SF30-AMD0003_-_FBO_-.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

AMD 003

Heather Bowden

The purpose of this amendment is to provide Q&A and 5th floor drawing.

Please see attachments for additional details.

General Services Administration Acquisitions Division 400 15th ST. SW Auburn, WA, 98001

General Services Administration Acquisitions Division 400 15th ST. SW Auburn, WA, 98001

EQ10PCB-1-18-0042

EQ10PCB-1-18-0042

RWA: N174849707/17/2018

05/22/2018

1 7

SCHEDULE

Item No. Supplies/Services Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

RFQ: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Space Renovations Project

AMENDMENT AMD 003

RFQ Number: EQ10PCB-1-18-0042

POSTING: RFQ and Amendments are posted on FedBizOpps

The purpose of this Amendment (002) is to:

ADDING: Questions & Answers – Received through July 13, 2018

ADDING: 5TH Floor Drawing

NOTE: No additional questions will be accepted after the posting of the amendment.

Please acknowledge receipt of this amendment AMD 003 in writing when submitting your proposal. Proposal due date remains July 20, 2018 at 2:00 pm (PST).

Item # Date Submitted

Question Response Date Response Responded By Responded in Amendment

1 6/14/18 Can another site walk be conducted? 6/15/18 Second site walk date set for 20 Jun 18 - See amendment AM0002 for additional details. CO / COR AM0002

2 6/14/18

The provided drawings for this project: Can you please specify the areas that will need flooring? I have attached the official drawings for reference. Would be beneficial if we could clearly identify the scope of work to avoid misinterpretation.

6/15/18

No areas need new flooring – the existing carpet will remain. Only in areas where we are adding or removing walls will new carpet need to be installed to patch.

COR AM0002

3 6/14/18 Index of color in the provided in drawings: Many things are going on in the diagram related to the project, but we could not identify the flooring annotations.

6/15/18 Because no new flooring is needed, except where to cut/patch from adding or removing walls. COR AM0002

4 6/14/18

We can see that the new walls are identified with the color black, and the existing walls are identified as green. Are the blue walls going to be replaced? Since we take into consideration all walls it is challenging to locate the flooring scope of work. Please advise. 6/15/18

Blue walls are existing and will remain. They are walls original to the space, while green walls indicate previous tenant improvements

COR AM0002

5 6/14/18

We will bid as a sub-contractor on this project. Is it possible to have access to the list of interested general contractors and/or site visit attendees list? We will submit our bid to general contractors.

However, I did not see the mentioned list in FBO (FedBizOpps.gov).

6/15/18

Sign in sheet is being provided in AM0002

CO AM0002

6 6/14/18

The SOW is identifying two separate systems; to determine which system is required the following items need to be clarified:

“All PAC doors shall be monitored by FPS at the regional MegaCenter (See provided DHS-FPS MegaCenter Alarm Requirements, “MARs”……The MegaCenter monitors IDS not

PACS.

“The client and server software shall be used in conjunction with intelligent controllers to provide a distributed access control and alarms monitoring system. In the event of a communications failure between the host server and the field controllers, the controllers shall continue to make local access control decisions and save all transactions in memory until communications are restored. At that time the controller shall upload all stored transactions to the server” Once again the PACS and IDS are two separate systems.

6/15/18

The system must integrate the MARs.

COR AM0002

7 6/14/18

Confirm the statement: “The system must process a minimum of 64 megabytes, use PIV/CAC exclusively, and be modeled on FIPS201-1 (not FIPS201-2).”

6/15/18

The system must to be able to process the currently issued Gov't credential PIV/PIV-I/CAC card. It should process no less than 64mgb to accomplish this. However, as an industry expert if the contractor is aware of a system that can process the PIV/PIV-I card, be clone/tamper resistant at the FIPS 201-1 standard but not process at the 64Mgb level and be a cost savings alternative, we would entertain the suggestion.

