Attachment_11_-_AsbestosLeadHazMaterial-_B_Wing.pdf

Report of Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Assessment – Rocky Mountain Research Station B-Wing

Contract: AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Subject Property:

Rocky Mountain Research Station

5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W.

Missoula, MT 59808

Prepared For:

United States Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 W Prospect Street Fort Collins Co 80526

Prepared By:

Abatement Contractors of Montana, LLC 208 Commerce St Missoula, MT 59807 Office: 406-549-8489 www.acm-contracting.com

Report for a Comprehensive Pre-Renovation Asbestos and Lead Hazardous Materials Assessment B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 Scope of Work

3.0 Site Description

4.0 Asbestos Inspection

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Methods

5.3 Findings

6.0 Mercury

7.0 Assumed PCBs

9.0 XRF

10.0 Summary of Findings:

10.1 Asbestos

10.2 Lead Based Paint

10.3 PCB-Containing Equipment

10.4 Mercury-Containing Equipment

11.0 Limitations

List of Tables

Table 1: Summary of ACM (B Wing)

Table 2: Summary of LBP (B Wing)

APPENDICIES

Appendix A – Sample Location Drawings Appendix B – ACBM & LBP Location Drawings Appendix C – Documentation of Accreditation Appendix D – XRF Performance characteristic sheet Appendix E – Data Summary Tables Appendix F – Analytical Reports Appendix G – PCB & Mercury Material List Appendix H – Photo Log of ACM and LBP

December 15, 2015

USDA Forest Service Attn: Corrie Kegel, PE 5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808

RE: Pre-renovation Inspection report for Asbestos, Lead & PCB Identification For Rocky Mountain Research Station for ‘B’ Wing Located at 5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808-9361

Attn: Corrie Kegel, Abatement Contractors of Montana, LLC (ACM) is pleased to provide the findings of the asbestos and lead-based paint inspection completed at the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS), in Missoula Montana. The inspection was performed from November through December, 2015 by Mr. Christopher Casas and Mr. Mike Foust; Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) accredited asbestos inspectors (MTA-4459) (MTA-2741) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accredited lead based paint inspectors (MT-I-I148223-1) (MT-S-28404-2). Credentials are attached.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The pre-renovation hazardous material assessment for the above referenced project was completed to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos. ACM collected a total of 79 bulk samples representing 24 homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspected asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM). Floor plan drawings with bulk sample locations are presented in Appendix A. Samples listed in Table 1 tested positive for asbestos.

Identification of regulated hazardous materials at the RMRS ‘B’ Wing was accomplished through physical inspection, bulk sampling, and collection of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) screening data of building materials within the site.

The asbestos inspection for asbestos-containing material (ACM) was conducted using the protocol developed for schools under the asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), as promulgated in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 763 (40 CFR, Part 763.354). Classification of the identified asbestos-containing materials was performed under the guidelines for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP).

The lead-based paint inspection was conducted using the protocols developed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). ACM used a field XRF analyzer to determine the presence or absence of LBP. HUD recognizes the XRF analyzer as the recommended method to determine lead in paint (HUD 1995, revised 1997 and 2000). The XRF analyzer collects chemical assay data and calculates the measurable amount of lead in paint.

ACM completed an inspection for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) within RMRS’s ‘B’ wing by an observational investigation to assess the quantity of PCBs. An inspection was also completed for mercury-containing equipment within the RMRS’s ‘B’ wing by an observational investigation to assess

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 the quantity of mercury-containing equipment. Our methods and findings for the Inspection and overall hazard assessment are presented in the following sections of this report.

A total of 37 separate HAs of suspect lead-containing surface coatings were identified at the site during the assessment. Four (4) HAs have been determined through on-site XRF analysis to be Lead-Based Paint (LBP). These surface coatings contain lead in concentrations greater than the Housing and Urban

Development (HUD) LBP criterion of one milligram per square centimeter (1.00 𝑚𝑔/𝑐𝑚2) of sampled area. Thirty Three (33) HAs have been determined through on-site XRF analysis to be NON-Lead- Based Paint and NON-LCP and therefore contain no amount of detectable lead.

HA’s listed in Table 2-0 tested POSITIVE for Lead in concentrations equal to or greater than the HUD LBP criterion and therefore are considered LBP.

Prior to initiating renovation activities at the site, an abatement plan should be prepared to address the handling, transport, and disposal of the asbestos-containing materials, lead-containing materials, PCBs containing materials, and mercury-containing equipment identified at the site in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, as described in this report.

2.0 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this project included a hazardous materials assessment of building components throughout the accessible interior and exterior spaces of Wing B. This work included visual assessment, sampling, and documentation of suspect and confirmed/assumed asbestos containing-building materials, lead-containing surface coatings, PCB’s Mercury light tubes, Thermostats as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency and State & local codes for Montana. This work also includes recording the locations of the materials, estimated quantities, +/- 10% of hazardous materials and recommendations for abatement of asbestos containing material and other hazardous materials. The scope of work included visual inspection for, but no sample collection of potential mercury-containing materials and potential PCB-containing equipment and materials. The purpose for conducting the inspection is to ensure all local, state and federal regulations related to hazardous waste are complied with during the upcoming renovation of Wing B. ACM’s scope of work for this project did not include preparation of abatement plans or specification documents.

3.0 Site Description

The Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) houses the Fire, Fuel and Smoke science program as well as the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory. The RMRS was constructed in 1960 complete with a combustion laboratory, a wet laboratory, maintenance garage spaces, and office spaces. The building is divided into A, B and C Wings. Wing A houses the combustion laboratory, the wet laboratory, the boiler room, the AC/refrigeration room, and the low velocity and high velocity wind tunnel laboratory.

Wing B houses the office spaces and the C Wing houses the server room, office space, and a printing room.

Building Exterior:

The foundation is poured concrete; the exterior structural walls of Wing B are pre-cast concrete with some CMU block structure finished with face brick. The roof includes the following layers: river rock, rubber membrane, tar paper wood fiber board, styrofoam wood fiber board and a thick tar layer over structural concrete decking.

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Building Interior:

The interior floor coverings of Wing B consists of self-adhesive carpet squares over concrete. The ceiling is completed with a drop down ceiling with 2x4 fiber glass ceiling tiles. The walls, columns and exposed beams are plaster over wire mesh. The windows are aluminum frames, glazing and caulking.

The interior office space flooring consists of self-adhesive carpet squares, quarry tile, vinyl asbestos tile, ceramic tile and carpet. The interior walls of the office spaces are finished with plaster and thick layer of skim coating. Interior office space is partitioned by metal framing finished with tongue and groove wood planks. The interior laboratory spaces of the 1st floor of Wing B are finished with the following types of resilient floor coverings, quarry tile, and vinyl asbestos tile. The interior walls of the laboratory are finished with cement asbestos board. The ceilings of the laboratory are either finished with fiber glass 2x4 ceilings tiles or cement asbestos boards.

4.0 Asbestos Inspection

Samples were obtained by trained, experienced individuals using techniques such as wet slicing, wet boring, or similar methods designed to limit contamination of the area during sampling. When applicable the sampled area was sealed using duct tape, or spry encapsulates as appropriate to the material being sampled.

There are several types of table countertops in ‘B’ Wing, these materials are uniformly manufactured material, and therefore a single bulk sample for each homogeneous area of table countertops was obtained for analysis and confirmation for potential asbestos containing materials.

There are materials encountered that are commonly found to contain asbestos and, therefore, are assumed to be ACM. This includes the 9x9 Dark green vinyl floor tiles with white streaks.

Several Marked fire doors were opened and visually and physically assessed for the presence of suspect asbestos containing material. The fire doors within ‘B’ wing contain fiberglass insulation. No suspected asbestos containing materials were observed within the fire doors.

The asbestos inspection was performed in accordance with the Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) 29 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 1926.1101(k), DEQ and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 40 CFR 61, Subparts A and M.

As required prior to renovation or demolition of building materials, the asbestos inspection consisted of a detailed survey of all building materials which will be disturbed by the demolition process. Suspect ACBM were visually identified and touched prior to sampling. Samples were placed into HA groups using a coding method to classify each material by type, texture, and date of application. Components of the inspection included:

• Identification of homogeneous suspect materials on a room-by-room basis;

• Collection and analyses of bulk samples to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos; and

• Bulk samples were not collected from any homogeneous material made of fiberglass, wood, foam, glass, or rubber.

A minimum of three (3) samples were collected from random locations of each HA of suspect material.

Samples were collected from existing damaged materials, as applicable. The samples were placed in pre-labeled plastic containers for transport to the laboratory.

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Samples were shipped, under chain-of-custody protocol for standard analyses, to Sanair Technologies Laboratory, Inc. in Powhatan, Virginia, for bulk asbestos analysis utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Bulk samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA method 600/R93/116 and EPA 600/m4- 82/020.

The DEQ defines ACM as material containing more than 1% asbestos based on laboratory analysis of the material using the EPA method 600/R-93/116 (“Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials’) by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Three categories of ACM have been defined in the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standard, which is established in Title 40, part 61, of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 61.141) and adopted by the DEQ in Title 17, Chapter 74, Subchapter 3, of the Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM 17.74.351). The NESHAP Category definitions are as follows;

• Category I Non-friable ACM - asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one (1) percent (%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix E, subpart E, 40 CFR 763, section 1 (PLM)

• Category II Non-friable ACM - any material, excluding Category I Non-friable ACM, containing more than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix E, subpart E, 40 CFR 763, section 1, PLM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Regulated ACM (RACM) - a) friable asbestos material; b) Category I Non-friable ACM that has become friable; c) Category I Non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; or d) category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by the subpart.

ACM collected 79 bulk samples representing 24 HAs of suspected ACBM. Table 1 summarizes analytical results for the building materials collected within the site. Additional information in Table 1 includes Sample ID, building material description, sample location, and recommended response actions.

Table 1: Summary of ACM (B Wing)

Table 1: Summary of ACM ‘B’ Wing

HA No.

HA

Description Location

Asbestos

Condition friable non-friable

SQFT/LF

Response

Action-

Basement

Cork.1 Chiller lines And Mudded

Fittings

Basement & Crawlspace to the mechanical room

60% Good condition Friable

800 LF

Remove prior to renovation or disturbance

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Mastic/ cork

Chiller lines & fittings

Basement & Crawlspace to the mechanical room

2% Good condition Friable

800 LF

Remove prior to renovation or disturbance

1st floor

HA

Description Location

Asbestos

Condition SF/LF/EA Response

Action-

VFT.1

VFT.2

VFT.4

9x9 Green Vinyl Floor

Tile 9x9Beige Vinyl Floor

Tile

Rooms 102-B, 106- B,110-B,108-B, 112-

B, 116-B, 118-B, 109-B, 126-B, 128-B, 123-B, 121-B, 115-B, 113-B, 111-B, 109-B, 107-B, 105-B, 103-B, 101-B

4% Good condition Non-friable

6,120 SF

(Intact Removal) prior to renovation or disturbance

WC.1 Caulking Men & Women’s interior window

4%

Good condition

Non-friable

44 LF

(Intact Removal) prior to renovation or disturbance

TRNST.1

Cement asbestos board

102-B, 106-B, 108-B, 112-B, 116-B, 118-

B,109-B 20%

Good Condition

2,490 SF

(Intact Removal) prior to renovation or disturbance

Assumed- ACM lab top

Black

Rooms 102,114,dark room

Assumed

Fair Non-friable

3 Ea

(Intact Removal) prior to renovation or disturbance

2nd floor

HA

Description Location

Asbestos

Condition SF/LF/EA Response

Action-

WC.1 Caulking Men & women’s interior window

4% Good

Condition Non-friable

44 LF

(Intact Removal) prior to renovation or disturbance

VFT.5

9x9 tile Maroon Vinyl

Floor 9x9 tile Beige

Vinyl Floor

201-B, 203-B, 205-B, 207-B, 209-B, 211-B, 213-B, 215-B, 217-B, 223-B, 225-B, 220-B, 212-B, 212-B, 210-B, 206-B, 204-B

3% Good

Condition Non-friable

6,580 SF

(Intact Removal) prior to

LC.3

White

Leveling Compound

212-1B, 212-2B 212-3B

3%

Good Condition

Non-friable

400 SF

(Intact Removal) prior to

Exterior

HA

Description Location

Asbestos

Condition SF/LF/EA Response

Action-

WC.1

Window caulking

Around all exterior window frames to brick on building.

7%

Good Condition

1,785 LF

prior to renovation or disturbance

WG.1

Window glazing

Around all window panes -exterior

2% Good condition

3,540 LF

prior to renovation or disturbance

CLK.1 Joint Sealant North west corner of B joining A & South west of B joining A

3% Good condition

48 LF

prior to

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

The purpose of lead assessment is to identify lead-containing surface coatings. Identification of Lead Containing Paint (LCP) and or Lead Based Paint (LBP) is necessary to determine whether renovation/demolition workers may potentially be exposed to airborne lead concentrations exceeding permissible exposure limits (PEL) established by the OSHA. Characterization of leachable lead in the overall potential waste stream is necessary to determine proper handling and disposal of renovation waste materials required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

HUD defines LBP as a surface coating containing lead in concentration greater than 1.0. The presence of LBP on surfaces scheduled to be impacted during the renovation activities increases the potential for workers to be exposed to airborne lead in concentrations greater than the OSHA PEL of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), which is established in 29 CFR 1926.62. However, it is important to note that the presence of LCP’s (i.e. coatings which contain lead at concentrations less than the HUD criterion of 1.0) may also present a potential exposure hazard for renovation workers.

As a result of the lead-based paint assessment conducted at the site, lead-based surface coatings (paints) were confirmed on the subject property as of the date of the assessment. The analytical results from this assessment effort identified the following lead-based paint (LBP) as defined by the EPA and/ or HUD standards.

5.1 Introduction

A LBP assessment was conducted in ‘B’ Wing of the RMRS for the client. The inspection was performed by Mr. Christopher Casas, a certified Lead-Based Paint Inspector. The purpose of the inspection was to confirm or deny the presence of lead-based paint. As part of the inspection, a visual survey of the property and structure was conducted and all painted surfaces were inventoried.

Since this project is non-HUD target housing, HUD regulations do not apply, Explanations of regulations are detailed for workers that will be on the site as follows:

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1926.62 - Lead in Construction Standard does not define lead based coatings or materials but does establish safe airborne exposure limits for employees working with lead containing materials by permissible exposure limit (PEL). In summary; if any material or coating contains lead above 100 ppm then abatement, renovation, or demolition contractors must demonstrate worker health and safety due diligence.

This includes: lead awareness training for all affected employees, establishment of proper personal protective equipment (PPE), proper demarcation of effected work area(s), and performance of negative exposure assessment (NEA) lead air monitoring prior to downgrading any established PPE.

Relating to disposal of lead-containing waste, RCRA regulatory criteria for “total” lead in a waste stream is established in 40 CFR 261, Subpart C. The regulatory criteria are listed in milligrams per liter (mg/l) of dissolved lead in a solution (“wet basis”), as determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) by EPA Method 1311.

5.2 Methods

ACM identified HAs of suspect LBP on interior and exterior surfaces for each of the site buildings, as described above, in general accordance with American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method E 1729-05 and/or Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead- Based Paint Hazards in Housing. ACM’s inspector distinguished HAs of suspect LBP visually and through field review of analytical data obtained using a Innov-X-Systems Alpha-4000 XRF analyzer. If deemed appropriate by the inspector, multiple tests were taken within a given HA; in such instances, the highest observed concentration for tests representing a respective HA were reported.

The XRF utilizes an ionizing electrical source and internal calculations to provide direct-read lead data.

Analytical data obtained from a field-calibrated XRF are accepted as accurate by the EPA and HUD.

It should be noted that this instrument performs its own detector calibration upon startup, and it’s accuracy was checked against known standards set forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) prior to, during (at a four (4) hour interval), and following testing. The Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) is included in Appendix D.

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

5.3 Findings

ACM collected a total of Forty Seven (47) XRF suspect lead coatings assays & calibration readings for the lead based inspection of Wing B. Any paint films with lead concentrations of 1.0 or greater were classified as Regulated Lead Containing Materials. In addition, the substrate condition was visually assessed at each assay test site. Additional paint or glaze coatings on the interior of the buildings were bulk sampled using destructive methods to verify the lead content in parts per million (ppm), summarized in Table 2. Results from ACM’s LBP assessment are summarized in the following sections for the site buildings.

ACM identified a total of 37 HAs of suspect LBP, all those determined to be LBP are summarized below.

Table 2: Summary of LBP (B Wing)

Table 2: Summary of LBP from XRF Analysis ‘B’ Wing

Component Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Basement

Yellow Pipe chase Natural Gas Line 209 LF 2.20

Blue Pipe chase Cold Water Line 275 LF 1.00

Orange Mechanical Room Lo-Pressure Steam Line 75 LF 4.42

1st floor

Ceramic Tile Rms 126 and 127 men & women’s

Glazing on green ceramic tile 570 SF 1.00

Toilets & sinks Rms 126 and 127 men & women’s

Toilets & sinks 4 toilets 2 sinks

5.00

Ceramic Tile 1st floor drinking fountain/hallway

Glazing on brown ceramic tile 130 SF 1.00

Plaster-lath Aerosols lab Top coat White paint/base grey 282 SF 1.00

Plaster-lath Dark room Top coat White paint/base grey 282 SF 1.00

2nd floor

Ceramic Tile 221-B, 222-B Glazing on green ceramic Tile 570 SF 1.00

Toilets & sinks 221-B, 222-B Toilets & sinks 4 toilets 2 sinks

5.00

% = Percentage < = Less Than Bold = LBP 0.5% by weight = HUD definition of lead-based paint

6.0 Mercury

A total of Three Hundred and Eighty Seven (387) suspected mercury-containing pieces of equipment were identified through visual observation associated with the site and were identified as being Mercury- Containing Equipment (MCP) during the assessment that include Fluorescent light tubes, CFL’s, thermostats, thermometers in mechanical rooms, hallways, offices throughout the building.

Due to the age of the structure, a visual inspection for potential mercury-containing equipment such as mercury switches, thermostats and thermometers was conducted at the site. Mercury-containing equipment is listed in the universal waste regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste regulations. EPA’s universal waste regulations streamline hazardous waste management standards for designated “universal waste” which includes mercury-containing equipment to prevent the item from entering municipal trash; instead it can be collected and disposed of at a hazardous facility. The federal universal waste regulations are set forth in 40 CFR (273.9).

Mercury-containing equipment is a device or part of a device (including thermostats, temperature and pressure gauges). Universal waste regulations apply to mercury-containing equipment. Personal handling this type of waste (i.e. disposed fluorescent light bulbs) must be trained regarding the proper handling and emergency response actions for the waste (mercury). It is recommended that the facility where the mercury-containing equipment is present participate in a management plan for the proper disposal and recycling of the hazardous waste. The hazardous waste must be containerized to protect it from damage and/or leakage, and the containers must be properly labeled to identify the type of universal waste (e.g. “Universal Waste – Mercury Thermostats” or ‘Waste-Mercury thermostat(s)’or “Used Mercury Thermostats”).

The transport of universal waste must include adequate packing materials to prevent breakage during storage, and handling in accordance with EPA and DOT regulations. Universal wastes may only be transported to other universal waste handlers, destinations facilities (e.g. disposal or recycling facilities).

Handling and transport of small quantities of universal waste do not need to be reported to the EPA;

however it is prudent to collect and document all receipts generated by the destination facilities.

ACM recommends the abatement specification document be prepared to include requirements for removal, handling, and disposal of these materials. These tasks should be completed by the abatement contractor.

7.0 Assumed PCBs

A total of One (1) suspected PCB-Containing Equipment was identified through visual observation to be associated with the site and was identified as being PCB-Containing Equipment during the assessment.

This Transformer is located in the basement storage room in the B Wing on the north wall. ACM was unable to DE- energize the transformer but based on the age it is presumed to contain PCB’s.

Current PCB regulations can be referenced in CFR 40 761. PCB-Containing equipment is currently listed under as a chemical substance under the Toxic substances Control Act (TSCA). The TSCA was established to control any substance determined to cause unreasonable risk to public health or the environment. PCB-Containing Fluorescent light ballasts identified in the assessment must be considered to be “PCB Bulk Product Waste”. This waste will require Manifesting and labeling for

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 disposal in accordance with CFR 761.62(b). The disposal options for this waste include disposal in a TSCA Incinerator, disposal in a TSCA/RCRA landfill, or a state-approved landfill (leach test required).

It is important to note that each load of PCB waste must be transported using the waste manifest protocol stipulated in 40 CFR 716.207. EPA does not require notification for removal or disposal of PCB bulk waste unless the waste generator owns or operates a PCB storage facility.

ACM recommends the abatement design specification document be prepared to include requirements for removal, handling, and disposal of these materials. These tasks should be completed by the abatement contractor or other trained personnel.

8.0 Quality Control & Quality Assurance

ACM utilized a unique sample I.D. number to each bulk sample to help with the elimination of microscopist’s potential bias. For example, if a numbering system indicates that seven samples are from the same room, a microscopist may be objective to each individual sample. Bulk samples obtained during the site inspection were identified and entered on sample summary sheets.

8.1 Chain-of-Custody Forms

In order to ensure that the samples are properly identified and tracked from the point of sample collection through receipt by the analytical laboratory, EPA requires that a chain-of-custody (COC) form be completed and accompany the samples. The COC contains essential items such as identification number, date, name of sampler and signature of recipient. Some laboratories request that COC forms they supply be used. These forms must be completed in the field and accompany the samples when they leave possession of the inspector. Inspectors should fill in a new COC form if mistakes have been made (i.e. incorrect information transferred from sample containers to COC form).

8.2 Quality Control (QC) Samples

Collection of side-by-side duplicates is recommended at the rate of 1 QC sample/building or 1 QC sample/20 samples, whichever is larger. The laboratory should analyze duplicates without knowing which the QC samples are. The results of duplicates are compared to determine sampling analytical precision.

8.3 Accredited Laboratories

To diminish the likelihood of challenges to the accuracy of laboratory results ACM utilized a accredited laboratories for the analysis of bulk samples (per AHERA 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E). A listing of accredited laboratories published by the EPA twice a year is available through the EPA regional Asbestos Coordinator or the TSCA hotline (202)-554-1404.

9.0 XRF

The XRF instrument was calibrated to the manufacturer’s standards prior to collecting field measurements and was checked periodically throughout the testing period against known NIST standards. All checks

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 performed throughout the assessment were within 5% of one another. Overall, the precision, accuracy, method compliance, and completeness of the data set were determined to be acceptable based on the data submitted and reported. The XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet for the XRF used by ACM specifies the ranges where XRF results are positive, negative, or inconclusive. The Performance Characteristic Sheet for this instrument is attached in Appendix D.

10.0 Summary of Findings:

10.1 Asbestos

• 4 building materials suspected of containing asbestos were confirmed to not contain asbestos.

If future renovation or demolition activities are planned, these non-ACBM materials may remain in-place and be demolished with the reminder of the building.

• 12 building materials suspected of containing asbestos were confirmed to contain greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos and are considered Asbestos Containing Building Materials. These materials will require special abatement considerations prior to commencing renovation/selective demolition activates. Several options for asbestos abatement, in conjunction with demolition operations, may be considered for this project. The owner’s representative should work with the owner to develop a cost effective abatement/renovation/demolition plan, with considerations for the health and safety of the abatement workers, the demolition personnel, and residents within the immediate vicinity of the demolition project.

• If abatement or renovation/selective demolition of the property is completed in accordance with current EPA and MDEQ-ACP guidelines, the services completed throughout the project will require asbestos qualified contractors and consultants to complete the work.

10.2 Lead Based Paint

• LBP was confirmed on 4 representative painted surfaces tested at the referenced site. These painted surfaces should be treated as lead hazardous waste and abated prior to removal, renovation, or salvage that may disturb the lead based paint Therefore, this material would require special considerations for pre-renovation lead abatement.

• The Federal Dangerous Waste Regulation (40 CFR Part 261) requires that lead containing materials with a lead content above 5,000 ppm threshold be treated as lead hazardous waste until toxic characterization leeching procedure (TCLP) bulk waste stream sampling by EPA method 1311 proves otherwise. The TCLP lead characterization threshold is 5 ppm. TCLP lead waste stream bulk sampling and analysis was not conducted as part of this survey project.

• The regulatory action level for lead, as defined under RCRA is 5 mg/L; therefore, a result above 5mg/L using the TCLP analytical method is defined as “hazardous waste” and must be transported by a hazardous waste transporter and disposed of at a hazardous waste facility.

Lead Based Paint Recommendations

• All coatings identified as containing greater than 100 ppm lead from bulk paint analysis, or by XRF Assay Testing, associated with this project are governed by Federal regulations.

Explanations of regulations are outlined in sections of this report.

• The LBP coated surfaces will require special abatement considerations prior to commencing renovation, and selective demolition activities. Several options for abatement in conjunction with renovation/selective demolition operations may be considered for this project. The Owner’s representative should work with the owner to develop a cost effective abatement/demolition plan, with considerations for the health and safety of the abatement workers, the demolition personnel, volunteers, and residents within the immediate vicinity of the renovation/selective demolition project.

• If abatement or demolition of the property is completed in accordance with current EPA guidelines, the services completed throughout the project would require lead qualified contractors and consultants to complete the work. The removal and containerization of the lead contaminated material should be completed during the lead abatement portion of the project.

10.3 PCB-Containing Equipment

Confirmed PCB-containing components are listed per room on the PCB and Mercury containing equipment drawing, and a complete summary of all identified PCBs are listed in Appendix G.

Identified PCB-containing components shall be disposed of as described in this report.

Specifically identified “PCB Bulk Product Waste” will require manifesting and labeling for disposal in accordance with CFR 761.62(b). Furthermore, disposal options for this waste include disposal in a TSCA Incinerator, disposal in a TSCA/RCRA landfill, or a state-approved landfill (leach test required). Each load of PCB waste must be transported using the waste manifest protocol stipulated in 40 CFR 716.207

10.4 Mercury-Containing Equipment

• Confirmed mercury-containing equipment is listed per room on the PCB and Mercury containing equipment drawing, and a complete summary of all identified PCBs are listed in Appendix G.

Identified MCP shall be disposed of at a hazardous facility, as stipulated in 40 CFR (273.9). The Mercury-Containing Equipment must be containerized to protect it from damage and/or leakage, and the containers must be properly labeled to identify the type of universal waste.

The transport of Mercury-Containing Equipment must include adequate packing materials to prevent breakage during storage, and handling. Handling and transport of small quantities of Mercury-Containing Equipment do not need to be reported to the EPA; however it is prudent to collect and document all receipts generated by the destination facilities.

B wing of the RMRS Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

11.0 Limitations

This asbestos and lead inspection summary was prepared based on information gathered during our site visits, phone conversations with the client, and interpretations of laboratory results of bulk samples collected during the inspection. The inspection was comprehensive to the referenced buildings.

Supplemental inspection and sampling may be required if additional asbestos HAs are exposed during excavation, demolition, or if the scope of work is expanded to include additional buildings or buried/underground piping that have not been inspected or analyzed for asbestos or lead content.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please call me at 406.549.8489. We look forward to working with you in the future.

Sincerely, Christopher Casas Mike Foust Environmental Technician Project Manager

Facility Map

("A" Wing) ("C" Wing)

("D" Wing) ("B" Wing)

APPENDIX A

Sample Location Drawings

Bulk Sample Location of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials - B Wing Basement (Piping)

Asbestos Bulk Sample

FP.1 A

FP.1 B

FB.1 C

MF.1 A

MF.1 B

MF.1 C

PMW.1 A

PMW.1 B PMW.1 C

PB.1 A

PB.1 B

PB.1 C

DNUP

D.F.

UP

RAMP

DN

DN

UP

UP

DN

RAMP

DN

D N

(E) VESTIBULE

100 B

(E) PASSAGE

104-B

(E) SECURITY

SYST. EQUIP. RM

117 B

(E) LOBBY

& DISPLAY

(E) OFFICE

101-B

(E) OFFICE

103-B

(E) OFFICE

105-B

(E) OFFICE

107-B

(E) OFFICE

109-B

(E) OFFICE

111-B

(E) OFFICE

113-B

(E) OFFICE

115-B

(E) OFFICE

121-B

(E) OFFICE

123-B

(E) OFFICE

128-B

(E) OFFICE

126-B

(E) RECEIVING

& SHIPPING

122-B

125-B

(E) DARK ROOM

109 B

(E) OFFICE

118-B

(E) OFFICE

116-B

(E) OFFICE

112-B

(E) INSTRUMENT

CALIBRATION

108-B

(E) INSTRUMENT

VAULT

110-B

(E) OFFICE

106-B

(E) INSTRUMENT

DEV. LAB

102-B

(E) MEN'S RR

126 B

(E) WOMEN'S RR

127 B

(E) JANITOR

CLOSET

124-B

(E) TOILET

102 C(E) JAN.

CLOSET

103 C

(E) HALL

104 C

(E) STORAGE

101 C

(E) LOADING PLATFORM

(E) OFFICE

105 C

(E) OFFICE

108 C

(E) OFFICE

106 C

(E) OFFICE

107 C

E F

C

UP

(E) MECH EQUIP

001 B

(E) STORAGE

002 B

(E) ELEV

EQUIP

003 B

AREAWAY

64 532

1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH'B' - Wing 1ST Floor

1/8" = 1'-0"

'B' WING - BASEMENT

1'-0" 4'-6"

12'-0"

3' -0

"6"

7"

TYP.

7"

TYP.

5' -0

O

PE

N

IN

G

W

PL

YW

O O

D A

CC

ES

S

D O

O R

SØ2'-6"CONC. PIPE7' DP

36'-3"

6'-11 2"

8' -9

3' -4

6' -4

'-1

0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

PLS.1 B PLS.1 C GRT.2 A VFT.5 A VFT.5 B VFT.5 C VFT.5 D VFT.5 E VFT.4 A

CT.1 B

LC.1 B CB.2 A

CB.1 B

CB.1 A

LC.1 A

CT.1 A

GRT.1 A,B,C

VFT.1 A

VFT.2- A,B,C

VFT.1 C

VFT.1 B

VFT.4 B

VFT.3 B

VFT.3 C

VFT.4 C

TRNST.1 C

VFT.3 B

TRNST.1 B

TRNST.1 C

PLS.1 A

VFT.4 E

CT.1 B

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing - 'B' Wing

CRT.1 A

CRT.1 B

CRT.1 C

DW.1 A

M.1 A,B,C

DW.1 B

VFT.1 A

VFT.2 A

DW.1 A

VFT.1 B

JT.1 A,B,C

M.3 A,B,C

CRPTG.1

M.2 A,B,C

VSF.1 A,B,C

VFT.2 B

VFT.2 C

VFT.1 C

BM.1 A

BM.1 B

BM.1 C

VFT.4 D

VFT.4 E

DNUP

D.F.

UP

RAMP

DN

DN

UP

UP

DN

RAMP

DN

(E) V ESTIBULE

100 B

(E) PA SSA GE

116 B

(E) SECURITY

SYST. EQ U IP. RM

117 B

(E) LO BBY

& DISPLA Y

101 B

(E) O FFICE

101 B

(E) O FFICE

103 B

(E) O FFICE

105 B

(E) O FFICE

107 B

(E) O FFICE

109 B

(E) O FFICE

111 B

(E) O FFICE

115 B

(E) O FFICE

121 B

(E) O FFICE

123 B

(E) O FFICE

128 B

(E) O FFICE

126 B

(E) RECEIV ING

& SHIPPING

122 B

(E) DA RK RO O M

109 B

(E) O FFICE

118 B

(E) O FFICE

116 B

(E) O FFICE

112 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

CA LIBRA TIO N

108 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

V A ULT

110 B

(E) O FFICE

106 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

DEV . LA B

(E) M EN 'S RR(E) WO M EN 'S RR

(E) JA N ITO R

CLO SET

124 B

(E) TO ILET

102 C(E) J A N .

CLO SET

103 C

(E) HA LL

104 C

(E) STO RA GE

101 C

(E) LO A DING PLA TFO RM

(E) O FFICE

105 C

(E) O FFICE

108 C

(E) O FFICE

106 C

(E) O FFICE

107 C

1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NO RTHTRUE NO RTH'B' WING - 1ST FLO O R

102 B

113 B

(E) OFFICE

Exterior Asbestos Sample Location Drawing B-Wing

JC.1 A JC.1 B JC.1 C

W .1 A W .1 B W .1 C

CRT.1 A

CRT.1 B

CRT.1 B

CRT.1 C

GRT.1 A

GRT.1 B

G G G

GRT.1 C

Asbestos Bulk Sample Location

Note* Sample Locations Are Approximate Note * Sample Locations in RED Contain Detectable Amounts of Asbestos

WC.1 AVFT.1 ELC.3 A,B,C

WC.1 B,C VSF.1 A,B,C

Asbestos Sample Location Map: 'B' Wing 2ND Floor

Asbestos Bulk Sample Location

Note* Bulk Sample Locations are Approximate Note* Sample Locations in RED Contain Detectable Amounts of Asbestos

202-A

204-B206-B206-B206-B210-B212-B212-B

212-B

214-B218-B220-B

225-B 223-B 217-B 215-B 213-B 211-B 209-B 207-B 205-B 203-B 201-B

APPENDIX B

ACBM, LBP & Mercury PCB Location Drawings

CH.WR

CH.WF

'B' WING BASEMENT - Location of Asbestos Containing Materials

LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MATERIALS INCLUDING PIPE JACKET,

MUDDED FITTINGS, AND MASTIC ON THE

CHILLED WATER LINE

202A

204 B206 B206 B206B210 B

212 B

214 B218 B220 B

225 B 223 B 217 B 215 B 213 B 211 B 209 B 207 B 205 B 203 B 201 B

Exterior Asbestos Containing Material Location - B Wing

Asbestos Containing Window Caulking

Asbestos Containing Sealant

Location of Asbestos Vinyl Floor Tile

'B' WING 2ND FLOOR - Location of Asbestos Containing Building Materials

Location of Asbestos Window Caulking

WINDOW CAULKING

WINDOW CAULKING

LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING

LEVELING COMPOUND AND BLACK MASTIC

220 B 218 B 214 B 212 B 206 B 206 B 206 B 204 B

202 A

201 B203 B205 B207 B209 B211 B213 B215 B217 B223 B225 B

'B' WING BASEMENT - LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

THE 'GAS' LINE.

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

THE 'LO-PRESSURE' STEAM LINE

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'COLD WATER' LINE

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'HOT WATER' LINE

DNUP

D.F.

UP

RAMP

DN

(E) VESTIBULE

100 B

(E) PASSAGE

104 B

(E) SECURITY

SYST. EQUIP. RM

117 B

(E) LOBBY

& DISPLAY

(E) OFFICE

101 B

(E) OFFICE

103 B

(E) OFFICE

105 B

(E) OFFICE

107 B

(E) OFFICE

109 B

(E) OFFICE

111 B

(E) OFFICE

115 B

(E) OFFICE

113 B

(E) OFFICE

121 B

(E) OFFICE

123 B

(E) OFFICE

128 B

(E) LIBRARY

126 B

(E) DARK ROOM

(E) Conf. RM 118 B

(E) GC LAB

116 B

(E) GC LAB

112 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

CALIBRATION

108 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

VAULT

110 B

(E) OFFICE

106 B

(E) INSTRUMENT

DEV. LAB

102 B

(E) MEN'S RR

126 B

(E) WOMEN'S RR

127 B

(E) JANITOR

CLOSET

124 B

E F

C

UP

(E) MECH EQUIP

001 B

(E) STORAGE

002 B

(E) ELEV

EQUIP

003 B

AREAWAY

1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH'B' WING - 1ST FLOOR

1/8" = 1'-0"

12'-0"

3' -0

"6"

7"

TYP.

7"

TYP.

5' -0

O

PE

N

IN

G

W

PL

YW

O O

D A

CC

ES

S

D O

O R

SØ2'-6"CONC. PIPE7' DP

36'-3"

6'-11 2"

8' -9

3' -4

6' -4

'-1

0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

Location of Lead Based Paint - B Wing

LEGEND

Lead Based Coatings and Glazings

Location of Lead Based Paint- B Wing 2ND Floor

Location of Lead Based Coatings, Or Glazings

220 B 218 B 214 B 212 212 B

212 B

210 B 206 B 206 B 206 B 204 B

202 A

203 B205 B207 B209 B211 B213 B215 B217 B225 B

APPENDIX C

Documentation of Accreditation

APPENDIX D

XRF Performance characteristic sheet

APPENDIX E

XRF Data Summary Tables

Summary of Suspect XRF Field Data Collected from the Rocky Mountain Research Station

'A' Wing- Missoula MT

Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5 Column6 Column7 Column8 Column9 Column10 Column11 Column12 Column13 Column14 Column15

Shot Pass Fail Standard Date Pb Pb +/- Side Quadrant Component Substrate Color Condition Notes Time

39 Insufficient Test Time 18-Nov-15 1.14 0.12 West Middle Wall Steel Black Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Stair Case 12:46:01

40 Positive 18-Nov-15 1.12 0.04 West Middle Stair Handrail Steel Black Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Stair Case 12:46:31

41 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0 North Middle Wall Plaster White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Wall 12:48:49

42 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.36 0.02 East Middle Door Metal Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Door 12:50:59

43 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.32 0.03 East Middle Door Metal Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Door 12:51:56

44 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.04 0.01 East Middle Wall Concrete Red Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Wall Red 12:55:42

45 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.03 0.01 North Middle Wall Concrete Red Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A wall Red 12:57:06

46 Positive 18-Nov-15 1 0.07 North Lower Floor Concrete Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A grey flooring 13:00:38

47 Positive 18-Nov-15 1 0.07 North Lower Floor Concrete Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A grey flooring 13:01:18

48 Positive 18-Nov-15 1 0.02 North Lower Floor Concrete Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A grey flooring 13:03:01

49 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0 North Middle Wall Concrete White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A grey flooring 13:04:43

50 Positive 18-Nov-15 1 0.06 North Middle Pipes Steel Blue Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A cold water pipe 13:08:52

51 Positive 18-Nov-15 2.02 0.06 North Middle Pipes Steel Yellow Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Gas 13:10:43

52 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.35 0.03 North Middle Pipes Steel Green Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Compressed Air

Pipe 13:12:24

53 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.32 0.02 North Middle Pipes Steel Red Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Fire sprinkler 13:15:46

54 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.31 0.03 North Middle Pipes Steel Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Pipes all painted grey 13:17:32

55 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.54 0.04 North Middle Pipes Steel Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Pipes all painted grey 13:18:19

56 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.35 0.04 North Middle Pipes Steel Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-00

Boiler Rm 111-A

Pipes all painted grey 13:18:57

57 Insufficient Test Time 18-Nov-15 0.48 0.06 South Middle Door Steel Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Door 13:21:51

58 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.52 0.03 South Middle Door Steel Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Door 13:22:18

59 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.46 0.03 South Middle Door Steel Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A door trim 13:24:12

60 Positive 18-Nov-15 4.42 0.43 South Middle Pipes Steel Orange Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

Orange Lo-pressure steam 13:25:44

61 Positive 18-Nov-15 4.27 0.12 South Middle Pipes Steel Orange Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A 13:26:16

62 Positive 18-Nov-15 4.15 0.11 South Middle Pipes Steel Yellow Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A gas 13:27:51

63 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.18 0.14 South Middle Furnace Steel Blue Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A fan attached to boiler 13:30:01

64 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0.01 South Middle Door Steel Black Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A boiler doors 13:31:24

65 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.21 0.02 South Middle Pipes Steel Blue Peeling

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A pipe from boiler 13:32:33

66 Positive 18-Nov-15 1.65 0.11 South Middle Pipes Steel White Peeling

Fire Lab Sec A-01

Boiler Rm 111-A

WST Frame and

Piping 13:35:00

67 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.01 0.01 South Middle Wall CMU White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab 13:38:04

68 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.01 0.02 West Middle Wall Ceramic Red Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab 13:39:51

69 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.03 0.01 South Middle Floor Concrete Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab 13:41:14

70 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.1 0.01 West Middle Door Metal Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab 13:43:15

71 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0 West Middle Pipes Metal White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab by bathrooms 13:44:39

72 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.1 0.01 West Middle Furnace Metal Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab by bathrooms 13:45:32

73 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.02 0.01 West Middle Wall Ceramic Green Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab bathrrom 13:46:51

74 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0 West Middle Door Metal Green Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab bathrrom atall door 13:48:01

75 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.03 0.01 West Middle Pipes Metal White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab bathrrom pipe to radiator 13:50:04

76 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.05 0.03 South Middle Furnace Metal Tan Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab bathrrom radiator 13:50:58

77 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.02 0.01 South Middle Cabinet Metal Grey Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab cabinets 13:56:45

78 Negative 18-Nov-15 0.01 0.01 North Middle Floor Concrete Off White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab floor 13:58:41

79 Negative 18-Nov-15 0 0 North Middle Frame Metal Green Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

110 A wet lab thermo machines 14:00:55

NIST STD Pass 19-Nov-15 1 0.01 NIST Standard - Red SRM 2573 NIST- STND CAL 15:57:49

1 PASS 19-Nov-15 9:37:40

2 Negative 19-Nov-15 0.02 0.01 West Middle Wall Ceramic White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Fuels Lab

Wall CMU Walls 9:50:53

3 Negative 19-Nov-15 0.03 0.01 East Middle Wall Ceramic White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Fuels Lab

Wall 9:52:56

4 Negative 19-Nov-15 0 0 North Middle Wall Drywall White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Fuels Lab

Wall CMU Walls 9:54:33

5 Negative 19-Nov-15 0 0 North Middle Ceiling Drywall White Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Fuels Lab

Wall 9:57:11

6 Negative 19-Nov-15 0.12 0.02 West Middle Door Metal Brown Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

106-A 10:00:32

7 Negative 19-Nov-15 0.01 0.03 West Middle Cabinet Metal Orange Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Prep sink 10:04:47

8 Negative 19-Nov-15 0 0 West Middle Cabinet Metal Orange Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Prep sink 10:11:46

9 Negative 19-Nov-15 0.04 0.02 West Middle Wall Wood Orange Intact

Fire Lab Sec A-01

105-A Prep sink 10:13:21

5 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 North Middle Wall Vinyl White Intact RMRS A 103 A 14:05:23

6 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.02 0.02 North Middle Wall Ceramic White Intact RMRS A 103 A 14:06:09

7 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 North Middle Wall Ceramic White Intact RMRS A 103 A 14:06:57

8 Positive 10-Dec-15 1.15 0.05 West Middle Metal Red Intact

RMRS A 202 A-

02wind tunnle 14:09:18

9 Positive 10-Dec-15 2.11 0.13 West Middle Metal Green Intact

RMRS A 202 A-

02wind tunnle 14:10:58

10 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0.01 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:18:53

11 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.06 0.01 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:19:57

12 10-Dec-15 0.02 0.02 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:20:49

13 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.19 0.22 South Middle Cabinet Metal Grey Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:22:40

14 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:23:26

15 Positive 10-Dec-15 1.1 0.05 South Middle Metal White Intact

RMRS A 202-A

Light Green

Railing 14:28:35

16 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.02 0.02 East Middle Floor Drywall Grey Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:31:32

17 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.06 0.02 South Middle Wall Metal White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:32:15

18 Insufficient Test Time 10-Dec-15 0.01 0.01 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:33:15

19 Positive 10-Dec-15 2.48 0.11 South Middle Pipes Steel Orange Intact

RMRS A 202-A Lo pressure steam 14:33:53

20 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.07 0.02 South Middle Pipes Steel Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

Blue cold water pip 14:34:34

21 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.01 0.02 North Middle Pipes Drywall Black Intact

RMRS A 202-

Ablack pipe 14:34:49

22 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:35:18

23 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.01 0.01 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:35:51

24 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.57 0.04 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:36:15

25 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.09 0.03 South Middle Wall Drywall White Intact RMRS A 202-A 14:36:40

26 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.13 0.02 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 14:54:59

27 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.06 0.04 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 14:56:04

28 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.08 0.01 South Middle Window Metal Green Intact

RMRS A 202-A

green windows 14:57:25

29 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 14:59:01

30 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.03 0.04 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 14:59:28

31 Negative 10-Dec-15 0 0 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 14:59:47

32 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.15 0.02 North Middle Metal Red Intact

RMRS A 202-A

red railing stair case 15:09:08

33 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.03 0.01 North Middle Floor Metal Black Intact

RMRS A 202-A

stair well steps 15:09:27

34 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.47 0.04 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 15:16:27

35 Positive 10-Dec-15 1.72 0.11 North Middle Pipes Drywall Grey Intact

RMRS A 202-A

Water Drain 15:17:53

36 Insufficient Test Time 10-Dec-15 0.28 0.06 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 15:19:04

37 Insufficient Test Time 10-Dec-15 0.32 0.06 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-A

blue water pipe 15:19:19

38 Positive 10-Dec-15 1.52 0.09 East Middle Metal Grey Intact

RMRS A 302-A

wind tunnle exhaust foe fire lab 15:19:35

39 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.02 0.01 North Middle Floor concrete Grey Intact

RMRS A 302-crt floor 15:23:03

40 Insufficient Test Time 10-Dec-15 0.03 0.01 North Middle Floor concrete Blue Intact

RMRS A 302 A-

Concrete Floor 15:28:09

41 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.05 0.02 North Middle Pipes Metal Blue Intact

RMRS A 202-Blue

Equpiment 15:28:36

42 Insufficient Test Time 10-Dec-15 0 0 North Middle Pipes Metal Green Intact

RMRS A 302-

Green Equipment 15:29:55

43 Negative 10-Dec-15 0.04 0.01 North Middle Pipes Drywall Blue Intact

RMRS A 302-A

b…