Q A_212_thru_254_1_Dec.docx

In Att L-9, the Contractor is required to provide a price for both the original version of the service bulletin CFM56-7B-SB-72-0929 (SLIN X082AH) & Rev 2 of the same service bulletin CFM56-7B-SB-72-0929-R02 (SLIN X082BC). This SB replaces the HPT Rotor Disk which is a Life Limited Part.

Does the government want prices for both the original version of the SB as well as revision 2?

Is the contractor expected to include the price of the Life Limited part (2410M49P02) as part of the Service Bulletin or is the LLP to be purchased under the LLP CLINs (X062, X075, X090)?

Price should be for CFM56-7B-SB-0929-R02 only. The replacement of the HPT Rotor Disk at the schedule time interval. The LLP is to be purchased under the LLP CLINs X026, X075 or X090.

SLIN X082AH has been updated in amendment 01to contain the CFM56-7B-SB-0929-R02 service bulletin information. SLIN X082BC has been removed in amendment 01as it is now a duplicate of updated SLIN X082AH.

Engine service bulletins SLINs X082XX work location "Concurrent with AEPD" has been changed to "Concurrent with Engine Induction for Repair" In amendment 01.

Attachment L-9, SLIN X082AH & X082BC Summary tab and all option Tabs

And

CFM56-7B-SB-72-0929

The Formula for the services is in error (see Cell B21):

Current Formula =INDEX(Summary!$C$3:$C$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT($A11,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0)) However it should be:

=INDEX(Summary!$C$3:$C$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT($A21,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0))

The formula for Hours per CLIN is in error (see Cell G21):

Current Formula =INDEX(Summary!$L$3:$L$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A11,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0)) However it should be:

=INDEX(Summary!$L$3:$L$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A21,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0))

The formula for Material per CLIN is also in error (see Cell L21):

Current Formula =INDEX(Summary!$S$3:$S$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A11,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0)) However it should be:

=INDEX(Summary!$S$3:$S$42,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A21,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$42,0))

Will the US Navy Update Spreadsheet L-8?

Attachment L-8 has been updated in amendment 01with the corrected formulas for CLIN 1061 on the Option Period 1 tab.

CLIN 1061 in Attachment L-8 has been corrected to reflect Engine Minimum Workscope (MRO) in amendment 01.

The formula for Hours per CLIN has been corrected in amendment 01.

The formula for Material per CLIN has been corrected in amendment 01.

Attachment L-8 Option Period 1

Option Period 1 Tab

(CLIN 1016)

Attachment L-8 does not list CLIN X012 on its summary or each option tab. As a result there are no values to plug into Attachment L-5 for CLIN X012. CLIN X014, however, has hours & material dollars in attachment L-8 to be used for evaluation purposes.

Is the US Navy going to update Attachment L-8 to include evaluation values for CLIN X012?

CLIN X012 will be used for Technical Directives and Service bulletins that are not priced out in Attachment L-9 (i.e. a technical directive is added). In the case of a technical directive being added that was not defined and priced, CLIN X012 will be charged. CLIN X014 is for Over and Above work associated with CLIN X013 (FFP Technical Directives, Modifications, and Retrofit).

X012 has been added to Attachment L-8 in amendment 01.

Attachment L-5 & Attachment L-8

Summary tab and all option Tabs

(CLIN X012 & CLIN X014)

On Option Period 6 Tab CLIN 6061 Minor Workscope (MRO) is listed twice (once on Row 35, second time on Row 44

Will the US Navy Update Spreadsheet L-5?

Option Period 6 Tab

Cell A35 – Current Value 3000 – Should be 3100 Cell A36 – Current Value 3002 – Should be 3102 Cell A37 – Current Value 3004 – Should be 3104 Cell A38 – Current Value 3005 – Should be 3105 Cell A39 – Current Value 3006 – Should be 3106

Will the US Navy Update Spreadsheet L-8?

Option Period 3 Tab

A subsequent synopsis change on 6 Oct. at FBO.gov stated that the submittal date was changed to 9 Jan. 2017, but Amendment 0001 did not include this change. Is the official due date for proposals changed to 9 Jan.2017?

What is to be submitted four weeks prior to the final submittal is only the preliminary Tables PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data) and Tables ES-1 (Offeror's Summary) and ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary). There may be several Tables PP-1 submitted.

The complete Volume 3 Past Performance and Volume 1 Executive Summary will be submitted January 9, 2017 and will include the final version of the subject tables.

Section I, Section L Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

This reference paragraph states that, ""The AEPD requirement includes, but is not limited to:

(1) A thorough and comprehensive inspection of selected aircraft structure and flight critical components by visual and appropriate Non-Destructive Inspection (NDI) methods with repair as required to ensure the serviceability of the affected structure until the next sequential Depot induction."" "

The NDI requirements come from Damage Tolerance Analysis. At this time the scheduled tasks that will be require NDI (or supplemental inspections) are still in development.

A place holder in Appendix C of the AEPD specification. Tasks will be added in the next update to the Spec.

All NDI new requirements will be performed under the O&A T&M CLINs until incorporated into SPEC

P-8A Integrated Maintenance Program Depot Specification Rev A, 30 October 2106

""Non-destructive inspections or tests shall be performed IAW P-8A NDI Manual or as directed by the FST. Personnel performing nondestructive inspections shall be qualified and certified in the applicable methods.""

Would the Government please clarify the basic NDI requirements for AEPD tasks and the intervals (flight hours, cycles, or calendar time) of those tasks?”

The basic NDI requirements include High Frequency Eddie Current, Low Frequency Eddie Current and Ultrasonic Testing.

The analysis in on going and will identify the intervals for each Task

All NDI new requirements will be performed under the O&A T&M CLINs until incorporated into SPEC

P-8A Integrated Maintenance Program Depot Specification Rev A, 30 October 2107

This component is not installed on the CFM 65-7B engine and should not be included in the list of SB’s for the engine MRO.

Recommend deleting this Service bulletin.

The Government concurs with deleting Honeywell-SB-49-7032 SLIN X082BB.

SLIN X082BB will be removed from Attachment L-9. Attachment will be updated in Amendment Two of solicitation.

Attachment L-9 Summary tab and all option Tabs

=INDEX(Summary!$S$3:$S$43,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A11,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$43,0))

It should be as follows: =INDEX(Summary!$S$3:$S$43,MATCH("X"&RIGHT(A21,3),Summary!$A$3:$A$43,0))

CLIN 1061 - The formula on “Option Period 1” Cell N22 has the following formula:

=H12+M12 It should be as follows:

=H22 + M22

Option Period 1 TAB

Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number N00019-15-R-2004. The submission date for all volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation. However it is requested that one hard copy and one electronic copy on a CD-ROM of Volume 3 Past Performance, Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data); as well as Volume 1 Executive Summary, Table ES-1 (Offeror’s Summary); and Volume 1 Executive Summary, Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary) be submitted four weeks prior to the submission date/time specified on Standard Form 33.

Can NAVAIR please verify when the due date and hour for the executive summary and the past performance as this is now unclear to the contractor.

The Government is requesting Tables PP-1, ES-1, and ES-2 to be submitted 4 weeks early (12 December 2016).

SF30/ SF33

Can NAVAIR please verify if the true submittal date is January 9th, 2017 and what form this is referenced on?

Yes the official Due date is changed to 9 Jan. 2017. This will be updated in the upcoming amendment.

SF33/SF30

a. P-8A Illustrated Parts Catalogue (No data contained within folder on the CD)

b. P-8A Structural Repair Manual (No data contained within folder on the CD)

c. LPS/JX Organic Coatings (No data contained within the folder on the CD)

d. Does NAVAIR have a specific Task Card for Strip and Paint of P-8A

NAVAIR has provided the missing data via AMRDEC.

Technical Data CD

Workscope 3.5.1 calls for SB categories 1-6.

CLIN 82 calls for accomplishment of SERVICE BULLETIN 72-0863.

SERVICE BULLETIN 72-0863 is defined as category 7.

This is just an example there are other category 7 SBs.

There appears to be a contradiction here.

Should we include the price of the SB in the pricing of the CLIN contradicting the Workscope?

Anything above a Category 6 SB are customer convenience/option items and are funded on a case by case basis.

The Contractor should provide FFP pricing under CLIN 0082.

Anything above a Category 6 SB will be determined for incorporation prior to induction of the Engine.

SOW Paragraph 3.5.1 and Service Bulletin 72-0863

These are not posted to the solicitation on FBO.gov

What takes precedence? The solicitation document that states 21 December? Or, the FEDBIZOPS webpage that states 9 January 2017?

What is to be submitted four weeks prior to the final submittal is only the preliminary Tables PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data) and Tables ES-1 (Offeror's Summary) and ES-2 (Relevant Contract Summary). There may be several Tables PP-1 submitted.

The complete Volume 3 Past Performance and Volume 1 Executive Summary will be submitted January 9, 2017 and will include the final version of the subject tables.

The Government is requesting Tables PP-1, ES-1, and ES-2 to be submitted 4 weeks early (12 December 2016). The complete Volume 1 Executive Summary and Volume 3 Past Performance shall be submitted on 9 January 2017 and shall include any updates to Tables PP-1, ES-1, and ES-2.

Section L

Question: when work is not performed on P-8A when within a secure perimeter, which is within a TSA controlled hangar under 49 CFR part 1542 and meets the requirements of the 49 CFR part 1554 Aircraft Repair Station Security rule, can the control point be closed and locked and thereby eliminating the need for persons to be staffed at the control point?

Will the Navy grant a waiver to the Small Business requirements of paragraph 2.2.8 for work being done100% OCONUS?

The Navy will not grant a waiver for a Small Business Strategy.

A SB Subcontracting Plan is not required for 100% of the work being done OCONUS, all contractors are required to submit a Small Business Strategy.

Under the FAA/Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) bi-lateral agreement, TCCA CAR 573 Approved Maintenance Organization is an acceptable equivalent to 14 CFR Part 145. Will the Government confirm that it will accept a recognized equivalent?

Yes the FAA/Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) bi-lateral agreement is equivalent and meets the intent of the FAA Advisory Circular AC 43-10C

The Model Contract: Provide a separately bound hard-copy Model Contract and a digital version on a separate disk from the proposal volumes in both PDF and MS file formats. Ensure that the Model Contract includes:

(1) The original signed SF33 for the basic solicitation and each amendment (as applicable) (including sections B-K)

(2) Signed Representations, Certifications, and Acknowledgements or Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) reference;

(3) Section B with proposed pricing;

(4) Section F with delivery dates filled in; and

(5) Section H (including any other proposed clauses).

(6) Subcontracting Plan

Question: Shall offerors include each page of the original solicitation as well as each page of each amendment? Please clarify.

Signed SF30 and SF33s only final proposal documents

151. "Reference: Airframe SOW Para 4.3 - Flap Track Attach fittings.

Question(s):

A. What document is driving the accomplishment of this requirement (TC, SB, etc.)?

B. How will this requirement be tracked for configuration management?

C. Is this requirement for all aircraft entering AEPD?"

A) The driving document is the BULLETIN SUPPORTING DOCUMENT (BSD) FOR P-8 SERVICE LIFE BULLETIN (SLB) NR-001, AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL LIFE LIMITS FOR FLIGHT HOURS AND LANDINGS.

B) Tracking will be accomplished via OOMA and SRC.

C) The requirement is landing based and may not coincide with a every DEPOT event."

The reference document is not required for proposal submittal and is located in the task card

It appears that there is a mismatch between the quantities of aircraft in the CLINS as compared to the quantity of aircraft in the induction schedule.

Gov’t review indicates that the CLIN quantities and the quantities induction schedule are the same. Please cite the specific discrepancy if it is perceived that a disagreement still exists.

Question 166 Will the Government provide the P-8 Layout of Passenger or Equipment Accommodation diagram?

Yes. The this information is in the P8 maintenance manuals and will be provided with the Technical Data CD referenced in the RFP

This was provided in the CD as a .zip under the AMM part I and part II chapter 25.