Attachment No. 2.docx
DOCX document 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SUPER Novel Optically diVerse Applications (SUPERNOVA) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- BAA-10-RD-01
About this file
Cost Proposal Instructions (FAR CONTRACTS) - Attachment No. 2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
SUPER Novel Optically diVerse Applications (SUPERNOVA) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Det 8, AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY AFRL/PK
COST PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS
(FAR CONTRACTS)
1. Offerors shall:
a. Ensure the attached DET 8 AFRL Air Force Adequacy Checklist (AFPAC) be completed and submitted as part of your proposal. In addition, it is highly recommended that you flow this checklist to your subcontractors/affiliates where certified cost and pricing data is required and that you use the elements of the AFPAC to evaluate the adequacy of a subcontractor/affiliate proposal.
You are advised that the contracting officer may determine costs associated with revising/reworking inadequate cost proposals as unreasonable, and must consider the nature and extent of any proposal inadequacies when assessing/negotiating profit.
b. Prepare and submit cost or pricing data and supporting attachments in accordance with Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408. Further, the offeror shall (1) include the attached Air Force Proposal Adequacy checklist (AFPAC) in pre-submission proposal quality reviews, and (2) furnish the completed checklist as part of their proposal submission.
c. Provide these Cost Proposal Instructions to all subcontractors. Proprietary subcontractor data may be submitted directly to the Government in accordance with Proposal Preparation Instructions in this announcement.
d. Furnish Tables 1 thru 4 (examples attached) for the entire performance period (supported by rationale required by paragraph 2) in hard copy and on CD as IBM PC compatible, Microsoft Excel, to include all cell formulas. Include a separate Cost Element Summary by Offeror Fiscal Year (OFY) for the basic and each option or task order as proposed. Identify when the OFY begins and ends.
e. Ensure that all rate data and estimating factors used in the proposal have been submitted for review to the cognizant Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) prior to cost proposal submission.
f. Provide copies of recent audits or Forward Pricing Rate Recommendations (FPRRs), Forward Pricing Rate Agreements (FPRAs) etc. to support proposed rates and factors and evidence to support the adequacy of accounting, estimating, and purchasing systems as applicable.
| g. Provide the following information as the first page of the proposal for the Prime and Each Subcontractor. | ||||
| i. | Name, title, telephone and fax numbers and e-mail address of offeror’s point of contact | ii. | Amount proposed for basic effort and each option | |
| iii. | Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant DCMA and DCAA offices | iv. | Name, title, signature of authorized representative | |
| v. | Date offer is submitted and expiration date of offer | |||
| vi. DUNS Number | ||||
| vii. CAGE Code |
2. Using the format in Table 1, submit a cost element summary by major cost element by OFY for each contract line item (CLIN) (i.e. basic period of performance and each option (if applicable) and/or Task, etc.). The detail required for each major cost element is described below. Address all cost elements applicable to the proposed effort and provide a narrative to support the basis of estimate.
| a. Direct Labor. As part of Table 1, list the proposed hours, rates, and calculated amounts for each direct labor category by OFY, by CLIN. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide rationale for proposed hours and labor mix, and provide the base labor rates for each category. Identify the source of the base rates and explain the methodology used to project each rate for subsequent years. If applicable, identify the proposed escalation factors applied to future estimates and rationale for the proposed factors. |
| Note: If temporary or part-time labor is proposed, explain the differences between the pay rates for full-time and temporary or part-time workers, and the impact of those differences on the direct rates proposed. Identify all uncompensated labor (straight time and/or overtime) included in this cost element, and explain the impact of uncompensated time on direct rates proposed. |
b. Indirect Cost Rates and/or Factors. As part of Table 1, list the proposed base, rate/factor and calculated amount for each indirect cost by OFY, by CLIN. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, identify all indirect cost rates/factors (such as fringe benefits, labor overhead, material overhead, G&A, Cost of Money (COM), etc.) and applicable allocation bases by OFY. If composite rates are used, provide the calculations used in deriving the composite rates. Identify the basis of proposed rates (e.g., FPRA and date of agreement, bidding rates and submission date, actual rates and effective date, billing rates and approval date, etc.).
c. Subcontracts/Interorganizational Transfers (IOTs). As part of Table 1, list each subcontractor/IOT cost separately by OFY by CLIN. Obtain fully disclosed cost proposals from each subcontractor and IOT (those actually performing labor hours) using the same cost element breakout required for Table 1 by OFY for each CLIN. Provide a list of anticipated subcontractors/IOTs using Table 2. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, IAW FAR 15.404-3(b) perform and provide evaluation results of cost/price analysis for each subcontract proposal. If subcontractors were selected on a sole-source basis, provide the rationale for this decision. Differences between the subcontractor/IOT proposed amounts and the prime contractor proposed amounts must be fully explained. If decrement factors are used, explain their development and application. If the proposed subcontractor’s fee rate is higher than the Prime’s fee, provide rationale as to why the subcontractor’s risk is greater than the Prime’s. NOTE: Fully disclosed Subcontractor/IOT proposals (including Tables 1 thru 4) are due by the closing date identified in this announcement.
In accordance with FAR 52.215-22, Limitations on Pass-Through Charges - Identification of Subcontract Effort: The contractor shall utilize Table 2 to identify the cost of work to be performed by each subcontractor by contract or task order as applicable. If the offeror subcontracts more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed the contractor must comply with the requirements of the provision.
| d. Material/Equipment. As part of Table 1, list material/equipment costs by OFY by CLIN. Using Table 4, provide a consolidated priced summary of individual material/equipment quantities and the basis for pricing (vendor quotes, invoice prices, etc.) by OFY by CLIN. For all items proposed, identify the item and show the source, quantity and price. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide information regarding the rationale/methodology used to derive the proposed material/equipment estimate. | |
| e. Travel. As part of Table 1, list travel costs by OFY by CLIN. Using Table 3, separately identify costs for travel including the purpose and number of trips, origin and destination(s), duration, and travelers per trip by OFY by CLIN. Note that Table 3 is a summary format and may be expanded to include more detailed travel rate information and calculations. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, provide a listing of all proposed travel rates (if not already provided as part of Table 3). Provide the basis for the proposed travel rates and rationale for the proposed trips. |
f. Other Direct Costs (ODCs). As part of Table 1, list ODC costs by OFY by CLIN. As part of the basis of estimate narrative, separately identify other direct costs to include consultants. Provide rationale for proposed other direct costs. Also, provide the source, quantity, price, and rationale for each of the proposed ODCs. If proposing consultants, provide consultant agreements to validate proposed rates and a determination by the offeror that the rate proposed is comparable to other consultant rates for work of similar nature. Substantiate the need for proposed consultant services.
g. Cost of Money (COM). Reference paragraph 2b above. Also, refer to FAR 52.215-16, Facilities Capital Cost of Money. Provide a Form CASB-CMF which contains proposed cost of money (COM) factors, if applicable, to include a display of all individual bases for the COM amounts. A DD Form 1861 for each OFY must be submitted if proposing COM.
| h. Fee. Reference paragraph 2b above. Identify proposed fee base and rate. |
| i. New Mexico Gross Receipts Tax (NMGRT). Reference paragraph 2b above. NMGRT may be applicable to the proposed effort. For assistance in determining the extent to which NMGRT may apply and applicable rates, contact the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, 5301 Central Ave., NE, PO Box 8485, Albuquerque, NM 87198, (505) 841-6200, http://www.tax.newmexico.gov/All-Taxes/Pages/Gross-Receipts-Tax.aspx. Identify the cost elements and amounts included in the NMGRT base, if applicable. Demonstrate the method of calculating total tax dollars included in the proposal. |
ATCH: Det 8 AFRL AFPAC
TABLE 1
COST ELEMENT SUMMARY
NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE TABLE - ALL OFFERORS SHOULD PROPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR APPROVED ACCOUNTING PRACTICES.
COST ELEMENT
OFY 1
BASE
OFY 1
RATE
OFY 1
AMT
OFY 2
BASE
OFY 2
RATE
OFY 2
AMT
TOTAL
BASE
AMOUNT
TOTAL
PROPOSED
AMOUNT
DIRECT LABOR
(List each direct labor category separately.)
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| TOTAL DIRECT LABOR |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
SUBCONTRACTS, IOTS
(List Separately)
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
MATERIAL
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| MATERIAL OVERHEAD |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
TRAVEL
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
ODCs (List consultants separately)
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| G&A |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
SUBTOTAL COSTS
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
COST OF MONEY
(See DD Form 1861)
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| FEE |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
TOTAL COST & FEE
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| NMGRT (IF APPLICABLE) |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
TOTAL PRICE
XXXX
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
| XXXX |
*Submit a cost element summary by OFY for each CLIN, basic, option and each Task Order, as appropriate, for each year of performance.
TABLE 2
SUBCONTRACT/INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS & CONSULTANTS
PRICE SUMMARY
| SUBCONTRACTOR NAME |
| SUBCONTRACTOR TASKS** |
| SUBCONTRACT TYPE |
| SUBCONTRACTOR QUOTED PRICE |
| SUBCONTRACTOR COST AS EVALUATED BY PRIME |
| DIFFERENCE |
TOTALS
**Identify Statement of Work or Work Breakdown Structure or provide a narrative explanation as an addendum.
TABLE 3
TRAVEL SUMMARY
| OFY |
| FROM |
| TO |
| PURPOSE |
| # TRIPS |
| # TRVLRS |
| # DAYS |
| TOTAL $ |
TABLE 4
BILL OF MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT
| Item |
| OFY |
| Description |
| Qty |
| Unit Price |
| Total Price |
| Vendor/Source (Company Name, Website URL, Etc) |
| Basis of Estimate (Quote, PO, Eng Est, Etc.) |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| TOTAL |
| 0 |
Revised 2 Nov 10
Attachment No. 2 Air Force Proposal Adequacy Checklist (AFPAC)
| ITEM # |
| ITEM DESCRIPTION |
| FAR |
REFERENCE
| Y |
| N |
or N/A
| PROVIDE EXPLANATION IF EITHER “NO or N/A” (use continuation page if necessary) |
| PROP REF PG |
| 1 |
| Is there a properly completed first page of the proposal in accordance with Table 15-2 I.A or as specified by the Contracting Officer (CO) in the solicitation? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.A |
| 2 |
| Is an Index, appropriately referenced, of all cost or pricing data and information accompanying or identified in the proposal, provided? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.B |
| 3 |
| Are there any exceptions to submission of certified cost or pricing data pursuant to FAR 15.403-1(b)? If so, is supporting documentation included in the proposal? Refer to checklist items 15, 16 and 17. |
| FAR 15.403-1(b) |
| 4 |
| Does the proposal include EXCEL spreadsheets of all applicable tables, on CD ROM WITH FORMULAS? |
| 5 |
| Is there a TABLE 1 cost element summary by major cost element by Offeror Fiscal Year (OFY) for each contract line item (CLIN) (i.e. basic period of performance and each option (if applicable) and/or Task, etc.). (Breakdowns for each cost element must be consistent with your cost accounting system.) |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.D & E |
| 6 |
| If more than one CLIN (Contract Line Item Number) or sub-CLIN (Sub Line Item is proposed as required by the RFP, are there summary total amounts covering all line items for each element of cost and is it cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, I. D & E |
| 7 |
| Is total price by cost element provided by each OFY? |
| 8 |
| Are CLIN prices by cost element provided by each OFY? |
Are all cost element breakdowns provided using TABLE 1?
FAR 15.408, Table 15-2
| 10 |
| Does the proposal reflect all specific requirements established by the CO? |
| 11 |
| If an incentive contract type, is contract geometry included (e.g. contractor proposed target cost, target profit or fee, min/max, ceiling, share ratio)? |
MATERIAL
| Note |
| Consolidated Bill of Material (CBOM). A CBOM is a consolidated priced summary of individual material quantities and subcontract items included in the various tasks, orders, or contract line items being proposed and the basis for pricing (negotiated/invoice prices, vendor quotes, average unit pricing, prior purchase history, long term agreements, etc). The offeror’s CBOM shall include estimated raw materials, parts, components, assemblies, subcontracts and services to be produced or performed by others, identifying as a minimum; the item, source, quantity and cost. |
| 12 |
| As part of Table 1 is material/equipment listed by OFY by CLIN? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II A. |
| 12.1 |
| Is there a completed Table 4 priced summary of individual material/equipment quantities and the basis for pricing (vendor quotes, invoice prices, etc.) provided by OFY by CLIN? For all items proposed are the items, sources quantity and prices identified? Is a basis of estimated narrative provided with information regarding the rationale/methodology used to derive the proposed material/equipment estimate? |
SUBCONTRACTS (Purchased material or services)
| 13 |
| Are fully disclosed subcontractor/IOT proposals (Including Tables 1 through 4) submitted to the government by the closing date identified in the RFP? |
| FAR 15.404-3(c) |
| 13.1 |
| Is Table 2 completed identifying the cost of work to be performed by each subcontractor by contract or task order as applicable |
| 13.2 |
| Does the proposal include the prime contractor’s evaluation and results of cost/price analysis establishing the reasonableness of each subcontract proposals? |
| FAR 15.404-3(b) |
| Note |
| Analyses not provided with the proposal may result in a delay to audit, fact-finding and negotiations. Analyses not included with the proposal shall be provided as soon as possible after the proposal submission date and shall be accomplished in sufficient time to support the definitization/contract award schedule. |
| 13.3 |
| If the subcontractors were selected on a sole-source basis, is the rationale for this decision provided? |
| 13.4 |
| If differences between the subcontractor/IOT proposed amount and prime contractor proposed amounts exist, is the reason for the difference fully explained? |
| 13.5 |
| Are decrement factors development and application fully explained? |
| 13.6 |
| Does the proposal identify those actions where assist audits have been requested by the prime or sub-tier contractors and identify the request date and scheduled receipt date? |
| Note |
| The need for assist audits resulting from proprietary data rights assertions at any tier must be identified to the CO as soon as possible in the proposal build cycle. Notwithstanding assist audits performed by the government, contractors must still perform and provide Price/Cost Analysis. |
INTERORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFERS
| 14 |
| For inter-organizational transfers proposed at cost, does the proposal include a complete fully disclosed cost proposal in compliance with Table 15-2 and this checklist? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.A.(2) |
| Note |
| Inter-organizational work is considered to be part of the certified cost or pricing data submission of the prime. As such, the prime contractor’s responsibility for conducting subcontractor Cost/Price Analysis does not apply to inter-organizational transfers. However, prior to the submission of the proposal, the prime contractor shall (a) ensure that all statement of work tasks are addressed without duplication and are consistent with the overall program performance schedule and, (b) ensure ground rules and assumptions are consistent with the prime proposals. |
| 15 |
| For inter-organizational transfers proposed at price in accordance with FAR 31.205-26(e), does the proposal provide an analysis by the prime that supports the exception from certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1 (reference checklist items 15, 16, and 17 below)? |
| FAR 31.205-26(e), FAR 15.403-1 |
ADEQUATE PRICE COMPETITION
| 16 |
| Does the proposal support the degree of competition and the basis for establishing the source and reasonableness of price for each subcontract or purchase order priced on a competitive basis exceeding the threshold for certified cost or pricing data? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.A.(1) |
COMMERCIAL ITEM DETERMINATIONS
| 17 |
| Is the contractor proposing commercial items either at the prime or subcontractor level that would be exempt from certified cost or pricing data requirements? |
| FAR 2.101, |
FAR 15.403-1 (b)(3) or (b)(5)
| Note |
| If you are modifying a commercial item or are providing a modified commercial item, there may be circumstances that require the submission of certified cost or pricing data (see Note to checklist item 17.3 below). |
| 17.1 |
| Has the contractor provided support for prime contractor assertions of commerciality and any subcontractor Commercial Item Determinations (CIDs) addressing, at a minimum, the following: |
| Note |
| A subcontractor CID includes the following information/data in addition to the prime contractor’s independent price analysis and conclusion of the subcontractor’s commerciality assertion. (checklist item 17.5.D) |
| 17.2 |
| Has the contractor provided a description of supplies or services and the basis for which the supply or service meets the Government’s requirements? |
| 17.3 |
| Has the contractor specifically identified the type of commercial item claim (FAR 2.101 commercial item sub-definitions (1) through (8)), and the basis on which the item meets the definition? |
| FAR 2.101 |
| 17.4 |
| For modified commercial items (commercial item sub definition) (3); did the contractor classify the modification(s) as either: |
A. Of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace (FAR 2.101 commercial item sub-definition (3)(i)) or
B. A minor modification (FAR 2.101 commercial item sub-definition (3)(ii)) of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace made to meet Federal Government requirements not exceeding the thresholds in FAR 15.403-1(c)(3)(iii)(B)? (see note below)
FAR 2.101
FAR 15.403-1
| Note |
| Modifications that do not qualify as “minor” under FAR 2.101 sub-definition (3) or modifications that qualify as “minor” where the total price of all such modifications exceeds the greater of the threshold for certified cost or pricing data (FAR 15.403-4) or 5% of the total price of the contract at the time of contract award are NOT exempt from the submission of certified cost or pricing data. Where the contractor is proposing a modified commercial item, the CO should, in every case, be consulted as soon as possible before the proposal is submitted. |
| 17.5 |
| Technical Assessment: For proposed commercial items “of a type”, or “evolved” or modified (FAR 2.101 commercial item sub-definitions (1) through (3)), did the contractor provide a technical description of the differences between the proposed item and the comparison item(s)? |
| FAR 2.101 |
| 17.6 |
| Price Reasonableness: Has the contractor provided, or made available, data other than certified cost or pricing data to establish price reasonableness of the proposed commercial item (to include any modifications not subject to certified cost or pricing data (ref. Note under checklist item 17.3 above) by supplying: |
A. Information/data related to competition (refer to checklist item 15), B. Information/data related to prices (sales data, market price assessments, etc.), C. cost data (cost elemental breakdown and supporting documentation not subject to certification in accordance with FAR 15.406-2), and D. for subcontractor assertions, the prime contractor’s price analysis/price reasonableness determination?
FAR 15.402(a)(2), FAR 15.403-1(c)(3)(ii), FAR 15.403-3(c), FAR 15.404-3(b) FAR 15.404-3(c)
FAR 15.406-2
| Note |
| The preferred method to establish the price reasonableness of commercial items is to obtain commercial sales data. It is recognized that other methods, such as market price assessments data or cost data not subject to certification, are also acceptable when prior sales data cannot be obtained. Sales data must (1) demonstrate sales to the general public, (2) be current and where possible, (3) in like quantities. Items sold to state, local or foreign governments or items sold with applications only to state, local, foreign government or the US government end items, are not considered to be sales to the general public unless the proposed commercial item meets the commercial item definition FAR 2.101 commercial item sub-definition (8). |
LABOR
| 18 |
| As part of Table 1, was a list provided of the proposed hours, rates and calculated amounts for each direct labor category by OFY by CLIN? |
| 19 |
| As part of the basis of estimate narrative was rationale provided for the proposed hours and labor mix? Is the source of the base rates and methodology used to project each rate for subsequent years fully explained? Are the proposed escalation factors applied to future estimates identified and rationale for the proposed factors provided? |
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
| 20 |
| Does the proposal include other direct costs and the basis for pricing by OFY by CLIN? Is there a fully completed Table 3 listing all proposed travel, by basic, each option or task order (as applicable) by OFY? If travel is discretely estimated does the proposal include number of trips, number of people, number of days per trip, locations, and rates (e.g. airfare, per diem, hotel, car rental, etc)? Does the proposal identify the basis for the proposed travel rates and rationale for the proposed trips? If consultants are proposed, does the proposal include a copy of the consultant agreements? Are the proposed consultant rates comparable to other consultant rates for work of similar nature? Is the need for the proposed consultant services substantiated? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II.D |
NEW CONTRACTS (INCLUDING LETTER CONTRACTS)
| 21 |
| Does the proposal identify actual hours, and cost incurred as well as hours/cost to complete and the time phasing associated with these hours/costs? This information/data is to be provided consistent with cost element summaries as identified in checklist item 9. |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, III |
CHANGE ORDERS, MODIFICATIONS AND CLAIMS
| 22 |
| If the proposal is for a modification or change order, have cost of work deleted (credits) and cost of work added (debits) been provided in the format described in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.B? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III.B |
PRICE REVISIONS/REDETERMINATIONS
| 23 |
| For price revisions/redeterminations, does the proposal follow the format in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2.III.C? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 III.C |
FACILITIES COST OR MONEY
| 24 |
| If facilities capital cost of money is proposed, does the proposal include a schedule of COM factors? submission of Form CASB-CMF or reference to an FPRP/FPRA and show the calculation of the proposed amount? |
| FAR 31.205-10 FAR Table 15-2,II.F |
RATES AND FACTORS
| 25 |
| Does the proposal include all rates and factors by year that are utilized in the development of the proposal and the basis of those rates and factors (FPRA/FPRP)? Identify the official submittal of such rate and factor data. |
OTHER
| 26 |
| Does the proposal identify the location and point of contact for any certified cost or pricing data which is referenced, but not included, in the proposal? |
| 27 |
| Does the proposal disclose the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, I.C.(2)(i) |
| 28 |
| Does the proposal disclose the nature and amount of any contingencies included in the proposed price? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 I.C.(2)(ii) |
| 29 |
| If Royalties exceed $1,500 does the proposal provide the information/data identified in FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 Paragraph II. E.? |
| FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 II. E. |
w
| 30 |
| If Economic Price Adjustments are being proposed, does the proposal show the rationale and application for the proposed indices? |
| FAR 16.203-4(a)(1) |
| 31.1 |
| Is the contractor proposing Performance-Based Payments? |
| FAR 32.10 |
| 31.2 |
| If so, has the contractor provided an expenditure profile, proposed events and their projected dates, proposed values for each event, completion criteria, and identification of which events are severable or cumulative? |
| FAR 32.10 |
| 32 |
| Excessive Pass-through Charges – Identification of Subcontract Effort, if the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70% of the total cost of work to be performed, does the proposal identify: (i) the amount of the offeror’s indirect costs and profit applicable to the work to be performed by the subcontractor(s); and (ii) a description of the added value provided by the offeror as related to the work to be performed by the subcontractor(s)? |
| FAR 15.408(n) DPAP Memo 23 Dec 2009 (DARS Tracking Number 2009-O0015) |
| 33 |
| Does the proposal explain the basis of all cost estimating relationships (CERs) (labor hrs or material) proposed on other than a discrete basis? |
| Note |
| Calculations/formulas/logic made to generate “CER” costs should be presented with proposal. |
| 34 |
| Does the proposal identify the need for government furnished material/tooling/test equipment? Include the lending contract number and CO contact information if known. |
| FAR 15.408, Table15-2, I A. (7) |
| 35 |
| Does the proposal include identification of any CAS non-compliances, or other estimating deficiencies that may impact the proposed price? |
| FAR Table 15-2.I.A.(8) |
image1.gif
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .