4-Attachment 3 - Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 163 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26057 Third Party Fire Inspection Reporting Software
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26057
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a scoring sheet document for Salt Lake City Corporation's Request for Proposals SLCI26057 for Third Party Fire Inspection Reporting Software. The document establishes the evaluation criteria and point allocation methodology that will be used to assess and rank vendor proposals submitted in response to the City's need for a comprehensive fire inspection reporting system. The scoring sheet outlines weighted categories and specific evaluation factors that will guide the selection committee's assessment of each bidder's qualifications, proposed solutions, technical capabilities, and ability to meet the City's requirements for collecting, organizing, and transmitting fire inspection data to the Salt Lake City Fire Department in electronic form.
The scoring sheet specifies the point distribution across multiple evaluation categories, allowing the selection committee to objectively compare proposals based on predetermined criteria including technical approach, cost-effectiveness, vendor experience, system functionality, compliance capabilities, and customer support offerings. The weighting of these categories reflects the City's priorities in selecting a contractor who can effectively manage inspections across multiple categories such as fire extinguishers, suppression systems, hood systems, fire alarms, and emergency responder communications, while also providing reminder functionality and compliance notification features. This structured evaluation framework ensures transparency in the proposal review process and enables the City to make a data-driven decision in awarding the contract to the vendor whose solution best addresses Salt Lake City's operational needs and budget constraints.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 10 13.3% 50.0 0.0 2 20 26.7% 100.0 0.0 3 30 40.0% 150.0 0.0 4 10 13.3% 50.0 0.0 5 5 6.7% 25.0 0.0
100.0% 375.00 0.0
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 375.00 0.00
RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Evaluation
RFP 70% 262.50 0.0 0.0%
RFP Section Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points Possible
Points Earned
RFP $0.00 $0.00 20% 93.75
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
80% 375.00 0.0 20% 93.75 0.0
100% 468.75 0.0
End User Training
Required Evaluation Criteria Point Threshold
Stage 4: Cost
Employee Gift Card Program
Attachment 3 - Score Sheet
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Solicitation # SLCI26057
Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
* The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 300 points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their total cost is than the total lowest cost. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Compliance with the City ethics requirement
Scorable Technical Criteria Total Special Skills, Qualifications, Additional/Innovative Offerings
Indicate if the City must execute a Software License Agreement (SLA). If so, provide a sample copy for City review and potential redlining.
Technical and Functional Capabilities
Total Technical Points
Stage 2: Scoreable Technical Criteria
Implementation and IT Compliance
Qualifications
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .