Attachment0015-Section_M_Tables.pdf

Attachment 0015 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tables Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments Table 4. Example Calculation of Evaluation Price Table 5. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AA, per Year Table 6. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLINs 0003AB, 0003AC, and 0003AE, per Year Table 7. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AD, per Year Table 8. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AF and 0003AK, per Year Table 9. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AG and 0003AJ, per Year Table 10. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLIN 0003AH, per Year

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Purple Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Proposal is unawardable.

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments

Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Table 4. Example Calculation of Evaluation Price

Example SLIN 0003AA - Tether (TCOM Part Number (P/N) 4D04764G01)

Range Weighting Proposed Unit

Prices Weighted Evaluated

Range Price

1-4 10% $ 500 $ 50

5-8 80% $ 460 $ 368

9-12 10% $ 440 $ 44

Weighted Unit Price $ 462

Evaluation Quantity

Weighted Unit Price Total SLIN

Evaluation Price

12 $ 462 $ 5,544

Table 5. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AA, per Year

SLIN 0003AA Tether

(TCOM P/N 4D04764G01)

Year One

Range Weighting

1-5 5%

6-14 45%

15-29 50%

Year Two

Range Weighting

1-5 5%

6-14 35%

15-29 60%

Year Three

Range Weighting

1-5 5%

6-14 35%

15-29 60%

Year Four

Range Weighting

1-5 5%

6-14 35%

15-29 60%

Evaluation Quantity

40 per year

Delivery Date

180 days after DO award

Table 6. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLINs 0003AB, 0003AC, and 0003AE, per Year

SLIN 0003AB

Gondola (UAV Solutions P/N 05A-0035-00)

SLIN 0003AC-

Envelope

(TCOM P/N

4D04885G01

SLIN 0003AE-

Hand Controller

(L-3 Wescam P/N 42228-05)

Year One

Range Weighting Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 90% 90%

6-10 5% 5% 5%

11-29 5% 5% 5%

Year Two

Range Weighting Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 10% 90%

6-10 5% 80% 5%

11-29 5% 10% 5%

Year Three

Range Weighting Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 10% 90%

6-10 5% 80% 5%

11-29 5% 10% 5%

Year Four

Range Weighting Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 10% 90%

6-10 5% 80% 5%

11-29 5% 10% 5%

Evaluation Quantity

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year 10 per year 1 per year

Delivery Date Delivery Date Delivery Date

270 days after DO award

365 days after DO award

60 days after DO award

Table 7. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AD, per Year

SLIN 0003AD Mooring Station

(TCOM P/N 4D05001G02)

Year One

Range Weighting

1-5 95%

6-10 5%

Year Two

Range Weighting

1-5 95%

6-10 5%

Year Three

Range Weighting

1-5 95%

6-10 5%

Year Four

Range Weighting

1-5 95%

6-10 5%

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year

365 days after DO award

Table 8. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AF and 0003AK, per Year

SLIN 0003AF

Tether

(Lockheed Martin (LM)

Services, Inc.

P/N SP-

9900000915)

SLIN 0003AK

High Antennas for Radio Communication

(HARC)

(Syntonics P/N 105000-0003/ 105600-0001)

Year One

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 50% 90%

6-14 30% 5%

15-29 20% 5%

Year Two

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 10% 90%

6-14 10% 5%

15-29 80% 5%

Year Three

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 10% 90%

6-14 10% 5%

15-29 80% 5%

Year Four

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 10% 90%

6-14 10% 5%

15-29 80% 5%

Evaluation Quantity

28 per year 1 per year

Delivery Date Delivery Date

180 days after DO award

540 days after DO award

Table 9. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AG and 0003AJ, per Year

SLIN 0003AG–

Pressurization and Avionic Unit

(PAU) (LM

Mission Systems & Training (LM

MST) P/N

3830422-001-101)

SLIN 0003AJ

Joint

Synchronization Information Transceiver

(JSIT) (LM MST

P/N 3830520-

005-101)

Year One

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 90%

6-10 5% 5%

11-29 5% 5%

Year Two

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 90%

6-10 5% 5%

11-29 5% 5%

Year Three

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 90%

6-10 5% 5%

11-29 5% 5%

Year Four

Range Weighting Weighting

1-5 90% 90%

6-10 5% 5%

11-29 5% 5%

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year 1 per year

Delivery Date Delivery Date

270 days after DO award

365 days after DO award

Table 10. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLIN 0003AH, per Year

SLIN 0003AH Envelope

(LM MST P/N 3830100-003-103)

Year One

Range Weighting

1-5 90%

6-10 10%

Year Two

Range Weighting

1-5 90%

6-10 10%

Year Three

Range Weighting

1-5 90%

6-10 10%

Year Four

Range Weighting

1-5 90%

6-10 10%

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year

365 days after DO award