6-Attachment F -Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 79 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK26-29 Dental Laboratory Services
- Solicitation number
- MK26-29
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation MK26-29, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, for all-inclusive dental laboratory services. The procurement seeks a vendor to provide both traditional and digital impression dentures on a per-item cost basis, including all necessary equipment and supplies. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of one year. The state reserves the option to award either a single contract to one responsive and responsible vendor or two separate contracts—one for traditional impression dentures and one for digital impression dentures—depending on vendor capabilities and evaluation outcomes.
The evaluation process consists of four stages weighted as follows: technical criteria (61 percent, 575 points), demonstrations (21 percent, 200 points), and cost (18 percent, 175 points), for a total of 950 evaluation points. Vendors must first pass five mandatory requirements, including a minimum of five years of experience fabricating dental prosthetics, one year of experience with governmental or public health entities, the ability to supply all required materials, possession of all necessary licenses and certifications, and compliance with GovRamp requirements. Technical scoring evaluates experience with denture fabrication, governmental service, underserved populations, written protocols, high-volume production capabilities, and scanner technology specifications. Only vendors meeting the 70 percent technical threshold (402.5 points) advance to the 45-minute system demonstration, which requires a 60 percent threshold (120 points) to proceed to cost evaluation. The cost formula awards points based on the lowest proposal price, with all other proposals receiving proportional points using the calculation: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Attachment D- Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12-Attachment F -Scoresheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 7-Attachment D- Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 11-Attachment E - MMTR.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment E - MMTR.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9-Attachment C - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment B - IT-Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 8-Attachment C - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Vendor
| Dental Laboratory Services | |
| SOLICITATION # MK26-29 | |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Vendor must have a minimum of five years of experience fabricating dental prosthetics, including full and partial dentures. | PASS | |
| 2 | Vendor must have a minimum of 1 year of experience providing dental laboratory services to governmental or public health entities. | PASS | |
| 3 | Vendor must be able to supply all materials required for the fabrication of dental prosthetics, including mailing containers. | PASS | |
| 4 | Vendor must hold all required licenses, permits, and/or certifications to operate a dental laboratory and provide the services described in this solicitation. | PASS | |
| 5 | Vendor MUST meet or agree to meet the GovRamp requirements. | PASS | |
| Proceed to Scoring |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Experience fabricating dental prosthetics, including dentures. | 30 | 26.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 2 | Experience Providing dental laboratory services to governmental or public health entities | 25 | 21.7% | 125.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 3 | Experience serving low-income, underserved, or special-needs population | 15 | 13.0% | 75.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 4 | Experience developing and following written protocols for prosthetic fabrication and case workflows. | 10 | 8.7% | 50.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 5 | Ability to produce high-volume dental prosthetics while meeting quality and turnaround time requirements. | 20 | 17.4% | 100.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 6 | Please provide a detailed overview of the scanner models your company offers or utilizes, along with their key features and technical specifications | 15 | 13.0% | 75.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 100.0% | 575.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 70% | 402.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria - Demonstrations | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| The demonstration will be a total of 45 minutes. 30 minutes to demonstrate and 15 for Q&A. Only vendors that pass the minimum technical threshold will present their demo. | ||||||||||
| 1 | System Demonstration | 40 | 100.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 100.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Demonstration Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Demos | 60% | 120.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | ||
| Only the vendors that meet the required minimum points in the above stages will move to the cost portion. | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Cost | 30% | 175.0 | 0.0 |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 61% | 575.00 | |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 18% | 175.00 | |
| Total Demo Points | 21% | 200.00 | |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 950.00 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .