IO Eval Criteria GTMO WDTF.docx

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Past Performance

(2) Technical Approach

(3) Master Schedule

(4) Team Qualifications

(5) Risk Assessments

(6) Commodities

Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

FACTOR 1: Past Performance Submission Requirement: Page Limit – 12 Pages: Submit completed Past Performance Questionnaires from at least 3 customers demonstrating past performance completed within the past 3 years.

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate how well the contractor performed on these contracts (See Past Performance Relevancy Ratings and Rating and Performance Confidence Assessments below). The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the Offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include, but are not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases; telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, and Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability. The Government may also contact the POC’s identified in Factor 1 to obtain Past Performance Information.

FACTOR 2: Technical Approach Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 8 pages.

Continued Operations. Based on the schedule constraints outlined in the SOW-Requirements Document, communicate how you would ensure continued operations of the facility during the project. Provide a graphic representation of how you plan to approach phasing.

Labor hours. Based on the schedule constraints outlines in the SOW-Requirements Document, communicate how all key personnel hours are determined and how the key personnel will accomplish the requirements in accordance with the SOW

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent it demonstrates the Offeror’s understanding of:

Maintaining operations during the project with minimal impact on patients/staff as well as meet the schedule and phasing constraints outlined in the SOW. Note: Less impact to staff and patients is considered a better approach; the fewer number of departmental moves, phases and disruption is considered a better value to the government. The plan will be evaluated against the schedule constraints outlined in the SOW.

FACTOR 3: Master Schedule Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 8 Pages.

Submit a narrative and graphic describing the Offeror’s proposed schedule.

1) Narrative. In narrative form, communicate how the Offeror will address all phases identified in the Schedule Graphic. Address how the Offeror will manage the schedule constraints outlined in the SOW-Requirements Document to minimize impact on facility operations.

2) Schedule Graphic. Submit a schedule graphic showing the total project duration (i.e., bar chart) and identify key activities. Include:

a. Initial Outfitting & Transition. Include the schedule constraints and key milestones outlined in the SOW-Requirements Document, include activity milestones and durations related to:

1) Personal Property Submittals

2) Transition Submittals

3) Schedule Constraints: Personal Property to include procurement, inspections, acceptance, and warranty.

4) Schedule Constraints: Transition to include inspections and acceptance.

5) Procurement of long lead Personal Property (PP) items.

6) Initial outfitting and transition with clearly defined transition periods (to include interim moves) for each phase.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it communicates and illustrates a logical and efficient total project scheduling approach in the detail needed so evaluators can evaluate Offeror’s schedule approach. Communicates required tasks, activities, deliverables, and submittals and within the schedule and operational constraints outlined in the SOW. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the outfitting and transition deliverables and activities, and project phasing requirements (including continued operations), to include inspections and acceptance.

FACTOR 4: Team Qualifications Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 16 pages.

Submit personnel experience information for key personnel listed in the SOW. The Contractor shall provide project names, dates, and government point of contract information (name, organization, email address, and phone number) for verification of experience. Personnel experience information should detail the roles and responsibilities of the personnel for each project.

Provide the qualifications of the following personnel.

1) Project Manager

2) Transition Planner

3) Equipment Planner

4) Interior Designer

5) Biomedical Equipment Technician

6) Public Relations Specialist

7) Communications Engineer

8) Cybersecurity consultant

Evaluation Criteria: Personnel will be evaluated to determine if they meet the qualifications found in the SOW-Requirements Document. The more qualifications personnel meet in the SOW-Requirements Document the more the government considers it a better value to the Government.

FACTOR 5: Risk Assessments Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 6 Pages.

Submit a list of risks specifically associated with this project. Identify the degree of risk, possible impact of the risk on project (schedule, cost, safety etc.), whether it’s within or outside the Offeror’s control, and a plan to mitigate the risk(s). Note: The successful Offeror will be required to use this table to build the Weekly Report, Risk Tab.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates the ability to:

1) Identify and mitigate risk(s)

2) Establish a degree of risk, that may impact mission, safety, quality, schedule, and cost, and

3) Identify whether risk(s) is/are within the Offeror’s control

4) Manage the impact on staff, patients, and operations as it relates to transition and occupant/FFE-LVS moves

FACTOR 6: Commodity Specifications Submission Requirements: No page limit. Submit a cut sheet or detailed product specifications for every proposed commodity (furniture, furnishings, equipment and low voltage systems) described in the Bid Schedule. Cut Sheets or product specifications must be highly specific and detail all options/accessories that will be provided.

Provide manufacturer, model, warranty information, size/capacity, and sustainability and efficiency features for all commodities proposed. Provide this information in tabular form supported by catalog data and any other applicable information. Include all options and accessories reflected in the price proposal. Note: PP=Personal Property.

Evaluation Criteria: The quote will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed commodities meets the criteria set forth in the SOW. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed material solutions and how these solutions contribute to sustainability objectives. The Government will also evaluate whether the proposed materials meet or exceed the requirements found in the SOW-Requirements Document.

PRICE

Submission Requirement: The Offeror shall submit pricing for this requirement on the attached bid schedule.

Evaluation Method: Price will be evaluated to determine if the price submitted by the Offeror is fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(c). (Cost Analysis)