Past_Performance_Survey.doc
DOC document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HVAC plus Other mechanical maintenances
- Solicitation number
- HSCG84-14-R-QAU000
About this file
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_6_Schedule_B.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amendment_6.pdf | ||
| Amendment_5.pdf | ||
| Amendment_5_Schedule_B.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amendment_4.pdf | ||
| Amendment_3.pdf | ||
| Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Schedule_B.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| WD_05-2069.pdf | ||
| HSCG84-14-R-QAU002.pdf | ||
| Amend_SF30.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HSCG84-14-R-QAU002
Facility HVAC and Mechanical Maintenance
Amendment A00002
TRACEN Petaluma and CAMSPAC
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation: HSCG84-14-R-QAU002
NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE:
The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The U.S. Coast Guard is considering this Contractor for HVAC and Mechanical Maintenance Services at U.S. Coast Guard Training Center Petaluma. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.
Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. facility engineer, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.
Upon completion of the survey, please email to susan.b.lawson@uscg.mil. If you have any questions, please call Susan Lawson at 510-437-5942. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.
CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:
TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:
Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:
QUESTIONS
Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:
1.
How consistent is the Contractor in providing sufficient staffing?
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2.
How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?
Comments:
3.
How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.
Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5.
Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6.
If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?
7.
In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor’s services and overall performance as:
a.
Exceptional – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.
b.
Satisfactory – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.
c.
Unsatisfactory – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.
Your Name:
Your Position:
Company:
Telephone No:
Fax:
E-mail address:
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .