Attachment_10_-_AsbestosLeadHazMaterial-_A_Wing.pdf

PDF 15 MB Posted

Attached to
Missoula Fire Sciences Lab Mechanical Upgrade Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-82FT-S-16-0015
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Service Rocky Mountain Research Station

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Inspection Report for Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Assessment – A Wing

Contract: AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Subject Property:

Rocky Mountain Research Station 5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W.

Missoula, MT 59808

Prepared For:

United States Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 W Prospect Street Fort Collins Co 80526

Prepared By:

Abatement Contractors of Montana, LLC 208 Commerce St Missoula, MT 59807 Office: 406-549-8489 www.acm-contracting.com http://www.acm-contracting.com/

Report for a Comprehensive Pre-Renovation Asbestos and Lead Hazardous Materials Assessment A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 Scope of Work

3.0 Site Description

4.0 Asbestos Inspection

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Methods

5.3 Findings

6.0 Mercury

7.0 PCBs

8.0 Quality Control & Quality Assurance

9.0 XRF

10.0 Summary of Findings:

10.1 Asbestos

10.2 Lead Based Paint

10.3 PCB-Containing Equipment

10.4 Mercury -Containing Equipment

11.0 Limitations

List of Tables

Table 1: Summary of ACM (A-Wing)

Table 2: Summary of LBP (A-Wing)

Table 3: Summry of Paint Chip Samples

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

APPENDICIES

Appendix A – Sample Location Drawings Appendix B – ACBM, LBP & Mercury PCB Location Drawings Appendix C – Documentation of Accreditation Appendix D – XRF Performance characteristic sheet Appendix E – XRF Data Summary Tables Appendix F – Analytical Reports Appendix G – PCB & Mercury Material List Appendix H– Photo Log of ACM, LBP & Mercury-PCB

December 15, 2015

USDA Forest Service Attn: Corrie Kegel, PE 5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808

RE: Pre-renovation Inspection report for Asbestos, Lead & PCB Identification For Rocky Mountain Research Station for ‘A’ Wing Located at 5775 U.S. Hwy 10 W, Missoula, MT 80526-59808-9361

Attn: Corrie Kegel, Abatement Contractors of Montana, LLC (ACM) is pleased to provide the findings of the asbestos and lead-based paint inspection completed at the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS), in Missoula Montana. The inspection was performed from October through December, 2015 by Mr. Christopher Casas and Mr. Mike Foust; Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) accredited asbestos inspectors (MTA-4459) (MTA-2741) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accredited lead based paint inspectors (MT-I-I148223-1) (MT-S-28404-2). Credentials are attached.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The pre-renovation hazardous material assessment for the above referenced project was completed to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos. ACM collected a total of 144 bulk samples representing 59 homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspected asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM). Floor plan drawings with bulk sample locations are presented in Appendix A. Samples listed in Table 1 tested positive for asbestos.

Identification of regulated hazardous materials at the RMRS ‘A’ Wing was accomplished through physical inspection, bulk sampling, and collection of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) screening data of building materials within the site.

The inspection for asbestos-containing material (ACM) was conducted using the protocol developed for schools under the asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), as promulgated in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 763 (40 CFR, Part 763.354). Classification of the identified asbestos-containing materials was performed under the guidelines for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP).

The lead-based paint inspection was conducted using the protocols developed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). ACM used a field XRF analyzer to determine the presence or absence of LBP. HUD recognizes the XRF analyzer as the recommended method to determine lead in paint (HUD 1995, revised 1997 and 2000).

ACM completed an inspection for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) within RMRS’s ‘A’ wing by a observational investigation to assess the quantity of PCBs.

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

ACM completed a inspection for mercury-containing equipment within the RMRS’s ‘A’ wing by a observational investigation to assess the quantity of mercury-containing equipment.

Our methods and findings for the Inspection and overall hazard assessment are presented in the following sections of this report.

A total of 48 separate HAs of suspect lead-containing surface coatings were identified at the site during the assessment. Twelve (12) HAs have been determined through on-site XRF analysis to be Lead- Based Paint (LBP). These surface coatings contain lead in concentrations greater than the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) LBP criterion of one milligram per square centimeter (1.00 𝑚𝑔/𝑐𝑚2) of sampled area. Fourteen (14) HAs have been determined through on-site XRF analysis to be NON- Lead-Based Paint and NON-LCP and therefore contain no amount of detectable lead.

HA’s listed in Table 2 tested POSITIVE for Lead in concentrations equal to or greater than the HUD LBP criterion and therefore are considered LBP.

Prior to initiating renovation activities at the site, an abatement plan should be prepared to address the handling, transport, and disposal of the asbestos-containing materials, lead-containing materials, PCBs containing materials, and mercury-containing equipment identified at the site in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, as described in this report.

2.0 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this project included a hazardous materials assessment of building components throughout the accessible interior and exterior spaces of Wing A. This work included visual assessment, sampling, and documentation of suspect and confirmed/assumed asbestos containing-building materials, lead-containing surface coatings, and any other potential hazardous material as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency and/or State of Montana. This work also includes recording the locations of the materials, estimated quantities of hazardous materials and recommendations for abatement of asbestos containing material and other hazardous materials. The scope of work included visual inspection for, but no sample collection of potential mercury-containing materials and potential PCB-containing equipment and materials. The purpose for conducting the inspection is to ensure all local, state and federal regulations related to hazardous waste are complied with during the upcoming renovation of Wing A. ACM’s scope of work for this project did not include preparation of abatement plans or specification documents.

3.0 Site Description

The Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) houses the Fire, Fuel and Smoke science program as well as the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory. The RMRS was constructed in 1960 complete with a combustion laboratory, a wet laboratory, maintenance garage spaces, and office spaces. The building is divided into three wings, ‘A’ wing, ‘B’ wing, and ‘C’ wing. ‘A’ wing houses the Combustion Laboratory, the Wet Laboratory, and the Boiler Room, The Chiller Room, and The Low Velocity and High Velocity wind tunnels.

Exterior of the building:

The Combustion Laboratory roof over Wing A slopes towards the south and is built up with multiple layers that include river rock, rubber membrane, tar paper, celotex, fiber board, tar paper, and a thick tar layer atop Structural concrete decking. The trim of the roof is aluminum coping. The exterior walls of the combustion lab are constructed from pre-cast concrete between concrete columns with caulked joints. The exterior walls are finished with red face brick over pre-cast concrete between the concrete columns.

Interior:

The interior floors of ‘A’ Wing are covered with Vinyl Floor Tiles, and paints. Walls in the combustion laboratory are finished with the first layer being ribbed aluminum sheeting over fiber glass insulation adhered (mastic dollops) to metal furring. The combustion laboratory is atop an air retention space which is over a concrete slab sloping to the south.

The interior finish materials on the walls include CMU blocks, ceramic wall blocks, drywall, and cement asbestos board. Room 203 A and 001 A house the chiller room, and boiler system, chilled water piping “Air conditioning and refrigeration units” domestic water lines all feed from the boiler room. The piping from this System runs through A Wing to feed B Wing and C Wing. The piping in room 203 A and 001 A include the heating water supply, heating water return, lo-pressure steam system, the cold water return, the hot water return, the Fire sprinkler system, the compressed air system, and the natural gas system.

The decking between the floors of Wing A is concrete above concrete floors.

4.0 Asbestos Inspection

The interstitial spaces between the CMU block was accessed on the 1st and 3rd floors in 4 different locations to visually assess for the presence of vermiculite. No visible vermiculite was observed within the interstitial space of the CMU blocks in ‘A’ wing.

There are several types of table countertops in ‘A’ Wing, these materials are uniformly manufactured material, and therefore a single bulk sample for each homogeneous area of table countertops was obtained for analysis and confirmation for potential asbestos containing materials.

Several Marked fire doors were opened and visually and physically assessed for the presence of suspect asbestos containing material. The fire doors within ‘A’ wing contain fiberglass insulation. No suspected asbestos containing materials were observed within the fire doors.

The asbestos inspection was performed in accordance with the Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) 29 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 1926.1101(k), DEQ and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 40 CFR 61, Subparts A and M.

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Required prior to renovation or demolition of building materials, the asbestos inspection consisted of a detailed survey of all building materials which will be disturbed by the demolition process. Suspect ACBM were visually identified and touched prior to sampling. Samples were placed into HA groups using a coding method to classify each material by type, texture, and date of application. Components of the inspection included:

• Identification of homogeneous suspect materials on a room-by-room basis;

• Collection and analyses of bulk samples to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos; and

• Bulk samples were not collected from any homogeneous material made of fiberglass, wood, foam, glass, or rubber.

A minimum of three (3) samples were collected from random locations of each HA of suspect material.

Samples were collected from existing damaged materials, as applicable. Samples were placed in pre-labeled plastic containers for transport to the laboratory.

Samples were shipped, under chain-of-custody protocol for standard analyses, to Sanair Technologies Laboratory, Inc. in Powhatan, Virginia, for bulk asbestos analysis utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Bulk samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA method 600/R93/116 and EPA 600/m4- 82/020.

The DEQ defines ACM as material containing more than 1% asbestos based on laboratory analysis for the material using the EPA method 600/R-93/116 (“Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials’) by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Three categories of ACM have been defined in the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standard, which is established in Title 40, part 61, of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 61.141) and adopted by the DEQ in Title 17, Chapter 74, Subchapter 3, of the Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM 17.74.351). The NESHAP Category definitions are as follows;

• Category I Non-friable ACM- asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one (1) percent (%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix E, subpart E, 40 CFR 763, section 1 (PLM)

• Category II Non-friable ACM- any material, excluding Category I Non-friable ACM, containing more than 1% asbestos as determined using the method specified in appendix E, subpart E, 40 CFR 763, section 1, PLM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Regulated ACM (RACM)- a) friable asbestos material; b) Category I Non-friable ACM that has become friable; c) Category I Non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; or d) category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by the subpart.

ACM collected One Hundred and Forty Four (144) bulk samples representing Fifty Nine (59) HAs of suspected ACBM. Table 1 summarizes analytical results for the building materials collected within the site. Additional information in Table 1 includes Sample ID, building material description, sample location, percent (%) asbestos, material condition, approximate square feet (SQFT)/Linear Feet (LF)/Count (EA), and recommended response actions. The analytical reports references rooms

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 numbers from the engineering plans for the building, where these room numbers differ from the room numbers currently being used in the building a note was issued in the location tab.

Table 1: Summary of ACM (A-Wing)

Table 1: Summary of ACM (A-Wing)

Sample No.

HA

Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response

Action

Basement

BC.1 Gaskets Pipe chase to burn chamber 40% Fair-

Friable

RACM

30 EA

Remove prior to renovation or demo

VFT.2 Green Floor tile Pipe chase to burn chamber 3% Fair-

Non-Friable 33 EA Remove prior to renovation or demo

Cork.1 Chilled water pipes

Pipe chase to burn chamber 60%

Fair- Friable

RACM

20 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

AC/Refrig.1 Chilled water pipes Mudded

Fittings

Pipe chase to burn chamber 5%

Fair- Friable

RACM

5 EA

Remove prior to renovation or demo

TRNST.1 Cement asbestos board Crawl Space 20%

Fair- Friable

RACM

50 SQFT

Remove prior to renovation or demo

001 Boiler room HA Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response

Action

TSI.4 Boiler Breeching Room 111-A 65%

Fair- Friable

RACM 450 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

BG.1 Boiler Door Gasket Room 111-A 80% Fair-

Friable

RACM

44 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

VERM.1

Vermiculite Mud Packing/ Boiler

Door Room 111-A <1% Fair

Non-Friable 50 SF Remove prior to renovation or demo

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

WC.1

Window

Caulking Boiler Room

Room 111-A 5% Fair- Non-Friable 110 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

1st Floor HA Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response Action

Clk.1 Caulking Room Doors

Throughout Section A 7%

Good condition

Non-Friable

596 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

BT.2 Black Lab tables

107-A (Analytical

Report References

105-A)

15%

Good condition

Non-Friable

1 EA

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Cork.1 “Vertical’ Chilled water pipes 101A 60%

Good condition Friable

RACM

24 LF Remove prior to renovation or demo

VFT.1

12x12 White-speckled Vinyl

Floor Tile

Room 103A (analytical

Report references 104-

A)

2%

Good condition

Non-Friable

540 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

TRNST.1 Transite Room 103-A Ceiling 101-A Ceiling 110-A

20% Good condition Non-Friable 350 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

M.4 Grey mastic dollops

Burn chamber mastic behind aluminum panels & fiberglass

2% Good condition Non-Friable 960 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

WC.1 Window Caulking

Room 103 A Viewing Windows

5% Fair-

Friable

RACM

65 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

N/A Small Oven Burn Chamber

Assumed Asbestos

Containing Transite

Good Condition – Non-Friable

15 SQFT

Remove Prior to renovation or demo

2nd floor HA Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response Action

WC.1 Window Caulking

Room 201 A Viewing Window

5% Good condition Non-Friable

44 LF

Remove prior

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

VFT.3 9x9 Vinyl Floor Tile Grey

Rooms 00A, & 202 A 3%

Good condition

Non-Friable

500 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

TRNST.1 Cement asbestos board 201A 20%

Good condition

Non-Friable

525 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

VFT.1 12x12 white tile Rooms 001 A, & 201A 2%

Good condition

Non-Friable

1,600 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

TRNST.1 Asbestos burn pad

Interior of low velocity 50%

Good condition

Non-Friable

90 SF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Cork.1 Chilled water pipes 211A & 00A 65%

Good condition Friable

RACM

605 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

AC/Refig.1 Chilled water pipes Mudded

Fittings 00A 5%

Good condition Friable

RACM

15 EA

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Clk.1 Caulking Room Doors 203,211 7%

Good condition

Non-Friable

140 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

WC.1

Window

Caulking chiller room

Chiller room 5% Good condition Non-Friable

150 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

G.1 Stove gasket Chiller room 90% Fair, Non-Friable

RACM

8 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

3rd floor HA Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response Action

G Gasket Vibration collar

301 A next to the fan unit 75%

Fair, Friable

RACM

45 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

M.1 Black Mastic sealant

Room 301-A 401-A north wall 8%

Good condition

Non-Friable

60 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Cork.1 Chilled water pipes Room 302 A 60%

Fair, Friable

RACM

180 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

M.4 Grey mastic dollops Room 301 A 2%

Good condition

Non-Friable

35 SQFT

Remove prior

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

AC/

Refig.1

Chilled water pipes Mudded

Fittings Room 302 A 5%

Fair, Friable

RACM

8 EA

Remove prior to renovation or demo

N/A Chilled water Expansion Tank Room 302 A Assumed

Good, Friable

RACM

352 SQFT

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Roof of ‘A’ Wing HA Description Location %Asbestos Condition SQFT/LF/EA Response

Action

DB.1 Exhaust Tunnel Breeching

Roof of 211A (Analytical references room 201A)

4% Good condition Non-Friable

2100 SQFT

Remove prior to renovation or demo

Clk.3 Off White Caulk Roof

Roof of 211 A (Analytical references room 201A)

2% Fair-

Friable

RACM

35 LF

Remove prior to renovation or demo

N/A Exterior Smoke Stack Gasket Exterior Assumed

Fair, Non-Friable

RACM

12 LF

Remove prior

5.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

As a result of the comprehensive lead-based paint testing (Assessment) conducted on 10/08/15, lead-based surface coatings (paints) were confirmed on the subject property as of the date of the (Assessment). Identification of Lead Based Paint (LBP) is necessary to determine whether renovation/demolition workers may potentially be exposed to airborne lead concentrations exceeding permissible exposure limits (PEL) established by the OSHA.

HUD defines LBP as a surface coating containing lead in concentration greater than 1.0. The presence of LBP on surfaces scheduled to be impacted during the renovation activities increases the potential for

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 workers to be exposed to airborne lead in concentrations greater than the OSHA PEL of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3), which is established in 29 CFR 1926.62.

As a result of the lead-based paint assessment conducted at the site, lead-based surface coatings (paints) were confirmed on the subject property as of the date of the assessment. The analytical results from this assessment effort identified the following lead-based paint (LBP) as defined by the EPA and/ or HUD standards

5.1 Introduction

A LBP assessment was conducted at the ‘A’ Wing of the RMRS for the client. The inspection was conducted by Mr. Christopher Casas, a Certified Lead-Based Paint Inspector. The purpose of the inspection was to confirm or deny the presence of lead-based paint. As part of the inspection, a visual survey of the property and structure was conducted and all painted surfaces were inventoried.

ACM collected 4 paint chip samples representing 4 homogeneous areas of representative interior, and exterior painted surfaces. The comprehensive LBP testing, conformed to HUD guide lines 24 CFR 35 section 35.930 (c), (d). LBP is defined by EPA regulations under Title X (Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992) as containing lead concentrations above 1.0 mg/cm² when measured by a portable XRF instrument or 0.5% by weight (5,000 parts per million) when measured by laboratory analysis.

Since this project is non-HUD target housing, HUD regulations do not apply, Explanations of regulations are detailed as follows:

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1926.62 - Lead in Construction Standard does not define lead based coatings or materials but does establish safe airborne exposure limits for employees working with lead containing materials by permissible exposure limit (PEL). In summary; if any material or coating contains lead above 100 ppm then abatement, renovation, or demolition contractors must demonstrate worker health and safety due diligence.

This includes: lead awareness training for all affected employees, establishment of proper personal protective equipment (PPE), proper demarcation of effected work area(s), and performance of negative exposure assessment (NEA) lead air monitoring prior to downgrading any established PPE.

Relating to disposal of lead-containing waste, RCRA regulatory criteria for “total” lead in a waste stream is established in 40 CFR 261, Subpart C. The regulatory criteria are listed in milligrams per liter (mg/l) of dissolved lead in a solution (“wet basis”), as determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) by EPA Method 1311.

5.2 Methods

ACM conducted the LBP survey using the current recognized protocol as presented in Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards. A new pair of non-powdered nitrile gloves was worn during collection of each sample. Samples were collected by removing a full-thickness layer of paint from a marked surface representative of the painted building component; utilizing a razor blade, utility knife, or chisel to collect samples from an approximately one (1) square inch surface area.

Sampling tools were cleaned in between samples to prevent cross-contamination. Bulk samples were

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 placed into pre-labeled plastic containers and overnight shipped under chain-of-custody protocol to Sanair Technologies Laboratory, Inc. in Powhatan, Virginia, an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory.

ACM identified HAs of suspect LBP on interior and exterior surfaces for each of the site buildings, as described above, in general accordance with American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method E 1729-05 and/or Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead- Based Paint Hazards in Housing. ACM’s inspector distinguished HAs of suspect LBP visually and through field review of analytical data obtained using a Innov-X-Systems alpha-4000 XRF analyzer. If deemed appropriate by the inspector, multiple tests were taken within a given HA; in such instances, the highest observed concentration for tests representing a respective HA were reported.

The XRF utilizes an ionizing electrical source and internal calculations to provide data. Analytical data obtained from a field-calibrated XRF are accepted as accurate by the EPA and HUD.

It should be noted that this instrument performs its own detector calibration upon startup, and it’s accuracy was checked against known standards set forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) prior to, during (at a four (4) hour interval), and following testing. The Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) is included in Appendix E.

5.3 Findings

ACM collected a total o Ninety Five (95) XRF suspect lead coatings assays & calibration readings for the lead based inspection of ‘A’ Wing. Any paint films with lead concentrations of 1.0 or greater were classified as Regulated Lead Containing Materials. In addition the substrate condition was visually assessed at each assay test site. Additional paint or glaze coatings on the interior of the buildings were bulk sampled using destructive methods to verify the lead content in parts per million (ppm), summarized in Table 3. Results from ACM’s LBP assessment are summarized in the following sections for the site. In some cases multiple XRF shots were taken over the same paint or glazing, the highest XRF reading for any given paint or glazing is then reported. The highest readings on the buildings piping systems are reported.

ACM identified a total of 48 HAs of suspect LBP, all of those were determined to be LBP are summarized below.

Table 2: Summary of LBP (A-Wing)

Table 2: Summary of LBP from XRF Analysis

Component Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Basement

Yellow Paint Pipe Chase to Boiler Room Natural Gas Line 125 LF 2.02

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Orange Paint Pipe Chase to Boiler Room Lo-Pressure Steam Line 85 LF 4.42

Dark Blue Paint Pipe Chase to Boiler Room Cold Water Line 80 LF 1.00

Light Blue Paint Pipe Chase to Boiler Room Hot Water Line 80 LF 1.00

Boiler Room Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Black/Red Paint Room 111 A Railing and Metal Stair Case 438 SQFT 1.14

Grey Paint Room 111 A Boiler Flooring 925 SQFT 1.00

Brown/ green base Room 111 A Metal Door 110 SQFT (3EA) .52

Dark Blue Room 111 A Cold Water Line 235 LF 1.00

Light Blue Room 111A Hot Water Line 235 LF 1.00

Yellow Room 111 A Natural Gas Line 230 LF 2.02

Orange Room 111 A Lo-Pressure Steam Line 280 LF 4.42

White with Black Undercoating Room 111 A Water Storage Tank Frame and

Piping 75 LF 1.65

1st Floor Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Green Room 108 A Structural Beam for Low Velocity Wind Tunnel Support 45 LF 2.11

Grey top coat/Yellow base

Paint

Pipe Chase above Bathroom and

Janitors Closet in Room 108 A

Natural Gas Line 26 LF 2.02

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Grey top coat/ Dark Blue base paint

Pipe Chase above Bathroom and

Janitors Closet in Room 108 A

Cold Water Line 30 LF 1.00

Grey top coat/ Light blue base paint

Pipe Chase above Bathroom and

Janitors Closet in Room 108 A

Hot Water Line 30 LF 1.00

White Top coat Grey/ Dark Blue base coat Room 107 A Cold Water Line 45 LF 1.00

White Top Coat Grey/ Light Blue base coat Room 107 A Hot Water Line 45 LF 1.00

White Top Coat /Grey base coat Room 107 A Roof Drain Line 30 LF 1.72

Chiller Room Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Orange Chiller Room (211 A) Lo-Pressure Steam Line 35LF 4.42

Cold Water Line Chiller Room (211 A) Cold Water Line 25LF 1.00

Grey Chiller Room (211 A) Roof Drain Line 30 LF 1.72

2nd Floor Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Red Room 00 A High Velocity Wind tunnel 2720 SQFT 1.15

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Green/Orange Room 00 A Low Velocity Wind Tunnel 6194 SQFT 2.11

Light Green Room 00 A Railing Below Low Velocity Window Tunnel 370 SQFT 1.10

Roof Drain Lines Room 00 A Roof Drain pipe Insulation 85 LF 1.00

Grey/Orange undercoating Room 00 A Lo-Pressure Steam Line 134 LF 4.42

Grey/ Dark Blue Undercoating Room 00 A Cold Water Line 110 LF 1.00

Grey/Light Blue Undercoating Room 00 A Hot Water Line 110 LF 1.00

3rd Floor Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Grey/Orange undercoating Room 302-A

Built up air conditioning Unit, Low Velocity Wind Tunnel, Supply Fan, & Wind Tunnel

Exhaust

1548 SQFT 1.52

Grey Paint Room 302 A Roof Drain Line 80 Ft 1.72

Orange Paint Room 302-A Lo-Pressure Steam Line 62 LF 4.42

4th Floor Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Orange Paint Room 400-A Underside of Wind Tunnel Exhaust Plenum 210 4.42

Roof Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

Grey paint/green & orange undercoating

Roof of Combustion

Chamber

Gravity Roof Ventilator Walls and flu hoist cap 240 SQFT 1.52

Combustion Chamber Location Material Description Quantity XRF Results

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

Green/ With Orange undercoating

Combustion

Chamber Flu 3370 SQFT 2.11

Silver Combustion Chamber

Vertical Lift Track for Steel Door to low Velocity Air Tunnel 136 LF 1.64

Green Room 401 A

Burn Chamber Platform

Flu Bracing 280 SQFT 1.52

% = Percentage < = Less Than Bold = LBP 0.5% by weight = HUD definition of lead-based paint

ACM performed destructive bulk paint sampling of materials suspect of containing lead for this assessment. ACM collected a total of 4 bulk coating samples from suspect coated building components.

The results of the bulk paint sampling are as follows.

The bulk paint samples collected for this project were submitted following proper chain of custody procedures to Sanair Laboratories, Inc. located in Virginia for analysis by method SW846, and 3050B/7000B. Sanair is an ACGIH accredited analytical laboratory.

Table 3: Summry of Paint Chip Samples

Table 3: Summary of Paint Chip Samples

Sample No. Color Description Lead Content

LBP.1 Brown Metal Doors .5942

LBP.2 Grey Concrete Flooring .1676

LBP.3 Grey/Red Concrete Flooring .1982

LBP.4 Black/Red Railing and Staircase 6.3148

% = Percentage < = Less Than Bold = LBP 0.5% by weight = HUD definition of lead-based paint

6.0 Mercury

A total of Six Hundred and Ninety Two (692) suspected mercury-containing equipment was identified through visual observation associated with the site and were identified as being Mercury-Containing Equipment during the assessment.

Due to the age of the structure, a visual inspection for potential mercury-containing equipment such as mercury switches, thermostats and thermometers was conducted at the site. Mercury-containing

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 equipment is listed as a universal waste regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste regulations. EPA’s universal waste regulations streamline hazardous waste management standards for designated “universal waste” which includes mercury-containing equipment to prevent the item from entering municipal trash; instead it can be collected and disposed of at a hazardous facility. The federal universal waste regulations are set forth in 40 CFR (273.9).

Mercury-Containing Equipment is a device or part of a device (including thermostats, barometers, manometers, temperature and pressure gauges, and mercury switches but excluding batteries and lamps) that contains elemental mercury integral to its function, this includes serval types of instruments that are used throughout electrical utilities and other industries. Universal waste regulations apply to mercury-containing equipment. Personal handling this type of waste (i.e. disposed fluorescent light bulbs) must be trained regarding the proper handling and emergency response actions for the waste (mercury). It is recommended that the facility where the mercury-containing equipment is present participate in a management plan for the proper disposal and recycling of the hazardous waste. The hazardous waste must be containerized to protect it from damage and/or leakage, and the containers must be properly labeled to identify the type of universal waste (e.g. “Universal Waste – Mercury Thermostats” or ‘Waste-Mercury thermostat(s)’or “Used Mercury Thermostats”).

The transport of universal waste must include adequate packing materials to prevent breakage during storage, and handling in accordance with EPA and DOT regulations. Universal wastes may only be transported to other universal waste handlers, destinations facilities (e.g. disposal or recycling facilities).

Handling and transport of small quantities of universal waste do not need to be reported to the EPA;

however it is prudent to collect and document all receipts generated by the destination facilities.

ACM recommends the abatement design specification document be prepared to include requirements for removal, handling, and disposal of these materials. These tasks should be completed by the abatement contractor or other trained personnel.

7.0 PCBs

A total of Six (6) suspected PCB-Containing Equipment was identified through visual observation to be associated with the site and were identified as being PCB-Containing Equipment during the assessment.

Current PCB regulations can be referenced in CFR 40 761. PCB-Containing equipment is currently listed under as a chemical substance under the Toxic substances Control Act (TSCA). The TSCA was established to control any substance determined to cause unreasonable risk to public health or the environment. PCB-Containing Fluorescent light ballasts identified in the assessment must be considered to be “PCB Bulk Product Waste”. This waste will require Manifesting and labeling for disposal in accordance with CFR 761.62(b). The disposal options for this waste include disposal in a TSCA Incinerator, disposal in a TSCA/RCRA landfill, or a state-approved landfill (leach test required). It is important to note that each load of PCB waste must be transported using the waste manifest protocol stipulated in 40 CFR 716.207. EPA does not require notification for removal or disposal of PCB bulk waste unless the waste generator owns or operates a PCB storage facility. The material list of all identified PCB-Containing Equipment is attached in Appendix G.

ACM recommends the abatement specification document be prepared to include requirements for removal, handling, and disposal of these materials.

8.0 Quality Control & Quality Assurance

8.1 Chain-of-Custody Forms

In order to ensure that the samples are properly identified and tracked from the point of sample collection through receipt by the analytical laboratory, EPA requires that a chain-of-custody (COC) form be completed and accompany the samples. The COC contains essential items such as identification number, date, name of sampler and signature of recipient. Some laboratories request that COC forms they supply be used. These forms must be completed in the field and accompany the samples when they leave possession of the inspector. Inspectors should fill in a new COC form if mistakes have been made (i.e. incorrect information transferred from sample containers to COC form).

8.2 Quality Control (QC) Samples

Collections of side-by-side duplicates are recommended at the rate of 1 QC sample/building or 1 QC sample/20 samples, whichever is larger. The laboratory should analyze duplicates without knowing which the QC samples are. The results of duplicates are compared to determine sampling analytical precision.

8.3 Accredited Laboratories

To diminish the likelihood of challenges to the accuracy of laboratory results ACM utilized a accredited laboratories for the analysis of bulk samples (per AHERA 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E). A listing of accredited laboratories published by the EPA twice a year is available through the EPA regional Asbestos Coordinator or the TSCA hotline (202)-554-1404.

9.0 XRF

The XRF instrument was calibrated to the manufacturer’s standards prior to collecting field measurements and was checked periodically throughout the testing period against known NIST standards. All checks performed throughout the assessment were within 5% of one another. Overall, the precision, accuracy, method compliance, and completeness of the data set were determined to be acceptable based on the data submitted and reported. The XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet for the XRF used by ACM specifies the ranges where XRF results are positive, negative, or inconclusive. The Performance Characteristic Sheet for this instrument is attached in Appendix D.

10.0 Summary of Findings:

10.1 Asbestos

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058

• Thirty Nine (39) building materials suspected of containing asbestos were confirmed to not contain asbestos. If future renovation or demolition activities are planned these non-ACBM materials may remain in-place and be demolished with the reminder of the building.

• Twenty (20) building materials suspected of containing asbestos were confirmed to contain greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos and are considered Asbestos Containing Building Materials. These materials will require special abatement considerations prior to commencing renovation/selective demolition activates. Several options for asbestos abatement, in conjunction with demolition operations, may be considered for this project. The owner’s representative should work with the owner to develop a cost effective abatement/renovation/demolition plan, with considerations for the health and safety of the abatement workers, the demolition personnel, and residents within the immediate vicinity of the demolition project.

• If abatement or renovation/selective demolition of the property is completed in accordance with current EPA and MDEQ-ACP guidelines, the services completed throughout the project will require asbestos qualified contractors and consultants to complete the work.

10.2 Lead Based Paint

• LBP was confirmed on Twelve (12) representative painted surfaces tested at the referenced site.

These painted surfaces should be treated as lead hazardous waste and abated prior to removal, renovation, or salvage that may disturb the lead based paint. Therefore this material would require special considerations for pre-renovation lead abatement.

• The Federal Dangerous Waste Regulation (40 CFR Part 261) requires that lead containing materials with a lead content above 5,000 ppm threshold be treated as lead hazardous waste until toxic characterization leeching procedure (TCLP) bulk waste stream sampling by EPA method 1311 proves otherwise. The TCLP lead characterization threshold is 5 ppm. TCLP lead waste stream bulk sampling and analysis was not conducted as part of this survey project.

• The regulatory action level for lead, as defined under RCRA is 5 mg/L; therefore, a result above 5mg/L using the TCLP analytical method is defined as “hazardous waste” and must be transported by a hazardous waste transporter and disposed of at a hazardous waste facility.

Lead Based Paint Recommendations

• All coatings identified as containing greater than 100 ppm lead from bulk paint analysis, or by

XRF Assay Testing, associated with this project are governed by Federal regulations.

Explanations of regulations are outlined in sections of this report.

• The LBP coated surfaces will require special abatement considerations prior to commencing renovation, and selective demolition activities. Several options for abatement in conjunction with renovation/selective demolition operations may be considered for this project. The Owner’s

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 representative should work with the owner to develop a cost effective abatement/demolition plan, with considerations for the health and safety of the abatement workers, the demolition personnel, volunteers, and residents within the immediate vicinity of the renovation/selective demolition project.

• If abatement or demolition of the property is completed in accordance with current EPA guidelines, the services completed throughout the project would require lead qualified contractors and consultants to complete the work. The removal and containerization of the lead contaminated material should be completed during the lead abatement portion of the project.

10.3 PCB-Containing Equipment

• Confirmed PCB-containing components are listed by room on the PCB and Mercury containing equipment drawing, and a complete summary of all identified PCBs are listed in Appendix G.

Identified PCB-containing components shall be disposed of as described in this report.

Specifically identified “PCB Bulk Product Waste” will require Manifesting and labeling for disposal in accordance with CFR 761.62(b). Furthermore disposal options for this waste include disposal in a TSCA Incinerator, disposal in a TSCA/RCRA landfill, or a state-approved landfill (leach test required). Each load of PCB waste must be transported using the waste manifest protocol stipulated in 40 CFR 716.207

10.4 Mercury -Containing Equipment

• Confirmed mercury-containing equipment is listed per a room on the PCB and Mercury containing equipment drawing, and a complete summary of all identified PCBs are listed in Appendix G. Identified MCP shall be disposed of at a hazardous facility, as stipulated in 40 CFR (273.9). The Mercury-Containing Equipment must be containerized to protect it from damage and/or leakage, and the containers must be properly labeled to identify the type of universal waste. The transport of Mercury-Containing Equipment must include adequate packing materials to prevent breakage during storage, and handling. Handling and transport of small quantities of Mercury-Containing Equipment do not need to be reported to the EPA;

however it is prudent to collect and document all receipts generated by the destination facilities.

11.0 Limitations

This asbestos and lead inspection summary was prepared based on information gathered during our site visits, phone conversations with the Client, and interpretations of laboratory results of bulk samples collected during the inspection. The inspection was comprehensive to the referenced buildings.

Supplemental inspection and sampling may be required if additional asbestos HAs are exposed during excavation, demolition, or if the scope of work is expanded to include additional buildings or buried/underground piping that have not been inspected or analyzed for asbestos or lead content. All Contractors shall field verify measurements prior to commencing work.

A Wing of the RMRS –Missoula, Montana. Contract AG-82FT-P-15-0058 If you have any questions regarding this report, please call me at 406.549.8489. We look forward to working with you in the future.

Sincerely, Christopher Casas Mike Foust Environmental Technician Project Manager

Facility Map

("A" Wing) ("C" Wing)

("D" Wing) ("B" Wing)

APPENDIX A

Sample Location Drawings

UP

DN UP

(E) ELEC PA NEL RM

002 A

(E) TRA NSFO RM ER RM

003 A

(E) BO ILER RO O M

111-A

(E) HO IST RM

004 A

U NEXCA V A TED

CRA WL SPA CE

CRA WL SPA CE

AA

EE

FF

DNUP

DN

D N

ELEVATOR

(E) RECEIV ING

110-A

(E) V IEWING

103-A

(E) V ESTIBULE

101-A

(E) CO M BU STIO N LA B

102-A

GRTA,B,C

(E) V ESTIBULE

100 B

(E) LA SER RM

104-A

(E) O FFICE/ LA B

106-A

(E) STO RA GE/

V ESTIBU LE

105-A

(E) FUELS LA B

107 A

(E) PREPA RA TIO N A ND STA GING

108-A

(E) BO ILER RM

111 A

(E) PA SSA GE

116 B

ECU RITY

EQ UIP. RM

17 B

AA

BB

D D

EE

FF

G G

(E) O FFICE

212 B

GE

(E) STA IR B1

(E) CO N TRO L RM

201 A

(E) WIN D TU NNEL

TEST A REA

00A

(E) A IR CO N DITIO N IN G EQ UIP

211-A

DN

UP

DN

(E

H

IG

H V

EL

O

C

IT

Y T

U N

N

EL

(E

LO

W

V

EL

O C

IT

Y

T U

N N

EL

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NO RTHTRUE NO RTH

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NO RTHTRUE NO RTH

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NO RTHTRUE NO RTH

8' -0

10" 12'-0"

'A ' WING - 2ND FLO O R 'A ' WING - 1ST FLO O R

'A' Wing - Basement Floor

TRNST.1 A

TRNST.1 B

TRNST.1 C

CWRMF.1 HWRMF.1

AC/REFRIG.1 A

AC/REFRIG.1 B

WMSNT

BG.1 A

SP.1 A

CLK.10 A

CLK.10 B,C

MF.1 A

MF.1 B

MF.1 C

VERM.1

AC/REFRIGLINE

GRT.1 A,B,C

GRT.1 B

TRNST.1 A

TRNST.1 B

TRNST.1 C

GRT.1 A

GRT.1 B

GRT.1 C

M..1 A

M.1 B

M.1 C

M.2 A

M.2 B

M.2 C

TSI.5 A,B,C

TSI.4 A

TSI.4 B

TSI.4 C

VFT.1 A,B,C

BT.1 A,B,C

VFT.1 A

VFT.1 B

VFT.2 C

VFT.2 A

VFT.2 B

VFT.1 C

VFT.3 A

VFT.3 B

VFT.3 C

DW.1 A

DW.1 B

DW.1 C

CBM.1 A

CBM.1 B

CBM.1 C

CLK.1 A

CLK.1 B,C

BT.2 A

BT.2 B

BT.2 C

BT.3 A

BT.4 A

BT.5 A

BT.6 A

BT.7 A

BT.8 A

DB 1

MJF 1,2,3

MJF 4,5,6

DB.2

DB 3

DB 3

DWP 4,5,6,

DWP 1,2,3

GRT.4 A,B,C

MSF.2 A,AC

G.1

Cork.1 A

Cork.1 B

Cork.1 C

WC.1 A WC.1 B,C

WG.1 A,B,C

WC.2 A

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing: 'A' Wing Basement, 1ST Floor, 2ND Floor

Asbestos Bulk Sample Location

Note* Sample Locations Are Approximate

Note* Sample locations in RED Contain Detectable Amounts of Asbestos

202-A

(E) MECHANICAL LOFT

301 A

(E) MECHANICAL RM

302 A

ROOF

UP

(E) BURN CHAMBER

PLATFORM

401 A

(E) CONTROL ROOM

402 A

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

8"

(E) BURN CHAMBER

OPEN TO BELOW

(E) FAN

'A' WING - 4TH FLOOR 'A' WING - 3RD FLOOR

DB.1 A

DB.1 B

DB.1 C

RC.2 C

RC.2 A,B

CLK.3 A

CLK.3 B

CLK.3 C

CLK.4 A

CLK.4 B

CLK.4 C

(E) COND.

& VENT

UNIT

(E

BU

IL

T -U

P A

IR

C

O N

D U

N

IT

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

'A' WING - ROOF

'A' Wing Exterior Sample Location Drawing : 'A' Wing 3RD Floor, 4TH Floor, Combustion Chamber Roof

Asbestos Bulk Sample Location

Note* Bulk Sample Locations Are Approximate Note * Bulk Sample Locations in RED Contain Detectable Amounts of Asbestos

(E) MECHANICAL LOFT

301 A

(E) MECHANICAL RM

302 A

ROOF

UP

(E) BURN CHAMBER

PLATFORM

401 A

(E) CONTROL ROOM

402 A

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

8"

(E) BURN CHAMBER

OPEN TO BELOW

(E) FAN

'A' WING - 4TH FLOOR 'A' WING - 3RD FLOOR

(E) COND.

& VENT

UNIT

(E

BU

IL

T -U

P A

IR

C

O N

D U

N

IT

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

'A' WING - ROOF

G-1

G-2 G-3

FP.1 A

FP.1 B

FP.1 C

TP.1 A TP.1 B

TP.1 C

DW.1 D

GRT.2 A

M.1 A

M.1 B

M.1 C

M.4 B M.4 A

M.4 C

Asbestos Sample Location Drawing: 'A' Wing 3RD Floor, 4TH Floor, & Combustion Chamber Roof

Asbestos Bulk Sample Location

Note* Sample Locations are Approximate

Note* Samples in Red Contain Detectable Amounts of Asbestos

APPENDIX B

ACBM, LBP & Mercury PCB Location Drawings

'A' WING BASEMENT - LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ON THE

'CHILLED WATER LINES'

LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MUDDED WRAP,

PIPE JACKET, AND MASTIC ON THE CHILLED WATER

SYSTEM.

'A' WING 1ST & 2ND FLOOR BOILER RM & CHILLER RM ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

ON THE 'CHILLED WATER' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING

PIPE JACKET, MUDDED FITTINGS,

AND MASTIC

'A' WING 2ND FLOOR- LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MATERIAL ON 'CHILLED WATER SYSTEM' PIPING

LOCATION OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MUDDED WRAPS, MUDDED FITTINGS, AND

MASTIC. ON THE CHILLED WATER SYSTEM

(E) ELEC PANEL RM

002 A

(E) TRANSFORMER RM

003 A

(E) HOIST RM

004 A

UNEXCAVATED

CRAWL SPACE

CRAWL SPACE

A A

EE

FF

G G

TOIL

JAN

DNUP

D N

ELEVATOR

(E) RECEIVING

110 A

(E) VIEWING

103 A

(E) VESTIBULE

101 A

(E) COMBUSTION LAB

102 A

(E) VESTIBULE

100 B

(E) LASER RM

104 A

(E) OFFICE/ LAB

106 A

(E) STORAGE/

VESTIBULE

105 A

(E) FUELS LAB

107 A

(E) PREPARATION AND STAGING

108 A

(E) BOILER RM

111-A

(E) PASSAGE

116 B

ECURITY

EQUIP. RM

17 B

A A

BB

D

D

EE

FF

G

G

(E) OFFICE

212 B

GE

(E) STAIR B1

(E) CONTROL RM

201 A

(E) WIND TUNNEL

TEST AREA

00A

(E) AIR CONDITIONING EQUIP

2011A

DN

UP

DN

(E

H

IG

H V

EL

O

C

IT

Y T

U N

N

EL

(E

LO

W

V

EL

O C

IT

Y T

U N

N

EL

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

10" 12'-0"

'-0

27'-3"

4' -0

Cement Asbestos Board

Thermal Sheet Insulation

Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tile

Asbesots Caulking

A-Wing 2ND Floor A-Wing 1ST Floor

A-Wing Basement Floor

Asbestos Containing Laboratory Countertop

'A' WING BASEMENT, 1ST, & 2ND FLOORS - Location of Interior Asbestos Containing Mateirals

Asbestos Containing Concrete Burn Pad

CAB Burn Box

12x12 Vinyl Floor Tile

CAB Ceilings & Walls Glazing on Viewing Windows

12X12 Vinyl Floor Tile CAB Ceilings & Walls Caulking on Viewing Window

Discarded CAB

Vermiculite Mudded Packing

Boiler Door Gaskets & Stove Gaskets

'A' WING - 1ST FLOOR BOILER DIAGRAM

BOILER 1 BOILER 2

NOTE: GLAZING IS WINDOW TO FRAME

NOTE: CAULKING IS FRAME TO BUILDING COMPONENT

NOTE: JOINT SEALANT IS BUILDING TO BUILDING

Mastic Behind Fiber Glass and Sheet Metal

C1-STAR

STOVE - GASKET

(E) MECHANICAL LOFT

301 A

(E) MECHANICAL RM

302 A

ROOF

UP

(E) BURN CHAMBER

PLATFORM

401 A

(E) CONTROL ROOM

402 A

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

8"

(E) BURN CHAMBER

OPEN TO BELOW

(E) FAN

'A' WING - 4TH FLOOR 'A' WING - 3RD FLOOR

(E) COND.

& VENT

UNIT

(E

BU

IL

T -U

P A

IR

C

O N

D U

N

IT

D2.2 : D2.2 1/8" = 1'-0"

TRUE NORTH

'A' WING - 3RD FLOOR PIPIING DIAGRAM

'A' Wing 3RD & 4TH Floors - Location of Asbestos Containing Materials

ASBESTOS CONTAINING

MASTIC BEHIND

FIBER GLAS INSULATION

ASBESTOS CONTAINING

GASKETS

ASBESTOS CONTAINING

PIPE JACKET & MUDDED FITTINGS

ON THE CHILLED WATER LINES

Asbestos Containing Breeching on Exhuast Tunnel , Roof of Room 211 A

Asbestos Caulking, Trim of Air Intake on Roof of Room 211 A

Exterior Asbestos Containing Material - A Wing

Exterior Asbestos Window Caulking

Exterior Asbestos Containing Material - A Wing

Exterior Asbestos Window Caulking

'A' WING BASEMENT - LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT

'LO-PRESSURE STEAM', GAS, & Cold Water Return SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'LO-PRESSURE' STEAM SYSTEM & Air Return Below Combustion Room

LOCATIONOF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'GAS' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'COLD WATER' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD

BASED PAINT ON HOT

WATER LINE

BOILER 2

BOILER 1

'A' WING 1ST & 2ND FLOOR LEAD BASED PAINT LOCATIONS

'LO-PRESSURE STEAM, GAS & COLD WATER' SYSTEMS

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'LO-PRESSURE STEAM' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'GAS PIPING' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'COLD WATER' SYSTEM

'A' WING 1ST & 2ND FLOOR LEAD CONTAINING PAINT PIPING DIAGRAM

(FACING NORTH)

'A' WING 1ST FLOOR LEAD CONTAINING PAINT PIPING DIAGRAM (BIRDS EYE VIEW)

'A' WING 1ST FLOOR LEAD CONTAINING PAINT DIAGRAM (FACING EAST)

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

'HOT WATER' SYSTEM

TOIL

JAN

DNUP

DN

ELEVATOR

(E) RECEIVING

110 A

(E) VIEWING

103 A

(E) VESTIBULE

101 A

(E) COMBUSTION LAB

102 A

(E) LASER RM

104 A

(E) OFFICE/ LAB

106 A

(E) STORAGE/

VESTIBULE

105 A

(E) FUELS LAB

107 A

(E) PREPARATION AND STAGING

108 A

(E) BOILER RM

001 A

(E) CONTROL RM

201 A

(E) WIND TUNNEL

TEST AREA

00A

(E) AIR CONDITIONING EQUIP

211A

DN

UP

DN

(E

H

IG

H V

EL

O

C

IT

Y T

U N

N

EL

(E

LO

W

V

EL

O C

IT

Y

T U

N N

EL

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

D2.1 : D2.1 1/8" = 1'-0"

'A' WING 2ND FLOOR 'A' WING 1ST FLOOR

BLDG NORTHTRUE NORTH

4"

'-0

27'-3"

'-4

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT - 'A' WING 1ST & 2ND FLOOR

LOCATION OF LEAD

BASED PAINT

Note: Water Tank Stand.

LOCATION OF RAIL,and Beam WIth

LEAD BASED PAINT

COATING

Pipe Chase Above Bathroom and Janitors Closet, Below Second Floor Concrete Decking.

LBP present on Natural Gas Line, And Cold Water Return.

Location of LBP on Natural Gase Line

Location of LBP on Cold Water Return.

'A' WING 2ND FLOOR- LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT

ON 'LO-PRESSURE STEAM' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

THE 'LO-PRESSURE' STEAM SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

THE 'HOT WATER' SYSTEM

LOCATION OF LEAD BASED PAINT ON

THE 'COLD WATER SYSTEM'

'A' WING 3RD FLOOR -…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .