Atch_2_PWS_TO_1_27_Mar_18.pdf

HTC711-18-R-D007

Attachment 2

Performance Work Statement Task Order 1

Limited Scope Traffic Engineering Services and Analysis 27 March 2018

1. OBJECTIVE

This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the specific tasks to be performed under the Limited Scope Traffic Engineering Services and Analysis task order under the Surface Deployment and Distribution Command’s Transportation Engineering Agency (SDDCTEA) Traffic Engineering Services Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.

2. SCOPE OF WORK

The Contractor shall provide Traffic Engineering Services to SDDCTEA supporting Traffic Engineering Branch requirements in accordance with the details and specifications outlined herein. Throughout these contract documents and through the life of this contract the work under these tasks will frequently be referred to as “quick study(ies)”.

3. Specific Task: Task 1 - Limited scope Traffic Engineering Services and Analysis (Quick Study)

The Contractor shall provide on-call traffic engineering services and/or analysis support.

The Contractor will be expected to deliver, as requested, services supporting SDDCTEA Traffic Engineering work. The work under this task order varies based upon customer demand. The intent of this task order is to provide SDDCTEA with a quick response, rapid action support to in-house traffic engineering staff. Work under this task order may include, site visit(s), briefings, surveys, safety reviews, analyses, data collection, professional recommendations and development of a study report with Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) exhibits. This task requires responsiveness to Agency needs that arise from high priority issues. These projects require a 5 day response time as per the Deliverables Table below. Examples of historical work previously conducted under this task are documented in Attachment A. These samples indicate the historical level of effort in man-hours for those services. Areas of expertise necessary to deliver services under this task order include:

• Traffic Data Collection; Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) and manual

• Entry Control Facility recommendations

• Installation technical support

• Traffic safety assessments

• Intersection and network capacity analysis

• Traffic Calming

• Localized Traffic Impact Study

• Master Plan review/assistance

• Traffic signing recommendations

• Guardrail warrant analysis

• Traffic Signal warrant analysis

• Pedestrian Studies

• Parking Studies

• Conceptual CADD based geometric details and concepts

• Plan reviews of DOD installation projects to include entry gate designs, signing and pavement marking plans, traffic signal designs, safety improvement projects, roadway design, traffic control plans, roadway lighting, and force protection and security designs. Data provided in support of the project may also be analyzed and/or reviewed. This may include traffic impact studies, design calculations, master planning studies, speed studies, and force protection guidelines.

• Provide traffic engineering guidance on an as-needed basis to DOD installations as requested by SDDCTEA. Telephone, email and written guidance shall be provided in the general areas of traffic operations and traffic control devices, force protection as it relates to the control of traffic, entry gate design parameters, roadway lighting, and safety.

• Interaction/collaboration through meetings and correspondence with DOD agencies, state departments of transportation, federal agencies, or local municipal Government officials. As requirements are developed, the Contractor will be provided contact information depending upon the installation/facility/entity requesting service. The Contractor will complete meeting minutes which document attendees, date/time, location, discussion points, and action items.

• Development of traffic engineering materials to support SDDCTEA’s Traffic Engineering Seminar/Workshop.

Full detailed requirements will be provided as the requirement develops. Task 1 services and support that have been provided under this type of task order are described below. The following services and support are examples of work provided within the study.

• Coordinate with the installation Point-of-Contact (POC) to schedule and conduct an on-site in-brief, with installation stakeholders, to review the scope of work, obtain necessary approvals and discuss data collection activities and outcomes.

• Calculate future traffic demand projections utilizing Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation analysis, and independent forecasting based on known Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), Grow the Army, and/or other known re-stationing. All stationing information shall be obtained through interview with the installation POC and through independent research. The traffic forecast design year shall be full build out year of all known improvements. POC vary and will be provided as requirements develop.

• Calculate, for Entry Control Facilities, the new lane requirements based on SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-15 and UFC 4-022-01, The Army Standard (AS) for Access Control Points (ACPs), and all other applicable service related requirements, latest versions. Contractor may utilize the SMART Decision Evaluator software (available on SDDCTEA’s website or upon request from COR) to assist in identifying the existing, short-term, and long-term impacts of security, manpower, automation, and traffic.

• For studies involving ECFs, interview the installation force protection and ID check personnel to query additional information concerning the current operations of internal and external access control points. Contact information varies and will be provided upon request for service.

• Provide conceptual scaled drawings of recommendations for new and modified ECFs.

When applicable (sight distance triangle requirements, geometric adjustments, striping adjustments, design vehicle accommodations, sidewalks, etc.), provide conceptual scaled drawings of recommendations for intersections and/or roadways that are included as part of this study. This shall include all geometric data used in the roadway alignment, recommended lane configuration, active & passive vehicle barrier placement, striping, signing, environmental constraints, and a statement of feasibility of design. (This is intended to be 11” x 17” foldouts graphically identifying all recommendations - prepared in color to scale with MicroStation CAD software, and overlaid onto an aerial photograph).

• Traffic and speed data collection, both manually and with automatic data collectors, shall be collected on a 15-minute period basis.

• Provide existing and future intersection capacity and network analysis utilizing HCS or SYNCHRO, traffic capacity software. Provide a summary of results and recommendations based on Level of Service (LOS), with consideration of traffic flow and safety. Intersection summary shall include discussion of lane group LOS as well as intersection LOS. Analysis shall include queuing analysis for all intersection lane groups to identify congestion.

• Traffic Safety Assessments shall address the following items:

o Traffic control o Lane configuration o Signing o Striping o Design vehicle accommodation o Operational concerns o Roadside hazards o Improper traffic control devices o Bicycle and pedestrian access o Analysis of most recent five years of crash data, if available o Any potential hazardous issue relevant to traffic

• Develop recommendations which will address fully compliant facility; immediate health or safety issues; existing traffic issues; and any recommendations which will maximize use of existing facility with minimal construction/reconstruction.

• Provide construction and preliminary engineering cost estimates for all recommendations.

• Provide a photographic record of all deficiencies and recommendations, where applicable.

• Perform desktop analysis of specific safety or traffic engineering related roadway issues based on information and data provided by others.

3.1 All studies/work requirements will require the submittal of:

3.1.1 Schedule: Contractor shall prepare a schedule outlining dates for field work. The schedule shall be delivered to the COR no later than five (5) working days after the notification by the TEA Traffic Engineer of the work requirement.

3.1.2 Notification: Contractor shall notify COR and Installation POC no later than seven working days after the notification by the TEA Traffic Engineer of the work requirement. Contractor shall notify COR prior to departure.

3.1.3 Draft Report: Contractor shall provide COR, assigned TEA Traffic

Engineer and Installation POC a draft report within 3 weeks (21 calendar days) of completion of field work. All personnel will be allowed 7 working days to provide comments. Contractor shall have 7 working days after receipt of all comments to address comments to the satisfaction of the

COR.

3.1.4 Final Report: Contractor shall provide Final Report to COR, assigned

TEA Traffic Engineer and Installation POC within 7 working days of receipt of all TEA Traffic Engineer comments.

3.1.5 Monthly Reports: Contractor shall provide monthly reports, NLT the 5th of each month. These reports shall include brief synopsis efforts completed;

labor hours, ODC, and travel used for each work requirement over the previous month and cumulatively; ratio of labor hours used over previous month relative to anticipated use of labor hours for that work requirement over the past month; anticipated labor hours to complete work requirement; summary of remaining labor hours, ODC, and travel;

anticipated work activities for next two months; and summary of expenses. The final report is due on the last day of the task order.

4. DELIVERABLES

4.1 All products, studies and analysis that are developed or provided under this PWS are the sole property of the Government. The contractor shall not use, disclose, transfer, convert, or otherwise appropriate any technical data, processes, studies, or engineering analysis developed during performance of this PWS, unless written permission from the Contracting Officer is obtained. IAW DFARS 252.227-7013 and DFARS 252.227-7014, the Government obtains under this contract "unlimited rights" to all non-commercial computer software, software source code, computer software documentation, enhancements, technical data, and similar non-commercial data developed exclusively at Government expense and delivered to the Government under this contract. "Unlimited rights" means rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display or disclose in whole or in part, in any manner and for any purpose whatsoever, and to have the ability to authorize others to do so. If any technical data or computer software applicable herein is changed (e.g. updated software, maintenance patches, version changes, new releases, substitutions) incident to this contract or in the exercise of any option associated with this contract, the Contractor shall deliver them with “unlimited rights” and those rights shall be at no cost to the Government.

4.2 All deliverables shall be made electronically via email to the COR. If a delivery is submitted via email and the size or the firewall prevents its delivery, the Contractor shall provide a Secure File Transfer Protocol site that allows the Government to download the deliverable. If a site is not available or not feasible, the Government will make one available to the Contractor. In case no sites are available, the Contractor shall deliver via compact disk / digital videodisk (CD/DVD). The CD/DVD must be properly labeled to identify the content to include classification, version number, and date.

4.3 Inspection and Acceptance. A deliverable is a specific measureable, tangible, and verifiable activity, outcome, result, item, or product that the Contractor shall provide and that will require formal Government acceptance and approval. The Government will review, assess, and provide comment, as required.

Final inspection and acceptance of all work performed, reports, or other deliverables shall be performed at the place of delivery. The COR will notify the Contractor of deliverable acceptance or provide comments in writing.

TASK 1 – LIMITED SCOPE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES AND

ANALYSIS (Quick Study)

Asserted Rights

Deliverable Delivery Schedule # Copies & **Medium/Format

PWS

Paragraph

Schedule

5 working days after notification by TEA Project Engineer of the work requirement

One (1) & E-mail 3.1.1

Unlimited

Notification

7 working days after notification by TEA Project Engineer of the work requirement

One (1) & Email 3.1.2

Unlimited

Draft Report

-Submit Draft Report w/in 21 calendar days from date of field work

-Contractor shall sufficiently address all comments within

7 working days

One (1) each & Email 3.1.3

Unlimited

Final Report

7 working days for transmittal of final report.

One (1) each & email in PDF format ***

3.1.4

Monthly Report

Monthly (NLT 5th of each month)

Electronic Format (Contractors Preference file type) 3.1.5

*Higher HQ agency for submittal to be determined in coordination with SDDCTEA.

** File naming convention for electronic submittals shall have the following format:

Installation Name, State_Final/Draft Study Type_YYYYMMDD (Example: Vance AFB, OK Final Parking and Safety Study_20120730) *** In the event file size is larger than email systems can handle AMRDEC shall be sued for file transfer.

Historical information on Quick Studies is provided in Appendix A.

5. SERVICE DELIVERY SUMMARY

The Service Delivery Summary (SDS) represents the most important contract objectives that, when met, will ensure contract performance is satisfactory. Although not all PWS requirements are listed in the SDS, the Contractor is fully expected to comply with all requirements in the PWS.

Contract Deliverables PWS Paragraph Performance Threshold Draft and Final Reports completed in an accurate and timely manner

3.1.3 & 3.1.4 No more than one late delivery and no more than five days late. No more than two sets of corrections/edits on final report with all corrections accomplished or addressed within five days of notice.

6. GENERAL INFORMATION

6.1 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE. The primary place of performance shall be the

Contractor’s facility. This task may require travel to military installations worldwide.

6.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE. The period of performance for this contract is:

Base: 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019 Option 1: 1 October 2019 to 30 September 2020 Option 2: 1 October 2020 to 30 September 2021 Option 3: 1 October 2021 to 30 September 2022 Option 4: 1 October 2022 to 30 September 2023

ATTACHMENT A: HISTORICAL SUMMARY of PREVIOUSLY DELIVERED

SERVICES

The following are previously delivered services under this type of task order. They are provided herein to assist the Contractor in understanding the requirements of this performance work statement. Labor hours includes travel time. The workload estimate for this requirement is 1200 hours.

FY 2017

Italy – Traffic Counts, 316 Labor Hours

• Nine intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMCs)

• Six roadway section counts

Massachusetts – Intersection (1) Study, 28 Labor Hours

• Desktop analysis

• Capacity analysis

• Intersection drawings

• Develop report

California– Sign Inventory, 58 Labor Hours

• Collect data for 391 signs.

South Carolina – Intersection Study, 95 Labor Hours

• One intersection TMC

• Two roadway sections

• Speed assessment

• Traffic Safety Assessment

• Capacity Analysis

• Conceptual drawings

• Cost Estimates

Colorado – Intersection Study, 110 Labor Hours

• Three intersection TMCs

• Traffic Safety Assessment

• Capacity Analysis

• Conceptual drawings

California – Pedestrian Study, 177 Labor Hours

• Four intersection TMCs

• Traffic Safety Assessment

• Pedestrian counts and safety assessment

• Speed assessment

• Conceptual drawings

• Cost Estimates

• Capacity assessment

South Carolina– Traffic Impact Study, 102 Labor Hours

• Cost Estimates

• Capacity assessment

• Road closure assessment and traffic re-distribution

California – Traffic Assessment, 206 Labor Hours

• High level assessment of bike routes and safety

• Traffic Safety Assessment for eight intersections

• Conceptual drawings

• Cost Estimates

• Capacity assessment

FY 2016

New York – Entry Control Facilities (ECF) Study, 164 Labor Hours

• Two ECFs

• Four intersection TMCs

• Existing and future capacity analysis

• Pedestrian Assessment

• Visitor Control Center (VCC) sizing

• Traffic Safety Assessment

• Develop Report

Connecticut – ECF Relocation Study, 140 Labor Hours

• One ECF

• Three intersection TMCs

• Existing and future capacity analysis

• VCC sizing

• Cost estimates

• ECF CADD concepts

Spain – Traffic Counts, 200 Labor Hours

• Three ECFs

• Four Intersection TMCs

Arizona– ECF Study, 240 Labor Hours

• Two ECFs

• Seven intersection TMCs

• Existing and future capacity analysis

• VCC sizing

• Origin and Destination study

• Cost estimates

• ECF CADD concepts

Alabama – Traffic Counts, 112 Labor Hours

• Five ECFs – two week counts

Virginia – ECF Study, 152 Labor Hours

• One ECF

• Existing and future capacity analysis

• VCC sizing and commercial vehicle assessment

• Traffic Safety Assessment

• Cost estimates

• ECF concepts

Georgia – Traffic Counts, 71 Labor Hours

• Four ECFs – two week counts