Bldg_4747_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf

PDF 7 MB Posted

Attached to
Central Steam Distribution Replacement Phase 2 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80MSFC18B0003
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center

About this file

Bldg 4747 Asbestos Survey Report Final

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Central Steam Distribution Replacement Phase 2, newest first.
File Type Posted
Abstract_of_Bids,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Posted_Copy,_Aug_9,_2018_REVISED_BLOCK_13.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Amendment_4,_REVISED_BLOCKS_11_&_13.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Posted_Copy,_Aug_9,_2018.pdf PDF
33_16_15_-_Thermal_Energy_Storage_Tank_Specification,_Amendment_4.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Amendment_4.pdf PDF
Army_and_NASA_Site_Access_Control_Boundaries_Map.pdf PDF
Bid_Instructions_for_IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Revised_Plans,_FAC-5071,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Attendees_at_Site_Visit,_June_20,_2018,_IFB_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Posted_Copy,_July_20,_2018.pdf PDF
Specifications_FAC-M5066,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
Plans,_FAC-5066,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
Bldg_4776_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4464_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4727_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4312_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4723_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4732_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4491_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4306_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4733_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4777_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4705_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4738_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4485_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4702_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4715_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4704_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4483_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003,_Posted_Copy,_June_26,_2018.pdf PDF
80MSFC18B003,_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Bldg_4711_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Bldg_4493_Asbestos_Survey_Report_Final.pdf PDF
Specifications_FAC-M5071,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
Plans,_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
IFB_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
Bid_Instructions_for_IFB_80MSFC18B0003.pdf PDF
Show all 40

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

General Asbestos Survey for Asbestos-Containing Materials

Prepared for:

Marshall Space Flight Center, AL

Building 4747 Marshall Space Flight Center

GSE - 013

October 31, 2008

Prepared by

Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway

Trinity, Alabama 35673

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Summary

2.1. Suspect ACMs

2.2. Recommendations

3. Survey Scope

4. Limitations

5. Survey and Sample Collection Procedure

6. Previous Survey / Plans Review

7. Suspect ACM Materials Not Sampled

8. Survey Sampling Results

9. Appendices

Task Order GSE 013 Page 1 of 26

GENERAL ASBESTOS SURVEY OF

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

1. Introduction

In accordance with GSE Task Order No.GSE-013 dated April 21, 2008, Great Southern Engineering, Inc. (GSE) has performed an asbestos survey of Building 4747 located at George C.

Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama. The 11,728 square feet building was identified to have been originally constructed in 1951. A total of 22 samples were collected from the building.

The objective of the Asbestos Survey is to determine the location and quantity of asbestos-containing materials at the Property building.

GSE’s Scope of Work included:

Visual inspection and identification of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in the Property building and collected a representative number of samples for analysis.

As part of this asbestos survey, GSE personnel collected samples of all suspect friable and suspect damaged non-friable building materials at the Property. The remaining suspect non-friable materials were not be sampled as part of this asbestos survey

Estimated quantities and locations of ACM.

Assessed the condition of the ACM identified.

Assigned a hazard rating to each type of ACM.

This report has been prepared for the use of George C. Marshall Space Flight Center. Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by professional consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions included in this report.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 2 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

The GSE, Inc. did not perform destructive sampling procedures at the site; therefore, regardless of the thoroughness of this survey, it is possible that suspected asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) might exist in the building beneath the floors, behind walls, within pipe chases, or in other inaccessible locations. If, during renovation or demolition activities, materials not addressed in this survey are discovered, these materials should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance.

Surveyed by:

William F. Ystueta

University of Alabama Safe State Program Accredited Inspector

Accreditation #AIN0508Y6144

Written by:

Manju Ramasamudra

University of Alabama Safe State Program Accredited Inspector/Management Planner

Accreditation #APL0308R5089

Task Order GSE 013 Page 3 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

2. Summary

GSE performed an Asbestos Survey and Hazard Assessment at Building 4747 in Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama on May 7, July 7 and September 6, 2008. Sample collection was completed by licensed personnel – William F. Ystueta. The following report summarizes the independent conclusions representing GSE’ best professional judgment based on information and data available to us during the course of this survey. Factual information regarding operations, conditions, and tests data provided by the client, owner or their representative has been assumed to be correct and complete. Additionally, the conclusions presented are based on the conditions that existed on the date(s) of the assessment.

The 11,728 square feet building was identified to have been originally constructed in 1951. A total of 22 samples were collected from the building. No Homogeneous materials were identified as asbestos-containing materials.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 4 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

2.1. Suspect ACMs

The following information is included for informational purposes:

A. The following suspect asbestos-containing materials were not sampled as part of this scope of work:

Suspect fibrous electrical cable covering (danger of electrocution) were not sampled.

These materials are not subject to regulation under NESHAP for demolition and renovation as long as they are in good condition and are not subject to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading.

Since ordinary demolition activities do not include sanding, grinding, cutting, and abrading, these materials may remain in place during building demolition, as long as they remain in good condition and are not friable.

If the material is in poor condition and is friable at the time of demolition or renovation, or if it will be subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, it should first be removed by a licensed asbestos removal contractor and disposed of as asbestos-containing waste.

When removing asphalt-roofing products, the material should be removed using a method that does not subject the material to sanding, cutting, grinding, or abrading (hand tools).

Asbestos-containing roofing may be disposed of as construction debris.

2.2. Recommendations

The following additional actions are recommended:

No further actions are recommended at this time.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 5 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

3. Survey Scope

This survey was conducted for the purpose of identifying asbestos-containing materials (ACM) throughout the building and to conduct a hazard assessment on existing ACM. The survey was non-destructive in nature and limited only to those areas that were readily accessible.

Specific areas to which access was limited by occupant request, unavailability of keys, or by site conditions included the following:

Behind the walls

Beneath the floors

Any suspect ACM not sampled as part of the assessment and if any additional suspect materials were to be identified behind walls and beneath the floors should be sampled prior to repair, renovation, or demolition activities.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 6 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

4. Limitations

GSE did not attempt to disassemble mechanical equipment, open pipe chases or assess materials within wall voids. Regardless of the thoroughness of a survey, the possibility exists that some areas containing asbestos were not identified, inaccessible or different from those at specific locations. The findings and opinions presented are relative to the dates of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at substantially later dates due to changes in the condition ACM may change over time, renovations and repairs.

This report is for the exclusive use of the client and its agents and use by any unauthorized parties in whole or in part, except as directed by legal jurisdiction, is at the sole risk of the user.

If this assessment includes reliance on work products and/or documents prepared by others, GSE has no responsibility for the accuracy of information contained therein.

Although this assessment has attempted to identify the presence or absence of ACM, potential sources of ACM may have escaped detection due to: (1) the scope of this assessment, (2) the inaccuracy of records, interviews, work products or documents made available to GSE for this report, (3) the presence of undetected or unreported renovations and repairs, (4) inaccessible areas, and/or (5) deliberate concealment of detrimental information.

Estimates presented in this report are based upon observations during the survey and owner-provided information. These reasonable estimates may be affected by unanticipated conditions potentially present in inaccessible or un-surveyed areas. GSE does not warrant or guarantee the quantity estimates. The use of such estimates shall be at the user's own risk and shall constitute a release and agreement to defend and indemnify GSE from and against any liability. If questions arise during the planning for renovation, demolition, or other construction activities, GSE should be notified to permit review of the data and present recommendations.

Interior of the following rooms were inaccessible during our Asbestos Survey on May 7, July 7 and September 6, 2008: None

Task Order GSE 013 Page 7 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

5. Survey and Sample Collection Procedure

Based on United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance documents, GSE considered all material applications identified during the visual assessment were suspect ACM and sampled as described below.

Bulk samples were collected of any materials, which were suspected of containing asbestos with the exception of fire doors. Fire doors were not sampled because the damage caused by sampling would render these materials friable and may also void the fire rating. Since these materials were not sampled, they should be assumed to be asbestos containing, unless sampled and proven otherwise. Sampling of these assumed ACMs should be performed prior to any renovation or other activity that may cause a material disturbance.

Samples of the remaining suspect ACM were taken in accordance with USEPA recommendations.

The number and location of samples collected was based on the type of material, the manner of application, and the homogeneity of the ACM (similarity of color, texture, and type). Each sample was collected and placed into an individual sample container. The sample location was noted on the field survey form and assigned an individual identification number. This number was affixed to the sample container as the sample was collected. The survey form was also used to note the material type and general condition of the material. During the inspection, each suspect material's accessibility, location, and friability were recorded. This information was used to assess the potential hazard of the ACM and to prioritize response action recommendations.

The USEPA defines asbestos-containing materials (ACM) as those that contain greater than one percent asbestos. Friable materials are defined as those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

GSE utilized the “positive-stop” method of sample analysis. In this method, analysis is stopped on a group of samples once the first positive (e.g., greater than 1% asbestos) sample is analyzed.

According to the USEPA, if one sample of a homogenous material is identified to be asbestos containing, the entire material must be considered asbestos containing. By using the positive-stop method, GSE reduces the Client’s laboratory analysis cost by not analyzing the additional samples.

Samples collected were carried and submitted under Chain-of-Custody to Steve Moody Micro Services LLC, Farmers Branch, Texas for analysis of asbestos using USEPA Method 40 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, also known as Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Steve Moody Micro Services LLC is certified by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and licensed by the Department of State Health Services.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 8 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

Samples collected were carried and submitted under Chain-of-Custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri for analysis of asbestos using USEPA Method 40 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, also known as Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). EMSL Analytical, Inc. is certified by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and licensed by the Department of State Health Services.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 9 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

6. Previous Survey / Plans Review

GSE was not provided with any previously conducted asbestos surveys of the Property. As-built/renovation-site plans and construction drawings were reviewed at the Facilities Department Drawing Room. Review of these documents did not identify building material specifications requiring the use of ACM. However, this does not preclude or prevent the potential use of ACM.

Task Order GSE 013 Page 10 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

7. Suspect ACM Materials Not Sampled

During the course of the property visit, GSE performed a preliminary review of interior, accessible areas of the subject building for the presence of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). This asbestos survey was conducted for overview purposes only; additional suspect materials may exist in concealed locations (behind walls and above ceilings, beneath the floors, within machinery, etc.). Also, not all suspect materials may have been sampled due to the condition or the location of the suspect materials. Destructive sampling of suspect ACMs was not performed. GSE will not be responsible for damaging materials or causing the materials to become friable. The USEPA defines asbestos-containing material as material containing greater than one percent asbestos. This review was not a pre-demolition/renovation survey or for regulatory submittal purposes.

Suspect and/or presumed ACMs were observed within the subject building during the property visit. These suspect and/or presumed ACMs that were not sampled as part of this asbestos survey are listed in the following table.

Sample Description Physical Condition

Friable Yes/No

Type of

ACM

Sample ID

Caulking, On Exterior Wall Joints UPS4 NoM

Wiring, Fibrous Electrical Cable Covering UPS6 NoM

Fire Doors, Fire Door Insulation UPS7 NoM

Mastic, Mirror Mastic UPS8 NoM

Caulking, Window Glazing UPS10 NoM

Duct Insulation, Duct Vibration Joint UPS11 NoM

Leveling Compound, Below ceramic tile flooring UPS13 NoM

Task Order GSE 013 Page 11 of 26

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

8. Survey Sampling Results

The results of the Survey are presented in the tables on the following pages. The tables describe the entire suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) identified in the building and list respective sample numbers and laboratory results. Sample numbers presented in the tables correspond to the sample numbers on attached Laboratory Analysis Forms. Also presented in the tables is the estimated quantity and assessed friability for each suspect ACM. For each suspect material identified as ACM, the assessed hazard potential is presented along with GSE’ recommended response action. Hazard potential for each material application is based on the material condition and accessibility to the public and maintenance personnel.

Glossary of Items for the following Table

Type of Asbestos (1) CH = Chrysotile

AM = Amosite CR = Crocidolite AN = Anthophyllite TR = Tremolite AC = Actinolite ND = No Asbestos Detected PC = Point Count Method

Type of ACM (2) M = Miscellaneous S = Surfacing TSI = Thermal Systems Insulation

Friability (3) F = Friable NF = Non Friable

Physical Condition (4) U = Good D = Damaged SD = Significantly Damaged

Potential for Disturbance (5) NPD = No Potential for Disturbance PD = Potential for Disturbance PSD = Potential for Significant Disturbance

Assessment Category (6) 1 = Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACBM, 2 = Damaged friable surfacing ACBM 3 = Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACBM 4 = Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACBM 5 = ACBM with potential for damaged 6 = ACBM potential for significant damage 7 = Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected

ACBM

X = not applicable

Unit of Measurement SF = Square Feet

LF = Linear Feet

Sample Description

Sample Location

Sample Analyzed

Yes/No

Estimated Quantity of

ACM

Assessment Category

Physical Condition

Friable Yes/No

Type of

ACM

% and Type of Asbestos Detected

Sample ID Potential For

Distrubance

Homogeneous Area 1

Wallboard Drywall System

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WF3-2

ND - Drywall38 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WE1-3

ND - Drywall ND - Spackle

39 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WF2-2

ND - Drywall40 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WR3-1

ND - Drywall41 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WR1-1

ND - Drywall42 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 102 Grid: WF4-1

ND - Drywall46 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 109 Grid: WL1-1

ND - Drywall47 PD

Sample Location

Sample Analyzed

Yes/No

Estimated Quantity of

ACM

Assessment Category

Physical Condition

Friable Yes/No

Type of

ACM

% and Type of Asbestos Detected

Sample ID Potential For

Distrubance

Homogeneous Area 2

Mastic Cove Base Mastic

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WR1-1

ND - Cream Mastic43 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WE1-1

ND - Cream Mastic44 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WE4-1

ND - Cream Mastic45 PD

Homogeneous Area 3

Pipe Insulation New Pipe Insulation

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: Wl2-2

ND - Insulation ND - Paper/Foil Wrap ND - White Mastic

1 PD

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: Wl2-3

ND - Insulation ND - White Mastic

2 PD

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: WL2-4

ND - Insulation ND - Paper/Foil Wrap ND - White Mastic

3 PD

Sample Location

Sample Analyzed

Yes/No

Estimated Quantity of

ACM

Assessment Category

Physical Condition

Friable Yes/No

Type of

ACM

% and Type of Asbestos Detected

Sample ID Potential For

Distrubance

Homogeneous Area 4

Pipe Insulation Old Pipe Insulation

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: WL2-2

ND - Insulation ND - Paper/Foil Wrap

4 PD

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: WL2-3

ND - Paper/Foil Wrap ND - White Mastic

5 PD

Yes TSI Yes U XRoom: 113 Grid: WL2-4

ND - Insulation ND - Paper/Foil Wrap ND - White Mastic

6 PD

Homogeneous Area 5

Caulking Wall Penetration Caulking

Yes M No U XRoom: 112 Grid: WE1-4

ND - Caulking1007 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WF3-4

ND - Caulking1008 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: WF3-4

ND - Caulking1009 PD

Sample Location

Sample Analyzed

Yes/No

Estimated Quantity of

ACM

Assessment Category

Physical Condition

Friable Yes/No

Type of

ACM

% and Type of Asbestos Detected

Sample ID Potential For

Distrubance

Homogeneous Area 6

Mastic Duct Mastic Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: F4-2

ND - Gray Mastic1010 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: F4-1

ND - Gray Mastic1011 PD

Yes M No U XRoom: 108 Grid: F3-4

ND - Gray Mastic1012 PD

1. CH = Chrysotile; AM = Amosite; CR = Crocidolite; AN = Anthophyllite; TR = Tremolite; AC = Actinolite; ND = No Asbestos Detected; or PC = Point Count Method

2. M = Miscellaneous; S = Surfacing; or TSI = Thermal Systems Insulation

3. F = Friable or NF = Non Friable

4. U = Good; D = Damaged; or SD = Significantly Damaged

5. NPD = No Potential for Disturbance; PD = Potential for Disturbance; or PSD = Potential for Significant Disturbance

6. 1 = Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACBM, 2 = Damaged friable surfacing ACBM, 3 = Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACBM, 4 = Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACBM, 5 = ACBM with potential for damage, 6 = ACBM potential for significant damage, 7 = Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM, or X = not applicable

SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet

9. Appendices

Appendix A— Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody Appendix B— ACM Sample Location Drawings Appendix C— ACM Location Diagrams Appendix D— Photographs Appendix E— Certificates and Licenses

Appendix A

Laboratory Results

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00001

390802122-0001

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Fibrous (other)59% Non-fibrous (other)41%

GSE00002

390802122-0002

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile1%Fibrous (other)18% Min. Wool56%

Non-fibrous (other)25%

GSE00003 Floortile 390802122-0003

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

GSE00003 Adhesive 390802122-0003A

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

GSE00004 Floortile 390802122-0004

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

GSE00004 Adhesive 390802122-0004A

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile12%Non-fibrous (other)88%

GSE00005 Floortile 390802122-0005

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

GSE00005 Adhesive 390802122-0005A

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17) Sue Ferrario (41) mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00006 Flooring 390802122-0006

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%

GSE00006 Adhesive 390802122-0006A

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00007 Flooring 390802122-0007

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile20%Non-fibrous (other)80%

GSE00007 Adhesive 390802122-0007A

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00008 Flooring 390802122-0008

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile20%Cellulose5% Non-fibrous (other)75%

GSE00008 Adhesive 390802122-0008A

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00009 Floortile 390802122-0009

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00009 Adhesive 390802122-0009A

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)96% Quartz2%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00010 Floortile 390802122-0010

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00010 Adhesive 390802122-0010A

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)96% Quartz4%

GSE00011 Floortile 390802122-0011

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00011 Adhesive 390802122-0011A

Black None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

GSE00012 Floortile 390802122-0012

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00012 Adhesive 390802122-0012A

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)90%

GSE00013

390802122-0013

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose28% Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7% Perlite28%

GSE00014

390802122-0014

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose28% Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7% Perlite28%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00015

390802122-0015

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose30% Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)30%

GSE00016

390802122-0016

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile19%Non-fibrous (other)81%

GSE00017

390802122-0017

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile19%Non-fibrous (other)81%

GSE00018

390802122-0018

Black Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%

GSE00019

390802122-0019

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose13% Non-fibrous (other)87%

GSE00020

390802122-0020

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose13% Non-fibrous (other)87%

GSE00021

390802122-0021

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose22% Non-fibrous (other)78%

GSE00022

390802122-0022

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00023

390802122-0023

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose13% Non-fibrous (other)87%

GSE00024

390802122-0024

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose15% Non-fibrous (other)85%

GSE00025

390802122-0025

Various Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile7%Cellulose4% Glass4% Min. Wool39%

Non-fibrous (other)46%

GSE00026

390802122-0026

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile8%Fibrous (other)6% Min. Wool35%

Non-fibrous (other)51%

GSE00027

390802122-0027

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Fibrous (other)45% Min. Wool25%

Non-fibrous (other)30%

GSE00028

390802122-0028

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose79% Non-fibrous (other)21%

GSE00029

390802122-0029

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose10% Glass5%

Non-fibrous (other)85%

GSE00030

390802122-0030

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)72% Perlite28%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00031

390802122-0031

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

GSE00032 Spackle 390802122-0032

Cream Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile2%Non-fibrous (other)98%

GSE00032 Drywall 390802122-0032A

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose15% Non-fibrous (other)85%

GSE00033

390802122-0033

Brown None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)98% Quartz2%

GSE00034

390802122-0034

Brown None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)98% Quartz2%

GSE00035

390802122-0035

Brown None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00036

390802122-0036

Various Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Chrysotile19%Non-fibrous (other)81%

GSE00038

390802122-0037

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose69% Non-fibrous (other)31%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00039 Spackle 390802122-0038

White None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Mica4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

GSE00039 Drywall 390802122-0038A

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose89% Non-fibrous (other)11%

GSE00040

390802122-0039

Various None Detected

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose69% Non-fibrous (other)31%

GSE00041

390802122-0040

White None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Mica4% Non-fibrous (other)96%

GSE00042

390802122-0041

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose5% Glass5%

Non-fibrous (other)90%

GSE00043

390802122-0042

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00044

390802122-0043

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

GSE00045

390802122-0044

Cream None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390802122

Attn: William F. Ystueta Great Southern Engineering, Inc.

3795 Gordon Terry Parkway Trinity, AL 35673

Customer PO:

Received: 05/13/08 9:10 AM

NONE GIVEN

Customer ID: GSEI78

Fax: (256) 350-9768 Phone: (256) 350-9754 Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:

5/23/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 5/27/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com

GSE00046

390802122-0045

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose31% Non-fibrous (other)69%

GSE00047

390802122-0046

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous

Cellulose30% Glass5%

Non-fibrous (other)65%

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.

Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (17)

PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab No. 102056

TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Client :

Project :

Project # :

Identification :

Test Method :

Great Southern Engineering

MSFC Building 4747

GSE-013

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116

Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content

Sample Date :

On 7/10/2008, six (6) bulk material samples were submitted by a representative of Great Southern Engineering for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The

PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below:

Steve Moody Micro Services, LLC

Lab Job No. :

Report Date :

08B-08323

07/07/2008

07/10/2008

2051 Valley View Lane

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 (Phone 972-241-8460)

1 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Insulation

None Detected - Paper / Foil Wrap

None Detected - White Mastic

2 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Insulation

None Detected - White Mastic

3 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Insulation

None Detected - Paper / Foil Wrap

None Detected - White Mastic

4 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Insulation

None Detected - Paper / Foil Wrap

5 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Paper / Foil Wrap

None Detected - White Mastic

6 Pipe Mastic None Detected - Insulation

None Detected - Paper / Foil Wrap

None Detected - White Mastic

Greg WerchanAnalyst(s):

Lab Director : Steve Moody Approved Signatory :

Thank you for choosing Steve Moody Micro Services

These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. Results may not be reproduced except in full. This test report relates only to the samples tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Accredited by the

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code 102056.

Lab Manager : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory :

Steve Moody Micro Services, LLC PLM Detail Report NVLAP Lab No. 102056

TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Project # : GSE-013

Sample Number Layer Components % Of

Sample

Analysis

Date

% of

Layer Analyst

Supplement to PLM Summary Report 2051 Valley View Lane

Farmers Branch, TX 75234

Client :

Project :

Great Southern Engineering

MSFC Building 4747

Lab Job No. :

Report Date :

08B-08323

07/10/2008

Mineral Wool Fibers1 Insulation (Yellow) 1% 07/1095% GW

Resin Binders1 Insulation (Yellow) 1% 07/105% GW

Cellulose Fibers1 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 2% 07/1060% GW

Glass Wool Fibers1 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 2% 07/1020% GW

Metal Foil1 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 2% 07/1020% GW

Cellulose Fibers1 White Mastic (White) 97% 07/105% GW

Pigment / Binders1 White Mastic (White) 97% 07/1095% GW

Mineral Wool Fibers2 Insulation (Yellow) 20% 07/1095% GW

Resin Binders2 Insulation (Yellow) 20% 07/105% GW

Cellulose Fibers2 White Mastic (White) 80% 07/105% GW

Pigment / Binders2 White Mastic (White) 80% 07/1095% GW

Mineral Wool Fibers3 Insulation (Yellow) 10% 07/1095% GW

Resin Binders3 Insulation (Yellow) 10% 07/105% GW

Cellulose Fibers3 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1060% GW

Glass Wool Fibers3 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1020% GW

Metal Foil3 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1020% GW

Cellulose Fibers3 White Mastic (White) 80% 07/105% GW

Pigment / Binders3 White Mastic (White) 80% 07/1095% GW

Mineral Wool Fibers4 Insulation (Yellow) 55% 07/1095% GW

Resin Binders4 Insulation (Yellow) 55% 07/105% GW

Cellulose Fibers4 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 45% 07/1060% GW

Glass Wool Fibers4 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 45% 07/1020% GW

Metal Foil4 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 45% 07/1020% GW

Note: No Mastic

Cellulose Fibers5 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 35% 07/1060% GW

Glass Wool Fibers5 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 35% 07/1020% GW

Metal Foil5 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 35% 07/1020% GW

Cellulose Fibers5 White Mastic (White) 65% 07/105% GW

Pigment / Binders5 White Mastic (White) 65% 07/1095% GW

Note: No Insulation

Project # : GSE-013

Sample Number Layer Components % Of

Sample

Analysis

Date

% of

Layer Analyst

Supplement to PLM Summary Report 2051 Valley View Lane

Farmers Branch, TX 75234

Client :

Project :

Great Southern Engineering

MSFC Building 4747

Lab Job No. :

Report Date :

08B-08323

07/10/2008

Mineral Wool Fibers6 Insulation (Yellow) 5% 07/1095% GW

Resin Binders6 Insulation (Yellow) 5% 07/105% GW

Cellulose Fibers6 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1060% GW

Glass Wool Fibers6 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1020% GW

Metal Foil6 Paper / Foil Wrap (White / Silver) 10% 07/1020% GW

Cellulose Fibers6 White Mastic (White) 85% 07/105% GW

Pigment / Binders6 White Mastic (White) 85% 07/1095% GW

PLM Summary Report NVLAP Lab No. 102056

TDSHS License No. 30-0084

Client :

Project :

Project # :

Identification :

Test Method :

Great Southern Engineering

MSFC Building 4747

GSE-013

Asbestos, Bulk Sample Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy / Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS)

EPA Method 600 / R-93 / 116

Sample Number Client Sample Description / Location Asbestos Content

Sample Date :

On 9/15/2008, six (6) bulk material samples were submitted by a representative of Great Southern Engineering for asbestos analysis by PLM/DS. The

PLM Detail Report is attached; additional information may be found therein. The results are summarized below:

Steve Moody Micro Services, LLC

Lab Job No. :

Report Date :

08B-10721

09/06/2008

09/15/2008

2051 Valley View Lane

Farmers Branch, TX 75234 (Phone 972-241-8460)

1007 Caulk None Detected - Caulking

1008 Caulk None Detected - Caulking

1009 Caulk None Detected - Caulking

1010 Duct Mastic None Detected - Grey Mastic

1011 Duct Mastic None Detected - Grey Mastic

1012 Duct Mastic None Detected - Grey Mastic

Jessica ScottAnalyst(s):

Lab Director : Steve Moody Approved Signatory :

Thank you for choosing Steve Moody Micro Services

These samples were analyzed by layers. Quantification, unless otherwise noted, is performed by calibrated visual estimate. Results may not be reproduced except in full. This test report relates only to the samples tested. These test results do not imply endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Accredited by the

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis under Lab Code 102056.

Lab Manager : Bruce Crabb Approved Signatory :

Project # : GSE-013

Sample Number Layer Components % Of

Sample

Analysis

Date

% of

Layer Analyst

Supplement to PLM Summary Report 2051 Valley View Lane

Farmers Branch, TX 75234

Client :

Project :

Great Southern Engineering

MSFC Building 4747

Lab Job No. :

Report Date :

08B-10721

09/15/2008

Calcite1007 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Binders / Fillers1007 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Calcite1008 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Binders / Fillers1008 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Calcite1009 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Binders / Fillers1009 Caulking (Off-White) 100% 09/1550% JS

Calcite1010 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1560% JS

Glue Binders1010 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1540% JS

Calcite1011 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1560% JS

Glue Binders1011 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1540% JS

Calcite1012 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1560% JS

Glue Binders1012 Grey Mastic (Grey) 100% 09/1540% JS

Appendix B

ACM Sample Location Drawings

First Floor Building 4747

Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL

Task Order #GSE-013

41, 44 39 43

1, 2, 3 4, 5, 6

1007 1008, 1009, 42 1010 38 40 1011 45, 46 47

Appendix C

ACM Location Diagrams

NOT APPLICABLE

Appendix D

Photographs

Building 4747, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

PHOTO 1. Drywall System PHOTO 2. Pipe Insulation

Appendix E

License and Certifications

1. Introduction
2. Summary
2.1. Suspect ACMs
2.2. Recommendations
3. Survey Scope
4. Limitations
5. Survey and Sample Collection Procedure
6. Previous Survey / Plans Review
7. Suspect ACM Materials Not Sampled
8. Survey Sampling Results
9. Appendices
Appendix A Laboratory Results
Appendix B ACM Sample Location Drawings
Appendix C ACM Location Diagrams
Appendix D Photographs
Appendix E License and Certifications

File details come from the government source that posted it.