Bidders_Questions_1_-_31_-_USS_GETTYSBURG_(CG-64)_SSRA.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USS GETTYSBURG (CG-64) SSRA
- Solicitation number
- N50054-16-R-0003
About this file
Government Responses to Request for Specification Clarification 1 - 31.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACTOR POC:
CONTRACTOR PHONE:
ITEM NO: ALL
TITLE: Shipcheck
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO:
TITLE:
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 168-12-003
TITLE: Shipcheck
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 168-12-001
TITLE: Door, Exterior, Individually Dogged:
replace (OPTION ITEM)
PARA. NO: 2.5
PAGE NO: 1 of 3
ITEM NO: 150-90-011, Errata One
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83505.01K, Superstructure Fatigue and Sensitization
PARA. NO: 2.16
PAGE NO: 2
ITEM NO: 612-11-004
TITLE: Handrail Assembly; replace
PARA. NO: 2.3
PAGE NO: 1
ITEM NO: 426-90-001 (Errata #1)
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-78972.01K Replace MK
4 MOD 2 Electromagnetic (EM) Log with the
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 1: the solicitation limits the shipcheck to Feb
1 thru Feb 5. Contrators and subs need sufficient time to review the specs and drawings prior to shipchecking. In addition we have had subcontractors that submitted their visit requests on feb 1 turned away today because the ship does not yet have their visit request. Please provide an additional ship check period thru 2/12/16.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ship Check has been extended until 10
February 2016 see Amendment 0002.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 7:
There are two references numbered 2.2. The first 2.2 is listed as 401-
8648401, which is the same dwg number as reference 2.3. The title for the first reference 2.2 is the same as the title for the second reference 2.2, so it appears that the first reference 2.2 may need to be deleted in its entirety.
Please make the appropriate correction.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.2 has been removed via
ERRATA Package # 4. Please refer to Ref 2.3 - 2.5 for Work Item
426-90-001. To request ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 2: While reviewing the package, KTR has identified work item 612-11-002 is listed on the Item Index, but it is not provided in the package. Will the Government be providing the missing work item or is this a canceled item? If providing, KTR request an extention for the delay.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work Item 612-11-002 was inadvertently left off of the Work Specification Package CD, although it was listed in the index. Upon request, the Government will provide via email, Work Item 612-11-002. To request this information, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Ted
Nigro, Contract Specialist at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The proposal due date remains unchanged.
REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION
Attachment J-8
DATE OF REQUEST: 02/18/2016 SOLICITATION NO: N50054-16-R-0003
MARMC POC: Ted Nigro
MARMC PHONE: 757-396-5041 x402
TITLE: USS GETTYSBURG (CG-64) Special Selected Restricted Availability (SSRA)
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference 2.5 and Para 3.1.1 have been deleted via ERRATA Package #2 and Para 3.2.3 and Para 4.2 have been deleted via ERRATA Package #3. To request ERRATA Packages #2 and #3 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: To request a copy of DRAWING 551-
8647294 ShipAlt CG47-83505.01K Ship Service Air Sys Mod, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The drawing will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: To request a copy of DRAWING 61211-
2-701 Rev F, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted
Nigro at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The drawing will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Paragraph 3.2.12 along with reference
2.12 will be deleted from work item and Para 3.2.1.4 has been added via
ERRATA Package #2 and #3. There is to be no installation of PCMS tile on this availability. To request ERRATA Packages #2 and #3 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 3: para states "3.2.12 Accomplish the requirements of 009-78 of 2.1 for the installation of new PCMS materials provided in 5.1 to the door located in 1.2.1 using sheet 191A of 2.12."
The required sheet from refe 2.12 (drawing # 472-7538420) has not been provided Please provide.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 4:
Ref. 2.5 472-7538420 REV Q, CG 47 Class Installation Details Special
Coating Materials was not included with the references furnished by the government. Will this drawing be furnished? It is called out on multiple spec items.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 5:
Reference 2.16 is drawing 551-8647294, ShipAlt CG47-83505.01K Ship
Service Air Sys Mod. The drawing furnished is the same number
(8647294), however, it is titled "MARKING DRAWING" PRINTED
WIRING RELAY LAMP DRIVER. WIl the Government provide a copy of the correct drawing?
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 6:
In this spec item, ref. 2.3, 61211-2-701 is called out as Rev "F", Stanchions and Lifelines Installation Test. However, Rev "E" of this drawing was furnished. Should the spec be modified to reference Rev "E" or will the
Government provide Rev "F" of this drawing?
PARA. NO: 2.2
PAGE NO: 1 of 2
ITEM NO: 150-90-005 (Errata #1)
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83503.06K, Superstructure Fatigue and Sensitization
PARA. NO: 2.12
PAGE NO: 2 of 4
ITEM NO: 437-90-001 (Errata #1)
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-74392K, Moriah Wind
System for CG Modernization; accomplish
PARA. NO: 2.6
PAGE NO: 2 of 3
ITEM NO: 456-90-004
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-77614.01K, ACB12/TI12 OA Computing Plant Upgrade;
accomplish
PARA. NO: 2.29
PAGE NO: 2 of 4
ITEM NO: 711-90-001 (Errata #1)
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-78818.01K, Mark 34
Mod 6 Gun Weapons System (GWS)
Modification; accomplish
PARA. NO: 2.18
PAGE NO: 2 of 4
ITEM NO: 150-90-003 (Errata #1)
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83503.04K, Superstructure Fatigue and Sensitization
Modifications (FWD); accomplish
PARA. NO: Missing reference DWG 304-
8648399
PAGE NO: Various on various work specs
ITEM NO: 150-90-006
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83503.07K, Superstructure Fatigue and Sensitization
Modifications (FWD); accomplish
PARA. NO: 2.17
PAGE NO: 2 of 5
ITEM NO: 612-11-004
TITLE: Handrail Assy replace
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 456-90-003
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-78510.01K
PARA. NO: 2.10
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 150-90-011
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83505.01K
PARA. NO: 2.16
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 150-90-015
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 11:
Reference 2.18 lists 304-8648399, CG47 Class Integrated Design Dwg for
CG64 Cableway Mod (SSRA16). The drawing includes a list of applicable
ShipAlts but ShipAlt 78818.01K is not on the list. Why is this 2.18 referenced in the work spec when there does not appear to be any work on the dwg for this ShipAlt? Please clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.18 is not part of this work item. Reference deleted by ERRATA Package # 4. To request
ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan
Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 7:
There are two references numbered 2.2. The first 2.2 is listed as 401-
8648401, which is the same dwg number as reference 2.3. The title for the first reference 2.2 is the same as the title for the second reference 2.2, so it appears that the first reference 2.2 may need to be deleted in its entirety.
Please make the appropriate correction.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.2 has been removed via
ERRATA Package # 4. Please refer to Ref 2.3 - 2.5 for Work Item
426-90-001. To request ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 10:
Reference 2.29 lists 401-8648466, CG47 Class Integrated Design Dwg for
CG64 Sonar Control (SSRA16). The drawing includes a list of applicable
ShipAlts but ShipAlt 77614.01K is not on the list. Why is 2.29 referenced in the work spec when there does not appear to be any work on the dwg for this ShipAlt? Please clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.29 is not required as part of this work item. Reference to be deleted by ERRATA 4. To request
ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan
Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 8:
Reference 2.12 lists 304-8648399, CG47 Class Integrated Design Dwg for
CG64 Cableway Mod (SSRA16). The drawing includes a list of applicable
ShipAlts on page 1/39 but ShipAlt 83503.06K is not on the list. Why is 2.12 referenced in the work spec when there does not appear to be any work on the dwg for this ShipAlt? Please clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.12 is not required as part of this work item. This reference will be deleted on ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to
Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 17:
Ref 2.20 has not been provided. Please provide.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.20 has been canceled. This reference will be deleted by ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA
Package #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and
Ted Nigro at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 15:
Ref 2.10 has not been provided, there is a Ref provided with the same drawing number 8648236, but it's not the ShipAlt drawing. Please provide correct reference
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government will provide correct drawing. To request a copy of DRAWING 8648236, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The drawing will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.6 is not required as part of this work item. Reference to be deleted by ERRATA 4. To request
ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan
Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 9:
Reference 2.6 lists 320-8648400, CG47 Class Integrated Design Dwg for
CG64 60/400HZ Power Ripout (SSRA16). The drawing includes a list of applicable ShipAlts but ShipAlt CG47-74392K is not on the list. Why is 2.6 referenced in the work spec when there does not appear to be any work on the dwg for this ShipAlt? Please clarify.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 14:
Sheets 3 & 4 of reference 2.2 (LAR00746/CG64/1274) are unreadable printed or electronically please provide readable copies.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The Government will provide a legible copy. To request a copy of LAR 00746/CG64/1274, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The LAR will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 13:
Reference 2.17 is listed as dwg 432-8648257, ShipAlt CG47-83503.07k
Misc IC Sys Mod Blk & Elem Wrg Diag. However, the drawing that was furnished with a filenmae of '8648257' is 183-8648257 Rev - ShipAlt CG47-
78818.02K MK 34 MOD6 GWS UPGRADE EOSS ADSU AFT FDN. It appears that the drawing number referenced in the work item should be 432-
8647257 REV - which has been furnished. Please make the appropriate correction to the work item spec.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.17 listed drawing is incorrect.
Correct drawing number is 432-8647257 and will be corrected on
ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA Package #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The drawing in question applies to
150-90-003, 150-90-007 and 150-90-012 and will be added to the work items by ERRATA 4. This drawing does not apply to 150-90-
016, 456-90-001 and 665-90-001. To request ERRATA Packages #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 12:
This question about DWG 304-8648399 applies to several work items. In reviewing the dwg and the block on the dwg listing the Applicable ShipAlts, there are six ShipAlts listed on the dwg that do not have the dwg listed as a reference in this work specification package. In addition to 150-90-003, 150-
90-007, 150-90-012, 150-90-016, 456-90-001, and 665-90-001 also do not list the dwg as a reference even though their ShipAlts are listed as being applicable. Please either add this drawing to the references for these work items or confirm that the work on this drawing is not to be performed for these ShipAlts.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 16:
Ref 2.16 has not been provided, there is a Ref provided with the same drawing number 8647294, but it's not the ShipAlt drawing. Please provde correct reference
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government will provide correct drawing.To request a copy of DRAWING 8647294, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The drawing will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83505.04K
PARA. NO: 2.20
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 150-90-016
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83506.07K
PARA. NO: 2.9
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 991-11-001
TITLE: Temporary Mast Staging
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 150-90-009
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83265.01K
PARA. NO: 3.1.5
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: Solicitation
TITLE: Period of Performance
PARA. NO: N/A
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 426-90-001
Title :ShipAlt CG47-78972.01K Replace MK 4
MOD 2 Electromagnetic(EM)
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 22:
For 426-90-001 - ERRATA One, there are two, 2.2 referances and for 2.3, has the same drawing number as the first 2.2 listed under 2.0, but different titles. Please clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: See Government Response to
Contractor Question # 7.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 17:
Ref 2.20 has not been provided. Please provide.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref 2.20 has been canceled. This reference will be deleted by ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA
Package #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and
Ted Nigro at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 18:
Ref 2.9 has not been provided. Please provide.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Government will provide drawing.
To request a copy of DRAWING 551-8650234, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil. The drawing will be provided via the AMRDEC SAFE website.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 19:
This item calls for Staging Mast for Ship's Force Use. This staging will be a major conflict in accomplishing item 150-90-011. Recommend rewording to Install staging when directed by the Supervisor and not to impede the performance of the scheduled work.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work item 991-11-001 will be canceled by ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA Package #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 20:
Calls for 10 linear feet of plate, confirm this is 10 sq. ft.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work item will be changed to reflect square feet by ERRATA 4. To request ERRATA Package #4 please send an email request to Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 21:
After careful review of the requirements of the Solicitation, the Contractor questions whether the existing work package can be accomplished within the solicited period of performance. The Contractor has developed an aggressive alteration-by-alteration schedule for the USS GETTYSBURG
SSRA and evaluated the practicability of executing in accordance with the schedule currently proposed. It is our assessment that despite an aggressive approach to scheduling, including potentially utilizing radical or novel approaches to achieve execution in such a manner as to reduce the duration of the required installations, we cannot generate an executable schedule that complies with the solicitation requirements. It appears the availability duration was established without due consideration of the requirement for extensive aluminum alterations / repairs which include 5xxx requirements and extensive containment considerations and their probable impact on vessel stability. Other factors affecting schedule include ingress / egress of material and manpower to/from multiple repair locations, limited work hours and the requirement to complete work 14 days in advance of the end of the period of performance. The Government's issuance of the solicitation requirements as written implies execution can be accomplished within the established period of performance. If the Government has an integrated schedule upon which it based the established period of performance, the Contractor requests that it be furnished to bidders.
Our scheduling details, approaches and detailed knowledge are proprietary and cannot be revealed in an open forum. Absent the Government furnishing its schedule for confirmation of the practicability of execution within the period of performance, we request a PRE-BID, offeror by offeror, fact-to-face meeting with Navy to facilitate dialog. This effort might extend the date for submission of bids, but we contend it would benefit all parties, most significantly the Government, as it considers the viability of various options for duration, scope, and compliance with 5xxx requirements to ensure a successful availability.
In summary, we request:
1) A copy of the Government's schedule driving the Period of Performance and/or,
2) A Pre-bid meeting to discuss technical concerns and production duration of each alteration as they relate to the overall performance of the solicited package.
3) An extension of the bid date commensurate with the time it will take to accomplish (1) and/or (2) and allow orderly preparation of a compliant proposal that is in the best interest of the Government.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
The Government has amended the requirement to complete work fourteen (14) days in advance of the Availability Completion Date.
To receive the revised Attachment J-3 Commencement &
Completion Dates and Milestones, please send an email request to
Morgan Myrick and Ted Nigro at
MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.
ITEM NO: 992-12-001
TITLE: Adverse Weather Perparation
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 665-90-001
Title :ShipAlt CG47-85640.01K Crew Physical
Fitness Center; Accomplish
PARA. NO: 2.10
PAGE NO: 2 of 4
ITEM NO: 150-11-015
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-83505.04K
PARA. NO: 2.2
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 426-90-001
TITLE: ShipAlt CG47-78972.01K
PARA. NO: 2.2
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 441-90-001
TITLE: S/A CG47-80897.01K
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 456-90-001
TITLE: S/A CG47-77614.01K
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 721-90-003
TITLE: S/A CG47-87438.01K, BL 7 PHASE
1C VLS UPGRADE; ACCOMPLISH
PARA. NO: 5.3
PAGE NO: 1
ITEM NO: 522-11-001
TITLE: BRACKET; REPLACE
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO: 1
ITEM NO: 982-31-001
TITLE: Machinery Space Production
Completion for LOA
PARA. NO: 3.1
PAGE NO:
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 31: This package has no requirement for
LOA, recommend deleting this item.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 28:
This question not only pertains to this spec but others. On dwg 8648512 there are items listed in the List of Material but has no source indicated, I=IAF, E=Existing, R=Replaced/Retain. This S/A is not listed in the 4720.
The question is who is providing this material?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 29:
Paragraph 5.3.1 calls for kitted material Ref NO. 2.17. There is no 2.17 of
W/I please advise.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 30:
W/I does not specify which bracket is being replaced. Please advise.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 26:
The first listed reference 2.2 in this item is the same reference as 2.3, recommend deleting the first 2.2 as the correct drawing title is on 2.3.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 27:
on drawings listed under the S/A 80897.01K, some items are listed with a source of I = Installing Activity Furnished. But in the 4720 for the S/A
80897.01K those same items are listed as EX_ (GFM). Which is correct
GFM or IAF? Example, drawing 523-8647771, 45 deg Elbow, Coupling and
1-1/4" od Tubing in the 4720 has these items as EXG but on the drawing they are IAF.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 24:
For 665-90-001 - ERRATA One. Drawing 320-8648391, Item No. 5 states that this controller is to be "R" relocated : Also states "R-2" retain for reinstallation : Also states "S-2" turn into nearest Naval Administrator. For estimating purposes, clarify if Contractor is to Price "NEW" controller, turn in existing controller, or relocate existing controller??
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: IAW note S-2, controller is to be removed and turned in. A LAR will be issued addressing the drawing after contract award.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 25:
Reference 2.2 was deleted by Errata One. By deleting this reference the ripout and replacement of the Port and Starboard Boat Platforms is deleted.
The remaining references support the ripout and replacement. Please review and confirm if errata one is correct.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:
Government Response is forthcoming.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 23:
Item states to "Accomplish all required preparation to secure the ship for adverse weather while secured to the pier, as designated by the Supervisor"
"Specific tasking to come via email from PM"
Without know the tasking the PM will request it's impossible to price this item as written, recommend providing Level of Effort to cover this requirment.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Specific tasking will state nothing more than to accomplish the requirements of paragraph 3.1 of the work item.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .