Att_L-3_Vol_3_PPQ_Combined.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
P-8A Airframe and Engine Depot Maintenance Competition Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00019-15-R-2004
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command Naval Air Warfare Center

About this file

Section L Attachment 3

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to P-8A Airframe and Engine Depot Maintenance Competition, newest first.
File Type Posted
Att_L-7_Prime_Contractor_Cost_Summary_FFP_Amendment_10.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-5_Price_Matrix_Amendment_10_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-5_Price_Matrix_Amendment_8_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-9_Prime_Contractor_Tech_Directives_FFP_Amendment_0007.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-5_Price_Matrix_Amendment_0007.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Exhibit_N_NAVY-OY6_Part_A_CDRLs_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Exhibit_N_NAVY-OY6_Part_A_CDRLs_Amendment_05.pdf PDF
Exhibit_AB_RAAF-OY4_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_AS_FMS-OY5_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_E_NAVY-OY2_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_AU_FMS-OY6_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_C_NAVY-OY1_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_N_NAVY-OY6_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Att_L-7_Prime_Contractor_Cost_Summary_FFP_Amendment_4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_H_RAAF-OY3_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_A_NAVY-IDIQ_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_AT_FMS-OP6_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_AN_FMS-OY3_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
N00019-15-R-2004_Conform_through_amendment_0003_(1-11-17).docx DOCX document
Q_302.docx DOCX document
Q__300-301.docx DOCX document
Q_287-295_for_posting.pdf PDF
JPO_PSFD_Final_Signed_MOU.pdf PDF
N00019-15-R-2004-0003.pdf PDF
Att_L-9_Prime_Contractor_Tech_Directives_FFP_Amendment_3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-5_Price_Matrix_Amendment_3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00019-15-R-2004_Conform_through_amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Attachment_19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
USN_Engine_EGTM_Trend_Summary.pdf PDF
Q_and_A285-286_for_positng.pdf PDF
Q A_212_thru_254_1_Dec.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_AD_RAAF-OY5_Part_B_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Att_L-8_Prime_Contractor_Cost_Summary_T M_Amendment_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_P_RAAF-OY6_Part_A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Exhibit_N_NAVY-OY6_Part_A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Exhibit_G_NAVY-OY3_Part_A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
N00019-15-R-2004-0001.pdf PDF
Exhibit_AB_RAAF-OY4_Part_B_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Exhibit_E_NAVY-OY2_Part_A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Exhibit_C_NAVY-OY1_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_CFM56-7B_CSI-CAI_Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_AB_RAAF-OY4_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_H_RAAF-OY3_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_U_NAVY-OY1_Part_B_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Attachment_8_Technical_Directives.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_J_NAVY-OY4_Part_A_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_Government_Furnished_Property_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-5_Price_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att_L-4_Vol_3__PP-1_PP_Cont_Data_Combined.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 50

P-8A Airframe and Engine Depot Maintenance Competition has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L – VOLUME 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to _ Mr. Rodney Flowers, at _rodney.flowers@navy.mil_______

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor: _______________________

b. Program Title: _____________________

c. Contract Number: __________________

d. Type of Contract: ____________Percent Complete: ____________
e. Award Fee (if applicable): _________Percent of Award Fee Received: _________

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name: ________________________________________________

b. Agency: _______________________________________________

c. Position: _______________________________________________

d. Relation to Program: _____________________________________

e. Phone/Fax Number/Email Address: _________________________

f. Date Questionnaire Completed: ____________________________

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program .

a. Aircraft Modifications. _________

b. Aircraft Field Maintenance at multiple sites in support of flight operations. __________

c. Aircraft on the Ground maintenance in support flight operations. ________

d. Directed subcontracts. ___________

e. Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP). ___________

f. Aircraft Heavy Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking. ______

g. Configuration Management of Aircraft and Aircraft Components. __________

h. Aircraft Flight Operations on Military sites. ___________

i. Engineering support for Field and Heavy Maintenance Activities supporting multiple aircraft sites. ___________

j. Corporate Oversight and Management of Aviation Maintenance Programs to include use of subcontract(s) in support of aircraft operating out of multiple sites. ________

k. Supply Support for Field and Heavy Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites. _________

l. Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites. _____

m. Obtaining Customs Clearances for export/import shipment of parts and material. __________

n. Aircraft Strip and Paint _________

o. Engine Overhaul and Repair _________

p. Engineering Services ________

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

|_|Exceptional |_|Very Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

4.2.2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

4.2.3. COST PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _________

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

e. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

f. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.4 MANAGEMENT

4.2.4.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.4.2 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.2.4.3 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

4.2.4.4 Small Business Utilization

If this contract contains a small business subcontracting goal, assess compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to Small Business participation (including FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (when required). Assess any small business participation goals which are stated separately in the contract Assess achievement on each individual goal stated within the contract or subcontracting plan including good faith effort if the goal was not achieved. Check one of the boxes below, noting however when applying the rating definitions for this assessment equate “small business goals” to requirements.

4.2.4.5 Overall Management Assessment

Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated____________________.

4.2.5. OTHER. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

4.3 SUMMARY: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), 1) definitely would not, 2) probably would not, 3) might, 4) might not, 5) probably would, 6) definitely would award this contract to this contractor, given the choice? Please explain.

Signature _____________________________________________ Date _____________ Please note that electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signator completed this form and agrees with the information contained within it.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .