Att5b_Addendum_to_the_Geotechnical_Investigation_Report_12-23-20.pdf

PDF 112 KB Posted

Attached to
GRCA 190083 - Improve Potable Water Supply to Inne
Solicitation number
140P2022R0100
Issued by

About this file

This addendum provides additional geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction on the alluvial delta at Phantom Ranch for the Trans-Canyon Water Distribution Pipeline Replacement Project at Grand Canyon National Park. It supersedes any conflicting information in the original July 2018 geotechnical investigation report. The addendum confirms that spread footings can be used rather than mat foundations to reduce concrete needs. It specifies minimum width and dimension requirements for continuous, isolated, and column spread footings. The allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf and differential settlement of 1 inch total and 0.5 inches differential are confirmed to be applicable for the delta site based on the sandy soil with cobbles and boulders observed. The minimum burial depth of 18 inches below grade for frost protection at elevations between 3,000 to 4,500 feet is also deemed acceptable, providing flexibility while still protecting infrastructure.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_8_40_91_10_Primary_Meters_and_Transmitters_(IG_Phase_3)_08.pdf PDF
Amendment_8_Questions_and_Answers_9-8-22_08.docx DOCX document
Amendment_8_SF_30_9-8-22_08.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_08.pdf PDF
Amendment_7_Questions_and_Answers_9-2-22_07.docx DOCX document
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_07.pdf PDF
Amendment_7_SF_30_9-2-22_07.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_Wage_Determination_AZ20220007_Heavy_06.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_Questions_and_Answers_8-26-22_06.docx DOCX document
Amendment_6_06_82_00_-_FIBERGLASS_REIN_PLASTIC_FABS_Rev_2022-08-25_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_Wage_Determination_AZ20220016_Heavy_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_43_23_04_Horizontal_Multistage_Pumps_GRCA_261633_Pump_3_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_Wage_Determination_AZ20220030_Building_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_SF_30_8-26-22_06.pdf PDF
Amendment_5_Questions_and_Answers_8-19-22_05.docx DOCX document
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_05.pdf PDF
Amendment_5_SF_30_8-19-22_05.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_SF_30_8-12-22_04.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_04.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_Att12b_CSF_Drawings_Rev_8-12-22_04.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_Questions_and_Answers_8-12-22_04.docx DOCX document
Amendment_3_03-E504_REV1_2022-08-02_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_03-C405_REV1_2022-08-02_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_03-E503_REV1_2022-08-02_03.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_SF_30_8-5-22_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_Questions_and_Answers_8-5-22_03.docx DOCX document
Amendment_3_03-C137_REV1_2022-08-02_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_03-C131_REV1_2022-08-22_03.pdf PDF
Amendment_2_Questions_and_Answers_7-29-22_02.docx DOCX document
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_02.pdf PDF
Amendment_2_SF_30_7-29-22_02.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2022R0100_Amd_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_01-E601_REV_1_7-22-22_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_01-E104_REV_1_7-22-22_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_Questions_and_Answers_7-22-22_01.docx DOCX document
Amendment_1_SF_30_7-22-22_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_01-E100_REV1_7-22-22_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_01-E631_REV_1_7-22-22_01.pdf PDF
Att4b_GRCA 190083 Basis of Design Report_Appendices only.pdf PDF
Att1f_GRCA 190083 Vol 04_Drawings_Pg 497to698_4-22-22.pdf PDF
Att7d_TransCanyon Waterline Drone Footage - End Plateau.mp4 MP4 file
Att6f_Innercanyon_Single-Phase_Transformer_Short_Circuit.pdf PDF
Att7e_Phantom_Rnch_Headworks_Excav_Photos.pdf PDF
Att1i_Revised_Drawings_1_7-5-22.pdf PDF
Att6i_GRCA_190083_Geotech_Field_Work_Photo_Album_4-17-18.pdf PDF
Att7b_TransCanyon_Waterline_Drone_Footage.mp4 MP4 file
Att2a_GRCA_190083_Final_CD_Specifications_Vol_1_Division_1.pdf PDF
Att6c_Suez_Proposal_for_GRCA_190083_MF-UF_Equip_9-2-20.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 93 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

2750 S. Wadsworth Blvd, Suite D-200 Denver, Colorado 80227

303.625.9502 www.LithosEng.com

December 23, 2020

Project No. 16066-1

HDR Engineering, Inc.

419 Canyon Avenue

Fort Collins, CO 80521

Attention: Mr. Rich Thornton, PE

Project Manager

Regarding: Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report

Trans-Canyon Water Distribution Pipeline Replacement Project

GRCA 190083

Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona

Mr. Thornton, Subsequent to the issuance of Lithos’ Geotechnical Investigation Report, dated July 6, 2018, HDR

Engineering requested further geotechnical recommendations regarding the proposed construction on the alluvial delta at Phantom Ranch. Following are the questions from HDR and Lithos’ responses.

Recommendations provided in this letter supersede any conflicting information the 2018 geotechnical report.

1. Can you provide the IBC / ASCE-7 seismic site class at the delta? There doesn’t appear to be seismic tests at that site in particular, and given the gravels, cobbles, and boulders at the delta, I don’t want to just assume that shear wave velocities would be the same as at Phantom Ranch.

Response: IBC/ASCE 7 Site Class A, Hard Rock is appropriate for this location.

2. We are designing for spread footings at the Phantom Ranch site rather than mat foundations to save concrete quantity.

Can you confirm this is acceptable, and provide:

a. Minimum width of continuous spread footings.

Response: 18-inch minimum width should be used. If this is infeasible for the location of the work, 12-inches could be used. Lithos requests to review drawings before they are finalized if 12-inches is used.

b. Minimum dimension for isolated (column) spread footings.

Response: 24-inch minimum square width should be used. If this is infeasible for the location of the work, 18-inches square could be used. Lithos requests to review drawings before they are finalized if 18-inches is used.

c. Confirm that 3,000 psf allowable bearing is acceptable for spread footings at the delta.

Response: 3,000 psf is acceptable.

HDR Engineering Trans-Canyon Water Distribution Pipeline Replacement Project Page 2 of 2

d. Confirm that 1 IN / 0.5 IN total / differential settlement is applicable for spread footings at the delta.

Response: This amount is applicable. Based on what we observed there, the soil appears to be mostly sand with cobbles and boulders. We do not anticipate above typical amounts of settlement here.

3. Coconino County has various frost depth requirements by elevation. For elevations between 3000 and 4500 FT, the minimum frost depth line is 12” below grade. The report recommends 24” and I wanted to see if you would object to 18” below grade? (I’d like save on some of the concrete we need to place down at that site.)

Response: 18-inches minimum burial is acceptable.

If you have any questions regarding the contents of this addendum, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely, Lithos Engineering

Nate Soule PE

Vice President

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .