equipment provided such as fire extinguishers. Final draft does not list them.
| Question | | | | |
| Does the Fire Department have the responsibility for all facility fire extinguishers on the installation including MFH? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 38 | Technical | Community Services | 28-1-13 | 28.1.19.10 |
Discussion Reference requires Service Provider to provide a conveniently located control point for linen exchange.
| Question | | | | |
| Will the Service Provider be able to use a government provided facility for this service? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 39 | Technical | Communications and | Section 7 | PWS Section 2, |
| Information Technology | page 2-1-18 | | | |
Discussion PWS requires contractor to provide support for a "QMIS Server" on page 7B-13
| Question | |
| Is this the same "SMART" application requirement that PWS calls out in Paragraph 2.1.23.7.2? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 18 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 40 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2/1/2017 | 2.1.23.2.12 | 25.1.4.3 |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion During the site visit, we observed numerous Contractor Owned vehicles. The current contract required that Government furnished vehicles be replaced by registration number during assigned fiscal years.
| Question | | | | | |
| Will the Government provide the offerors a list of vehicles replaced by the imcumbent contractor and the years they were replaced? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 41 | Technical | Transportation | 25-1-4 | 25.1.4.3 | Current Contract |
Discussion Referenced paragraph requires that the contractor provide vehicles required to perform the requirements listed in the PWS. During the site visit, we observed numerous contractor-furnished vehicles being operated to meet requirements. Some of these vehicles looked new and having numerous years of service left.
| Question | |
| Is the incumbent contractor going to be allowed to use those vehicles in serviceable condition and having years of service left. Or will the incumbent | |
| contractor also be required to purchse new vehicles for this contract to make it a :level playing field?" | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 19 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 42 | Technical | Transportation | 25FF-1 | Appendix 25FF, | Appendix 25FA |
| Paragraphs 1 and 3 | | | | | |
Discussion Referenced paragraphs require that the contractor replace vehicles as necessary during the life of the contract. The contractor is also responsible for maintaining these vehicles in a serviceable condition.
| Question | | | | | |
| Will the contractor be allowed to perform maintenance on contractor-furnished vehicles in the vehicle maintenance facility (Bldg. 293) or must the | | | | | |
| maintenance be performed in an off-base facility? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 43 | Technical | Transportation | 25FF-1 | Appendix 25FF | 25.1.4.3 |
Discussion During the site visit, we observed numerous carts of various sizes being driven by the incumbent contractor. However, they are not listed in the PWS.
| Question | |
| Are these carts maintained by the incumbent contractor and when they are no longer serviceable, who replaces them? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 20 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 44 | Technical | Communications and | Page 5 of 136 of | CLIN Scheule B 0019 and Sub CLINS | |
| Information Technology | and PWS 7 | | | | |
Discussion The Para # in the PWS do match up to the CLINS for Pricing except for 0019AB. 0019AD reference now states reserved and not assigend to Web Services Management. PWS does not have Para 7.1.3 any more it is 7.1.3.a and 7.1.3.b which conflicts with CLIN 0019AC and AE
| Question | | | | |
| What are the correct PWS refrences for each SUB CLIN under 0019 and option years? This is needed for correct pricing. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 45 | Technical | Engineering Services | 15-1-1 | 15-1 |
Discussion The statement is that CADD (Computer Aided Design and Drafting) be used in all designs.
| Question | |
| Is there a specific software program that the installation or AETC requires to be used? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 21 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 46 | Technical | Engineering Services | 15-1-2 | 15.1.1.1.6 | |
Discussion : Paragraph identifies the requirement to attend meetings conducted by the local community.
| Question | | | | |
| many or what are the frequency of the local community meetings? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 47 | Technical | Engineering Services | 15-2 | 15.2 |
Discussion The performance threshold for suspense’s to be excellent is to be answered prior to six days of the due date. Anticipation is that there will be many suspense’s that will have due dates shorter than six days.
| Question | |
| How will the suspense’s with times that will not enable meeting the Outstanding threshold be handled for this performance standard? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 22 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 48 | Technical | Engineering Services | 15-2 | 15.2 | |
Discussion This performance standard identifies an amount to be designed to be considered as Outstanding. There will be occasions where to support the mission that a far larger program will be required.
| Question | | | | |
| What is the precept of consideration for this increase in service provided (cost). | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 49 | Technical | Engineering Services | 15-D-1 | 15-D |
Discussion Under the column heading ‘Date Due” for the studies and plans, there are several entries with the word “Annual” as the due date.
| Question | |
| What is the next due date for this plans and studies after 1 April 2008? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 23 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 50 | General | 109 | 3.5.4 | | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion A consistent change throughout the new RFP, compared to the Draft FRP, is that the Basic Year FY08 annual hours per employee changed from 2,096 by 50% to 1,048. This change appears several times in the new RFP but not in paragraph 3.5.4.
| Question | | | | | |
| Are the Basic Year FY08 annual hours per employee shown in paragraph 3.5.4 correct or incorrect? Shouldn’t they be 1,048 to align with the rest of | | | | | |
| the RFP? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 51 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-1-16 | 2.1.23.2.1 | 2.3.2.6 |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion This paragraph states that the service provider shall furnish commercial source items that can be procured by the general public. There are items used in aircraft maintenance, such as engine oil, sealants, etc. that although NSN listed and MIL-Spec’d can be purchased by the general public through the same vendors that the USAF purchase the items. It is our understanding that all products used on aircraft need to be procured through the standard supply system to ensure mil-spec conformance.
| Question | |
| Are items that are procured for use on aircraft excluded from this requirement and ordered solely through SBSS, or the Government IMPAC program? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 24 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 52 | Technical | Communications and | Appendix 7B | 7B-23 | C&I Training Operations Table |
| Information Technology | | | | | |
Discussion “COE component training classes.” This section has a quantity of 14 days and a frequency of weekly with duration of 114 hours.
| Question | | | | | |
| Is the assumption correct that 2 week training is held every week (overlapping of course) or is the frequency supposed to be Bi-Monthly or Monthly? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 53 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-1-17 | 2.1.23.2.12.2 | 2.3.3.3 |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion Paragraph 2.1.23.2.12.2 states that the Service Provider shall provide fuel, oil and lubricants for all service provider vehicles. Paragraph 2.3.3.3 states that the Government will provide gasoline or diesel fuel for Government provided, and service provider vehicles. This paragraph goes on to state that VIL point-of-sale keys are used to preclude their use in support of vehicles not listed in Appendix FF of each section and service provider vehicles not purchased as replacement for these vehicles. Appendix FF lists only 17 special purpose vehicles that are to be provided by the Government. There are many general purpose vehicles that will be required to be procured by the Service Provider specifically execute the contract.
| Question | |
| Is it the intent of this PWS that the Service Provider will be required to provide all fuel, oil, and lubricants for its fleet of Service Provider vehicles | |
| unless they are replacements for the 17 vehicles listed in Appendex FF? or Is the intent that the Service Provider will provide oil and lubricants and | |
| the Government will provide Fuel for the Service Providers vehicle fleet? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 25 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 54 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-1-18 | 2.1.23.7.1 | |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion This paragraph was added to this PWS revision that introduces the Systematic Management and Reporting Tool (SMART)
| Question | | | | |
| Is this a USAF or AETC standard program that will be furnished by the Government, or is this a concept that the Service Provider will have to develop | | | | |
| to meet the requirements that were added in Paragraphs 2.1.23.7.1 thru 2.1.23.7.13? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 55 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-3-2 | 2.3.2.4 |
| Services | | | | |
Discussion This paragraph states that the Government will maintain and repair equipment leased/rented by the Government, and provided to the service provider…
| Question | |
| Is there a listing of equipment that will be leased/rented by the Government and provided to the service provider | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 26 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 56 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-2 | | |
Discussion This paragraph states that AFI 21-101 references other AFI’s and Directives, that will be complied with to the maximum extent practical to perform the required services for aircraft maintenance. There are several directives referenced in AFI 21-101 that are not listed in Appendix 3A, Applicable Publications.
| Question | | | | |
| Based on para 3.1.1.3.2, do we assume that directives referenced in AFI 21-101, but not listed in Appendix 3A are to be considered advisory | | | | |
| publications and followed to the “maximum extent practical” to accomplish the requirements of the PWS, but are not mandatory publications? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 57 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-3 | 3.1.1.4.9 |
Discussion This paragraph requires the Service Provider to support any assessment, inspection, exercise, deployment, static display, flyover, incentive flight, open house (airshow), Medical Air Evac, ROTC orientation flight, Civilian Fly-in, or change of Command Ceremony, that involves aircraft and/or maintenance resources. It goes on to state that these events may occur on weekends, or holidays, and the cost associated with these events shall be included in the Target Cost.
| Question | |
| Does the workload data specified in paragraph 3BB.2.0 (680 Man-Hours) account for all main-hours expended in support of this paragraph? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 27 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 58 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-19 | 3.1.22.17.1 | AETCI 21-105 |
Discussion This paragraph requires the service provider to provide the monthly logistics indicators report to the Government QAE NLT the fifth calendar day of the next month. This requirement conflicts with the guidance for this report contained in AETCI 21-105. IAW AETCI 21-105, the Logistics indicator data spreadsheet is due by the 7th Calendar day of the next month and the Narratives and Senior Leader’s Comments are due by the 10th Calendar day of the next month.
| Question | | | | |
| Was the citing of the 5th calendar day for submission of the monthly logistics indicators report a mistake in the PWS, and should we consider AETCI | | | | |
| 21-105 the guiding directive for the report? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 59 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-34 | 3.1.27.2.8 |
Discussion This paragraph requires management of courtesy-stored assets to be included in the self-inspection program for the Munitions Storage Area (MSA).
| Question | |
| How much courtesy-stored munitions assets are currently stored in the MSA? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 28 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 60 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-35 | 3.1.27.3 | Para 3.1.27.3.1, para3.1.27.6.12, |
| Appendix 3E, Appendix 3FG.1.8, | | | | | |
| Appendix 3I | | | | | |
Discussion It is unclear who, or what agency is intended to fulfill the Munitions Accountable Systems Officer (MASO) responsibilities. The wording in paragraph
3.1.27.3 leads us to believe the MASO is someone other than the Service Provider. For example: para 3.1.27.3.1 states, “The service provider shall:
…Perform those functions that are delegated by the MASO”; para 3.1.27.3.6 states, “The service provider shall: …Forward all count sheets and computer listings to the MASO”; para 3.1.27.6.12 states, “Any changes to the existing method must be approved by the MASO/Chief QA prior to implementation.”
| Question | | | | |
| Who is the MASO? Are MASO responsibilities accomplished by the Government or Service Provider? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 61 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-2-2 | Note B |
Discussion This paragraphs states that: …Fleet time shall not be less than 150 hours for the T-6 …for more than two (2) consecutive or three (3) total months in any contract period. The acceptable Fleet time range for the T-6 is 150 ±10 hours (140 to 160 hours).
| Question | |
| Shouldn’t this read, “Fleet time shall not be less than 125 hours…..? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 29 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 62 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3A-2 | Table 3A.1 | PWS Section 2-1, paragraph 2.1.7 |
Discussion Table 3A.1 lists AFI 91-301, Air Force Occupational and Environmental Safety, Fire Prevention and Health (AFOSH) Program, and AFI 91-302, Air Force Occupational and Environmental Safety, Fire Prevention and Health (AFOSH) Standards, as mandatory publications. Paragraph 2.1.7, however, states that: “The service provider shall establish a safety program for employees IAW OSHA standards. Service provider shall not be required to comply with AFOSH standards except as needed to protect AF resources (facilities to include hangars and industrial areas, equipment, and AF personnel). For flight line operations the service provider shall comply with AFOSH STD 91-100, Aircraft Flight line – Ground Operations and Activities.
| Question | | | | |
| Should AFI 91-301 and AFI 91-302 be listed as “advisory publications”, and applicable only as they pertain to protection of AF resources? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 64 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-1-16 | 2.1.23.2.5 |
| Services | | | | |
Discussion This paragraph states that the Service Provider shall provide all user maintenance for the care, and/or upkeep of all Government-furnished office equipment. According to past practice, the Government provides normal upgrade of furnished ADPE equipment and parts required to repair furnished ADPE (i.e. hard drives, memory sticks, motherboards, power supplies etc.).
| Question | |
| Does this requirement extend to the parts required to repair or normal upgrade of Government furnished ADPE? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 30 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 65 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-2 | 3.1.1.4.1 | |
Discussion This paragraph requires the Service Provider to perform aircraft maintenance operations support (organizational level) for T-1, T-6, and T-38 aircraft at Woodring Regional airport in Enid, Oklahoma and Kegelmen auxiliary field in Jet, Oklahoma as part of every day activities—not considered off-station recoveries.
| Question | | | | |
| What are the average annual number of maintenance recoveries accomplished at Woodring Renional and Kegelman Aux Field? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 66 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-5 | 3.1.3.4.3 |
Discussion This paragraph states: Cross-country and deployment aircraft will be launched, normally on Friday and occasionally on Saturday and Sunday. Cross-country recovery will normally be accomplished on Sunday and occasionally on Saturday or holidays. Cost shall be included in Target Cost.
| Question | |
| Would the Government provide an estimate of how many Saturdays and holidays annually the service provider should be prepared to launch cross- | |
| country and deployed aircraft and recover cross-country aircraft? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 31 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 67 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-19 | 3.1.22.15.2 | Appendix 3FB-Luke |
Discussion This paragraph states: “The command has pre-positioned equipment to include a trailer (see Appendix 3FB-Luke) at Luke AFB, AZ to reduce transit time to and from Vance AFB. The service provider shall provide a vehicle capable of safely towing the Government provided trailer with equipment.”
| Question | | | | |
| What is the configuration and capacity of the 24 foot trailer listed in appendix 3FB-Luke (goose-neck, enclosed, open, ramps, weight capacity)? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 68 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3FBL-1 | 3FBL.1 |
Discussion The listing of equipment stored at Luke AFB shows T-38 equipment, but does not list any equipment for T-1 or T-6 equipment.
| Question | |
| Is the Government planning to pre-position T-6 or T-1 equipment (provided by their respective COMBS) at Luke AFB? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 32 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 69 | General | CBA, pages 47- | Article 23.1 | | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion The CBA contains unusual criteria concerning pay, in that it identifies minimum and maximum wage rate ranges.
| Question | | | |
| Since union wage rates are typically tied to seniority, in an effort to ensure reasonable wage rate estimates for personnel currently on the program, | | | |
| would the Government provide a seniority listing? | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 70 | Price | 99 | 1.10 |
Discussion Subcontractors who will perform more than 20% of the work shall provide their price/cost proposal to the prime contractor for inclusion in Volume V, in a sealed package, if desired.
| Question | |
| Is it the Government’s intent to include major subs price/cost proposal in the Prime Contractor’s Volume V (Past Performance)? Should major subs | |
| instead include their price/cost proposal in the Prime Contractor’s Volume VI (a) and/or (b)? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 33 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 71 | General | 81 | Section I | DFAR Clause 252.211-7003 | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion Department of Defense Instruction 5000.64 mandates that the following tangible items are marked with an item unique identifier (UID):Items with an acquisition cost of over $5,000; tems that are currently serially managed; Items that are sensitive or classified;Property that is furnished to third parties, particularly U.S. Government contractors.
| Question | | | |
| (a) Is the Vance services contract already compliant with UID? (b) Will any additional equipment be required by the contractor?(c) Will the | | | |
| Government include a CLIN for UID cost recovery? | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 72 | Price | 99 | 1.10 |
Discussion The offeror shall submit one complete hard copy of all price/cost files as Volume VI(a). The offeror should limit the cost/price volume VI(b) to 2 (two) three inch binders, not including major subcontractors, principals, joint venture partners or other individual companies, and one 2 inch binder for major subcontracts.
| Question | |
| To show sufficient detail to ensure cost realism, would the Government consider increasing the binder size requirement for major subcontractors? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 34 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 73 | Price | 99 & 119 | 1.10 | 5.3 | |
Discussion Section L, Paragraph 1.10 states, “The price/cost proposal (Volume VI(a) and Volume VI(b)) shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions and Paragraph 5 of this section…….”. This paragraph also states, “Volume VI(b) shall include the completed cost model at Attachment 6”, and that Volume VI(b) shall be limited to two three inch binders, etc.Paragraph 5 provides instructions for Volume VI(a), but does not mention Volume VI(b).
| Question | | | |
| Would the Government add instructions to paragraph 5 for Volume VI(b) to address the following questions?(a) Is the completed Government Cost | | | |
| Model (Attachment 6) required in both Volume VI(a) and VI(b)?(b) Is the completed Schedule B required in both Volume VI(a) and VI(b)? (c) Is | | | |
| supporting cost detail required in both Volume VI(a) and VI(b)? (d) Is a completed Manpower Matrix required in both Volume VI(a) and VI(b)?(e) | | | |
| Does “The offeror should limit the cost/price volume VI(b) to 2 (two) three inch binders” equate to six inches of total binder space? | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 74 | General | Attch 13, all pages | Column B |
| Contracting | | | |
Discussion The following cells contain reference errors: B3, B5, B7, B9, B11, B13, B15, B17, B19, and B21
| Question | |
| Will the Government please make changes to the aforementioned cells and release an amended Subcontracting Plan Worksheet? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 35 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 75 | General | Section G, page 65 | 1 | | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion
| Question | | | | |
| Please clarify contract “one combined invoice and receiving report” thru WAWF. Is the FPIF 1/12th invoice to be processed on a DD250? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 76 | Technical | Aircraft Maintenance | 3.-1-41 | 3.1.28.1 |
Discussion This paragraph states that QA Inspectors will not perform maintenance or be augmentees to other work centers. The Service Provider may need to have the flexibility to use the QA personnel in maintenance tasks during contingency or emergency circumstances (i.e. Hurricane Evacuation). Also, certain maintenance-type tasks are normally accomplished by QA (i.e. Weight & Balance Technician/Supervisor, etc.). In addition, the Service Provider may need the flexibility to temporarily detail a qualified QA inspector to fill a critical specialty shortage in another classification (as permitted by the CBA) due to unforeseen circumstances until the shortage can be rectified through new-hires, transfers, or the individual can be returned to work.
| Question | |
| Can the statement restricting QA Inspectors from performing any maintenance either be removed altogether, or modified to exclude the types of tasks | |
| mentioned above? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 36 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 78 | Past | Attachment 8, | F. | | |
| Performance | | | | | |
Discussion Requirement: “For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals.” However, the format of the Past Performance Information Sheet only appears to require two points of contact (although three may be provided if one were to exercise the option to include the QA person and the Site Manager):1 Quality Assurance Person and/or Site Manager2 Administrative Contracting Officer.
| Question | | | |
| Please clarify the number and titles of the customer points of contact required. | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 79 | Past | Attachment 8, | H. |
| Performance | | | |
Discussion This Item requires discussion of the cited contract’s relevance to Mission Capability Subfactor 4, Small Business Subcontracting Plan and SDB Participation Targets. This would appear to duplicate the information requested in Items J and K.
| Question | |
| Please clarify the distinction among each of the requirements:Item H., response to Subfactor 4Item J., Compliance with Utilization of Small | |
| Business ConcernsItem K., Subcontracting Plan requirements | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 37 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 80 | Past | Section L, page | 4.1.4 | | |
| Performance | | | | | |
Discussion This section says that offerors may discuss efforts to resolve problems on prior contracts, but Section 4.1, Contents, does not provide direction for where in the Past Performance Volume offerors are to include this discussion.
| Question | | | | |
| Please clarify whether responses to Resolution of Problems should be addressed in the individual Past Performance Information Sheets or as a separate | | | | |
| section within the Past Performance Volume. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 81 | General | Section L, page 97 | 1.8 | 1.12 |
| Contracting | | | | |
Discussion The RFP section L1.8 states that a complete Manpower Matrix shall be included in every Volume of the technical proposal. Our assumption is that the manpower matrices are to be included only in Technical Volumes 2 and 3, as shown in the table on page 98 and as described in paragraph 1.12, not in Volume 1.
| Question | |
| Is a Manpower Matrix required to be included in Technical Proposal Volume 1, Mission Integration, and if so, is the matrix excluded from the page | |
| count? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 38 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 82 | Technical | Applicable to All | 2.-1-9 | 2.1.13.4 | Figure 2A.1.2 |
| Services | | | | | |
Discussion Paragraph 2.1.13.5 directs Records to be managed IAW AFMAN 37-123, Management of Records. This reference has been removed from the publications listing in Appendix 2A (PWS figure 2A.1.2)
| Question | | | | |
| Suggest you add AFMAN 37-123 to Appendix 2A or remove the reference from paragraph 2.1.13.5. | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 83 | Technical | Transportation | 25FF-1 – 25FF-4 | Paragraph 1 and 3 |
Discussion The following vehicles will be initially provided as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) but will be removed from use and not replaced by the Government during the life of the contract. In accordance with (IAW) AFI 23-302 (30 Jun 06), Section 4J, paragraph 4.52.3.1. “The contractor(s) will assume sole responsibility for all associated utilization costs of GFE vehicles, including: operations, maintenance and repair, and replacement. The contractor(s) will determine replacement based on best business practices/replacement criteria.”
| Question | |
| (a) Is it the Government’s intent for the contractor to purchase vehicles during the term of this contract?(b) If the contractor is required to purchase | |
| replacement vehicles, will the Government accept used vehicles, or are new vehicles required?(c) Will the Government or will the contractor retain | |
| title to the replacement vehicles?(d) Will the Government provide further clarification by means of a vehicle removal schedule, i.e., the projected year | |
| each vehicle will be removed from use?(e) Will the Government further define “Vehicle Type” and “Vehicle Equivalent” as presented in Appendix? | |
| (f) Does “Price” represent original acquisition price or current replacement price? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 39 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 84 | General | CBA, pages 151- | Appendices E, F, | | |
| Contracting | and G | | | | |
Discussion The Service Contract Act (SCA) requires the successor contractor to provide wages and fringe benefits no less than those provided for by the predecessor contractor CBA in the first year of the contract. It is customary for the incumbent contractor to provide minimum health and welfare rates to ensure SCA compliance.
| Question | | | |
| (a) Minimum Health and Welfare (H&W) rates were not identified in any of the incumbent Employee Benefit Plans in the CBA. Will the Government | | | |
| provide minimum H&W rates applicable to this solicitation? | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 85 | General | CBA, pages 151- | Appendices E, F, |
| Contracting | and G | | |
Discussion The Service Contract Act (SCA) requires the successor contractor to provide wages and fringe benefits no less than those provided for by the predecessor contractor CBA in the first year of the contract. It is customary for the incumbent contractor to provide minimum health and welfare rates to ensure SCA compliance.
| Question | |
| (b) In order to estimate comparable/reasonable benefits, will the Government provide a Summary Benefit Plan Description currently provided to service | |
| employees working on the program? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 40 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 86 | General | CBA, pages 151- | Appendices E, F, | | |
| Contracting | and G | | | | |
Discussion The Service Contract Act (SCA) requires the successor contractor to provide wages and fringe benefits no less than those provided for by the predecessor contractor CBA in the first year of the contract. It is customary for the incumbent contractor to provide minimum health and welfare rates to ensure SCA compliance.
| Question | | | |
| (c) In order to estimate comparable/reasonable benefits, will the Government provide employee group insurance participation data? | | | |
| Response | | | |
| 87 | General | CBA, pages 151- | Appendices E, F, |
| Contracting | and G | | |
Discussion The Service Contract Act (SCA) requires the successor contractor to provide wages and fringe benefits no less than those provided for by the predecessor contractor CBA in the first year of the contract. It is customary for the incumbent contractor to provide minimum health and welfare rates to ensure SCA compliance.
| Question | |
| (d) Will CBA employees that choose not to participate in a benefit plan receive cash in-lieu of benefits? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 41 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 88 | General | CBA, pages 151- | Appendices E, F, | | |
| Contracting | and G | | | | |
Discussion The Service Contract Act (SCA) requires the successor contractor to provide wages and fringe benefits no less than those provided for by the predecessor contractor CBA in the first year of the contract. It is customary for the incumbent contractor to provide minimum health and welfare rates to ensure SCA compliance.
| Question | | | | |
| (e) In order to estimate comparable/reasonable benefits, will the Government provide a copy of the CBA Supplement to include any and all | | | | |
| Memorandums of Understanding? | | | | |
| Response | | | | |
| 89 | Technical | Purchasing | 26-1-1 | 26.1 THRU 26.1.1.6 |
Discussion This section requires the service provider to have and submit an approved purchasing system to the ACO within 15 days after contract award. All requirements on page 26-1-1 require the service provider to get approval from the ACO for all actions described.
| Question | |
| What is the advantage of having an approved purchasing system, if these actions are required? | |
| Response | |
| Friday, March 02, 2007 | Page 42 of 281 |
| ID | Request For | Performance Work | Page | Paragraph | Additional Cross Reference |
| Proposal | Statement | Reference | Reference | | |
| 90 | General | Section L, 102 | 3.2.4.1.1 | | |
| Contracting | | | | | |
Discussion There is a requirement to show number and percentages of: direct, additive direct, indirect, and overhead labor.
| Question | | | | | |
| What is the definition of additive direct labor? | | | | | |
| Response | | | | | |
| 91 | Technical | Airfield Management | 21FF-1 | 21FF.1 | AFI 13-213, Para. 3.6 |
Discussion Appendix 21FF Airfield Management Government Furnished Property and Services (Vehicles) states none are provided.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.