5-[Document Management Services] BPM004656 Solicitation Attachment 4 - Conformance Statements_Konica Minolta BAFO.pdf
PDF 466 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR063772
- Contract number
- CTR063772
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) No. BPM004656 for Document Management Services, issued by the Arizona Department of Administration's State Procurement Office, located in Phoenix, Arizona. The proposal is specifically from Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc., who is submitting a detailed response to the state's solicitation.
The RFP covers document management services, with Konica Minolta providing a comprehensive response that includes multiple conformance statements and exceptions to various contract terms. The company has carefully reviewed the solicitation documents and is proposing specific modifications to sections including Services Acceptance, First Party Liability Limitation, Indemnification, Warranties, and State's Contractual Remedies. Key proposed changes include adding qualifiers like "reasonable" to various clauses, clarifying liability limits, and ensuring balanced language around contract performance and potential damages. The proposal indicates Konica Minolta's intent to provide document management services while negotiating specific contract terms to protect their interests.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposal
Solicitation No. BPM004656
Document Management Services
Arizona Department of Administration State Procurement Office
100 N 15th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85007
Solicitation Offer Form Page 1 of 4
Conformance Statements
If taking exceptions, the Attachment Supplements must be uploaded as a separate word doc. file titled “Attachment Supplement -”
STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY EXCEPTIONS UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.
READ PARAGRAPH 6.8 OF THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS BEFORE TAKING ANY EXCEPTIONS – TAKING
EXCEPTIONS CAN BE GROUNDS FOR STATE REJECTING OR DOWN-GRADING YOUR OFFER IN EVALUATION.
CONFORMANCE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
X YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Instructions to Offerors and Uniform Instructions to Offerors of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors in the Solicitation Documents, and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 1.
CONFORMANCE TO SCOPE OF WORK AND PRICING
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
X YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work Document and the Pricing Document of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.
NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work Document and the Pricing Document of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 2.
CONFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:
YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.
X NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understand the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices 2 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment Supplement 3.
Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.
Company Name Signature of Person Authorized to Sign
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1EDF3C91-DA29-4BAA-8A18-5F048D1065F0
State Procurement Office
Solicitation Offer Form Page 2 of 4
Conformance Statements - Supplement 1 Exceptions to Instructions
Article / Paragraph or Exhibit Reference
Proposed Changes / Alternate Language RFP Language (Copy and Paste from Solicitation)
Special Instructions to Offerors x X Exception:
X Rationale:
x
Uniform Instructions to Offerors
State Procurement Office
Solicitation Offer Form Page 3 of 4
Conformance Statements – Supplement 2
Exceptions to Scope of Work and Pricing
Article / or Exhibit Reference
Proposed Changes / Alternate Language RFP Language (Copy and Paste from Solicitation)
Scope of Work
Pricing Document
Solicitation No. BPM4656
State Procurement Office
Solicitation Offer Form Page 4 of 4
Conformance Statements – Supplement 3 Exceptions to Contract Terms & Conditions
Article/ or Exhibit Reference
Proposed Changes / Alternate Language RFP Language (Copy and Paste from Solicitation)
Special Terms & Conditions
11.9.
Services Acceptanc e
X Exception: State has the right to make acceptance of Services subject to acceptance criteria which are disclosed to Contractor. State may apply acceptance criteria conformity to the Contract, accuracy, completeness, or other indicators of quality or other matter for which the Contract or law states a requirement, whether stated directly or by reference to another document, standard, reference specification, etc. State will not owe Contractor any payment for unaccepted Services; and State may, at its discretion, withhold or make partial payment for any rejected Services if Contractor is still in the process of re-performing or otherwise curing the grounds for State’s rejection.
X Rationale: Where services are subject to acceptance criteria, then the criteria should be made known to the Contractor so that Contractor is able to comply.
State has the right to make acceptance of Services subject to acceptance criteria. State may apply acceptance criteria conformity to the Contract, accuracy, completeness, or other indicators of quality or other matter for which the Contract or law states a requirement, whether stated directly or by reference to another document, standard, reference specification, etc. State will not owe Contractor any payment for unaccepted Services;
and State may, at its discretion, withhold or make partial payment for any rejected Services if Contractor is still in the process of re-performing or otherwise curing the grounds for State’s rejection.
13.7 First
Party Liability Limitation
X Exception: 13.7.1. LIMIT. Subject to the provisos that follow below and unless stated otherwise in the Special Terms and Conditions, State’s and Contractor’s respective first party liability arising from or related to the Contract is limited to the greater of $1,000,000 (one million dollars) or 3 (three) times the purchase price of the specific Materials or Services giving rise to the claim.
X Rationale: The amount of liability is determined by weight risk (i.e., amount of liability one assumes) against reward (amount of revenue one expects to receive under the contract). Here, liability capped at 3x price of the material or service giving rise to the claim is the result of our balancing risk against reward.
13.7.1. LIMIT. Subject to the
provisos that follow below and unless stated otherwise in the Special Terms and Conditions, State’s and Contractor’s respective first party liability arising from or related to the Contract is limited to the greater of $1,000,000 (one million dollars) or 3 (three) times the purchase price of the specific Materials or Services giving rise to the claim.
State Procurement Office
Solicitation Offer Form Page 4 of 4
Uniform Terms & Conditions
6.3.
Indemnific ation – Patent and Copyright
X Exception: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State against any liability, including reasonable costs and expenses, for infringement of any patent, trademark or copyright arising out of Contract performance or use by the State of materials furnished or work performed under this Contract. The State shall reasonably notify the Contractor of any claim for which it may be liable under this paragraph. If the contractor is insured pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-621 and § 35-154, this section shall not apply.
X Rationale: Basic tenant of contract damages is that aggrieved party is not entitled to recoup all costs and expenses but only “reasonable” costs and expenses.
The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the State against any liability, including costs and expenses, for infringement of any patent, trademark or copyright arising out of Contract performance or use by the State of materials furnished or work performed under this Contract. The State shall reasonably notify the Contractor of any claim for which it may be liable under this paragraph. If the contractor is insured pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-621 and § 35-154, this section shall not apply.
7.
Warranties
X Exception: Unless otherwise modified elsewhere in these terms and conditions, the Contractor warrants that, for one year after acceptance by the State of the materials, they shall be:
7.2.1. Of a quality to pass without reasonable objection in
the trade under the Contract description;
7.2.2. Fit for the intended purposes for which the
materials are used as such use is described in the Contract;
X Rationale: 7.2.1 – where State has discretion to object, the exercise of such discretion should be reasonable so as to prevent arbitrary objection.
Unless otherwise modified elsewhere in these terms and conditions, the Contractor warrants that, for one year after acceptance by the State of the materials, they shall be:
7.2.1. Of a quality to pass without
objection in the trade under the Contract description;
7.2.2. Fit for the intended
purposes for which the materials are used;
8. State’s Contractua l Remedies
X Exception: 8.4. Right of Offset. The State shall be entitled to offset against any sums due the Contractor, any reasonable expenses or costs incurred by the State, or damages reasonably assessed by the State concerning the Contractor’s non-conforming performance or failure to perform the Contract, including expenses, costs and damages described in the Uniform Terms and Conditions.
X Rationale: Basic tenant of contract damages is that aggrieved party is not entitled to recoup all expenses and costs but only “reasonable” expenses and costs.
8.4. Right of Offset. The State
shall be entitled to offset against any sums due the Contractor, any expenses or costs incurred by the State, or damages assessed by the State concerning the Contractor’s non-conforming performance or failure to perform the Contract, including expenses, costs and damages described in the Uniform Terms and Conditions.
State Procurement Office
Solicitation Offer Form Page 4 of 4
Moreover, where State has discretion to offset damages, the exercise of such discretion should be reasonable so as to prevent arbitrary assessment of damages.
| 2022-12-14T11:57:56-0800 | |
| Digitally verifiable PDF exported from www.docusign.com |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .