Exhibit 8 - Medical Audit Tool.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 433 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Medical and Mental Health Services
- Solicitation number
- 1301
- Issued by
- Idaho
About this file
This file is a Medical Audit Tool spreadsheet developed by the Idaho Department of Correction for evaluating Value Based Care Performance across IDOC facilities. The document establishes a comprehensive quarterly audit framework with 25 distinct audit categories designed to assess medical service delivery quality and compliance. The audit tool encompasses credentialing and training standards, discharge planning procedures, receiving and diagnostic unit screening protocols, sick call services across general population and restrictive housing units, off-site care management, periodic health assessments for aging residents, chronic disease programs for diabetes, chronic kidney disease, HIV, and cirrhosis, dental and oral care, tuberculosis screening and treatment, vaccination programs, hepatitis C monitoring, infection control, peer review, and resident education. Each audit category specifies detailed performance thresholds ranging from 90% to 100% compliance, with weighted scoring allocations and specific clinical quality indicators that medical vendors must satisfy.
The audit tool functions as a performance measurement mechanism to hold contracted medical service vendors accountable to IDOC standards. Each audit includes specific populations sampled, clinical criteria to be evaluated, documentation requirements, and templated data collection sheets for recording individual resident encounters. The framework requires chart review documentation, vendor reporting, and IDOC dashboard tracking of compliance metrics. The tool demonstrates IDOC's emphasis on clinical outcomes, patient safety, continuity of care, medication management, specialty referral processes, and preventive health services. Several audit categories specifically target vulnerable populations including pregnant residents, individuals in long-term care settings, those receiving infirmary services, and residents undergoing observation protocols. The audit thresholds and weighted scoring structure indicate that IDOC will use this tool to evaluate vendor performance during contract execution and potentially tie payment or contract renewal to achievement of these quality standards.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Performance Audits
Summary of Audit Information
| Audit | |||||
| Number | Audit Period | ||||
| Quarter 1 20XX | |||||
| Overall Score | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| Threshold | Audit Results | ||||
| 1 | Credentialing and Training | 100% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 2 | Discharge Planning | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 3 | RDU Screening | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 4 | Sick Call GP | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 5 | Sick Call Segregation | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 6 | Sick Call RDU | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 7 | Off-Site Care | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 8 | Periodic Health Assessment | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 9 | CDP - Diabetes | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 10 | CDP - CKD | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 11 | CDP - HIV | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 12 | CDP - Cirrhosis | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 13 | Oral Care | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 14 | TB Screening and Treatment | 98% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 15 | Vaccination Program | 98% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 16 | Pregnant Resident | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 17 | Long Term Care | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 18 | Infirmary | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 19 | 23-Hour Observation | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 20 | Hepatitis C Monitoring | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 21 | Transfer Screening | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 22 | Diagnostics | 90% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 23 | Infection Control & CQI | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 24 | Peer Review | 95% | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| 25 | Resident Education | 98% | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
01 Credentialing Training
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||
| Audit No: | 1 | Credentialing and Training | Audit Date: | |
| Threshold: | 100% | Audit Type: | MED QTR (X) | |
| Weight: | 2% | Auditor: | ||
| Medical vendor shall supply IDOC with a full roster of all vendor staff employed at each site during the audit period. |
The term "vendor staff" includes any person providing services on behalf of the vendor to include vendor employees, agency staff, telehealth staff, and all on-site specialty contract staff.
| Q1 | All staff completed IDOC contractor training (first available training after hire, including agency staff) | |||||||||||
| Q2 | All staff are CPR/AED certified; The CPR course must have a verified hands-on component | |||||||||||
| Q3 | All staff have documented Naloxone rescue administration training | |||||||||||
| Q4 | A current license, certification, or registration is on file for all RNs, LPNs, dental hygienists and any other healthcare professionals who are required to obtain or maintain a professional licensure, certification, or registration (Includes Correctional Medical Specialists and Unlicensed Assistive Personnel who administer medications) | |||||||||||
| All Practitioners to include Medical Doctors, Doctors of Osteopathy, Psychiatrists, Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, Dentists, Optometrists, and/or other applicable licensed practitioners must have documentation of current: | ||||||||||||
| Q5 | All Medical vendor providers (physician, NP, PA) are registered as Idaho Medicaid providers within 90 days of hire | |||||||||||
| Q6 | Board of Pharmacy Licensure | |||||||||||
| Q7 | Unrestricted DEA/Controlled Substance Registration | |||||||||||
| Chart Review: | No | Total | 0 | |||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | |||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | ||||||
| SITE | NAME | TITLE | DATE OF | |||||||||
| HIRE | DATE OF | |||||||||||
| TERM | IDOC | |||||||||||
| TRAIN | CPR/AED | |||||||||||
| TRAIN | NARCAN | |||||||||||
| TRAIN | LICENSE | |||||||||||
| CERTIF | MEDICAID | |||||||||||
| REGIST | BOP | |||||||||||
| LICENSE | DEA/CS | |||||||||||
| REGIST | NOTES | |||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||||||
| 70 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
02 Discharge Planning
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 2 | Discharge Planning | Audit Date: | |||||||||
| Threshold: | 90% | Audit Type: | MED - QTR X | |||||||||
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: | ||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will provide the names of 100 residents released over the relevant audit period. | ||||||||||||
| Residents discharged to the community are provided with: | ||||||||||||
| Q1 | 30 day supply of all current oral medications (7 day supply for narcotic medication) | |||||||||||
| Q2 | 30 day script for all current oral medications (7 day script for narcotic medication) - Script not required for OTC medications | |||||||||||
| Q3 | Current Medication List to include medication name, dosage, administration instructions, and reason for use (i.e. associated diagnosis) | |||||||||||
| Q4 | Updated Problem List - Reflects all current medical, mental health, dental and substance use disorder diagnosis | |||||||||||
| Q5 | Medical supply and equipment needs (diabetic supplies, mobility devices, wound care supplies, C-Pap, etc.) eyeglass prescription and naloxone (intranasal device and script) are documented and provided. Note: Naloxone is required only for residents diagnosed with a substance use disorder. | |||||||||||
| Q6 | Summary of vaccines received (to include dates received) over the last 5 years of incarceration | |||||||||||
| Q7 | Need for appointments: Follow-up type and time frame is included | |||||||||||
| Q8 | Contact information (phone number) for appropriate clinics, based on reported district and/or city of discharge, is provided to resident | |||||||||||
| Q9 | Medicaid application completed: Application submitted, or if previously active, is now in suspended mode. If ineligible, documentation of plan for health insurance at release is provided. | |||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Num | 0 | |||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | DISCH | |||||||||
| DATE | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | |||
| 30 DAY SUPPLY | ||||||||||||
| 7-NARC | 30 DAY SCRIPT | |||||||||||
| 7-NARC | CURRENT |
MED
LIST UPDATED
PROB
LIST EQUIP
NARCAN
EYEGLASS VACCINES
ADMIN
| 5 YRS | F/U APPT TYPE |
| TIME | CMTY |
CONTACT
| INFO | MEDICAID INSUR | |
| PLAN | Notes | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 15 | ||
| 16 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 18 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 22 | ||
| 23 | ||
| 24 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 26 | ||
| 27 | ||
| 28 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 30 | ||
| 31 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 33 | ||
| 34 | ||
| 35 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 38 | ||
| 39 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 41 | ||
| 42 | ||
| 43 | ||
| 44 | ||
| 45 | ||
| 46 | ||
| 47 | ||
| 48 | ||
| 49 | ||
| 50 | ||
| 51 | ||
| 52 | ||
| 53 | ||
| 54 | ||
| 55 | ||
| 56 | ||
| 57 | ||
| 58 | ||
| 59 | ||
| 60 | ||
| 61 | ||
| 62 | ||
| 63 | ||
| 64 | ||
| 65 | ||
| 66 | ||
| 67 | ||
| 68 | ||
| 69 | ||
| 70 | ||
| 71 | ||
| 72 | ||
| 73 | ||
| 74 | ||
| 75 | ||
| 76 | ||
| 77 | ||
| 78 | ||
| 79 | ||
| 80 | ||
| 81 | ||
| 82 | ||
| 83 | ||
| 84 | ||
| 85 | ||
| 86 | ||
| 87 | ||
| 88 | ||
| 89 | ||
| 90 | ||
| 91 | ||
| 92 | ||
| 93 | ||
| 94 | ||
| 95 | ||
| 96 | ||
| 97 | ||
| 98 | ||
| 99 | ||
| 100 |
&8This material is property of the IDOC and is not to be reproduced without expressed permission Last revised on 11/15/10
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
03 RDU Screen
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 3 | Receiving and Diagnostic Unit (RDU) Screen | Date of Audit: | |||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | |||||||||||
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: | ||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will provide the names of 100 residents who processed through RDU (ISCI, PWCC, SBWCC) in the relevant audit period. | ||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Initial medical history and screen (includes vital signs and actual weight) | |||||||||||||
| Q2 | Laboratory testing: CMP, CBC, HIV, RPR, HCV, A1C and Quantiferon Gold are drawn within 72 hours of arrival (Excl wknd & hol) | |||||||||||||
| Q3 | Laboratory results are reviewed by a provider prior to discharge from the intake facility | |||||||||||||
| Q4 | Positive HIV ab and/or positive T-PAL are reviewed with resident (FTF) within 72 hours of result (Excl wknd & hol, Known HIV = NA) | |||||||||||||
| Q5 | Initial Health Assessment completed by provider within 7 days of arrival | |||||||||||||
| Q6 | Identified Problems (diagnosis) are documented on the Problem List | |||||||||||||
| Q7 | Referrals are made to the appropriate modality (i.e., Chronic Disease Program, Mental Health, Off-site Specialty services, etc.) | |||||||||||||
| Q8 | Initial dental screen is performed by a dentist within 7 calendar days of arrival | |||||||||||||
| Q9 | MOUD are continued within 24 hours of arrival | |||||||||||||
| Q10 | MOUD: COWS scoring is ordered and completed (if not ordered, clinical justification is present) | |||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | |||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | RDU |
ADMIT
DATE MEDICAL SCREEN LABS 72 HOURS LABS REVWD HIV
T-PAL
| 72 HRS | INITIAL PHA | PROB LIST | REFER |
| PRN | DENTAL SCREEN | MOUD CONT | |
| 24 HRS | COWS ORDERED & DONE | Notes | |
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | |||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | |||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | |||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | |||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | |||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | |||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | |||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | |||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | |||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | |||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | |||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | |||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | |||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | |||
| 98 | |||
| 99 | |||
| 100 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
04 Sick Call GP
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||
| Audit No: | 4 | Non-Emergency Healthcare Services | |||
| General Population | Date of Audit: | ||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||
| Weight: | 6% | Auditor: | |||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC Health Services will review facility specific GP sick call logs reporting any resident who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom, in the relevant audit period, as obtained from the electronic health record. |
Based on the above list, The IDOC DIG will provide the names of 135 residents housed in GP who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom over the relevant audit period.
| KPI | 1. Face-to-face encounter within 24 hours | Percentage Based Score | ||||||||
| Percentage of Health Service Request's (HSR's) received and addressed within 24 hours of HSR triage | ERROR:#DIV/0! | Indicator | Score | Weight | ||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom | 1 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 15% | |||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom and were subsequently addressed via a face-to-face encounter within 24 hours of triage | 2 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 85% | |||||||
| Residents who submit a Health Service Request detailing a clinical sign, symptom, or complaint are evaluated in Nurse Sick Call within 24 hours of triage and their medical record reflects the following: | Weighted Average | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||
| Q1 | Vital Signs (T, R, P, BP, O2 Sat) completed and documented on NET or in Provider Sick Call Encounter | |||||||||
| Q2 | Assessment is conducted and is specific to the presenting complaint | |||||||||
| Q3 | Appropriate Plan and intervention occurs according to the NET Guidelines (Actions & Referral: emergent, urgent, routine, none) | |||||||||
| Q4 | Provider visit (when referred from NSC) occurs timely, according to NET guidelines (Emerg/Urg = contact provider, rout = 14d) | |||||||||
| Q5 | If resident did not attend their provider referral appointment, a Medical Response Disposition form (MRD) is sent to the resident notifying them of their missed appointment with instructions regarding next steps (ex: resubmit HSR, rescheduled, etc.) | |||||||||
| Weighted Average | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | DATE |
OR
| HSR # | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | |||
| VS | ASSESS | PLAN | ||||||
| REFERRAL | PROVIDER | |||||||
| VISIT | NO VISIT | |||||||
| DOC | Notes | |||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 |
05 Sick Call Seg
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||
| Audit No: | 5 | Non-Emergency Healthcare Services | |||
| Restrictive Housing Unit (RHU) | Date of Audit: | ||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: | |||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC Health Services will review facility specific RHU sick call logs reporting any resident who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom, in the relevant audit period, as obtained from the electronic health record. |
Based on the above list, The IDOC DIG will provide the names of 40 residents housed in RHU who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom over the relevant audit period.
| KPI | 1. Face-to-face encounter within 24 hours | |||||||||
| Percentage of Health Service Request's (HSR's) received and addressed within 24 hours of HSR triage | 95% | Indicator | Score | Weight | ||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom | 100 | 1 | 95% | 15% | ||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom and were subsequently addressed via a face-to-face encounter within 24 hours of triage | 95 | 2 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 85% | ||||||
| Residents who submit a Health Service Request detailing a clinical sign, symptom, or complaint are evaluated in Nurse Sick Call within 24 hours of triage and their medical record reflects the following: | Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||
| Q1 | Vital Signs (T, R, P, BP, O2 Sat) completed and documented on NET or in Provider Sick Call Encounter | |||||||||
| Q2 | Assessment specific to the presenting complaint | |||||||||
| Q3 | Appropriate Plan/intervention according to sick call encounter guidelines (referral - emergent, urgent, routine, none) | |||||||||
| Q4 | Provider visit (when applicable) is conducted according to sick call encounter guidelines (Emerg/Urg = contact provider, rout = 14d) | |||||||||
| Q5 | If resident did not attend their provider referral appointment, a Medical Response Disposition form (MRD) is sent to the resident notifying them of their missed appointment with instructions regarding next steps (ex: resubmit HSR, rescheduled, etc.) | |||||||||
| Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | DATE |
OR
| HSR # | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | |||
| VS | ASSESS | PLAN | ||||||
| REFERRAL | PROVIDER | |||||||
| VISIT | NO VISIT | |||||||
| DOC | Notes | |||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 |
06 Sick Call RDU
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||
| Audit No: | 6 | Non-Emergency Healthcare Services | |||
| Reception and Diagnostic unit | Date of Audit: | ||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||
| Weight: | 1% | Auditor: | |||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC Health Services will review facility specific RDU sick call logs reporting any resident who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom, in the relevant audit period, as obtained from the electronic health record. |
Based on the above list, The IDOC DIG will provide the names of 25 residents housed in RDU who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing a clinical sign or symptom over the relevant audit period.
| KPI | 1. Face-to-face encounter within 24 hours | Percentage Based Score | ||||||||
| Percentage of Health Service Request's (HSR's) received and addressed within 24 hours of HSR triage | 95% | Indicator | Score | Weight | ||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom | 100 | 1 | 95% | 15% | ||||||
| Total number of Health Service Requests received that detailed a clinical sign or symptom and were subsequently addressed via a face-to-face encounter within 24 hours of triage | 95 | 2 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 85% | ||||||
| Residents who submit a Health Service Request detailing a clinical sign, symptom, or complaint are evaluated in Nurse Sick Call within 24 hours of triage and their medical record reflects the following: | Weighted Score: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||
| Q1 | Vital Signs (T, R, P, BP, O2 Sat) completed and documented on NET or in Provider Sick Call Encounter | |||||||||
| Q2 | Assessment specific to the presenting complaint | |||||||||
| Q3 | Appropriate Plan/intervention according to sick call encounter guidelines (referral - emergent, urgent, routine, none) | |||||||||
| Q4 | Provider visit (when applicable) is conducted according to sick call encounter guidelines (Emerg/Urg = contact provider, rout = 14d) | |||||||||
| Q5 | If resident did not attend their provider referral appointment, a Medical Response Disposition form (MRD) is sent to the resident notifying them of their missed appointment with instructions regarding next steps (ex: resubmit HSR, rescheduled, etc.) | |||||||||
| Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | DATE |
OR
| HSR # | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | |||
| VS | ASSESS | PLAN | ||||||
| REFERRAL | PROVIDER | |||||||
| VISIT | NO VISIT | |||||||
| DOC | Notes | |||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 |
07 Off-Site Care
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||||
| Audit No: | 7 | Off-Site Care | Date of Audit: | ||||
| Threshold: | 90% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||||
| Weight: | 5% | Auditor: | |||||
| Population Sampled: Based on information provided from the previous quarter's consult request log, 100 resident charts with non-emergency room off-site consults will be randomly selected for review across the Idaho Department of Correction, with queries proportional to the number of residents in each facility. | |||||||
| Residents who require specialized healthcare needs that extend beyond the medical clinics provided on-site are referred to a community specialist and their medical record reflects the following: | |||||||
| Q1 | Utilization Management decision is made within 5 business days of request (obtained from consult log) | ||||||
| Q2 | ATP Determination: Provider must review ATP with patient, or send a MRD (with plan) within 14 days of ATP determination | ||||||
| Q3 | Scheduling: Urgent appointments are secured and documented in the medical record within 7 days of UM approval AND routine appointments are secured and documented in the medical record within 30 days of UM approval. | ||||||
| Q4 | Vital Signs (T, R, P, BP, O2 Sat, Wt) and Return from Offsite evaluation are completed by a Registered Nurse (If RN not avail, LPN can conduct - must notify provider) | ||||||
| Q5 | Reason for offsite appointment is documented in the Return From Offsite encounter form | ||||||
| Q6 | Offsite specialty consults, recommendations, and/or reports are filed in the medical record within 14 days of the offsite appointment | ||||||
| Q7 | Specialist consult, recommendations, and/or report is reviewed with the patient in a face-to-face encounter within 14 calendar days of the offsite appointment | ||||||
| Q8 | Deviation from offsite specialist consult recommendations: Clinical justification is required within 14 days | ||||||
| Q9 | Informed refusal signed by the resident and licensed staff member (applicable if resident refused offsite consult) | ||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | ||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | ||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | OFFSITE VISIT |
OR
| ATP DATE | TYPE OF SERVICE | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 |
| UM APPROV | ||||||||||
| OR ATP | ATP DISC OR MRD | |||||||||
| 14D | APPT SECURED 7D/30D | VS | ||||||||
| RETURN EVAL | REASON OFFSITE | |||||||||
| DOC | REPORT |
FILED
| 14 DAYS | SPEC REC REV W/ PT 14D | DEV SPEC REC | REFUSAL | Notes |
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
08 Periodic Health Assmt
| Idaho Department of Correction Contract Performance Measure Audit | ||||
| Audit No: | 8 | Periodic Health Assessment - Care of the Aging | Date of Audit: | |
| Threshold: | 90% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR X | |
| Weight: | 5% | Auditor: | ||
| Population Sampled: |
IDOC DIG will provide the names of 100 residents aged 50 and older whose birth month occurred in the relevant audit period. Residents sentenced to a rider are exempt, regardless of age.
| Q1 | Periodic Health Appraisal (PHA) offered in the residents' birth month (age 50 and over) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q2 | Signed and Dated PHA Consent or Refusal is documented in the medical record. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q3 | PHA is completed by last day of the month following the residents birthday month. (i.e., Birthday is June, PHA must be completed by July 31st). Must contain narrative documentation of abnormal findings. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Periodic Health Appraisal Encounter must include the following: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Complete set of Vital Signs - Temp, Respirations, Pulse, Blood Pressure, O2 Saturation, and Weight (Actual/not stated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | Provider review of Vital Signs (last 12 months) - Document findings generally, if abnormal, the plan/intervention is documented. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q6 | Weight management review with recommendations for intervention if >5% weight loss or gain in the last twelve (12) months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7 | Vaccine review is documented, recommended vaccines are offered as appropriate, including but not limited to Shingrix, RSV, Pneumococcal. (Vaccine administration will be captured on audit tool 15) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q8 | Vision Screen - Snellen (with or without glasses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | Hearing Screen (Whisper or other) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | If FAIL Hearing Screen - referral to audiology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q11 | Review of systems conducted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q12 | Medication/Polypharmacy review conducted by a provider | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q13 | Functional Activities of Daily Living Assessment Conducted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q14 | Cognitive Screen conducted/scored. Score of < 3 validated for dementia screening. If score <3 proceed to Q15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q15 | Cognitive Screen < 3 Patient enrolled <30d in CDP Special Needs/Cognitive Decline - Documented review for appropriateness of KOP medication | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q16 | Fall Risk Assessment conducted, and documented. IF PASS - Continue to Q17 Timed Get Up and Go. If FAIL, SKIP Q17 Timed Get Up and Go, proceed to Q18. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q17 | Timed Get Up and Go test is conducted and results documented. If AT-RISK/FAIL, Continue to Q18 Fall Prevention Measures. If PASS, proceed to Q19. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q18 | Document fall prevention measures for FAILED Fall Risk Assessment or AT-RISK/FAILED Timed Get up and Go | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q19 | POST form is discussed with patient, completed, and filed in medical chart. The resident EHR banner shall reflect the resident's current POST preferences. If resident elects not to complete a POST form, provider should note declination in the PHA; A signed refusal form is not required. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | Q14 | Q15 | Q16 | Q17 | Q18 | Q19 | |||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| of Birth | Date of PHA | Birth Offer | Con/ Ref | PHA Comp | Vitals Done | 12 mo Vital Rev | Wt Mngt | Vacc | Vision | Hear | Aud | ||||||||||||||
| Ref | Rev of Syst | Poly Rx Rev | ADL | Mini Cog | Cog CDP if appl. | Fall Risk Asmt. | Get up Go | Failed Fall Risk TGUG | POST | NOTES: | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
09 CDP - DM CALC2
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 9 | Chronic Disease Program | |||||||||||||
| Diabetes Mellitus | Audit Date: | ||||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Audit Type: | MED QTR (X) | ||||||||||||
| Weight: | 4% | Auditor: | |||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will maintain an internal dashboard that identifies all residents with a history of a HbA1c of 6.5 or greater, or a diagnosis of diabetes. Key performance indicators will be measured based on residents who have a HbA1c of 6.5 or greater and individual chart reviews will be conducted on residents who have 2 HbA1c values 9.0 and above obtained at least 12 weeks apart. | |||||||||||||||
| KPI | 1. HbA1c | Indicator | Score | Weight | |||||||||||
| Percentage of HbA1C completed in the six (6) months | 100% | 1 | 100% | 12.50% | |||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1C greater 6.5 | 100 | 2 | 100% | 12.50% | |||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1c greater than 6.5 who had an A1C drawn in the last 6 months | 100 | 3 | 100% | 12.50% | |||||||||||
| KPI | 2. Statin | 4 | 100% | 12.50% | |||||||||||
| Percentage of Statins prescribed for individuals between the ages of 40 and 75 | 100% | 5 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 50.00% | |||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1C greater 6.5 | 100 | Weighted Average | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||
| Total number of residents, between the ages of 40 and 75, with an A1C greater than 6.5 prescribed a statin | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| KPI | 3. BP Average | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of individuals whose BP average is less than 140/90 over the last 3 months | 100% | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1C greater 6.5 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1C greater than 6.5 whose BP average is less than 140/90 over the last 3 months | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| KPI | 4. Microalbumin | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of Urine microalbumin completed in the last 12 months | 100% | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1C greater 6.5 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an A1c greater than 6.5 who had a Urine Microalbumin completed in the last 12 months | 100 | ||||||||||||||
| For those with an A1C of 9.o and above, a chart review will be conducted to assess: | |||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Active Insulin prescription (or signed, informed refusal by documenting provider) | ||||||||||||||
| Q2 | Diabetic retinopathy screening within the last 12 months (dilated eye exam) | ||||||||||||||
| Q3 | Time between CDP visits does not exceed 90 days | ||||||||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Num | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||
| INFO | INFO | INFO | Q1 | INFO | Q2 | INFO | Q3 | ||||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | DATE |
DM
| DX | MOST RECENT |
| A1C DATE | A1C |
| VALUE | INSULIN |
| RX | DEE |
| DATE | DEE |
| DONE | DATE |
LAST
| CDP | CDP 90D | Notes |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 15 |
10 CDP - CKD
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||
| Audit No: | 10 | Chronic Disease Program | |||
| Chronic Kidney Disease | Audit Date: | ||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Audit Type: | MED QTR (X) | ||
| Weight: | 2% | Auditor: | |||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will maintain an internal dashboard that identifies all residents with a history of chronic kidney disease. Key Performance Indicators will be measured based on two glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values below 60, obtained at least twelve weeks apart. |
Individual chart reviews will be conducted on residents who have 2 GFR values below 30, obtained at least twelve weeks apart.
| KPI | 1. Creatinine/eGFR: | Indicator | Score | Weight | |||||||||
| Percentage of residents with a GFR rate <60 who had a Creatinine and GFR level drawn in the last 6 months. | 100% | 1 | 100% | 25.00% | |||||||||
| Total number of residents with a GFR rate <60 | 100 | 2 | 100% | 25.00% | |||||||||
| Total number of residents with an eGFR rate below 60 who had a GFR and creatinine level drawn in the last 6 months | 100 | 3 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 50.00% | |||||||||
| KPI | 2. Urine Microalbumin | Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| Percentage of residents with a GFR rate <60 who had a Urine Microalbumin level drawn in the last 6 months. | 100% | ||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with a GFR rate < 60 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Total number of residents with an eGFR rate <60 who had a Blood Microalbumin level drawn in the last 6 months | 100 | ||||||||||||
| For those with an eGFR less than 30, a chart review will be done to assess: | |||||||||||||
| Q1 | Nephrology consult completed within the last 12 months (See exceptions for new DX and Dialysis) | ||||||||||||
| Q2 | No current nephrotoxic medications are prescribed (Absence = 1, Presence = 0) | ||||||||||||
| Q3 | Time between CDP visits does not exceed 90 days | ||||||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Num | 0 | ||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | ||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||
| INFO | Q1 | INFO | Q2 | INFO | Q3 | ||||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | NEPHRO CONSULT | ||||||||||
| DATE | NEPHRO | ||||||||||||
| CONSULT | N-TOXIC MED | NSAIDS |
NO = 1
| YES = 0 | DATE LAST CDP | CDP |
| 90D | NOTES | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 |
11 CDP - HIV
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 11 | Chronic Disease Program | ||||||||||||||
| Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Audit Date: | |||||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Audit Type: | MED QTR (X) | |||||||||||||
| Weight: | 2% | Auditor: | ||||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will maintain an internal dashboard that identifies all residents who have a diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Individual chart reviews will be conducted on all HIV positive residents. | ||||||||||||||||
| Residents with an HIV or AIDS diagnosis are routinely monitored by on-site providers and specialists to monitor for progression of disease and their medical record reflects the following: | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Viral Load Suppression: VL not detectable in the relevant audit period (ND= 1, det = 0) | |||||||||||||||
| Q2 | HIV medications prescribed without lapse in the last 12 months | |||||||||||||||
| Q3 | Pneumococcal vaccine up to date | |||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Hepatitis B vaccine up to date | |||||||||||||||
| Q5 | HIV specialist consult completed in the last 12 months | |||||||||||||||
| Q6 | HIV Specialist consult recommendations are reviewed with the resident in a face-to-face encounter within 14 calendar days of the HIV Specialty appointment | |||||||||||||||
| Q7 | HIV Specialist recommendations completed (Medication, diagnostic testing, and immunizations) | |||||||||||||||
| Q8 | Dental assessment conducted in the last 12 months. | |||||||||||||||
| Q9 | Baseline chest X-ray is completed and reviewed by a provider (within 30 days of arrival to intake facility) | |||||||||||||||
| Chart Review | Yes | Num | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||||
| INFO | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | INFO | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | INFO | Q8 | Q9 | |||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | VIRAL |
LOAD
DATE NEG
VIRAL
| LOAD | HIV MED RX NO LAPSE | PNEUMO VAC | HBV |
| VAC | HIV/ID CONSULT | ||
| DATE | HIV CONSULT | ||
| Q 12 MOS | CONSULT | ||
| REV W/ PROVIDER | HIV SPEC |
REC DIAG/
| LAB | DENTAL ASSESS | |
| DATE | DENTAL ASSMT | |
| Q 12 MOS | CXR 30 D OF INTAKE | COMMENTS |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 15 | ||
| 16 |
12 CDP - Cirrhosis
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 12 | Chronic Disease Program | ||||||||||||
| Cirrhosis | Audit Date: | |||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Audit Type: | MED QTR (X) | |||||||||||
| Weight: | 4% | Auditor: | ||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will maintain an internal dashboard, that identifies all residents who have a history of Cirrhosis, to include other qualifiers such as an F4 fibrotest score, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal varices, alcoholic cirrhosis, and/or any other cirrhosis related diagnosis codes documented in the EMR. This audit includes residents housed in Community Release Centers but excludes residents participating in the expanded release CRC program. | ||||||||||||||
| Residents with Fibrotest score of F4, and/or cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, or esophageal varices are routinely monitored by on-site providers and receive routine diagnostic testing to monitor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and their medical record reflects the following: | ||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Cirrhosis diagnosis documented on problem list (Current Health Status tab) | |||||||||||||
| Q2 | Ultrasound for HCC screening completed in last 6 months | |||||||||||||
| Q3 | No active prescriptions for NSAIDs (NO = 1, YES = 0) | |||||||||||||
| Q4 | Variceal screening by EGD completed (baseline) and per Hepatologist or Gastroenterologist recommendations thereafter | |||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Num | 0 | |||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | No | Denom | 0 | |||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||
| INFO | Q1 | INFO | INFO | Q2 | INFO | Q3 | INFO | INFO | Q4 | |||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | FIBRO | |||||||||||
| SCORE OR OTHER DX | CIRR | |||||||||||||
| ON PL | COMP |
OR
DECOMP ULTRA
SOUND
DATE ULTRA
SOUND
| Q 6MOS | NSAID |
| TYPE | NSAIDS |
NO = 1
| YES = 0 | EGD | |
| DATE | EGD | |
| RECS | EGD | |
| BASELINE & PER RECS | COMMENTS | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 | ||
| 15 |
13 Oral Care
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||
| Audit No: | 13 | Oral Care | Date of Audit: | |
| Threshold: | 90% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | |
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: | ||
| Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will maintain an internal dashboard that identifies all residents who submitted a denture related health Service Request (HSR). |
The IDOC Health Services will review facility specific dental sick call logs reporting any resident who submitted a Health Service Request (HSR) detailing the need for dental treatment, in the relevant audit period, as obtained from the electronic health record.
| KPI | 1. Dentures: | Indicator | Score | Weight | |||||||
| Percentage of dentures completed within 8 months of final extraction (6 mos if no extract) | 100% | 1 | 100% | 25% | |||||||
| Total number of residents who requested dentures | 100 | 2 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 75% | |||||||
| Total number of residents who requested and received dentures within 8 months of final extraction (6 mos if no extract) | 100 | Weighted Average: | 25% | ||||||||
| Residents who submit a Health Service Request detailing routine, urgent, or emergent needs, including dentures receive timely treatment and their medical record reflects the following: | |||||||||||
| Q1 | Routine (non-urgent/non-emergent) dental treatment is provided within 30 days of resident request | ||||||||||
| Weighted Average: | 0% | ||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | ||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | ||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | HSR # | ||||||||
| OR TIME | DATE | DATE | Q1 | ||||||||
| DENTAL | |||||||||||
| TREATMENT REQUESTED | DENTAL | ||||||||||
| TREATMENT PROVIDED | 30 DAYS | TOTAL | Notes | ||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||||
| 11 | |||||||||||
| 12 | |||||||||||
| 13 | |||||||||||
| 14 | |||||||||||
| 15 | |||||||||||
| 16 | |||||||||||
| 17 | |||||||||||
| 18 | |||||||||||
| 19 | |||||||||||
| 20 | |||||||||||
| 21 | |||||||||||
| 22 | |||||||||||
| 23 | |||||||||||
| 24 | |||||||||||
| 25 | |||||||||||
| 26 | |||||||||||
| 27 | |||||||||||
| 28 | |||||||||||
| 29 | |||||||||||
| 30 | |||||||||||
| 31 | |||||||||||
| 32 | |||||||||||
| 33 | |||||||||||
| 34 | |||||||||||
| 35 | |||||||||||
| 36 | |||||||||||
| 37 | |||||||||||
| 38 | |||||||||||
| 39 | |||||||||||
| 40 | |||||||||||
| 41 | |||||||||||
| 42 | |||||||||||
| 43 | |||||||||||
| 44 | |||||||||||
| 45 | |||||||||||
| 46 | |||||||||||
| 47 | |||||||||||
| 48 | |||||||||||
| 49 | |||||||||||
| 50 | |||||||||||
| 51 | |||||||||||
| 52 | |||||||||||
| 53 | |||||||||||
| 54 | |||||||||||
| 55 | |||||||||||
| 56 | |||||||||||
| 57 | |||||||||||
| 58 | |||||||||||
| 59 | |||||||||||
| 60 | |||||||||||
| 61 | |||||||||||
| 62 | |||||||||||
| 63 | |||||||||||
| 64 | |||||||||||
| 65 | |||||||||||
| 66 | |||||||||||
| 67 | |||||||||||
| 68 | |||||||||||
| 69 | |||||||||||
| 70 | |||||||||||
| 71 | |||||||||||
| 72 | |||||||||||
| 73 | |||||||||||
| 74 | |||||||||||
| 75 | |||||||||||
| 76 | |||||||||||
| 77 | |||||||||||
| 78 | |||||||||||
| 79 | |||||||||||
| 80 | |||||||||||
| 81 | |||||||||||
| 82 | |||||||||||
| 83 | |||||||||||
| 84 | |||||||||||
| 85 | |||||||||||
| 86 | |||||||||||
| 87 | |||||||||||
| 88 | |||||||||||
| 89 | |||||||||||
| 90 | |||||||||||
| 91 | |||||||||||
| 92 | |||||||||||
| 93 | |||||||||||
| 94 | |||||||||||
| 95 | |||||||||||
| 96 | |||||||||||
| 97 | |||||||||||
| 98 | |||||||||||
| 99 | |||||||||||
| 100 |
&8This material is property of the IDOC and is not to be reproduced without expressed permission Last revised on 11/15/10
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
14 TB Screening & Tx
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||
| Audit No: | 14 | TB Screening and Treatment | Date of Audit: | |
| Threshold: | 98% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | |
| Weight: | 2% | Auditor: |
Population Sampled: The IDOC DIG will provide the names of all residents whose birth month occurred in the relevant audit period excluding those who entered RDU in the last four (4) months. For every resident whose birthday occurred in the relevant audit period, the report shall include the results of their most recent PPD skin test, or Quantiferon blood test results.
| The vendor will provide a facility level Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment log relevant to the reporting period. | Percentage Based Score | |||||||||||||
| KPI | 1. Annual TB test | Indicator | Score | Weight | ||||||||||
| Percentage of annual TB tests conducted in the residents birth month. | 93% | 1 | 93% | 35% | ||||||||||
| Total number of residents whose birthday month occurred in the relevant audit period (by quarter) | 600 | 2 | 100% | 15% | ||||||||||
| Total number of residents whose birthday month occurred in the relevant audit period who received an annual TB test in their birthday month. | 556 | 3 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 50% | ||||||||||
| KPI | 2. Annual TB Screening Form (Past positive, in lieu of annual TB test) | Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||
| Percentage of annual TB symptom screenings conducted in the residents birth month. | 100% | |||||||||||||
| Total number of residents whose birthday month occurred in the relevant audit period (by quarter) | 20 | |||||||||||||
| Total number of residents whose birthday month occurred in the relevant audit period who received an annual TB symptom screen in their birthday month. | 20 | |||||||||||||
| For those with an initial positive PPD, conversion, or Quantiferon Gold test, a chart review will be conducted to assess for the following: | ||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Chest X-Ray is completed within seventy two (72) hours of initial positive PPD or Quantiferon Gold test | |||||||||||||
| Q2 | LTBI treatment is administered per provider order | |||||||||||||
| Q3 | Monthly LTBI visit conducted by RN, mid-level practitioner, or physician. | |||||||||||||
| Weighted Average: | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | |||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | Yes | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC# | INFO | INFO | Q1 | INFO | INFO | Q2 | Q3 | |||||
| DATE OF | ||||||||||||||
| POS RESULT | DATE | |||||||||||||
| OF CXR | CXR 72 HOURS | START DATE | ||||||||||||
| LTBI TX | END DATE | |||||||||||||
| LTBI TX | LTBI TX COMPLETE | LTBI VISIT | ||||||||||||
| Q MONTH | Notes | |||||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||||||||
| 100 |
15 Vaccination Prog
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||||
| Audit No: | 15 | Vaccination Program | Date of Audit: | ||||
| Threshold: | 98% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||||
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: | |||||
| The medical vendor shall maintain a facility specific Influenza Clinic binder which shall include the dates influenza clinics were held and copies of each completed vaccine consent form. Consent forms shall be maintained on-site until reviewed by an IDOC Healthservices team member in the first quarter. | |||||||
| KPI | 1. Influenza vaccine Clinics: (scored in Q1 only) | ||||||
| Percentage of facilities that completed at least two annual flu vaccine clinics between October 1st and December 31st | 100% | ||||||
| Total number of facilities | 10 | ||||||
| Total number of facilities that completed both required clinics (credit will not be given for partial compliance) | 10 | ||||||
| FACILITY | DATE #1 FLU VACC CLINIC | DATE #2 FLU VACC CLINIC | FLU |
CLINIC
| ICIO | 1 | |||||||||
| NICI | 1 | |||||||||
| PWCC | 1 | |||||||||
| SAWC | 1 | |||||||||
| MVTC | 1 | |||||||||
| ISCC | 1 | |||||||||
| SBWCC | 1 | |||||||||
| IMSI | 1 | |||||||||
| ISCI | 1 | |||||||||
| SICI | 1 | |||||||||
| TOTAL: | 10 | |||||||||
| Residents identified as needing a Shingrix or RSV vaccine are offered the relevant vaccine(s) in the quarter in which their birthday falls. | ||||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE: | ||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Num | 0 | |||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | |||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | INFO | DATE | Q1 | DATE | Q2 | INFO | ||
| VACCINE | ||||||||||
| DUE | SHINGRIX |
ADMIN OR
| REFUSED | SHINGRIX | RSV |
| ADMIN OR REFUSED | RSV | ADMIN |
OR
REFUSED
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
| 13 |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 17 |
| 18 |
| 19 |
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 25 |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| 30 |
| 31 |
| 32 |
| 33 |
| 34 |
| 35 |
| 36 |
| 37 |
| 38 |
| 39 |
| 40 |
| 41 |
| 42 |
| 43 |
| 44 |
| 45 |
| 46 |
| 47 |
| 48 |
| 49 |
| 50 |
| 51 |
| 52 |
| 53 |
| 54 |
| 55 |
| 56 |
| 57 |
| 58 |
| 59 |
| 60 |
16 Preg Resident
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 16 | Pregnant Residents | Date of Audit: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weight: | 4% | Auditor: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: The medical vendor shall maintain a current registry of pregnant residents and submit a facility level pregnancy log, to IDOC on or before the 15th day of each month following the close of the relevant reporting quarter. For any pregnant resident who delivers, they will be kept on the registry for 90 days to ensure that post-partum depression screening is completed and that no other urgent pregnancy related needs are identified. Chart reviews will be conducted on all pregnant and post-partum residents up to 90 days after delivery. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Pregnant and postpartum residents receive timely and appropriate prenatal and post-partum care and their record reflects the following: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Problem List accurately reflects pregnancy related diagnosis | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q2 | STI testing is conducted within 7 days of intake: HIV, HCV, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q3 | OUD screening is completed at intake using a validated screening tool | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q4 | If OUD diagnosis at intake, MOUD agonist is offered or resident is referred to a local OTP | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q5 | Prenatal vitamins prescribed - Initial Health Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q6 | Bottom bunk order in place | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q7 | Snack order in place | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q8 | Pillow order in place | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q9 | Seen by OB within 30 days of intake | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q10 | Evaluated by mid-level provider or physician at least once per month while pregnant | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q11 | All pregnancy encounters contain a full set of vital signs (T,R,P,BP,O2 Sat) and actual weight | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q12 | First postpartum visit occurred 1-14 days post delivery | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Q13 | Second postpartum visit occurred between 5 and 7 weeks post delivery | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IDOC | Counseling provided and documented in accordance with her expressed desires regarding her pregnancy, whether she elects to keep the child or use adoptive services | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IDOC | Depression screening is conducted at least once during pregnancy (validated tool) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IDOC | Depression screening is conducted at least once during the post partum period (validated tool) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||||||||||||||||
| INFO | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | IDOC | IDOC | IDOC | |||||
| SITE | NAME | IDOC # | DUE DATE | PROB | |||||||||||||||||
| LIST | STI TESTING 7 DAYS | OUD SCREEN | MOUD | ||||||||||||||||||
| RX | VITA- | ||||||||||||||||||||
| MINS | BOTTOM BUNK | SNACK | EXTRA PILLOW | OB 30 DAYS | MONTHLY PROVIDER EVAL | ENCOUNT VITALS | PP #1 VISIT | ||||||||||||||
| 1-14D | PP #2 |
VISIT
5-7 WKS COUNS DESIRES PREG
DEPR
SCREEN POST -P
DEPR
| SCREEN | Notes | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
17 Long-Term Care
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | ||||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 17 | Long-Term Resident Care | Date of Audit: | |||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | |||||||||||||
| Weight: | 4% | Auditor: | ||||||||||||||
| Population Sampled: IDOC Health Services auditors will review the records of all residents housed in and admitted to long-term care in the relevant audit period. All assessments must be face-to-face and conducted once every seven (7) days, documentation in absentia does not meet this standard. | ||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Admission assessment conducted by a physician or mid-level provider on day of admission to LTC | |||||||||||||||
| Q2 | Weekly physical assessment conducted by a physician or mid-level provider | |||||||||||||||
| Q3 | Weekly skin assessment conducted by a physician or mid-level provider (discussion - diabetic/wounds, impaired mobility, bed sores, etc.)? | |||||||||||||||
| Q4 | Weekly mental status evaluation is documented, including orientation to person, place, and time. If significantly different from baseline, plan must be documented (baseline is progressive week-to-week, not retroactive to baseline at admission). | |||||||||||||||
| Q5 | Weekly review of vital signs, including weight (actual), is conducted by a physician or mid-level provider. If abnormal, plan is documented. | |||||||||||||||
| Q6 | Daily vital signs and weekly weights are conducted | Discuss | ||||||||||||||
| Q7 | If > or < 5lb weight change in the previous 7 days, physician or mid-level provider documented a plan to address weight change | |||||||||||||||
| Q8 | If > of < 5% weight change over the previous month, physician or mid-level provider documented a plan to address weight change | |||||||||||||||
| Chart Review: | Yes | Total | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Report (Vendor): | Yes | Denom | 0 | |||||||||||||
| Dashboard (IDOC): | No | % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||||||||||||
| SITE | INFO | INFO | INFO | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | |||||
| NAME | IDOC# | ADMIT | ||||||||||||||
| DATE | DIS | |||||||||||||||
| POSITION DATE | DIS | |||||||||||||||
| POSITION | ADMIT | |||||||||||||||
| ASSMT | WKLY | |||||||||||||||
| ASSMT | WKLY SKIN ASSMT | WKLY MENTAL STAT | WKLY | |||||||||||||
| VS REVIEW | NURSE VS(D), WT (WK) | >5LB WT CHANGE 7 D | >5% WT CHANGE 1 MO | NOTES | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| 15 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 IDOC Data Sensitivity Classification - L3 Restricted
18 Acute Infirmary Care
| Idaho Department of Correction Value Based Care Audit | |||||||||||||||
| Audit No: | 18 | Infirmary | Date of Audit: | ||||||||||||
| Threshold: | 95% | Type of Audit: | MED QTR (X) | ||||||||||||
| Weight: | 3% | Auditor: |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .