Draft PWS TX LA Group ORC 19 Nov 2019.pdf

W912BV-20-R-0003

19 November 2019

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

FOR

TEXAS, LOUISIANA GROUP

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT (ORC)

AT

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO (JBSA) CAMP BULLIS, TEXAS

JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS

JBSA LACKLAND, TEXAS

JBSA RANDOLPH, TEXAS

LAUGHLIN AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

CONTRACT NUMBER: TBD

19 NOVEMBER 2019

SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Barksdale Air Force Base (AFB), Dyess AFB, Goodfellow AFB, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Camp Bullis, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, JBSA Lackland, JBSA Randolph, Laughlin AFB, and Sheppard AFB. This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration. The range of activities includes maintenance of established remedies, implementation of optimization to enhance remedial progress at applicable sites, and achievement of site specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at 100 sites, which include both Installation Restoration Program (IRP) and Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) sites.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the Air Force has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators”.

1.1 Introduction

The following facilities are included in this Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). Note that permit renewals required during the ORC contract period of performance will be accomplished under a separate contract. However, the ORC Contractor would be expected to comply with the terms of any revised permit.

1.1.1 Barksdale AFB

Barksdale AFB occupies approximately 22,000 acres in northwestern Louisiana within the Shreveport-Bossier City metropolitan area. The installation was first operated by the United States Army Air Corps and was later turned over to the US Air Force (AF). Barksdale AFB is divided into two principal areas, the Main Base Area and the East Reservation. The Main Base Area, located in the northwestern section of the base, is approximately 3,000 acres in size and includes the airfield, industrial shops, housing areas, and recreational facilities. The East Reservation comprises the remaining acreage and is mainly undeveloped. The majority of the formerly used range sites are located within the East Reservation. Remediation activities at Barksdale AFB are being conducted pursuant to both Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) and National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) requirements, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Regulatory oversight is provided by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), including their Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP) regulation. Barksdale AFB has a RCRA Hazardous Waste Corrective Action Permit that includes 5 Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) that are IRP sites; however, these sites follow the CERCLA remediation process. The RCRA Hazardous Waste Corrective Action Permit renewal application occurred in March 2018.

1.1.2 Dyess AFB

Dyess AFB comprises 5,366 acres of land in north Central Texas within the city limits of Abilene. It serves as the home of the 7th Bomb Wing. Remediation activities at Dyess AFB are being conducted pursuant to the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The RCRA Permit for Dyess AFB was rescinded in 2008. Many of the IRP Sites are being administered under a Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (FFCA) dated 30 September 1991.

1.1.3 Goodfellow AFB

Goodfellow AFB comprises 1,116 acres of land in west central Texas in Tom Green County within the southeastern limits of the City of San Angelo. Goodfellow AFB has the Lake Nasworthy Recreation Camp, an off-base privatized housing area, and an on-base privatized housing area. The primary mission of Goodfellow AFB is to train firefighting, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance personnel. Remediation activities at Goodfellow AFB are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.1.4 JBSA Camp Bullis

Camp Bullis is located on 27,993 acres of land primarily in Bexar County, Texas. It is situated approximately 19 miles northwest of downtown San Antonio, Texas and Fort Sam Houston. The mission of Camp Bullis is to provide ranges, training areas, air space, and facilities to support federal, state, and local government activities. Portions of Camp Bullis are also used for recreational purposes. Seasonal hunting, shooting, and youth adventure sporting are among the featured recreations. In keeping with the Camp Bullis mission, the facility operates an explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) range for the destruction of waste ordnance. Various organizations use the range to explode ordnance found throughout south central Texas and elsewhere. The San Antonio Police Department also detonates explosives at the EOD Range for both emergency disposal and training purposes. Remediation activities at Camp Bullis are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA (MMRP) and under RCRA Permit IHW-50335(IRP). Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.1.5 JBSA Fort Sam Houston

Fort Sam Houston (FSH) is located on 2,935 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas. It is situated entirely within the city limits of San Antonio, Texas and approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the downtown area. The Installation has five missions organized around five functions:

headquarters, logistical base, garrison, mobilization, and medical support. FSH serves as an administrative instructional/training and medical center. FSH provides support for the U.S.

Army Medical Command, the U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), the U.S. Army Fifth Recruiting Brigade (SW) Regional, the Southern Command and Headquarters, and the Fifth U.S. Army assigned/attached tenant units;

and smaller services and agencies. Camp Bullis is a sub installation under the command of FSH.

Remediation activities at FSH are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.1.6 JBSA Lackland AFB

Lackland AFB is located on approximately 7,000 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas; and encompasses three land areas: Lackland Main Base (LMB), Lackland Training Annex (LTA), and Kelly Field Annex (KFA). It is situated entirely within the city limits of San Antonio, Texas and approximately 5 miles southwest of the downtown area. Lackland AFB gained responsibility for KFA sites as a result of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). Lackland AFB is home to the 37th Training Wing (37 TRW) which operates a variety of training squadrons. Within the 37th TRW is the 37th Training Group (37 TRG) which oversees the 5 technical training schools on the base, and the 737 TRG which oversees the Basic Military Training squadron. Remediation activities at Lackland AFB are being conducted pursuant to both CERCLA and the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ. Most sites are regulated under the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP). Lackland AFB has a RCRA permit (originally issued to Air Force Real Property Agency [AFRPA]/Former Kelly AFB) covering KFA SWMUs.

1.1.7 JBSA Randolph AFB

Randolph AFB is located on approximately 2,300 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas;

approximately 14 miles northeast of downtown San Antonio. The base is bordered by commercial and residential land to the north and agricultural land elsewhere. An additional 825-acre auxiliary airfield annex facility is located approximately 23 miles east of the base and is known as the Seguin Auxiliary Airfield. Randolph AFB is home to the 12th Flying Training Wing (12 FTW) assigned to the Air Education and Training Command (AETC). Remediation activities at Randolph AFB are being conducted pursuant to both CERCLA and RCRA.

Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.1.8 Laughlin AFB

Laughlin AFB is located on 3,776 acres of land in southwestern Texas, in Val Verde County, approximately 7 miles east of Del Rio. The nearest metropolitan area, San Antonio, is 150 miles to the east. Laughlin AFB is a pilot training base and home to the 47th Flying Training Wing of AETC. Remediation activities at Laughlin AFB are being conducted under the corrective actions portion of RCRA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.1.9 Sheppard AFB

Sheppard AFB is located on 5,736 acres of land in north central Texas, four miles north of downtown Wichita Falls. The base is bordered by agricultural lands, limited residential and commercial development, and a major highway with commercial development. Frederick Municipal Airport space is leased by the base for landing training. Lake Texoma Recreational Annex, a remote facility located 120 miles east, is also associated with the base. The mission at the base includes both technical and basic training. Remediation activities at Sheppard AFB are being conducted pursuant to CERCLA. Regulatory oversight is provided by TCEQ.

1.2 Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities required to achieve the POs of this PWS. This PWS and enclosures listed below include general requirements of the project to meet the AF objectives:

• Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions

• Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI) o Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet o Enclosure 2B – GFI CDs o Enclosure 2C – Alternative Objective Site Consideration Summary

• Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Property (GFP) NOT APPLICABLE The AF is required to implement remedies as necessary to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) mission, while effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost conscious framework. The AF desires all sites be cleaned up to standards that allow for the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance (POP) in the most efficient and cost effective manner as supported by a business case analysis that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. Hand in hand, accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are critical adjuncts to optimization success. In keeping with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-7020, the AF defines optimization, under the ORC, as the reduction of contaminant mass and concentrations, reduction in LCC, or any combination of activities leading to acceleration of Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC), as a result of remedial implementation the Contractor undertakes, above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved Decision Document (DD).

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission to include the sharing of information with USACE, other AFCEC Contractors and AF personnel; and cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the achievement of the POs in the Performance Period (PP) per Table 1 of this PWS, and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within PP specified for each site.

AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the POP.

Site specific POs are identified in Table 1: Performance Table below. POs that are in keeping with standard DERP milestones are defined in Enclosure 1. In addition, for certain categories of sites, the AF has set data-driven POs based on current site conditions in keeping with the POP of the contract and ORC goal. For this ORC, only one of these POs categories is applicable:

Alternate Objectives, which is described below.

The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub-Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both Government and regulator) per the Performance Standard are required in writing.

1.2.1. Performance Models

The Contractor shall develop performance models for all sites listed in Table 1 of this PWS that do not have a PO of Long Term Management (LTM) and have a remedy planned or in place.

For all sites proposed to reach RC/SC during the POP, work planning documents shall contain the performance model. Final performance models, subject to be modified as needed during the life of the contract, shall be submitted as part of the Work Plan required under PWS section

6.1.2. For sites with a PO of Remedial Action - Operation (RA-O) which consists exclusively of inspection and maintenance of Land Use Controls (LUCs), a performance model would not be necessary. Performance models shall describe how site conditions are expected to change over time, using appropriate performance indicators, from current state through PO achievement. The Contractor shall provide monitoring reports, in accordance with the DD, that demonstrate whether the remedial response is progressing and performing consistent with the performance model.

Performance model and site management approach shall include the following:

• Develop and document the approach to determine remedial progress relative to the defined performance indicators, associated decision criteria, and objectives consistent with the performance model. The documented approach is expected to facilitate decisions about optimization as well as provide a quantifiable understanding of how the response is progressing, list contingency options, and demonstrate when the objective has been reached. An individual site may have more than one performance model (e.g., different parts of the site that are addressed by separate remedies and represented by different sets of monitoring wells).

• Demonstrate an understanding of the site-specific Conceptual Site Model (CSM) as it relates to the operation of existing systems, distribution of contaminates, and remedy effectiveness and degradation rates (see details on the definition of CSM in Section 8.1.3). Update the CSM using Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) as needed based on performance and monitoring data throughout the performance period and implement remedy contingencies as warranted by the evolving CSM. Submit updated CSMs subsequent to receipt of new information.

• Develop an Exit Strategy that identifies and implements opportunities to improve remedy protectiveness, effectiveness, and cost efficiency, and to facilitate progress toward the end goal of the Exit Strategy, including innovative technologies (see details on the Exit Strategy preparation in Section 8.1.4). The goal is to accelerate contaminant reduction thereby minimizing future AF liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. Update the Exit Strategy as dictated by site progress throughout the PP. Submit updated Exit Strategies subsequent to receipt of new information.

• Develop baselines and performance models representative of the extent of contamination being addressed that describe the historic and expected course of the remedial progress

(i.e., how conditions are expected to change over time as demonstrated by appropriate performance indicators) from the current baseline state through PO achievement.

• Define the baseline state for each contaminant of concern (COC). The baseline state is determined by using select monitoring wells that are representative of the site and with sufficient data to develop statistics based historic concentration trends for site COCs. A scientific approach that uses a line of best-fit (e.g., first order decay rate) is appropriate for estimating the baseline attenuation rate, The baseline attenuation rate, in turn, can be used to extrapolate a baseline concentration and measures of future performance.

Supporting information for the baseline concentrations shall include the rationale for the well selection and the time period used to develop the trends, justification for the selected line of best-fit, actual values used to define the trend, and extension of the line of best-fit to predict values for future years independent of future remedy implementation plans.

For additional detail on development of baselines, refer to the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance, Version 1.

• Using the baseline as a starting point (above), develop a scientifically-based remedial performance model for each COC. The performance model shall be representative of the contaminant extent being addressed and include performance indicators, decision criteria, and annual and final goals achievable within the performance period. Goals should be consistent with the performance model used to optimize remedial efficiency, quantify how the response is progressing, and demonstrate when the annual and final goals have been achieved. The performance model shall include demonstration of contaminant reduction, process improvement and corrective action level indicators, and process failure and contingency action level indicators that reconcile underperforming remedies when combined with the decision criteria.

1.2.2. Optimized Exit Strategy

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.3. Alternate Objectives

Table 1 of the PWS identifies Alternate Objectives as the PO for selected sites. These sites have complex attributes that have, to date, inhibited progress towards the achievement of RC. For Alternate Objective sites, as for all sites in Table 1 of the PWS where applicable, the Contractor shall maintain compliance throughout the POP of the contract with all existing requirements including but not limited to regulations, Federal Facility Agreements, RCRA Permits, final or interim Records of Decision (RODs), or other equivalent remedial DDs. The Contractor is responsible for implementing changes to the monitoring program based on activities conducted in the Advanced Site Characterization (PWS Section 1.2.2.1) ) including the addition and decommissioning of wells in the monitoring well network as agreed by the all parties and the addition of new delineation monitoring where new information indicates our understanding of the plumes is changed. Only JBSA Camp Bullis Site LF002 (Site 8) (Landfill 8) is identified as an Alternate Objectives site in Table 1 of the PWS.

Based on technical review of existing site conditions/activities, the AF placed sites in the category of Alternate Objective if one or more of the following conditions exist:

1. Achieving RC is expected to require substantially longer than 30 years.

2. Achieving RC is unattainable with standard characterization and/or existing remediation technology due to technical or other limitations related to site conditions.

3. Achieving RC is anticipated to require advanced site characterization technologies to improve the Conceptual Site Model (CSM), determine appropriate remedial technology, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants.

The AF will use data and information obtained during execution of this PWS to determine restoration potential and future investment strategies at Alternate Objective sites. Each Sub- CLIN for the Alternate Objective sites will only be awarded if the activities are needed to determine the future investment strategy for the site. The decision to award each Sub-CLIN resides solely at the discretion of the AF.

For each Alternate Objective site, a summary of site-specific considerations is provided in PWS Enclosure 2C. As with all GFI provided, this GFI is provided for informational purposes only;

the Contractor remains responsible for developing their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the PO. The Contractor shall conduct project scoping sessions before work plan development and throughout the planning and execution of the project to meet the PO including the Installation Point(s) of Contact (POC[s]), the AFCEC Program Manager, the AF technical support team, and USACE Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). After contract award and approval by the AF and USACE, the Contractor shall participate in scoping sessions with the regulators, as appropriate.

1.2.3.1. Advanced Site Characterization

Based on existing data, the AF has determined that the existing remedial approaches at the Alternative Objective sites are not achieving satisfactory remedial progress towards their intended goals. In order for the AF to determine the best path forward for these sites, the Contractor shall conduct Advanced Site Characterization to collect data to update and refine the CSM in order to achieve the following goals: (1) Fill data gaps; and (2) Collect data needed to:

(A) Determine why existing and previous remedial actions are not effective at achieving remedial progress, (B) Determine appropriate remedial technology(ies) based on site conditions, and C) Develop remediation design parameters for recommended technology(ies).

Advanced Site Characterization includes the following three activities: (1) Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), (2) Revised CSM, and (3) Groundwater Monitoring Program Update.

1.2.3.1.1. Supplemental Site Investigation

The Contractor shall conduct an SSI to collect data necessary to improve the CSM, determine appropriate remedial technology, support remediation design and construction, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants. The Contractor shall implement advanced characterization methods, both established approaches and state-of-science techniques consistent with AF, regulatory, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC), and Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program/Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (SERDP/ESTCP) guidance to attain these objectives. Data collection includes better definition of the geology, hydrogeology, geochemistry, and/or distribution of Contaminants of Concern (COCs), as required. The Contractor shall evaluate the need for, and collect the following data where appropriate: (1) Source zone delineation; (2) Source strength1,2,3 ; (3) Vertical and lateral extent of contamination, if not sufficiently defined; (4) Plume stability4; (5) Migration pathway, rates, and fluxes in 3-D; (6) Mass distribution; (7) Biogeochemical framework; (8) Impact of recent and historical remedies on site conditions; and

(9) Comprehensive risk including the vapor intrusion pathway.

The SSI report shall document data collection efforts to include a risk evaluation, if appropriate.

The Contractor shall evaluate and provide recommendations regarding whether additional source control is needed or whether the plume, or portions of the plume, is amenable to natural attenuation by conducting source strength and plume stability evaluations as needed.

1.2.3.1.2. Conceptual Site Model

The Contractor shall develop a revised CSM in 3-D to include establishing or updating existing fate and transport models based on existing data and data gathered during the SSI. The CSM should cover the source area and the distal plume, to include the lateral and vertical extent of the contaminants in the context of geologic/hydrogeological parameters and the remedial actions conducted to date.

1.2.3.1.3. Groundwater Monitoring Program Update

The Contractor shall evaluate the current horizontal and vertical well distribution to determine if the following can be properly evaluated:

a. Remedy performance in treatment areas

b. Hydrogeology, plume geometry, horizontal and vertical plume stability, and matrix diffusion across site

c. Plume migration through use of perimeter/boundary wells and sentinel wells

Based on the well network evaluation, coordinated and approved by the Government and regulators (if required), the Contractor shall optimize the monitoring well network to include adjusting sample collection frequency and the addition of new wells as appropriate. The Contractor shall update the Basewide or Site-specific Monitoring Plan or other equivalent document, as appropriate.

1.2.3.2. Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation

Based on all existing data and data gathered during the Advanced Site Characterization, the Contractor shall evaluate the existing active and/or passive remedy(ies)5,6,7. The Contractor shall provide recommendations to augment, modify, and/or replace the existing remedy8. The evaluation and recommendations will include a cost-benefit analyses and evaluation of the usability, expandability, and/or discontinued use of any existing infrastructure. All remedy

1 ITRC. (2015). Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tool Selection.

2 SERDP/ESTCP. (2012). Matrix Diffusion Tool Kit.

3 USEPA. (2009). Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Sites with LNAPL.

4 USEPA. (2014). High Resolution Site Characterization for Groundwater Short Course, 23rd Annual NARPM Training Program.

5 USEPA. (2010). Best Management Practices.

6 USEPA. (2014). Groundwater Remedy Completion Strategy.

7 ITRC. (2006). Performance-Based Management.

8 ITRC. (2010). Use and Measurement of Mass Flux and Mass Discharge.

recommendations must include a performance model addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to section 1.2.1, Performance Models.

Where necessary to evaluate the proposed technology, the Contractor shall conduct pilot scale technology demonstrations. The Contractor shall identify appropriate remedial technologies and target zones; and design, plan, conduct, and evaluate the pilot and/or field scale technology consistent with AF, regulatory, and ITRC guidance. The Contractor shall determine performance monitoring criteria and identify a control sub-site (current state) for comparison and to evaluate results.

In some instances, achievement of RC may not be feasible with currently available technologies within a reasonable timeframe (i.e., more than 30 years). If this is the case, the Contractor shall develop and evaluate alternatives for site management that will be protective of human and ecological health. If this recommendation is made, it must include the rationale, and recommended metric when active remediation can cease, and a strategy for obtaining regulatory buy-in.

1.2.3.3. Decision Document Amendment

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.4. Remedial Action – Operation and Reduce Life-cycle Cost/Long Term Management and Reduce Life-cycle Cost

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.5. Remedial Action – Operation and Long Term Management

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or LTM as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and LTM site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the POP.

• Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to section 1.2.1, Performance Models.

• For RA-O sites, deliver an RA-O & Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report two years prior to the POP end date. The Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report shall:

o Document activities to date and identify activities and assumptions to further reduce LCC 10 years post-PO.

Table 1: Performance Table Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

N/A Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Draft PMP within 60 calendar days of contract award, Final PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

PMP.

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

N/A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

(QASP)

Draft QASP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

QASP.

N/A Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule

(MPS)

Draft IMS/MPS within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final IMS/MPS within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

IMS/MPS.

N/A Basewide Quality Program Plans (QPP) for each Installation

Draft Basewide QPP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of Basewide QPP.

See Section 8.1.1.1.e for site list

1,4-Dioxane Sampling (Phase 1) One (1) Year AF and USACE approval of Technical Memorandum/Report (one per installation)

N/A Annual Contractor Manpower Reporting

Throughout the duration of the POP

Accepted Annual Report

Barksdale AFB

DP020

(SWMU 9),

(POL Bulk Storage Area), (Landfill No. 1)

LTM in accordance with the Hazardous and solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) Corrective Action Permit

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

DP021

(SWMU 1)

(POL Pump House)

LTM in accordance with the LDEQ No Further Action Notification (NFA) dated 9/11/2013

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF003

(Landfill No. 2

[SWMU 12]

and No. 3

[SWMU 13])

LTM in accordance with the HSWA Corrective Action Permit

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF003

(Landfill No. 2)

Achieve Landfill Cap Replacement for Landfill No. 2

Three (3) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of Annual Remedial Action Status Report.

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

LTM in accordance with agreement with state regulators and provisions in the Louisiana Administrative Code

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill Cap Inspection Report and Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF034 LTM in accordance with the approved Statement of Basis

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

MU055 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

MU056 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

SS049 LTM in accordance with the LDEQ approval of Remedial Investigation (RI) Report dated 12/12/2013

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ST032 SC Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

TS935 SC Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

TU502 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls

TU503 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU505 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU509 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU516 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue LTM in accordance with the approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

TU521 RC

Upon achievement of RC, continue approved DD throughout the duration of the POP.

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of and AF signature on Final Remedial Action Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Annual Land Use Controls Inspection Reports).

XU559 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU560 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562A LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562C LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU562D LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

XU563 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU564 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU565 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU565A LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU643 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

XU936 LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection and Maintenance Reports).

Dyess AFB N/A Establish a Basewide Land Use

Control Implementation Plan (LUCIP) for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

N/A Abandon wells associated with closed out IRP sites (approximately five wells)

One (1) year from the award of the Well Abandonment Sub-

CLIN (0048AA)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of the well abandonment plan and completion report.

N/A Remove fencing associated with former IRP sites: OT008 (one fenced area), and FT003 (three fenced areas)

One (1) year from the award of the Fence Removal Sub-CLIN

(0048AB)

AF and USACE approval of removal action.

DP043

(POL Sludge Disposal Area No. 2)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

FT001

(Fire Protection Training Area

no. 1A)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

FT002

(Fire Protection Training Area

no. 1B)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF004

(Landfill No. 4)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

LF013

(Hardfill No. 1)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF013

(Hardfill No. 1)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

OT011

(DRMO)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

OT031

(Drum Storage Area Building 5017)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

OT035

(Golf Course Maintenance Shop)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD007

(South Diversion Ditch)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD020

(Oil Water Separator 4317)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD025

(Oil Water Separator 5204)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD028

(Building 7040 Oil Water Separator)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SD029

(Building 8007 Oil Water Separator)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS042

(Background Boring 2)

(BB2)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ST032

(Auto Hobby Shop)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

WP005

(Evaporation Pit Waste Storage)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation

Goodfellow AFB N/A Establish a Basewide LUCIP for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

AOC002

(Former Aircraft Wash Racks)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

AOC005

(Former Warehouse/ Maintenance Facilities)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF001

(South Landfill)

LTM in accordance with the approved DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF001

(LF-01)

(South Landfill)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

LF002

(LF-02)

(Southeast Landfill)

LTM in accordance with the approved DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF002

(LF-02)

(Southeast Landfill)

Conduct landfill maintenance to address Five-Year Review findings

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Landfill maintenance report).

SS003

(SS-03)

(Drum Storage Area)

LTM in accordance with the approved DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS007

(Carbon Tetrachloride Plume)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS008

(Former Railroad Spur)

LTM in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ST004

(Former Fuel Leaking Storage Tank ST-04)

LTM in accordance with the approved Response Action Plan (RAP) including incorporating any RAP amendments

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

JBSA Camp Bullis N/A Establish a Basewide LUCIP for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

FR001

(Stokes Mortar Munitions Site)

LTM in accordance with the approved Corrective Action Completion Report (CACR)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation

FR004

(75 mm Munitions Area)

LTM in accordance with the approved CACR

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF002

(Site 8) (Landfill 8)

RA-O in accordance with the approved Response Action Plan (RAP) including incorporating any RAP amendments/changes or changes to the monitoring program

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly Operations and Maintenance [O&M] Reports, etc.)

LF002

(Site 8) (Landfill 8)

Alternate Objectives in accordance with Section 1.2.3 of the PWS including the following:

1) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation [SSI], Revised Conceptual Site Model [CSM], and Monitoring Program Update)

2) Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM, and Basewide Monitoring Plan.

AF and USACE approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs if required to demonstrate the effectiveness of the remedy.

JBSA Fort Sam Houston N/A Establish a Basewide LUCIP for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

AT018

(FTSH-018-R-

01) (Trench Warfare Complex)

LTM in accordance with the approved DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

DA561

(Area of Concern [AOC] 13)

LTM in accordance with the approved Deed Notice

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF001

(FTSH-30)

(Landfills 2, 3, 4B, and 5)

LTM in accordance with the Post- Response Action Care Report

(PRACR)

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF002

(FTSH-29)

(Landfills 4A, 6, and 7)

LTM in accordance with the approved PRACR

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF003

(FTSH-26)

(Landfill 8B) (Alias XE105)

LTM in accordance with the approved PRACR

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

JBSA Lackland N/A Establish a Basewide LUCIP for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

LF001

(Former Landfill D-9)

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF011

(Former Landfill 11) (Site D-1) approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF012 (West) (Former Landfill D-2)

RA-O in accordance with the

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF012 (East) (Former Landfill D-2)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF013

(Former Landfill 13) (Site D-3)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF014

(Former Landfill D-4)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF015

(Former Landfill D-5)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF016

(Former Landfill D-6)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF017

(Former Landfill D-7)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

LF018

(Former Landfill D-8) (IRP Site D-8)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF021

(Landfill No. 4) approved DD

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation

LF028

(Landfill No. 6)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports)

LF029

(Landfill No. 5)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports)

LF036

(Landfill 36) (Hardfill #$)

(AOC 4)

(Landfill 36 West)

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

SS043

(Spill Site Number 43) (Consolidated Site 3) (CS-3) (Landfilled Ravine)

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval a of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

SS050

(Groundwater in Zone 5)

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

WP029

(Former Sludge Spreading Area

SA-1)

(Site SA-1)

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval f RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.)

JBSA Randolph N/A Establish a Basewide LUCIP for all sites listed in Table 1.

One (1) year AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LUCIP.

FT004

(Former Fire Training Area No. 2)

RA-O in accordance with the approved ROD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M…