RFP 2024-08 Evaluation Criteria and Weights.pdf
PDF 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 2024-08 Information Technology Research Subscription Services State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 86987
- Issued by
- Southampton County, Virginia
About this file
This document is an evaluation criteria and scoring matrix for RFP 2024-08 "Information Technology Research Subscription Services" issued by a Virginia state agency. The document outlines how proposals will be evaluated using a numerical scoring system across multiple criteria, with Business Functional Requirements and Service Delivery Requirements receiving the highest weights of 10 points each. SCM Account Management Requirements and Pricing Structure Requirements are weighted at 8 points each, while supplier experience and qualifications are weighted at 5 points. The document also includes evaluation criteria for optional analyst services.
The scoring system incorporates consideration for DSBSD-certified small or micro businesses with a weight of 3 points for supplier status and subcontracting plans as detailed in Exhibit H. While price is not assigned a numerical score, it will be considered as a value/cost ratio in the evaluation process. For proposals that include optional analyst services, an additional criterion weighted at 7 points is added while maintaining the same weights for all other categories.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 2024-08
RFP 2024-08
Information Technology Research Subscription Services
Evaluation Criteria and Weights
Proposals will be evaluated using a numerical scoring system for the evaluation criteria listed below. Note: Price is not assigned a numerical score but will be considered in the form of a value/cost ratio.
Evaluation Criteria Weight (1-10) Supplier’s experience, qualifications, viability, and past performance (Supplier Profile)
Supplier’s status as a DSBSD-certified small or micro business, and Supplier’s proposed Supplier Procurement and Subcontracting Plan as set forth in Exhibit H
The extent to which Supplier’s proposal satisfies the requirements identified in Exhibit A Requirements:
SCM Account Management Requirements 8 Business Functional Requirements 10 Service Delivery Requirements 10 Pricing Structure Requirements 8
Proposals that include optional analyst services shall be evaluated using the below evaluation criteria.
Evaluation Criteria Weight (1-10) Supplier’s experience, qualifications, viability, and past performance (Supplier Profile)
Supplier’s status as a DSBSD-certified small or micro business, and Supplier’s proposed Supplier Procurement and Subcontracting Plan as set forth in Exhibit H
The extent to which Supplier’s proposal satisfies the requirements identified in Exhibit A Requirements:
SCM Account Management Requirements 8 Business Functional Requirements 10 Service Delivery Requirements 10 Pricing Structure Requirements 8 Optional Analyst Services Requirements 7
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .