Q As_feb12013.pdf

PDF 61 KB Posted

Attached to
Standard Staircase Trucks and C-5 Staircase Trucks
Solicitation number
FA8533-12-R-31169
Issued by

About this file

Question Answers dated Feb 1 2013

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Q As_jan152013.pdf PDF
Q As_jan42013.pdf PDF
FA853312R31169______0004.pdf PDF
158revised-1.pdf PDF
FA853312R31169______0003.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLRequestforDeviationC002.pdf PDF
Q As_dec192012.pdf PDF
IUIDStandard.pdf PDF
Attachment2PastPresentPerformanceQuestionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment5ConsentForm.pdf PDF
C5CDRLTestProcedureD001.pdf PDF
C5CID.pdf PDF
EDLC5.pdf PDF
DD1653.pdf PDF
SpecialPackagingInstructions.pdf PDF
C5AircraftStaircaseSOW_Aug2012.pdf PDF
CIDAmend1Standard.pdf PDF
C5CDRLTechReportServiceBullentinD003.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLTestInspectionReportA002.pdf PDF
C5CDRLTestInspectionReportD002.pdf PDF
C5CDRLTechReportWeldingD004.pdf PDF
CIDAA59888StandardTruckAmend2.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLTechReportServiceBullentinA003.pdf PDF
C5CDRLRequestforDeviationF002.pdf PDF
TMCRC5.pdf PDF
Q As_dec42012.pdf PDF
TMCRStandard.pdf PDF
C5CDRLECPF001.pdf PDF
Attachment1FACTSSheet.pdf PDF
158revised.pdf PDF
CDRLTMCRStandardB001.pdf PDF
CIDAA59889C5TruckAmend2.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLTechReportWeldingA004.pdf PDF
FA853312R31169superseding.pdf PDF
IUIDC5.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLTestProcedureA001.pdf PDF
CIDStandard.pdf PDF
PackagingInstructions_revised.pdf PDF
EDLStandard.pdf PDF
CIDAmend1C5.pdf PDF
FA853312R31169______0002.pdf PDF
CDRLTMCRC5E001.pdf PDF
GeneralEngineeringNotes.pdf PDF
Attachment4ClientAuthorizationLetter.pdf PDF
StandardCDRLECPC001.pdf PDF
Attachment3TransmittalLetter.pdf PDF
FA853312R31169______0001.pdf PDF
CIDA-A-59888Amend1.pdf PDF
Attachment4 —
C5AircraftStaircaseSOW_Aug2012.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 62 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Staircase Truck (Standard and C‐5) Questions & Answers February 1, 2013

1. Question: There are concerns regarding the CDRL’s for both the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) and Request for Deviations (RFD) and their potential negative impact on the required delivery schedule.

If an issue/concern arises it stops production until a solution is given, agreed upon and implemented.

Regardless of what time is required to reach a solution, the delivery timeline remains the same without taking into account this unforeseen delay created by ECP’s or RFD’s approval or disapproval actions.

Does the Government anticipate required delivery dates being modified at no cost to the successful contactor with respect to ECP’s and RFD’s?

Answer: If an issue or a concern arises due to an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) or a Request for Deviation (RFD), the contractor and the Government will work together to find a reasonable solution.

The Government may extend the delivery as needed and/or upon request of the contractor. There will be no negative impact on delivery schedule due to an ECP or a RFD; however, terms and conditions agreed upon as a result of an ECP or a RFD can have a negative impact or cost the contractor if those terms and conditions are not met.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .