Amendment_0001_and_0002_Questions_and_Answers.pdf
PDF 44 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-17-R-0043
About this file
Amendment 0001 and 0002 Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question # Reference Question Question Response
14 Section B, Section L, 4.0b, Section C, 10.0
Section, CLIN 0005AB, Post Production Support, require both hourly rates and a total proposed value for production support.
In addition, Section L, 4.0b requires that we provide labor categories, labor rates, indirect rates, fee and the calculated total for each labor category. Section C 10.0 of the SOW identifies general post production efforts that may be directed by the Government after award. Since specific post production efforts aren’t defined in the SOW, please clarify what assumptions the Contractor should use in developing a total price for CLIN 0005AB.
We were interpreting “calculated total for each labor category” as a total amount to accomplish post production efforts.
Perhaps it’s the Government’s intent to mean “calculated total hourly labor rate for each labor category.”
Due to the nature of CLIN 0005AB, a total proposed value for the overall CLIN is not to be provided. The offeror shall provide
(i) Labor Rate loaded through G&A, (ii) Fixed Fee, and (iii) Fully Burdened Labor Rate for each hourly labor rate for each year as directed in Section B and Section L, 4.0b.
15 Section L, 7.0 Section L. 7.0 requires that Contractor include all signed pages of the basic RFP and all amendments. However, Amendment 1 on FBO is Attachment 0025 and does not include an SF-30.
The FBO site lists Amendment 2 but when the link is pulled up the SF-30 shows Amendment 1. Please clarify.
The way that FBO is set up is the reason it shows that way.
The Government has amended the notice on numerous occasions (ie: Draft RFP, Q&A's, Final RFP). To keep everything together we put Amendment 0001 under all of the previous submissions. Please know that it is truly Amendment 0001 and not amendment 0002. You are still required by the basic RFP to sign the basic and all amendments.
Common Helmet Mounted Display (CHMD) Final Request for Proposal (RFP)
Solicitation Number: W58RGZ‐17‐R‐0043
Question # Reference Question Question Response
16 Section L, 2.0 Is the highlighted sentence below in reference to only the unverified requirements or all of the attributes of the CHMD?
Section L - 2.0 - Volume I - TECHNICAL/SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE FACTOR
Subfactor 2) Systems Integration and Test. a) Integration and Qualification. The offeror shall describe the programmatic and technical approach for completion of Integration requirements identified in Section J Attachment 20 and completion of qualification IAW RFP Section C para 3.2. In addition to the technical approach, the offeror shall include descriptions of relevant technical ability/experience that fully demonstrates the offerors ability to successfully integrate the proposed display and complete qualification of any unverified requirements in AVNS-DTL-10868. **HIGHLIGHTED SENTENCE**The description shall provide the overall attributes and operation of the CHMD.**
The offeror's shall provide the "OVERALL" attributes of the CHMD at a HIGH level to include the attributes that they feel they meet. Detail documentation of those attributes in this section are not required; but should instead be captured in the Compliance Matrix identified in Subfactor 1. However the remaining content in "Section L, 2.0, Subfactor 2), a) Integration and Qualification", requests more detail on the attributes they don't meet and how they intend to verify them through system integration and test.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .