Amendment_0001_Q_and_A_spreadsheet.pdf
PDF 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GRTE 149677 Moose Waste Water/Water Plant Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- P16PS01023
About this file
Amendment 0001 Question and Answer Spreadsheet
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question and Answer
Spreadsheet
P16PS01023
GRTE 149677
Question No. Sheet or Reference Question Response Amendment
Answered
Drawing E4.3; Spec 25‐ 51‐00, Part 1.2.A
On drawing E4.3, General Note 3. States “The National Park service has provided a sole source justification for telemetry system. The telemetry system and components shall be by Motorola and shall be installed by timberline. No substitution of specified equipment will be allowed.”
In the specifications section 25‐51‐00, addresses the integrated automation of the project. In part 1.2.A of the section talks about programming and integration of the telemetry system.
Thus the question I have is: Is the integration and programming of the telemetry system part of the sole source services provided by Timberline, or should it be part of the proposal package?
This question and response pertain to the Moose Water System specifications. The integration of the telemetry and control system between the Taggart Tank and Taggart well house should be part of the proposal package. The integration and programing of data reporting from Taggart Well house to Moose Water Lab is part of the sole source service provided by Timber Line.
There appears to be a discrepancy between E4.3, General note 3, and E5.4. Note 1. Please clarify who is to provide specific panels, or if contractor is providing all.
This question and response pertain to the Moose Water System specifications.
Contractor is providing all. The Contractor is responsible for furnishing and installing all equipment, controls, hardware, and wiring at Taggart Well Tank and Taggart Well House.
Is the pre‐proposal site visit mandatory?
The purpose of the site visit is to give potential offerors the chance to see the project site for proposal pricing. This site visit is not mandatory.
SF1442
The SF 1442 says the proposal is due 6/2/16 and the solicitation (Page 113) states it is due Monday, June 6, 2016. Please clarify when proposals are due for this project.
Proposals are due 06/06/2016 at 10:00am Mountain Daylight Time (MDT).
Section L, Page 113
Factor 1 – Previous Relevant Experience. Offeror shall submit 3‐5 examples of past performance on similar projects in scope and costs that occurred within the last 10 years. Please confirm that a total of 3‐5 examples should be submitted for all three Elements.
Not 3‐5 per Element.
A total of 3‐5 examples.
Projects cited should demonstrate that the Contractor has the technical capability, skills, and experience to successfully manage and perform the three listed elements
Section L, Page 113
Factor 1 – Previous Relevant Experience. Offeror shall submit 3‐5 examples of past performance on similar projects in scope and costs that occurred within the last 10 years. Must an example be at a certain percentage complete in order to submit?
It is the contractor's responsibility to submit projects that best demonstrate their capability to successfully complete this job.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .