Att6c_Suez_Proposal_for_GRCA_190083_MF-UF_Equip_9-2-20.pdf

SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions

3239 Dundas Street West, Oakville, ON L6M 4B2 Canada

Tel: +1 905 465 3030

Nina Khanzadeh HDR Engineering Project Engineer

Nina.Khanzadeh@hdrinc.com

Water Technologies & Solutions

2913 Quitman St.

Denver, CO 80212

Tel: +1 720 855 7296

Date: September 2nd, 2020

Re: Microfiltration/Ultrafiltration Equipment GRCA 190083 – Replace Inner Canyon Waterline

Dear Ms. Khanzadeh, SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions, is pleased to present our technical proposal for the supply of a ZeeWeed membrane filtration system for the Grand Canyon National Park Trans-canyon Waterline.

As a pioneer and the world leader in membrane technology, SUEZ has proposed the latest technology for this project, featuring a pressurized ultrafiltration membrane, the ZeeWeed 1500. We are fully committed to use our experience and resources to help HDR to efficiently deliver a state-of-the-art membrane facility based on proven, reliable and cost-effective membrane systems.

open platform integrated header (IH) design for the simplest and most competitive membrane replacement

SUEZ strongly believes that water utilities should have options for membrane replacement. This belief has driven us to develop a market leading after-market service business to provide cradle-to-grave support for water and wastewater utilities and to ensure that our customers are beyond satisfied with their SUEZ membranes and system.

SUEZ also understands that when it comes time for membrane replacement, having the freedom and flexibility to evaluate more than one solution is a feature that owners value.

Early versions of Open Platform designs attempted to make a large metal rack that could accommodate all known current modules. While this did, in fact, provide some flexibility in future membrane replacements, it required many sacrifices to accommodate modules of greatly differing size, shape and weight, with tie points in all different configurations. Not only was this inefficiency less than ideal, but pressurized MF/UF membranes are changing faster than any other membrane technology - even a rack designed for every module in existence today cannot possibly be designed to accommodate the generation of modules that will be in existence in 10 years.

The latest Open Platform approach widely adopted in the industry is the Integrated Header (IH).

Where previous generations needed adjustment kits with complex fittings, hoses and supports in order to wedge a new style of module into an existing rack, an Integrated Header (IH) means that there is no more rack to replace. The connections between modules are built directly into the modules themselves. This means that a new manufacturer’s modules can be dropped wholesale onto a clean slab when the old modules are removed with no awkward retrofit kits and supports. This blank canvas is also idea for the latest, greatest and most cost-efficient modules that will be available in the future.

While we are pioneering this latest approach to Open Platform membrane systems, many other manufacturers are on board, including Memcor:

https://www.dupont.com/products/memcorcpIIuf.html

The Integrated Header (IH) system, combined with our self-backwashing technology that requires no separate backpulse tank, means that the SUEZ system can offer the most efficient layouts. As a result, we expect a much smaller footprint and a lower profile than older membrane rack designs. At a remote site with difficult building conditions, smaller footprint is a significant construction savings.

We believe that the Integrated Header (IH) model provides the end user with the greatest value today and the greatest value and flexibility in the future.

standardized offering for the greatest reliability and value

For systems of this size, we believe that the greatest value to the client comes from a completely pre-engineered system that is designed with a conservative flux that does not overload the membranes or require extensive and complex cleaning. Our system is designed with low loading rates (under 30 gfd net) for maximum reliability. These factors allow you to be confident that “the bugs of been worked out”, while simultaeously keeping costs down by carfully managing execution expenses. We are proposing this optimized and standardized system. It meets all of the intent of the specification, but might have some minor dfferences in execution that we believe help to maintain optimal value, such as:

- Our offering comes with our class-leading InSight monitoring package. This package tracks key performance parameters (TMP, temperature, flow, etc.) and provides reports on the overall health of the membrane system. Reports will be explained in detail during commissioning and training. They will offer all the required information to evaluate the overall operation of the membrane system, but may differ slightly from the format requested for the monitored test period report.

- All instruments will be calibrated in the factory and verified by the fields service representatives, but they will not have individualized, factory calibrations certificates.

- The equipment submittal package is described in this proposal and covers all of the “typical” submittals, including P&IDs, electical drawings, layout drawings, equipment cut sheets, O&M manuals, etc.. It is functionally similar to the submitals described in the specification but may differ in format.

dedicated service support and the industry’s best tools

Tina St. Pierre is our regional Lifecycle Manager dedicated to Arizona. Tina is dedicated to the long-term service and support of your plant and will have the largest UF service team in the country available to her.

When we pioneered the municipal membrane market, we knew that we couldn’t afford to have bad references. With that in mind, we set about developing the most advanced and comprehensive tools on the market to ensure that all of our plants were successful.

With a full staff of experienced membrane process experts at your disposal 24-7, we can provide a level of comfort and support that is unparalleled – particularly through those early years when the operators are still “getting to know” the membrane plant. Our process experts are based in North America and are people who have real membrane experience in commissioning and service of real membrane plants.

We also developed industry leading tolls to help the operators manage the plant. Included among them is our InSight system. This system stores key operating data that is invaluable when it comes to troubleshooting with the 24-7 Process Support team. Look back and explore the behavior of the system last week, last month or years ago. Additionally, the operators will receive diagnostic alerts based on this data that range from “Excellent”, to “Fair” to “Could be time for some maintenance”. We help to store and track data from hundreds of plants around the globe – our tools are tried and true and designed for your maximum piece of mind.

A few housekeeping notes include:

- The South Rim plant is designed to provide a 3-train, net production capacity of 1,400 gpm (2.016 MGD) as specified with peak instantaneous flows as high as 590 gpm per skid, consistent with our understanding of the the definition of “firm capacity per UF/MF skid”.

Tina St. Pierre 416-402-9869

905-465-3030 X 3004

InSight Process Support Room

- We have received both Addendum 1 and Addendum 2.

- Each backwash at the South Rim will generate approximately 620 gallons of waste per event and approximately 5% of the total production volume per day. Each backwash at Phantom Ranch will generate approximately 62 gallons of waste and will similarly total to approximately 5% of the daily production.

Solids drain from a high point on the skid and are cleared most efficiently if they are wasted to atmospheric pressure. We recommend allowing backwash waste to drain to a low profile collection tank (9’H or less) with a collection capacity of at least 2 backwash volumes. (A 6’ R, 7’ H circular polyethylene tank would fit this purpose for the South Rim facility).

- All the labor and commissioning time requested in the specification are included in this proposal.

As one of the central pieces of your treatment plant, the ultimate success of your membrane system is based as much on the people and the organization with whom you contract as it is on the technology. We are proud to have pioneered the use of low pressure membranes in municipal applications and of having built an infrastructure that doesn’t allow for bad references. We are very eager to build a long-term partnership with you. Thank you again for your interest and for the opportunity to share our proposal with you.

If you have any questions or require any clarifications regarding any of the subject matter discussed in this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours Truly, Grant MacInnis, P.Eng.

Regional Manager Water Technologies & Solutions 2913 Quitman Street Denver, CO 80212

Proposal for the Grand Canyon National Park Trans-canyon Waterline Replacement Project Project #: GRCA 190083 – Replace Inner Canyon Waterline

SUEZ proposal number: 423682 submitted to:

HDR Engineering attn : Nina Khanzadeh, Project Engineer submitted by:

SUEZ WTS Systems USA, Inc.

3239 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario L6M 4B2

Grant MacInnis, P.Eng.

Regional Manager cell: (303) 396-9532 e-mail: grant.macinnis@suez.com local representation by:

The Coombs-Hopkins Company 4380 So. Syracuse Street, Suite 450

Denver, CO 80237 Phone (303) 477-1970

668 North 44th Street, Suite 251 Phoenix, AZ 85008 Tel: (602) 275-4303

September 2nd, 2020 copyright© SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions, 2020

SUEZ confidential and proprietary information

SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions confidential and proprietary information The enclosed materials are considered proprietary property of SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions (SUEZ). No assignments either implied or expressed, of intellectual property rights, data, know how, trade secrets or licenses of use thereof are given. All information is provided exclusively to the addressee and agents of the addressee for the purposes of evaluation and is not to be reproduced or divulged to other parties, nor used for manufacture or other means, without the express written consent of SUEZ. The acceptance of this document will be construed as an acceptance of the foregoing.

The following are trademarks of SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions and may be registered in one or more countries:

InSight, Z-PAK, ZeeWeed, and ZENON proposal for the Grand Canyon Nation Park Trans-canyon Waterline Replacement Project proposal number 423682 – table of contents Page 1 of 2

Water Technologies & Solutions table of contents 1 SUEZ’s experience and capabilities

1.1 company history

1.2 SUEZ’s quality assurance & quality control

1.3 ZeeWeed 1500 ultrafiltration membrane experience

1.4 project support

1.5 local support

2 references

3 SUEZ’s ZPAK R advantage

3.1 simplified design

3.2 ease of equipment access

3.3 ease of installation

3.4 operating procedures

4 technical and engineering details

4.1 basis of design

4.2 proposed membrane system configuration

5 scope of supply

5.1 scope of supply by SUEZ – South Rim WTP

5.2 scope of supply by SUEZ – Phantom Ranch WTP

5.3 commissioning services

5.4 aftermarket services

5.3 scope of supply by others

6 warranty

6.1 warranty provisions

6.2 mechanical warranty

6.3 membrane warranty

6.4 performance warranty

6.5 initial performance test

6.6 monitored test period

7 commercial terms

7.1 system price

7.2 price validity proposal for the Grand Canyon Nation Park Trans-canyon Waterline Replacement Project proposal number 423682 – table of contents Page 2 of 2

Water Technologies & Solutions

7.3 taxes

7.4 delivery

7.5 payment terms

7.6 proposed project schedule

7.7 membrane module replacement price

7.8 terms and conditions appendix a – ZW1500 RMS module and ZPAK R supplemental information appendix b – equipment technical specifications appendix c – preliminary drawings appendix d – SUEZ hourly rate sheet appendix e – SUEZ’s aftermarket service capabilities appendix f – Seller’s warranty – ZeeWeed membrane modules appendix g – SUEZ standard terms and conditions proposal for the Grand Canyon National Park Trans-canyon Waterline Replacement Project proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 1 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions

1 SUEZ’s experience and capabilities

1.1 company history

From modest beginnings in 1980, ZENON Environmental Inc. grew to become the global leader of low pressure membrane filtration technology. Spurred by the vision that membranes are the world's answer to water shortages, overuse, and pollution, the company has always focused on a single goal—to make superior membrane systems a cost-effective solution for everyone who needs them.

The ZeeWeed ultrafiltration membrane, developed in 1990, was a paradigm shift in membrane technology. At that time, membrane systems were primarily using pressurized cartridges with many components and high energy requirements. ZENON transformed the industry with the introduction of membranes that are immersed directly into process tanks and need only a slight vacuum to filter water.

GE Water & Process Technologies acquired ZENON Environmental Inc. on June 1, 2006, uniting patented ZENON technologies with GE's corporate leadership and financial depth to provide unparalleled performance and the best overall water treatment solutions. GE Water & Process Technologies generated ~$2.1 billion USD in revenues in 2016 with 7,500 highly skilled salesmen and engineers with strong digital capabilities.

On October 1, 2017, SUEZ purchased GE Water & Process Technologies. GE Water & Process Technologies now joins forces with SUEZ’s Industrial Water activities to create the Water Technologies & Solutions business unit within the SUEZ Group. With a solid financial position and a wide breadth of portfolios, this business unit aims to be a worldwide leader in water and treatment solutions for the industrial and municipal markets.

SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions now operates with over 10,000 employees and addresses the needs of over 50,000 customers worldwide. Additionally, relying on 650 R&D and expert staff as well as 17 Research & Excellence Centers of SUEZ, the business unit is committed to expanding its water treatment offerings and digital capabilities to deliver best-in-class solutions.

1.2 SUEZ’s quality assurance & quality control

At SUEZ, we are driven by a passion for delivering on every commitment. We are dedicated to providing our customers the highest quality offerings with unparalleled customer service and responsiveness.

proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 2 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions

1.2.1 QA / QC Program

Our Quality Policy firmly states our commitment to:

Meet and exceed customer expectations

Improve customer satisfaction and trust

Deliver our quality products and services on time, in compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements

Continuously improve the quality of our products, services and processes

Respond quickly and effectively to resolve issues

Our Quality Policy is put into practice as outlined in our Integrated Management System Manual. The Manual describes the systems in place to “Plan – Do – Check – Act,” with involvement from all levels of the organization.

Feedback loops ensure Quality is maintained and improved-upon.

Please refer to the following website for copies of our Quality Policy, and our Integrated Management System Manual.

https://www.suezwatertechnologies.com/ehs-quality-policy

Our quality system is certified by ISO and other quality governing bodies.

1.2.2 membrane and system manufacturing SUEZ is unique from other system integrators that purchase membranes from other suppliers, in that we manufacture the membranes and the skids. By keeping the membrane manufacturing in-house, SUEZ can closely monitor and control the quality of the products offered. Membranes for both the South Rim and Phantom Ranch projects will be manufactured at our world-class manufacturing facility in Oroszlány, Hungary.

Built on a solid foundation of dedication and excellence, the SUEZ membrane manufacturing division is committed to delivering high quality membrane products to global customers. SUEZ owns and operates all of its manufacturing resources to ensure strict controls over the manufacturing process and rigid quality standards for every membrane module that leaves the plants.

SUEZ employs the industry’s most advanced manufacturing techniques, which enables the production of top-quality membranes with maximum efficiency. The manufacturing process is almost completely automated, which minimizes quality issues and maximizes product consistency. Over the past several years, our manufacturing infrastructure has easily accommodated the rapid increases in demand for SUEZ products – increasing production by more than 500 percent during this period.

membrane manufacturing plant located in Oroszlány, Hungary https://www.suezwatertechnologies.com/ehs-quality-policy proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 3 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions

Prior to shipping, all our products undergo a rigorous inspection to verify that all system components meet the quality and performance standards that SUEZ customers have come to expect.

SUEZ manufacturers membrane skids at one of our two manufacturing facilities, implementing the same level of quality and automation utilized at our plant in Hungary. SUEZ will perform hydrostatic pressure tests and leak tests of each skid before shipment; and will perform communication linkage tests in the factory to ensure the master PLC communicates with Remote I/O panels.

1.2.3 quality processes

The following sections profile SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions quality processes.

product design quality is designed into products through a stage-gate methodology all products undergo design and process failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) new products are rigorously tested using standardized methods to simulate accelerated membrane life specialized tests confirm robustness and identify weak points in critical components quality specifications for each product are checked throughout the delivery process membrane manufacturing all incoming raw materials are checked against established specifications all in-process steps are standardized, and work methods are controlled for repeatability quality is built into each process step a 100% final inspection and wet test is conducted on all finished membrane modules 100% material serial number control and lot traceability throughout the operation statistical process control is applied to maintain process control at all times six sigma process improvement methods ensure that process fundamentals are fully understood quality management system the SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions quality management system is ISO

9001:2008 certified semi-annual external audits are conducted by a reputable external certifying body, and internal audits are conducted by cross-company teams SUEZ continually improves its quality management system to facilitate ongoing improvements of its products and services product reliability testing proprietary testing methodologies confirm product reliability testing methods are calibrated against actual field data to ensure fair representation of all challenges that products face in the field product operating parameters are tested well above normal operating ranges to determine potential points of failure, to establish an operational safety factor in our design, and to provide quality assurance proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 4 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions design deficiencies are rigorously investigated to determine root cause.

Countermeasures are retested to confirm the long-term adequacy of any changes.

process reliability and troubleshooting SUEZ maintains three facilities for process testing: (i) ZENON Technology Centre

(ZTC) for testing on actual municipal sewage and/or aggressive surface water; (ii) Guelph Wastewater Testing Facility, with three parallel testing units for comparative studies; (iii) Accelerated testing laboratory for long-term simulation.

full-scale testing of product developments is also conducted at select client sites.

at any time, SUEZ also has approximately 70 pilot units in service at various sites throughout the world. These pilot testing units are an integral part of our process R&D program. New operating approaches are regularly given real world challenges to prove feasibility and effectiveness.

purchased components reliability the quality and reliability group audits the performance of all suppliers.

SUEZ maintains an approved vendor list based on our vendor rating system.

site visits are made to suppliers to confirm that the product is made to specification and any necessary corrective actions are taken by vendors.

suppliers are required to test devices to verify that products meet SUEZ specifications.

through long term relationships with key suppliers we learn, together with our partners, how to ensure delivery of the best possible quality on every job.

global quality database all quality issues and concerns are maintained on a global database.

the SUEZ quality database ensures that we do not repeat problems and we effectively implement any identified countermeasures.

SUEZ customers quickly benefit from anything we learn anywhere in the world.

accountability & support

We treat all customers responsibly and take our accountability for quality and reliability seriously. If an issue or concern is identified, we take the appropriate actions, in partnership with our customers, to implement an agreed upon interim countermeasure, to investigate the root cause of the problem, and to ensure that an adequate corrective action is taken.

We have an unparalleled track record for standing behind our product and working with customers to optimize processes and resolve implementation and operational problems

1.3 ZeeWeed 1500 ultrafiltration membrane experience

SUEZ is a world leader in membrane filtration technology and has been a pioneer in the development of membranes for drinking water treatment applications. Developed in the early 1990’s, the patented ZeeWeed membrane is well-proven, with hundreds of ZeeWeed installations in operation in North America and around the world, in a variety of water and wastewater treatment applications. SUEZ continues to lead the way in the membrane market with > 1750 ZeeWeed installations worldwide.

proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 5 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions

The following table summarizes SUEZ’s experience with ZeeWeed membrane treatment plants Worldwide and in North America.

Total number of ZeeWeed Membrane Treatment Plants worldwide (in operation or design, all applications) > 1750

Total number of ZeeWeed Membrane Treatment Plants in North America (in design or operation, all applications) > 850

Total Number of ZeeWeed Municipal Drinking Water Membrane Plants in North America (in design or operation) > 250

The membrane proposed for both the South Rim and Phantom Ranch Water Treatment Plants is the ZeeWeed 1500 UF pressurized module. Since the product launch in 2009, the ZeeWeed 1500 module has been well proven with many installations ranging in size and feed water quality. The ZeeWeed 1500 module incorporates the identical PVDF material and construction as SUEZ’s immersed ZeeWeed 1000 module.

SUEZ’s experience with the ZW1500 membrane is summarized as follows:

Total Number of Worldwide ZeeWeed Drinking Water Membrane Plants using non-reinforced fiber (in design or operating)

> 190

Total Worldwide Capacity of ZeeWeed Drinking Water Membrane Plants using non-reinforced fiber (in design or operating)

> 1,490 MGD

As requested, detailed reference and contact information is provided for five (5) reference projects in section 2 – references.

1.4 project support SUEZ’s global UF/MBR center of excellence is in Oakville Ontario, Canada. This office is the focal point of SUEZ’s ultrafiltration (UF) membrane research and development, as well as the design and delivery of UF-based water and wastewater treatment systems. The UF membrane division is 100% focused on developing, manufacturing, and supporting leading-edge, hollow fiber water and wastewater treatment solutions. All design, engineering and technical support for the Grand Canyon NPS projects will be directed out of the Oakville, Ontario UF/MBR center of excellence.

SUEZ is uniquely qualified to deliver commissioning services, technical support, and maintenance activities through all phases of the plant’s life, from equipment installation to long term plant operation. SUEZ provides expertise and knowledge with staff that can respond quickly and effectively.

proposal number 423682 – 1 – SUEZ’s experience and capabilities page 6 of 6

Water Technologies & Solutions

SUEZ can confidently state that should a treatment plant require immediate support, we will find a way to get the support required. We are at the ready to put our team to work. When it comes to meeting your after-market service requirements, SUEZ has the depth needed:

technical support staff for 24/7 emergency system controls staff and process support engineers and technicians local field service representatives spare parts

1.5 local support

1.5.1 regional lifecycle manager SUEZ knows the importance and long-term implications involved in selecting a membrane supplier. We invest in this partnership through our regional lifecycle manager, in addition to other communications and services set up to support the operations staff over the life of the plant. The regional lifecycle manager will act as the SUEZ “quarterback”, engaging in frequent communication with plant staff and ensure timely access to all the technical resources provided by SUEZ.

Tina St. Pierre – regional lifecycle manager 416-402-9869 tina.stpierre@suez.com

1.5.2 local representative SUEZ WTS is represented locally by The Coombs-Hopkins Company – representing quality equipment for the treatment of water and wastewater for over 30 years in both the Colorado and Arizona areas.

The Coombs-Hopkins Company

4380 So. Syracuse Street, Suite 450 Denver, CO 80237 Phone (303) 477-1970

668 North 44th Street, Suite 251 Phoenix, AZ 85008 Tel: (602) 275-4303 mailto:tina.stpierre@suez.com proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 1 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions

2 references SUEZ has provided the following five (5) reference projects. We trust that these will provide a representative sample of installations, but please feel free to request references from any of our other plants if you would like to investigate further.

Northwest Clay Utility District WTP, Moss, TN (1.29MGD, expanded to 2.0)

Sicamous / Mara Lake WTP, British Columbia (2.17 MGD)

Dillon Valley District WTP, Dillon, Colorado, USA (1.0 MGD)

Fayetteville WTP, Fayetteville, TN, USA (4.5 MGD, expanded to 8 MGD)

Franklin WTP, Franklin, TN, USA (4.0 MGD)

Additionally, see the end of this section for a full installation list of the ZeeWeed 1500 module.

proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 2 of 11

Northwest Clay Utility District Water Treatment Plant, Moss, Clay County, Tennessee, United States location Moss, Clay County, Tennessee type of system ZeeWeed ultrafiltration owner, contact

Northwest Clay Utility District 3061 Moss Arcot Road Celina, TN 38551 Mr. Jamey Allen E-mail: nwcwtp@gmail.com Tel: (931) 243-3546 process ultrafiltration for Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity removal capacity phase 1: 1.296 MGD phase 2: 2.0 MGD commissioned to be commissioned phase 1: September 2014 phase 2: October 2017 membrane model ZeeWeed 1500 raw water source surface water - Cumberland River raw water quality:

turbidity (NTU) hardness (mg/L as CaCO3) temperature (°C) TOC (mg/L) total iron (mg/l) total manganese (mg/L)

2-235, 1.3-2.6 (settled) 65-100 4-20 1.6-2.2 0.1-0.3 0.01-0.02 pre-treatment process raw water with oxidation/coagulation (direct filtration or settled water) chemical oxidation, flash mix, chemical coagulation (alum), flocculation and settling using plate settlers summary of system design parameters package system model Z-PAK 800 mailto:nwcwtp@gmail.com proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 3 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions number of trains phase 1: 2 phase 2: 2 total number of installed modules phase 1: 30 phase 2: 48 design instantaneous flux at 4°C

44.3 gfd design membrane system recovery

95% design cleaning regime

Maintenance cleans daily with NaOCl at 100 mg/L.

Maintenance cleans are not heated.

Heated recovery cleans every 30 days with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by acid cleans with 2,000 mg/L citric acid.

scope by SUEZ

- feed pumps

- automatic backwash strainers

- aeration blowers

- backpulse tank

- backpulse pumps

- CIP tank

- CIP pump

- chemical dosing panels

- compressed air system

- instrumentation and analyzers proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 4 of 11

Mara Lake Water Treatment Plant, District of Sicamous, British Columbia, Canada location District of Sicamous, British Columbia

446 Main Street Sicamous, British Columbia V0E 2V0 Darrell Symbaluk BPE/ Admin Public Works Supervisor Tel: (250) 836-4105 Colan Morrow 250-517-0934 cmorrow@sicamous.ca process two stage design using ultrafiltration for Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity removal capacity 1st stage: 2.17 MGD (8.2 MLD) 2nd stage: 0.21 MGD (0.78 MLD) date of start up August 2016 membrane model 1st stage: ZeeWeed 1500 2nd stage: ZeeWeed 1500 raw water source surface water – Lake raw water quality:

turbidity (NTU) temperature (°C) TOC (mg/L)

<3 1-18 <2 pre-treatment process 1st stage: 500um strainers 2nd stage: none – direct filtration of 1st stage backwash waste summary of system design parameters package system model 1st stage: Z-PAK 8” PL 2nd stage: Z-PAK 6” PL number of trains 1st stage: 3 2nd stage: 1 total number of installed modules

1st stage: 144 (48 installed modules per train) 2nd stage: 18 design instantaneous flux 1st stage: 29.6 gfd (50.2 lmh) 2nd stage: 11.5 gfd (19.6 lmh) design membrane system recovery

1st stage: 92-95% 2nd stage: 80% overall: 98.2-98.8% proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 5 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions design cleaning regime

1st stage: Maintenance cleans daily; six days per week with 250 mg/L NaOCl, one day per week with 500 mg/L citric acid with sulfuric acid for pH depression. Recovery cleans 12 times per year with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by 2,000 mg/L citric acid with sulfuric acid for pH depression.

2nd stage: Maintenance cleans daily; six days per week with 250 mg/L NaOCl, one day per week with 500 mg/L citric acid with sulfuric acid for pH depression. Recovery cleans 12 times per year with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by 2,000 mg/L citric acid with sulfuric acid for pH depression.

proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 6 of 11

Dillon Valley District Water Treatment Plant, Dillon, Colorado, United States location Town of Dillon, Colorado

Water Solutions, Inc.

Mr. Patrick Armour, Operator PO Box 192, Silverthorne, CO 80498 Tel: (970) 262-0227 Email: paramour@wsicolorado.com process two stage design; 1st stage coagulation for TOC removal, ultrafiltration for Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity removal. 2nd stage permeating directly to distribution.

capacity 1.0 MGD date of start up April 2014 membrane model 1st stage UF: ZeeWeed 1500 2nd stage UF: ZeeWeed 500 raw water source river water raw water quality:

turbidity (NTU) temperature (°C) TOC (mg/L) apparent colour (TCU)

0.4 - 41

0.2 - 11

0.0 – 4.0 10 – 45 pre-treatment process chemical pre-treatment (coagulation) summary of system design parameters system model 1st stage: Z-PAK 350 2nd stage: Z-BOX M12 number of trains 1st stage: 2 2nd stage: 1 total number of installed modules

1st stage: 64 (32 installed modules per train) 2nd stage: 12 design instantaneous flux at 0.2°C

1st stage: 26 gfd 2nd stage: 10 gfd proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 7 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions design membrane system recovery

1st stage: 95% 2nd stage: >76% overall: >99% design cleaning regime

1st stage: Maintenance cleans weekly with 100 mg/L NaOCl and with 2 g/L citric acid.

Heated recovery cleans every 30 days with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by 2 g/L citric acid.

2nd stage: Maintenance cleans weekly with 100 mg/L NaOCl and with 2 g/L citric acid. Recovery cleans every 30 days with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by 2 g/L citric acid.

proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 8 of 11

Fayetteville Water Treatment Plant, Fayetteville, Tennessee, United States location Fayetteville, Tennessee

Fayetteville Public Utilities 408 College Street West Fayetteville, Tennessee 37334 Mr. David Posey, Water Plant Supervisor Tel: (931) 433-1522 process ultrafiltration for Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity removal capacity phase 1: 4.5 mgd phase 2: 6.0 mgd phase 3: 8.0 mgd date of start up April 2016 membrane model ZeeWeed 1500 raw water source surface water - Elk River settled water quality:

turbidity (NTU) temperature (°C)

< 2 95% of the time 6-26 pre-treatment process chemical oxidation, flash mix, chemical coagulation, flocculation and settling using plate settlers summary of system design parameters number of trains phase 1: 3 phase 2: 3 phase 3: 4 total number of installed modules phase 1: 180 phase 2: 240 phase 3: 320 design instantaneous flux at 17°C

52.6 gfd design membrane system recovery

95% design cleaning regime

Maintenance cleans daily with NaOCl at 100 mg/L.

Maintenance cleans are not heated.

Heated recovery cleans every 30 days with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by acid cleans with 2,000 mg/L citric acid with hydrochloric acid (to reduce cleaning solution pH).

proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 9 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions scope by SUEZ

- 3 feed pumps

- 3 automatic backwash strainers

- 2 aeration blowers

- 2 backpulse pumps

- skidded CIP system with 2 CIP pumps

- chemical dosing panels

- compressed air system

- instrumentation and analyzers proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 10 of 11

Franklin Water Treatment Plant, Franklin, Tennessee, United States location Franklin, Tennessee owner, contact

Franklin Water Treatment Plant 838 Lewisburg Pike Franklin, Tennessee 37064 Mr. Brian Goodwin – Assistant Director E-mail: brian.goodwin@franklintn.gov Tel: (615) 794-4554 ext 6863 process ultrafiltration for Giardia, Cryptosporidium and turbidity removal capacity 4.0 MGD commissioned March 2018 membrane model ZeeWeed 1500 raw water source surface water – Harpeth River – to water reservoir settled water quality:

turbidity (NTU) temperature (°C) TOC (mg/L) total iron (mg/l) total manganese (mg/L)

1 - 10 5 – 30 1 - 5

0.05 – 0.2

0.06 – 0.4 pre-treatment process chemical pre-oxidation (sodium permanganate), chemical coagulation (ACH), flash mixing, flocculation, settling, followed by 500 micron strainers proposal number 423682 – 2 – references Page 11 of 11

Water Technologies & Solutions summary of system design parameters package system model Z-PAK 1100 number of trains 3 total number of installed modules design instantaneous flux at 5°C

41.0 gfd design membrane system recovery

95% design cleaning regime

Maintenance cleans daily. Two (2) times per week using 250 mg/L NaOCl. Five (5) time per week using 500 mg/L citric acid with hydrochloric acid (to reduce cleaning solution pH).

Maintenance cleans are not heated.

Heated recovery cleans twelve (12) times per year with 500 mg/L NaOCl followed by acid cleans with 2,000 mg/L citric acid with hydrochloric acid (to reduce cleaning solution pH).

table 1: municipal drinking water and tertiary installations name of facility facility location application size of plant

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

North America

Regional Municipality of Macdonald

Manitoba, Canada drinking water 2,100,000 yes

June 2011 (UF only) river water, pre-oxidation coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.5-30 NTU TOC: 5.1-21 mg/L

Cartier Manitoba, Canada drinking water 1,826,000 yes August 2011

(UF only) river water, pre-oxidation coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.5-27.7 NTU TOC: 9–15 mg/L

Magrath Alberta, Canada drinking water 1,609,000 yes September 2011 river water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-35 NTU TOC: 9-15 mg/L

Flin Flon Manitoba, Canada drinking water 2,030,500 yes July 2013 river water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.2–10 NTU

TOC: 5–14

Village of Chase

WTP

British Columbia, Canada drinking water 1,321,004 yes December 2015 surface water, coagulation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0-10 NTU, avg. 2 NTU TOC: 0-3 mg/L, 1 mg/L avg.

Mara Lake WTP (Sicamous)

British Columbia, Canada drinking water

2,166,446 (1st stage) 206,322 (2nd stage) yes April 2016 surface water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.5-30 NTU, 2 NTU avg.

TOC: 1-3 mg/L, 2 mg/L avg.

Headingly WTP (Cartier Regional Water Cooperative)

Manitoba, Canada drinking water 3,424,042 yes April 2016 surface water, oxidation/coagulation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-100 NTU, 15 NTU avg.

TOC: 6-16 mg/L

Harmony Alberta, Canada drinking water 1,268,026 yes September 2016 river water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.2-14 NTU TOC: 1-2 mg/L location application size of plant

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Grand Cache Alberta, Canada drinking water 1,368,000 yes January 2018 surface water raw water with oxidation/coagulation or settled water, 500 um strainer raw water turbidity: 0.7-8 NTU TOC: 7.2-10 mg/L settled water turbidity: 1-10 NTU, 2 NTU avg.

TOC: 4-10 mg/L, 5 mg/L avg.

Baie Comeau Québec, Canada drinking water 6,000,000 yes May 2018 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.9-1.4 NTU TOC: 4.6-6.1 mg/L

Municipalité de Montebello WTP

Québec, Canada drinking water 528,340 yes May 2018 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: <1 NTU TOC: 3-4 mg/L

Arbutus WTP (Ladysmith)

British Columbia, Canada drinking water P1: 2,848,000 P2: 3,553,000 no July 2020 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, DAF clarifier, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-15 TOC: 0.9-3 mg/L

The Regional Municipality of York Lake Simcoe Water Reclamation Centre

Ontario, Canada tertiary 5,283,400 no March 2022 municipal secondary effluent, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-20 NTU TOC: 5-20 mg/L TSS: 10-18 mg/L TP: 0.6-5 mg/L

Las Gallinas California, USA tertiary

P1: 1,400,000 P2: 2,700,000 P3: 5,400,000 yes August 2012 municipal secondary effluent, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.2-40 NTU BOD: 1.2-30 mg/L TSS: 0.4-38.0 mg/L

Paulding Ohio, USA drinking water 2,150,000 yes January 2014 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 10-40 NTU TOC: 3.2 – 9 mg/L, 4 avg.

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Dillon Valley District

Colorado, USA drinking water 1st stage:

600,000 yes April 2014 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, 500um strainer turbidity: 0.4-41 NTU TOC: 0-4 mg/L

Knox-Chapman Utility District

Tennessee, USA drinking water

P1: 8,000,000 P2:

12,000,000 yes April 2014 surface water, coagulation/flocculation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.5-230 NTU, 15 NTU avg.

TOC: 0.5-5.5 mg/L, 2.0 mg/L avg.

Panoche Demonstration Unit

California, USA reuse

144,000 (UF only) yes June 2014 turbidity: 0.3-7.4 NTU BOD: 0-101.8 mg/L TSS: 41.4-61.8 mg/L

Northwest Clay Utility District

Tennessee, USA drinking water

P1: 1,270,000 P2: 2,000,000 yes

P1: September P2: October 2017 surface water, raw water, or settled water, 500 um strainer raw turbidity: 2-235 NTU,

13.3 NTU avg. TOC:

1.6-2.2 mg/L, 1.89 mg/L avg.

settled turbidity: 1.3-2.6 NTU,

1.75 NTU avg. TOC:

1.4-1.9 mg/L, 1.6 mg/L avg.

Fulton Road Membrane Filtration Facility (Floyd County)

Georgia, USA drinking water 820,000 yes December 2014 groundwater, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.5-10 NTU,

0.75 NTU avg.

TOC: 0.1-3 mg/L,

0.56 mg/L avg.

Service Area 10 WTP in Deadhorse

Alaska, USA drinking water 460,800 yes September 2015 surface water, pre-chlorination, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.02-5.0 NTU

Big Fiery Gizzard WTP Expansion (Tracy City)

Tennessee, USA drinking water 2,000,000 yes November 2015 surface water, oxidation/coagulation, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-60 NTU,

2.6 NTU avg.

TOC: 1.5-8.0 mg/L,

3.0 mg/L avg.

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Fayetteville

WTP

Tennessee, USA drinking water

P1: 4,500,000 P2: 6,000,000 P3: 8,000,000 yes April 2016 surface water, settled water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0-5 NTU, <2 NTU avg.

TOC: 1.8-2.5 mg/L,

2.2 mg/L avg.

Smith Mountain Lake WTP (Bedford)

Virginia, USA drinking water P1: 3,000,000

P2: 4,000,000 yes April 2017 surface water coagulation/flocculation 500 um strainer turbidity: 0-15 NTU, ≤5 NTU avg.

TOC: 2.2-7.9

Rahway WTP New Jersey, USA drinking water 7,700,000 yes October 2017 settled water, 500 um strainer turbidity: < 5 NTU

Lake Forest WTP Illinois, USA drinking water

P1:

14,000,000 P2:

18,000,000 yes February 2018 surface water 200 um strainer turbidity: 0.1-260 NTU, 5 NTU avg.

TOC: 2-3.3 mg/L, 2.65 mg/L avg.

total iron: 0.01-1.88 mg/L avg. 0.1 mg/L

City of Franklin

WTP

Tennessee, USA drinking water 4,000,000 yes March 2018 settled water, 500 um strainer turbidity : 1-10 NTU ≤ 2 NTU avg.

TOC : 1-5 mg/L, ≤ 2 mg/L avg.

Perry Point Veterans Affairs Medical Center

WTP

Maryland, USA drinking water 1,000,000 yes February 2019 surface water oxidation, coagulation, flocculation, and settling 500 um strainer settled water:

turbidity: 1 NTU avg., 10 NTU max.

TOC: 1.9 mg/L avg., 2,8 mg/L max.

total iron: 0.1 mg/L avg., 0.3 mg/L max.

total manganese: 0.02 mg/L avg., 0.05 mg/L max.

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Eastland County

WTP

Texas, USA drinking water 6,000,00 yes May 2019 surface water raw water with oxidation or settled water, 500 um strainer raw water turbidity: 1-5 NTU, 1.5 NTU avg. TOC: 5-13 mg/L, 6.4 mg/L avg.

settled water turbidity: 0.2-5 NTU, 1 NTU avg. TOC: 5-7 mg/L, 5.7 mg/L avg.

Muse Spring

WTP

Virginia, USA drinking water 2,000,000 yes March 2020 well and spring water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-2 NTU, ≤1 NTU avg.

TOC: <1

Catawba River

WTP

South Carolina, USA drinking water 6,000,000 no June 2020 surface water direct filtration with coagulant addition or clarified effluent from Superpulsators 500 um strainer raw water turbidity: 1-78 NTU, 13 NTU avg. TOC: 2.3-4.9 mg/L, 3.2 mg/L avg.

settled water turbidity: 0.11-1.90 NTU, 0.35 NTU avg.

St. Johnsbury Vermont, USA drinking water 3,000,000 no September 2020 surface water pre-chlorination oxidation (potassium permanganate), coagulation, flocculation 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.8-12 NTU,

0.8 NTU avg.

TOC: 1.9-10 mg/L, 7 mg/L avg.

total iron: <0.1 mg/L total manganese: 0.02-

0.275 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L avg.

South WTP (Henderson Water Utility)

Kentucky, USA drinking water 4,000,000 no January 2021 settled water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-4 NTU, 2 NTU avg.

TOC: 0.9-3.2 mg/L, 2.5 mg/L avg.

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Dalton Utilities Georgia, USA drinking water P1:40,000,000

P2:50,000,000 no March 2021 settled water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0.3 NTU avg., 3 NTU max.

TOC: 1.5 mg/L avg., 3 mg/L max.

total iron: 0.02 mg/L avg., 0.1 mg/L max.

total manganese: 0.05 mg/L avg., 0.2 mg/L max.

Buford Water Works

Georgia, USA drinking water

P1: 2,500,000 P2: 5,000,000 no October 2022 surface water, pre-chlorination, 500 um strainer turbidity: 0-50 NTU,

2.6 NTU avg.

TOC: 1-3 mg/L,

1.6 mg/L avg.

total iron: 0-1.4 mg/L,

0.09 mg/L avg.

total manganese: 0-0.2 mg/L, 0.02 mg/L avg.

Asia

Matsu Island Taiwan RO-pre-treatment – drinking water

634,080 yes October 2010 100 um strainer, open ocean intake in East China Sea turbidity: <5 NTU

Mudan River Linkou Drinking Water Upgrade

China drinking water 4,000,000 yes June 2013 river water, coagulation, flocculation, sand filtration

Daqing Oil Field Drinking Water Upgrade Project

China drinking water 35,700,000 yes December 2014

Heilongjiang Sunwu Drinking Water Upgrade

China drinking water 5,300,000 yes June 2015 river water, coagulation, flocculation, sand filtration

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Heihe Kedong Drinking Water Upgrade

China drinking water 5,300,000 yes March 2017 river water, coagulation, flocculation, sand filtration

Qingdao Baishe River Drinking Water Treatment Plant

China drinking water 60,750,00 yes October 2018 river water, sand filtration, ozone, BAC turbidity: 0.5-74 NTU COD: 2-4 mg/L

Europe

Simem Spain drinking water 655,000 yes June 2010 surface water

Zilio Italy drinking water 208,000 yes September 2011 surface water

Lazio Italy drinking water 190,225 yes March 2012 groundwater, 500 um strainer, pre-oxidation turbidity: 5-30 NTU iron: 1.5 mg/L manganese: 0.065 mg/L

Celtic Anglian Dublin, Ireland municipal secondary effluent

145,300 yes August 2012 500 um strainer

TSS: <25 mg/L avg, 100 mg/L peak BOD: <18 mg/L avg, < 35 mg/L peak, COD: <65 mg/L avg, <150 peak

Lehiu - Xylem Romania drinking water 518,000 yes May 2013 surface water

Santa Eufemia – Xylem

Portugal drinking water 6,208,000 yes January 2014 surface water

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Latin America

RDK SeaPak Curacao sea water 4,530,000 yes January 2015 100 um filter, coagulation (ferric chloride)

Australia and New Zealand

Mirani Water Reclamation Facility

Mirani Queensland tertiary 2,203,000 no municipal secondary effluent, 500 um strainer turbidity: < 30 NTU BOD: < 20 mg/L TSS: < 30 mg/L table 2: non-municipal drinking water and tertiary applications location application size of plant

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

North America

KSH Fortress Paper

Québec, Canada boiler feed water 1,116,000 yes November 2012 500 um strainer turbidity: <10 NTU

TOC: <5 mg/L

Perry Nuclear (Cleveland)

Ohio, USA power – boiler feed water 359,040 yes April 2009 Lake Erie source water, 500 um strainer turbidity: <10 NTU avg., 100 NTU peak

ConAgra Foods

– Lamb Weston

Washington, USA food production 2,200,000 yes June 2010 municipal secondary effluent, MMF, 500 um strainer

TSS: <10 mg/L TOC: <1.5 mg/L

TVA Sequoia Tennessee, USA power – boiler feed water 890,000 yes September 2010 river water, 500 um strainer turbidity: <20 NTU TOC: 2.27 mg/L

Allegheny Energy

Pennsylvania, USA power – boiler feed water

UF: 321,120

DPRO:

187,200 yes October 2010 river water, coagulation/ flocculation, clarification, 500 um strainer turbidity: 2-10 NTU TOC: 1.1 mg/L

Wheelabrator – North Broward

Florida, USA power – boiler feed water 411,840 yes November 2010 grey water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 2 NTU TOC: ≤ 15 mg/L

Faribault Energy Minnesota, USA power – boiler feed water

UF: 321,120

DPRO:

187,200 yes December 2010 groundwater, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.4 NTU TOC: 1.9 mg/L

Microchip (Tempe)

Arizona, USA process makeup water

UF: 146,880

RO: 172,800 yes April 2011

UF reject and municipal water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.1 NTU TOC: 3.7 mg/L

Graphic Packaging

Michigan, USA boiler feed water

UF: 210,000

RO: 144,000 yes May 2011 groundwater, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1-37 NTU TOC: 4 mg/L

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

Duke Energy Indiana, USA power - boiler feed water 3,862,320 yes September 2011 coagulation + clarification, 500-micron strainer turbidity: <1 NTU

Niagara Bottling (Ontario)

California, USA beverage production

604,800- 1,296,000 yes October 2011 groundwater, 500 um strainer turbidity: <2.0 TOC: 2.2 mg/L

Duke Energy – Buck Station

North Carolina, USA power – boiler feed water

UF: 144,000

DPRO:

108,000 yes November 2011 river water, coagulation/ flocculation, clarification, 500 um strainer turbidity: <5 NTU TOC: <3 mg/L

Arcelor Mittal Indiana, USA industrial –steel milling - RO pre-treatment

2,183,040 – 3,274,560 yes May 2012 surface water, 500 um strainer turbidity: <10 NTU avg., 40 NTU peak TOC: 5 mg/L

Duke Energy – Dan River Station

North Carolina, USA power – boiler feed water

UF: 144,000

DPRO:

108,000 yes September 2012 river water, coagulation/flocculation, clarification, 500 um strainer turbidity: <5 NTU TOC: <3 mg/L

DTE Energy (East China)

Michigan, USA surface water 300,000 yes October 2012 500 um strainer turbidity: <20 NTU avg., 200 NTU peak

PCS Nitrogen (Augusta)

Georgia, USA boiler feed water UF: 2,629,440

RO: 2,160,000 yes October 2012 river water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 5-300 NTU, 40 NTU avg.

TSS: 5-150 mg/L, 10 mg/L avg.

TOC: < 8.0 mg/L, <5.0 mg/L avg.

FMI Stafford Arizona, USA groundwater 360,000 yes November 2012 groundwater, 500 um strainer turbidity: 1.1 NTU TSS: 1-2 mg/L

Calpine Hermiston Power

Oregon, USA power – boiler feed water 504,000 yes July 2013 river water, 500 um strainer turbidity: <3–50 NTU TOC: 1.4 mg/L

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical water quality parameters

TVA Watts Bar Tennessee, USA power – boiler feed water 1,008,000 yes October 2014 river water, 500 um strainer turbidity: 20 NTU TOC: 2 mg/L

Allegany Ballistic Labs

West Virginia, USA boiler feed water 403,200 yes February 2015

PGE Beaver Generating Plant

Oregon, USA boiler feed water 2,500,000 yes November 2015

Asia

Sollink Taiwan industrial water re-use 253,440 yes April 2009 industrial WW activated sludge treatment with secondary clarification and filtration, 500 um strainer turbidity: <10 NTU avg., 33 NTU peak COD: 30 mg/L avg.

Nantze Taiwan industrial water re-use 670,000 yes October 2010 industrial secondary effluent turbidity: 20-40 NTU 57 NTU peak COD: 40 mg/L

Simem – Dye Water India industrial water re-use 2 x 76,089 yes November 2010 textile wastewater TSS: 10 mg/L color: 800-1000 TCU COD: 160-200 mg/L

Simem – Wash Water India industrial water re-use 2 x 405,812 yes November 2010 textile wastewater TSS: 6-8 mg/L color: 430-640 TCU

PT Padi Sri Lanka CPI product water 2,105,000 yes December 2010 DAF, multimedia filtration, 500 um strainer turbidity: <1 NTU

(gpd) online commissioned date upstream processes typical…