COR AM0002

8 N/A

No Question but notification

6/15/18

Contractor shall disregard requirement #7, "Sound Attenuation" for Director's Suite only.

All other sound attenuation requirements (Mail/Copy Room and LE Suite) shall remain

COR AM0002

9 N/A

Scope of Work (SOW) being replaced in its entirity.

6/15/18

Government has added additional requirement to SOW: Install dense packed celluose sound bat in newly constructed wall between Section 930 and Director's Suite. Sheath Director's Suite side (of wall) with one layer sound rock and one additional layer Type X GWB.

COR AM0002

10 6/14/18 We did not see existing HVAC, Alarm system & Fire Sprinkler drawings. Can we get those

6/15/18

HVAC and Fire Sprinkler PDFs provided.

Contractor responsible for verifying accuarcy.

Fire Alarm drawings are SBU and can be provided post award.

COR AM0002

11 6/14/18 Is the PIV Access Control system that is part of this RFP going to be an extension of the existing access control system or a separate system?

6/15/18 Separate from any other PACS system. However it will be integrated via the Mega Center MARS for IDS

COR AM0002

12 6/14/18

In regards to Section 2 (Project Background) – Can the government provide further clarification in regards to “security system enhancements complaint with GSA’s HSPD-12 security system”? Was this intended to reference GSA’s Approved Products List (APL) (https://www.idmanagement.gov/approved-products-list/) If so can the PACS system be any system off the APL or is there a specific PACS system preferred?

6/15/18

Contractor shall/can use any product off the

APL.

COR AM0002

13 6/14/18 In regards to Section 6.11 (Physical Access Control System (PACS)) – this section references FIPS201-1 compliance. In order to meet this requirement the security installer must be a qualified HSPD-12 Systems Integration Service Provider. Can the government directly outline this requirement in the SOW?

6/15/18

This system is a stand alone system, integration is not required. References to the FIPS 201-1 are in reference to Tamper, and Clone vulnerabilities as well as being able to process a FIPS 201-1 compliant credential e.g. PIV/PIV-I/CAC. This system is not expected to validate CHUID nor be integrated into a Fed Bridge. Simply read and process at a FIPS 201-1 level prohibiting clone and tampering.

COR AM0002

14 6/14/18 Due to the importance of these questions in determining the labor and certifications required, would the government allow for an extension until these questions are answered

6/15/18 Due date has been extended. Please see the amendment for additional details. CO AM0002

15 6/14/18 Will there be an extension granted on the proposal due date once all the questions have been consolidated? 6/15/18 Pending at this time. If an extension is done it will be through an amendment CO AM0002

16 6/14/18

System to be designed to be able to integrate with am existing regional system at a later date. What system, by what manufacturer? Codebench was mentioned as it was a manufacturer and 64Mb PIV/CAC system based on FIPS201-1, but no manufacturer.

6/15/18

This is no longer a requirement. Contractor shall disregard.

COR AM0002

17 6/14/18

12 doors and all but one are single, but little to no information on if they are mortise or mag locks and who is supplying the locks.

* Doors are to have position switches and a local sounder, but no mention of a request to exit.

* Doors are supposed to identified with push bars on the drawings, but I didn’t see it. I am guessing mostly mortise locks by division 8, but I am just guessing.

6/15/18

Contractor to supply mortise locks and e strikes, contractor shall note on door schedule. RTE is required on secured doors, contractor shall note on door schedule. Follow all P100 and FLS codes as noted in PBS-P100 2017 and Region 10 Fire Alarm Design, Installation and Testing Policy.

COR AM0002

18 6/14/18

All doors to be monitored at the Federal Mega center. No information on dual contacts, existing security panel or anything.

Is there a security system, does it need new contacts as doubles or relays on our system to be monitored? I would need more information on how to do this and an IDS system was not mentioned in the SOW or drawings. Security system is only mentioned as the PACS system.

6/15/18

MARS identifies all that is needed to intgrate into the Mega Center ops.

COR AM0002

19 6/14/18

The access system is not to be on the BLM network. Do we supply the switch, or do they?

* Contractor is to run network drops, is that the GC or us?

* If we supply the switch does it need to be Cisco if they later decide to integrate to the BLM network for regional server connection?

6/15/18

The security system is stand alone, and will not be on anyone's network. GSA has no preference as to who provides drops. No switch required.

COR AM0002

20 6/27/18 Does the government want the existing lighting to be reused or replaced or retrofitted with LED kits? 7/16/18 reuse existing lighting COR AM0003

21 6/27/18

If the existing lighting is to be replaced or retrofitted with LED kits, how far will this extend? For example, would any of the lights around “Door 1” require any work? Would the entire area of the “Director’s Suite” and “Section 930” require any lighting upgrades?

7/16/18 n/a, as the exisitng lighting will be reused

COR AM0003

22 7/11/18

In the SoW revision 2, section 6 (page 4) it calls for 5/8” gypsum board for new walls then later in section 6, Salient Characteristics (page 12), under Gypsum Wallboard it calls for QuietRock 530.

Excluding the wall between section 930 and the Director’s Suite as this wall has a unique assembly, just want clarification that all new walls are getting QuietRock 530 on both sides?

7/16/18

New walls should get QuietRock 530 or approved equal with same charactericts.

COR AM0003

23 7/11/18

In SoW revision 2, section 6.8 Security Mesh Wall Extension – LE Suite (Evidence Room) it calls for a suspended security mesh ceiling layer above the existing ACT grid.

As this would require multiple cuts of the mesh to fit around the ACT suspension wires as well as any fire alarms, sprinklers, and HVAC, would GSA allow the security mesh to be installed vertically from top of wall to the underside of the floor above?

This would prevent intrusion into space from above.

7/16/18

Yes

COR AM0003

24 7/12/18 Clarification – The only new electrical power and data devices shown on existing walls (green walls), are located on the wall adjacent to the new conference room?

7/16/18 Yes

COR AM0003

25 7/12/18

Can Type MC cable and flexible metal conduit be used to feed new electrical devices in existing walls, to reduce cutting, painting and patching that would be needed to install metallic tubing? 7/16/18

Yes

COR AM0003

26 7/12/18

In the new conference room, during the pre-bid walkthrough it was not possible to locate all of the existing floor boxes to determine if the desired quantity of (12) existed as noted, With the amount of furniture and the carpet installed over top of these outlets. Is there electrical drawings showing the current electrical layout in this area?

7/16/18

As builts of electrical do not exist. Operations managers will work with selected contractor to confirm locations.

COR AM0003

27 7/12/18 If new electrical powered floor boxes are to be added, is a round ‘poke thru’ style floor box acceptable? 7/16/18 Yes, submittal required prior to final approval COR AM0003

28 7/12/18 It is described to add (2) HDMI outlets in the new conference room for wall mount TV’s, where is the other end of the HDMI cable to be located to connect to the TV’s.

7/16/18 Lower left (south east ) corner of conference room where podium is shown. COR AM0003

29 7/12/18 Regarding the BLM Server room, to determine cable length, is the 5th floor drawing of this area located overtop of the 4th floor drawing where Door 1 is shown?

7/16/18 Drawing of 5th floor provided for reference, note one door is not shown. COR AM0003

30 7/12/18 In the new conference room, office 3 and office 5, are the lighting fixtures to be isolated and new individual lighting controls to be added for these rooms?

7/16/18 Yes

COR AM0003

7/12/18

Is it acceptable to install all new power and security conduits above the ACT ceilings of the forth floor to feed to the new electrical and security devices?

7/16/18 Yes, if there is room in the ceiling. GSA prefers use of the walker duct, the conduit exists already in the floor.

COR AM0003

NOTE: NO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS WILL BE

ANSWERED AFTER AMD 0003 IS PUBLISHED.

BLM SERVER

ROOM

AFB 5TH FLOOR

FOR

REFERENCE

ONLY