Atch_7_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_dated_01Jun16.pdf

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8533-16-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:

Prime Subcontractor Vendor/Supplier

F. Was this a competitive contract?

_Yes No

G. Period of performance:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised):

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Initial contract cost: $

I. Current/final contract cost: $

J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

K. Description of service/product provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency name:

B. Address:

C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable):

D. Using commands (AFMC, ACC, AFGSC, etc) for the service / product provided:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL/BLUE - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

G VERY GOOD/PURPLE - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely and effective corrective action.

S SATISFACTORY/GREEN - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting

(or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

M MARGINAL/YELLOW – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

U UNSATISFACTORY/RED – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive customer oversight and involvement was required.

N NEUTRAL/WHITE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

Technical Performance E G S M U N

1. How well did the contractor’s final product meet the technical requirements of the specification and/or SOW?

2. How well were contractor’s systems engineering processes integrated to ensure timely completion of technical milestones such as SRR, PDR, CDR, DT&E, OT&E and production of the end product?

3. What was the overall quality of initial through final technical data deliveries such as Engineering Drawings, Tech Manuals as well as other key technical documents supporting the development, design, testing and production reviews and processes?

Schedule E G S M U N

1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

2. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems?

3. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

4. How effectively did the contractor overcome issues associated with Government Furnished Property, Government Furnished Equipment, and/or Government Furnished Information?

Schedule E G S M U N

5. How effective was the contractor at maintaining schedule requirements (including program milestones, and production requirements)?

Cost E G S M U N

1. How effectively was the contractor in managing cost?

2. How effective was the contractor in matching the intial cost estimate with the final price?

3. How effectively did the contractor manage any cost overruns or underuns?

4. Did the contractor deliver timely and accurate cost reporting?

5. Did the contractor deliver timely and accurate invoicing?

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?.

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!