Attachment_34_Q A.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
Wetland Restoration Projects Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-7335-S-10-0014
Issued by
Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service

About this file

Attachment 34

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Wetland Restoration Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
AG-7335-10-S-0014 bid abstract.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_39_Q A.docx DOCX document
SF_30_continuation_page.docx DOCX document
S_30.pdf PDF
Attachment_35_Change_page_59_for_Attachment_12.docx DOCX document
Attachment_38_Tom_Way_Site_Visit_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_37_supplement_to_Attachment_12.docx DOCX document
SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment_36_supplemental_pages_for_Attachment_10.pdf PDF
SF_30_continuation_page.docx DOCX document
Attachment_32_Page_1_Fritz_Bothun.pdf PDF
Attachment_31_Roten_Site_Visit_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_33_Baker_Site_Visit_Sign-in.pdf PDF
SF30_Block_14_Continuation.docx DOCX document
SF1442 - conformed copy of sol.pdf PDF
Attachment_30_Page_68of68_Attachment_12.pdf PDF
Attachment_28_April_29_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_27_Fritz-Bothun_Sign-in.pdf PDF
SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment_25_Amend_0002_Fritz Bothun.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_24_Tom_Way_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_19_West_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_18_Newsom_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_26_Stout_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_21_Replace_P58of_Attachment_0012.pdf PDF
Attachment_23_Replace_P723-4_Attach_11.pdf PDF
Attachment_20_Replace P1of_Attachment_0012.pdf PDF
Attachment_22_Page_045-8of_Attachment_0011.pdf PDF
Attachment_17_Roberts_Sign-in.pdf PDF
SF30_Continuation.rtf RTF text file
Attachment_14_April_19_Pre-Bid_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_April_20_Pre-Bid_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_16_April_22_Brixey-Hicks_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_Tom_Way.pdf PDF
AG-7335-S-10-0014-0001.pdf PDF
SF1442.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_Baker West.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_Hoogendoorn.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_WD_Creek_Rogers_Counties.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Wage Determination.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_Fritz Bothun.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_Roberts.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_Newsome.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Stout.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Roten.pdf PDF
AG-7335-S-10-0014.rtf RTF text file
Attachment_1_Local Instructions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_Brixey Hicks.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Vigeant Hayes.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Wetland Restoration Projects has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AG-7335-S-10-0014-0005 ATTACHMENT 34 - Q & A MAY 10, 2010

1. QUESTION: Hayes - Earthwork quantity on Hayes project plan view sheet(3) show a total of 37,625cy. The individual construction features add up to 24,650cy. Is there an error in this summary?

ANSWER: See Attachment 35 for change to Attachment 12.

2. QUESTION: Hayes - The swales on the Hayes project plan view sheet(3) show a qty of 1000cy each on sheet(3) and 500cy each on sheet (10). Which is correct? Detail B and C on sheet (3) may explain this difference but I am unable to find this detail.

ANSWER: See Attachment 35 for change to Attachment 12.

3. QUESTION: Newsom - Can solid slab sodding be substituted for mulch sod?

ANSWER: No substitutions for mulch-sod since there is an onsite source.

4. QUESTION: Hoogendoorn - Can solid slab sodding be substituted for mulch sod?

ANSWER: Slab sodding is acceptable for the Hoogendoorn property. See Attachment 36 for specifications.

5. QUESTION: Hayes - At the site visits for the Atoka and Bryan county projects it was stated that no foundation preparation would be necessary prior to placing spoil into existing flooded borrow areas can this be verified? If the spoils from the new features do not provide enough material to fill the existing borrow areas will additional features be added?

ANSWER: The prospective bidders were told that no foundation preparation would be required in areas in which the water could not be removed. In the areas that can be drained, the surface vegetation shall be removed before placing the fill.

6. QUESTION: Baker - Please confirm that the pipe structures for the Baker project have already been purchased.

ANSWER: The pipe, anti-seep collars, and water control structures have been purchased for the Baker site.

7. QUESTION: West - Please confirm that the 58 acre mowing and clearing on the West project is as needed to build the structures.

ANSWER: 58 acres of clearing will not be necessary for the West site. The only area that needs to be cleared is the work area. The contractor will not be required to remove any tree larger than 12” diameter within the work area.

8. QUESTION: Vigeant, Atoka Co. The project plan view (sheet 2) shows a quantity of 6500 cy for the GSS 1 and 2000 cy for the structure removal. The GSS 1 detail (sheet 6) shows a quantity of 4500 cy for the GSS 1 and 2000 cy for the structure removal. Please verify which sheet is correct.

ANSWER: The correct amount is 4500 CY. See Attachment 37 for detail of the change.

9. QUESTION: Increase the period of performance on Hoogendoorn, Bryan Co. It is currently scheduled for 30 days and considering the conditions at the site and the work to be done I believe more time will be necessary.

ANSWER: The period of performance for the Hoogendoorn property will remain at 30 days.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .