Atch_14_TEA_PPQ.docx

HTC711-18-R-D007

Atch 14 Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101, 3.104 & 42.1503 For Official Use Only

Past Performance Questionnaire

USTRANSCOM

HTC711-18-R-D007

TRAFFICE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS (TEA)

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings should include comments for any area rated Exceptional or lower than Satisfactory. Rating definitions are provided on the last page. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, in PDF format, via e-mail to both of the individuals below. Please complete and submit no later than 12:00 p.m. Central Time 16 July 2018.

E-mail : crystal.s.amos.civ@mail.mil

NOTE: CPARS may be reviewed for the contractors in addition to the responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Dollar value:

Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:

Position/Title:

Business Address:

Relation to Program:

Phone: (DSN)_____________________________(Commercial)__________________________________

FAX: (DSN) _____________________________(Commercial) __________________________________

Other suggested points of contact:

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

Please note that if your responses indicate a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages.

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without government intervention?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:

b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

REMARKS:

c. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other ) to meet varying workloads?

REMARKS:

d. How would you rate the contractor’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?

REMARKS:

2. Technical

a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach and ability to meet the Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work requirements?

REMARKS:

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

REMARKS:

c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work requirements?

REMARKS:

d. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and, if so, to what extent?

Yes _____ No _______

REMARKS:

3. Cost Control

a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls? Yes _____ No _______

REMARKS:

4. Key Areas

a. Knowledge and experience in performing traffic engineering studies.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

REMARKS:

b. Knowledge and experience of traffic engineering software and tools, i.e. Highway Capacity Software or Synchro (HCM based); Microstation CAD software; ESRI, ARCGIS or GIS application; and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) based travel demand modeling, traffic projections and trip generation.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

REMARKS:

c. Knowledge and experience with civil sector transportation guidelines, standards, and procedures from American Association of State Highway Transportation Office (AASHTO), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); State Departments of Transportation and ITE.

REMARKS:

d. Knowledge and experience with operation, design and threat analysis of entry control facilities or access control points for military installations; application of DoD and Service oriented traffic control and entry/access control facilities standards/guidelines/publications (i.e. UFC, AR, AFMAN, OPNAVINST, MCO and SDDCTEA tools and publications); and antiterrorism and force protection guidelines and standards.

REMARKS:

5. Contractor’s Overall Performance

REMARKS:

6. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes ___________ No__________

If “No”, why?

Any additional comments:

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In