NB194000-16-04839_W3_Customization_PPQ.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SB1341-16-RQ-0982
About this file
B1W3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) FOR
WING 3 CUSTOMIZATION SOLICITATION SB1341-16-RP-0982
| CONTRACTOR (Firm Name): |
| CLIENT NAME: |
| CLIENT EMAIL: |
| CLIENT ADDRESS: |
| CLIENT PHONE/FAX NUMBER: |
| PROJECT DESCRIPTION: |
| PROJECT CONTRACT VALUE: |
| PROJECT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: TO |
| PROJECT PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: |
RETURN THIS FORM DIRECTLY BACK TO meelondrell.parks@nist.gov
| TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT | |||||||||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 1 | QUALITY: | ||||||||
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 2 | SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | ||||||||
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources including methods and manpower to accomplish tasks and to meet the contract schedule. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 3 | CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: | ||||||||
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| d) Overall customer satisfaction. | E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 4 | MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR | ||||||||
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| c) Government Property Control. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| e) Utilization of Small Business [SUBCONTRACTOR] concerns. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 5 | COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | ||||||||
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in REMARKS section below. | YES | NO | |||||||
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in REMARK section below. | YES | NO | |||||||
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any | |||||||||
| financial problems? If yes, please explain in REMARKS section below. | YES | NO | |||||||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 6 | SAFETY/SECURITY | ||||||||
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR | |||||||||
| EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE | Exceptional | Very Good | Satisfactory | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | Not Applicable | |||
| 7 | GENERAL | ||||||||
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues in REMARKS section below) | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in REMARKS section below | YES | NO | |||||||
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. | E | VG | S | M | U | N | |||
| REMARKS | |||||||||
| 8 | Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. |
Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
9 Any additional comments related to the contractor’s performance:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) ATTACHMENT
&P of &N
RETURN THIS FORM DIRECTLY BACK TO meelondrell.parks@nist.gov or fax (303) 497-5470
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .