RFP 2024-08 Evaluation Criteria and Weights.pdf
PDF 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 2024-08 Information Technology Research Subscription Services State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 86987
- Issued by
- Southampton County, Virginia
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria and weights document for RFP 2024-08 from Virginia for Information Technology Research Subscription Services. The document outlines how proposals will be evaluated using a numerical scoring system, with specific weights assigned to different evaluation criteria on a 1-10 scale. The key requirements include SCM Account Management Requirements (weight: 8), Business Functional Requirements (weight: 10), Service Delivery Requirements (weight: 10), and Pricing Structure Requirements (weight: 8).
The evaluation process includes consideration of the supplier's experience, qualifications, viability, and past performance (weight: 5), as well as their status as a DSBSD-certified small or micro business and proposed Supplier Procurement and Subcontracting Plan (weight: 3). For proposals that include optional analyst services, an additional criterion is added with a weight of 7. While price is not assigned a numerical score, it will be considered in the form of a value/cost ratio. The document indicates a preference for DSBSD-certified small or micro businesses through the dedicated evaluation criterion.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 2024-08
RFP 2024-08
Information Technology Research Subscription Services
Evaluation Criteria and Weights
Proposals will be evaluated using a numerical scoring system for the evaluation criteria listed below. Note: Price is not assigned a numerical score but will be considered in the form of a value/cost ratio.
Evaluation Criteria Weight (1-10) Supplier’s experience, qualifications, viability, and past performance (Supplier Profile)
Supplier’s status as a DSBSD-certified small or micro business, and Supplier’s proposed Supplier Procurement and Subcontracting Plan as set forth in Exhibit H
The extent to which Supplier’s proposal satisfies the requirements identified in Exhibit A Requirements:
SCM Account Management Requirements 8 Business Functional Requirements 10 Service Delivery Requirements 10 Pricing Structure Requirements 8
Proposals that include optional analyst services shall be evaluated using the below evaluation criteria.
Evaluation Criteria Weight (1-10) Supplier’s experience, qualifications, viability, and past performance (Supplier Profile)
Supplier’s status as a DSBSD-certified small or micro business, and Supplier’s proposed Supplier Procurement and Subcontracting Plan as set forth in Exhibit H
The extent to which Supplier’s proposal satisfies the requirements identified in Exhibit A Requirements:
SCM Account Management Requirements 8 Business Functional Requirements 10 Service Delivery Requirements 10 Pricing Structure Requirements 8 Optional Analyst Services Requirements 7
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .