Attachment 9 - QASP.pdf
PDF 96 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maritime Position, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Systems In-Service Engineering and Technical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N65236-17-R-0008
About this file
This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and draft Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) documents for a maritime position, navigation, and timing systems support services contract opportunity with the Department of the Navy. The QASP outlines acceptance criteria and surveillance methods for evaluating contractor performance across quality of deliverables, schedule adherence, cost control, retention of key personnel, and customer satisfaction. Performance will be assessed on a monthly basis using CPARS draft approval documents, with ratings ranging from exceptional to unsatisfactory in identified performance areas directly tied to the contract's requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
SPAWARSYSCENLANT 4335/1 (Rev. 08/16) Page of
FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT
** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #1/CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
(CDRL) DOCUMENTS
CDRL documents (data deliverables) weights vary depending on the value to the government. If CPARS Draft Approval Document (CDAD) CDRL exists in the basic contract, it must be included in the task order and in the QASP. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
CDRL documents that are complete; have no flawed information, analyses, assumptions or conclusions; and have a minimum number of minor grammatical errors (i.e., errors in less than 10% of the pages).
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% Review by COR
COR will review within 10 working days of receipt and log results of all reviews (i.e. CDRL Documents accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
CDRL #
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
FREQUENCY
DESCRIPTION
CPARS
GROUP
WEIGHT
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Govt's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective action.
Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events
Quality of Product #1
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #2/HARDWARE GOODS
(e.g., Fabricated items, Repairs, Refurbishment, etc.). Hardware goods weights vary depending on the value to the government. Hardware goods of most value are those which affect cost, schedule, and critical path.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All items meet applicable requirements for standards of workmanship as indicated in the SOO and/or PWS.
100% inspection by the COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., hardware goods accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.
Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #2 8.2.1.4029.1.523496.503679
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All aspects of installation and equipment removal conform to the following work standard. Aspects to be inspected include: grounding and bonding methods, space, hull and equipment penetration, welds, cable routing and supports, connectorization, bracing, equipment accessibility, shock mounts, and applicable TEMPEST equipment and classification requirements.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #3/INSTALLATION AND EQUIPMENT REMOVAL
Installations and equipment removal weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #3 Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by the COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., installations/equipment removals accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
QUALITY OF PRODUCT #4/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
Software Development task weights vary depending on the value to the government. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
All functionality of the "Product/Program", works as designed with a maximum of 5% minor problems (i.e., problems which do not affect results (each product)). Product relates to coding during development, modeling, simulation, etc.)
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Quality of Product #4 Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., software development tasks accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
Documents are delivered "on time" in accordance with official schedules and milestones (not counting excusable delays).
SCHEDULE #1/DOCUMENTS
CDRL document weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.
CPARS
GROUP
CDRL #
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #1 Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all CDRL document deliveries (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
SCHEDULE #2/DELIVERY OF SCHEDULED MILESTONES
(e.g., Installations, Equipment Removal, Program Reviews, Testing, Deliver, etc.). Milestone schedule weights vary depending on the value to the government.
Note: Weight of values must equal 100 per page.
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
On time scheduled delivery is defined as meeting the task order scheduled delivery dates (not counting excusable delays).
CPARS
GROUP
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
WEIGHT
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Schedule #2 Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.
To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
100%
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Govt's benefit.
To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
90-100%
Performance meets contractual requirements.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is
76 -89%
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements
Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.
Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is less than or equal to 75%
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
100% inspection by COR.
COR will log results of all milestone schedule events (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
METHOD OF
SURVEILLANCE
APPLICABLE
OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
TASK
CPARS
GROUP
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is less than 80%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is more than five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/ DO/TO throughout the contract period is between 80% and 99%, round to closest %.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between four and five.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is three.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between two and one.
Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is zero.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/ DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Some key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.
Many key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.
100% review by COR.
COR will review and maintain log of all key positions and instances of vacancies throughout task order period.
100% review by COR
COR will review and maintain log of all identified (named) key personnel and identify turnover throughout task order period.
Percent (%) of qualified key personnel required by the task order throughout the task order period. Vacancies for vacation or daily sickness will not be included, extended sickness and absences will be included.
Retention of identified (named) key personnel throughout the period of the task order.
Retention of Key Personnel Percent of Key Personnel Management of Key Personnel
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
OBJECTIVES ACCEPTABLE
QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)
APPLICABLE
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
Cost Control Any increase in negotiated labor rates greater than 15%.
Identifies an annual fully burdened per person labor charge in any labor category in excess of
SIGNATURE DIRECTION:
The COR is required to sign the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) once a final bid and/or a formal contractor submission (PWS, Proposal, QASP) has been accepted and is ready to be funded. The Ordering Officer will enter in the task order/contract number (as applicable) and sign the QASP, which will lock it. The QASP will be used as a reference by the contractor when completing the monthly CDAD and by the COR when reviewing the monthly CDAD and entering the final CPARS. Any changes to the QASP after award require a modification.
If the cumulative amount of Other Direct Costs (ODCs) will exceed 10% of the original ODC total (for any given period of performance). Unless total is less than pre-award threshold (10% of Labor or $3 Million).
Any Instances/Overruns require a Post Award ODC Service Contracting Performance Metrics Memorandum signed by COR and forwarded to Contracting Officer (KO).
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.
Post Award Service Contracting Performance Metrics (Formerly Tripwire) Monitoring Cost Variance Cost overrun of more than 10%
Round to closest %.
Cost overrun of 2 - 10%
Round to closest % Plus or minus 1% of estimated cost
Round to closest % Savings to the government of 2 - 10%
Round to closest % Savings to the government of more than 10%
Round to closest % Accurate forecasting, managing and controlling cost.
Business Relations Customer Satisfaction External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written complaint (including email) Verbal concerns expressed by external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) No external customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) complaints received Verbal compliments received from external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written compliments (including email) Customer satisfaction is based on the number of positive or negative responses COR receives from customers.
Note: Does not include "policy" comments.
SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD MONTHLY CPARS DRAFT APPROVAL DOCUMENT (CDAD)
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT
COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE
RATIONALE
Quality of Product or Service Documents Installations and Equipment Removal
(I/ER)
Hardware Goods Software Development (SW Dev) *KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
Schedule Documents Milestone Schedule Cost Control Percent of Key Personnel Retention of Key Personnel Mgmt of Key Personnel Customer Satisfaction Business Relations Cost Variance
CPARS
GROUP
TASK
MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT
CONTRACTOR INPUT
COR INPUT
CALCULATED
RATING
RATIONALE
RATIONALE
*KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.
Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.
Material Acquisition Support Repair Support Engineering Support ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* Material Acquisition Support Repair Support Engineering Support ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* Material Acquisition Support Repair Support Engineering Support Software Development ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required* ASREQ As required*
PWS
TO Various Milestones ASREQ As required*
| CurrentPage: |
| PageCount: |
| Button1: |
| contNum: N65236-17-R-0008 |
| doToNum: N/A |
| contName: TBD |
| date: 2017-10-01 |
| sooPWS: Maritime PNT Systems, ISEA & Technical Support Services |
| sooPWS: TBD |
| corName: TBD |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee |
| hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS PCO to negotiate "consideration" to reduce adverse impact to mission |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc6: Inv Track/Warranty Track/Failure Status |
| cdrl6: A008,A009, A0010 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: MTHLY Monthly |
| desc5: CSWF |
| cdrl5: A007 |
| wtt2: |
| wtt3: |
| wtt4: |
| wtt5: |
| wtt6: |
| wtt7: |
| wtt8: |
| wtt9: |
| wtt10: |
| wtt11: |
| wtt12: |
| wtt13: |
| wtt14: |
| wtt15: |
| wtt16: |
| wtt17: |
| wtt18: |
| totWt20: 100 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc4: SDP/SW+Doc |
| cdrl4: A005,A006 |
| desc3: Eng Design Docs/Install Drawings |
| cdrl3: A003/A004 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc2: Tech Analysis, |
| cdrl2: A002, |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc1: Program Mgmt Report |
| cdrl1: A001 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: MTHLY Monthly |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc7: Training Doc |
| cdrl7: A011 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc8: Source Code |
| cdrl8: A012 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: MTHLY Monthly |
| desc9: CSR, TOSR, CDAD |
| cdrl9: A013, A014, A021 |
| desc10: TO Closeout Report |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| cdrl10: A015 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc11: Invoice Spt Doc, Limitation Notification & Rationale |
| cdrl11: A016, A017 |
| desc12: CFSR |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| cdrl12: A018 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc13: Quality Doc |
| cdrl13: A019 |
| desc14: C&S Milestone |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: 10 days post award |
| cdrl14: A020 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc15: Trip Report |
| cdrl15: A022 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: ASREQ As required* |
| desc16: OCONUS Deploy Doc |
| cdrl16: A023 |
| descTot: Total |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| desc17: |
| cdrl17: |
| notAppHard: 0 |
| num1: |
| num2: |
| num3: |
| num4: |
| num5: |
| num6: |
| num7: |
| num8: |
| num9: |
| num10: |
| num11: |
| num12: |
| num13: |
| num14: |
| num15: |
| num16: |
| num17: |
| num18: |
| descr18: |
| num19: |
| descr1: |
| descr2: |
| descr3: |
| descr4: |
| descr5: |
| descr6: |
| descr7: |
| descr8: |
| descr9: |
| descr10: |
| descr11: |
| descr12: |
| descr13: |
| descr14: |
| descr15: |
| descr16: |
| descr17: |
| hardwt1: |
| hardwt2: |
| hardwt3: |
| hardwt4: |
| hardwt5: |
| hardwt6: |
| hardwt7: |
| hardwt8: |
| hardwt9: |
| hardwt10: |
| hardwt11: |
| hardwt12: |
| hardwt13: |
| hardwt14: |
| hardwt15: |
| hardwt16: |
| hardwt17: |
| hardwt18: |
| hardwt19: |
| hardwt20: |
| totWt2: 100.00000000 |
| totWt2: 100.00000000 |
| totWt2: 100.00000000 |
| totWt2: 100.00000000 |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| notAppInstall: 0 |
| descrTot: Total |
| descrTot: Total |
| descrTot: Total |
| hardwt21: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| Asterisk * Codes require contractor guidance to price deliverable item.: |
| sched1Remedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS PCO to negotiate "consideration" to reduce adverse impact to mission |
| DropDownList1: Yes |
| DropDownList1: Yes |
| ApprovalSign: |
| orderOffSig: |
| DropDownList2: Yes |
| DropDownList4: Yes |
| DropDownList3: Yes |
| costVarApp: Yes |
| bizRelApp: Yes |
| preAwardTrip: $165.00 |
| forMonth: |
| datenobinding: |
| docB: |
| docC: |
| Weight: |
| docA: |
| ierB: |
| ierC: |
| ierA: |
| swB: |
| swC: |
| swA: |
| hardB: |
| hardC: |
| hardA: |
| KOAdjudication: |
| docB2: |
| docA2: |
| docC2: |
| mileB: |
| mileA: |
| mileC: |
| perB: |
| retenA: |
| retenC: |
| retenB: |
| perC: |
| perA: |
| costA: |
| costC: |
| costB: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .