Attachment_07_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Material Management
Solicitation number
N00033-14-R-6507
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 07

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Q A_(Part_5).docx DOCX document
Amendment_03.docx DOCX document
QA_Part_4.docx DOCX document
Q A_Part_3.docx DOCX document
Amendment_02.docx DOCX document
Attachment_07_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Q A__Part2.docx DOCX document
Attachment_18-_MSC_Warehouse_Vehicle_Requirements.docx DOCX document
Attachment_12-Govt_Office_space_counts_and_locations_warehouse.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_07_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_-_Wage_Determinations.docx DOCX document
Attachment_03_Labor_Category_Rate_Table_by_location.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MM_RFP_Amendment_01..doc DOC document
MM_RFP_Q A.docx DOCX document
N00033-14-R-6507_RFP.doc DOC document
Attachment_12-List_of_Govt_office_space_counts_and_locations_warehouse.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_06_-_Past_Performance_Data.docx DOCX document
Attachment_03_-_Labor_Category_Rate_Table.docx DOCX document
Attachment_08_-_Personnel_Qualifications.docx DOCX document
Attachment_02_-_Non_Disclosure.docx DOCX document
Attachment_14_-__DD254_-_Warehouse_Services.pdf PDF
Attachment_11-Warehouse_Historical_workload_Metrics.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_10_-_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_-_MSC_Logistics_Software_Systems.pdf PDF
Attachment_16_-_SF_LLL.doc DOC document
Attachment_09_-_Sample_Tasks.docx DOCX document
Attachment_04_-_Performance_Metrics.docx DOCX document
Attachment_01_-_PAP.doc DOC document
Attachment_17_-_Daily_Metrics.docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_-_Wage_Determinations.docx DOCX document
Attachment_05_-_Performance_Evaluation_Survey.docx DOCX document
SYNOPSIS__MM1224.docx DOCX document
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 07

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO: FACSIMILE:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (14 APRIL 2014 @ 1000 Washington DC Time) to Ms. Britni Jones. Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Britni Jones at (202) 685-5965 Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Britni Jones
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Ms. Britni Jones

914 Charles Morris CT SE Washington Navy Yard DC 20398-5540

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Britni Jones
(Facsimile Number)(202) 685-5965
(E-mail Address)britni.jones@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .