Attachment_0015_-_Section_M_Tables_Amendment0001.docx

60 KB Posted

Attached to
Persistent Surveillance Systems - Tethered: Engineering, Logistics, Operations and Program Management Support
Solicitation number
W56KGY-15-R-0016
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Updated Attachment 0015

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A07_-_W56KGY-15-R-0016_0003_SF33.pdf PDF
Solicitation_QA_2015OCT21.docx DOCX document
A07_-_W56KGY-15-R-0016_0002_SF33.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_-_BASE_PWS_PSS-T_Amendment0002.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0014_-_Section_L_Tables_Amendment0002.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_QA_2015OCT20.pdf PDF
Attachment_0014_-_Section_L_Tables_Amendment0001.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_QA_2015OCT17.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0001_-_BASE_PWS_PSS-T_Amendment0001.docx DOCX document
A07_-_W56KGY-15-R-0016_0001_SF33.pdf PDF
Attachment_0013_-_FFP_Price_Template_PSS-T_Amendment0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0008_-_TO_PWS_PSS-T_Amendment0001.docx DOCX document
A01_-_ExhibitA_CDRL_MGMT.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitC_CDRL_ADMN.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitD_CDRL_CMAN.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitH_CDRL_IPSC.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitB_CDRL_FNCL.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitG_CDRL_TMSS.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Q A.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitJ_CDRL_ATTS.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitL_CDRL_SESS.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitE_CDRL_NDTI.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitK_CDRL_MISC.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitN_CDRL_MFFP.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitM_CDRL_QCIC.pdf PDF
A01_-_ExhibitF_CDRL_SAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment0014-Section_L_Tables.pdf PDF
Attachment0016-PWS_Labor_Hour_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0015-Section_M_Tables.pdf PDF
Attachment0008-TO_PWS_PSS-T.docx DOCX document
Attachment0013-FFP_Price_Template_PSS-T.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0011-Tech_Data_Req_Quest.docx DOCX document
Attachment0012-PPQ_PSS-T.docx DOCX document
Attachment0002-BASE_QASP_PSS-T.pdf PDF
Attachment0010-Data_Tech_NDA_PSS-T.pdf PDF
Attachment0005-PRS_PSST.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment0001-BASE_PWS_PSS-T.pdf PDF
Attachment0009-TO_QASP_PSS-T.docx DOCX document
A07_-_W56KGY-15-R-0016_SF33.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment 0015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Tables

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings1
Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings1
Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments2
Table 4. Example Calculation of Evaluation Price2
Table 5. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AA, per Year3
Table 6. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLINs 0003AB, 0003AC, and 0003AE, per Year4
Table 7. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AD, per Year5
Table 8. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AF, 0003AK, and 0003AL, per Year6
Table 9. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AG and 0003AJ, per Year7
Table 10. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLIN 0003AH, per Year8

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color
Rating
Description
Blue
Outstanding
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Purple
Good
Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Green
Acceptable
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow
Marginal
Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red
Unacceptable
Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating
Definition
Very Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant
Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments

Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating
Definition
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Table 4. Example Calculation of Evaluation Price

Example
SLIN 0003AA - Tether (TCOM Part Number (P/N) 4D04764G01)
Range
Weighting
Proposed Unit Prices
Weighted Evaluated Range Price
1-4
10%
$ 500
$ 50
5-8
80%
$ 460
$ 368
9-12
10%
$ 440
$ 44
Weighted Unit Price
$ 462
Evaluation Quantity
Weighted Unit Price
Total SLIN Evaluation Price
12
$ 462
$ 5,544

Table 5. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AA, per Year SLIN 0003AA Tether

(TCOM P/N 4D04764G01)

Year One

Range
Weighting
1-5
5%
6-14
45%
15-29
50%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
1-5
5%
6-14
35%
15-29
60%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
1-5
5%
6-14
35%
15-29
60%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
1-5
5%
6-14
35%
15-29
60%

Evaluation Quantity

20 per year

Delivery Date

180 days after DO award

SLIN 0003AB Gondola (UAV Solutions P/N 05A-0035-00)
SLIN 0003AC- Envelope (TCOM P/N 4D04773G09
SLIN 0003AE- Hand Controller (L-3 Wescam P/N 42228-15)

Year One

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
90%
90%
6-10
5%
5%
5%
11-29
5%
5%
5%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
10%
90%
6-10
5%
80%
5%
11-29
5%
10%
5%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
10%
90%
6-10
5%
80%
5%
11-29
5%
10%
5%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
10%
90%
6-10
5%
80%
5%
11-29
5%
10%
5%
Evaluation Quantity
Evaluation Quantity
Evaluation Quantity
1 per year
10 per year
1 per year
Delivery Date
Delivery Date
Delivery Date
270 days after DO award
365 days after DO award
60 days after DO award

Table 6. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLINs 0003AB, 0003AC, and 0003AE, per Year

Table 7. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Medium, SLIN 0003AD, per Year SLIN 0003AD Mooring Station

(TCOM P/N 4D05001G02)

Year One

Range
Weighting
1-5
95%
6-10
5%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
1-5
95%
6-10
5%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
1-5
95%
6-10
5%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
1-5
95%
6-10
5%

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year

Delivery Date

365 days after DO award

Table 8. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AF, 0003AK, and 0003AL, per Year

SLIN 0003AF Tether (Lockheed Martin (LM) Services, Inc. P/N SP-9900000915)
SLIN 0003AK High Antennas for Radio Communication (HARC) (Syntonics P/N 105000-0003)
SLIN 0003AL High Antennas for Radio Communication (HARC) (Syntonics P/N 105600-0001)

Year One

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
50%
90%
90%
6-14
30%
5%
5%
15-29
20%
5%
5%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
10%
90%
90%
6-14
10%
5%
5%
15-29
80%
5%
5%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
10%
90%
90%
6-14
10%
5%
5%
15-29
80%
5%
5%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
10%
90%
90%
6-14
10%
5%
5%
15-29
80%
5%
5%
Evaluation Quantity
Evaluation Quantity
Evaluation Quantity
28 per year
1 per year
1 per year
Delivery Date
Delivery Date
Delivery Date
180 days after DO award
540 days after DO award
540 days after DO award

Table 9. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLINs 0003AG and 0003AJ, per Year

SLIN 0003AG– Pressurization and Avionic Unit (PAU) (LM Mission Systems & Training (LM MST) P/N 3830422-001-101)
SLIN 0003AJ Joint Synchronization Information Transceiver (JSIT) (LM MST P/N 3830520-005-101)

Year One

Range
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
90%
6-10
5%
5%
11-29
5%
5%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
90%
6-10
5%
5%
11-29
5%
5%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
90%
6-10
5%
5%
11-29
5%
5%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
Weighting
1-5
90%
90%
6-10
5%
5%
11-29
5%
5%
Evaluation Quantity
Evaluation Quantity
1 per year
1 per year
Delivery Date
Delivery Date
270 days after DO award
365 days after DO award

Table 10. Evaluation Criteria for PSS-T Large, SLIN 0003AH, per Year SLIN 0003AH Envelope

(LM MST P/N 3830100-003-103)

Year One

Range
Weighting
1-5
90%
6-10
10%

Year Two

Range
Weighting
1-5
90%
6-10
10%

Year Three

Range
Weighting
1-5
90%
6-10
10%

Year Four

Range
Weighting
1-5
90%
6-10
10%

Evaluation Quantity

1 per year

Delivery Date

365 days after DO award

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .