Atch_2_HTC711-18-R-D007_Ques_Ans.pdf
PDF 252 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
- Solicitation number
- HTC711-18-R-D007
About this file
Atch Two, Ques Ans Reply
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch_1_HTC711_18_R_D007_Amendment_0002__6_Jul_18.pdf | ||
| HTC711-18-R-D007_SDDC_TEA_Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| HTC711-18-R-D007_SDDC_TEA_Amendment_0001_signed.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_Amendment_0001_HTC711-18-R-D007_TEA_Synp.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_PWS_TO_1_27_Mar_18.pdf | ||
| Atch_11_TO_2_Staffing_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch_14_TEA_PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_9_TEA_RFP_Info_Sheet_22_May_18.docx | DOCX document | |
| HTC711_18_R_D007_TEA__Final.pdf | ||
| Atch_4_PWS_TO_3_27_Mar_18_(SAMPLE_ONLY).pdf | ||
| Atch_1_PWS_IDIQ_5_APR_18.pdf | ||
| Atch_6_QASP_TO_2.pdf | ||
| Atch_13_TEA_PP_Ref_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_8_-_IDIQ_Labor_Categories_&_Rates.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Atch_3_PWS_TO_2_27_Mar_18.pdf | ||
| Atch_7_Labor_Cat_Requirements.pdf | ||
| Atch_12_TO_3_Staffing_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch_10_TO_1_Staffing_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch_5_QASP_TO_1.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS (TEA)
HTC711-18-R-D007
QUESTION AND ANSWER
1. Can you confirm if the Past Performance Questionnaire (attachment 14) will be counted towards the page limit?
a. No, past performance questionnaires (PPQ) will not be counted against the page limit. They are sent directly to AQ office from POC providing performance information.
2. Attachment 8 provides space for both Government Site rates and Contractor Site rates. The Performance Work Statements do not seem to require on-site staffing/service. Therefore, are Government Site rates necessary?
a. Yes, please provide both Government and Contractor site rates. This will ensure both rates have been evaluated prior to any future requirements for Government site work.
3. The first paragraph on Page 6 of the RFP indicates that for Task Order 0003 “In the event of a discrepancy in the comparison of the staffing matrix (labor categories and hours) to the Price Proposal, the Price Proposal shall be considered to represent the offeror’s intent”. However, the first paragraph of Page 9 of the RFP says, “Pricing for
Sample Task Order 0003 will not be submitted.” Please clarify.
a. Pricing for Sample Task Order 0003 is not required. We will issue an amendment to revise verbiage.
4. Is it correct to assume that small business subcontracting is not required as part of this contract?
a. That is correct, small business subcontracting is not required.
5. Per Provision 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (a) and (b), we are to include solicitation cover sheet SF 1449) with our submittal. SF 1449 was not included in the RFP documents. Do we need to include with our submittal?
a. SF 1449 is not required, please submit coversheet as discussed in para 5.A.1 “Cover
Letter” discussed in the solicitation on page 3.
6. Is there an incumbent for this RFP, TEA, IDIQ?
a. Yes, Gannet Fleming, HTC711-15-D-D002
7. Does the fact that we are an SDVOSB matter in the decision making process?
a. This is a full and open solicitation all responsible offerors will be considered.
File details come from the government source that posted it.