Paving_IDIQ_Pre-Proposal_Brief_2015-03-12.pdf

Agile Base and Worldwide Support

72d Air Base Wing

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

Pre-Proposal Conference and Base Tour

12 March 2015

Elizabeth Fikes

Contracting Officer

AFSC/PZIOC

elizabeth.fikes@us.af.mil

WELCOME

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE

Presolicitation Conference

AGENDA

8:30-8:50 OPENING REMARKS AND AGENDA

Mr. Stephen Palmer, Contracting Officer, AFSC/PZIOC

8:50-9:00 WELCOME

Ms. Cathy Scheirman, Deputy Base Civil Engineer, 72 ABW/CE

9:00-9:30 PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW

Mr. Bede Ley, Base Civil Engineer, 72 ABW/CEPM

9:30-10:00 PROCUREMENT / ACQUISITION OVERVIEW

Mr. Stephen Palmer, Contracting Officer, AFSC/PZIOC

10:00-10:15 BREAK

10:15-10:35 SMALL BUSINESS BRIEFING

Ms. Tracy Nicholson, Small Business Director

10:35-11:10 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION CRITERIA

Mr. Van Garmon, Source Selection Advisor, AFSC/PZCAB

11:10-11:20 CLOSING REMARKS

Mr. Stephen Palmer, Contracting Officer, AFSC/PZIOC

11:30-12:30 BOARD BUS FOR BASE TOUR AND SAMPLE PROJECT SITE VISIT

WELCOME

Ms. Cathy Scheirman, Deputy Base Civil Engineer

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

Overview

Mr. Bede Ley

Project Management Branch Chief

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

Background

Paving program will accomplish a broad range of construction, repair, and maintenance of several paving methods at Tinker AFB

To include

Paving and asphalt repair and/or replacement of existing paved areas

Paving and asphalt installation of any new requirements within scope of this IDIQ

Repair and/or replacement of foundations, footings and structural elements

Contract Structure Utilizes Detailed Specifications

Edited Unified Facilities Guide Specifications

Oklahoma Department of Transportation

Specifications

Pre-priced Line Items 110 line items firm fixed price line items

Economic price adjustment included for asphalt line items

Pre-Priced Line Items Structure (Paving) X001 – 2” Asphalt Repair (Less Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X002 – 2” Asphalt Repair (More Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X003 – 4” Asphalt Repair (Less Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X004 – 4” Asphalt Repair (More Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X005 – 6” Asphalt Repair (Less Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X006 – 6” Asphalt Repair (More Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X007 – 8” Asphalt Repair (Less Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X008 – 8” Asphalt Repair (More Than 200 SY) (EPA Eligible)

X009 – Asphalt Cold Milling (Up to 2 ½”)

X010 – Milling (Mob and Demob)

X011 – Asphalt Overlay (1-1/2") (EPA Eligible)

X012 – Asphalt Overlay (2") (EPA Eligible)

X013 – Asphalt Overlay (2-1/2") (EPA Eligible)

X014 – Asphalt Pavement Removal

X015 – Fabric Reinforcement for AC Pavement

X016 – 2” Asphalt Construction (EPA Eligible)

X017 – 2” Asphalt Pavement (EPA Eligible)

X018 – 4” Asphalt Pavement (EPA Eligible)

X019 – 6” Asphalt Pavement (EPA Eligible)

X020 – 8” Asphalt Pavement (EPA Eligible)

X021 – 4” Asphalt Trail Construction (EPA Eligible)

X022 – 2” Asphalt Sidewalk Construction (EPA Eligible)

X023 – Asphalt Seal Coat

Contract Line Items

Pre-Priced Line Item Structure (Paving Cont.)

X024 – PCC Pavement Removal

X025 – Asphalt Speed Table (EPA Eligible)

X026 – 6" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X027 – 6" PCC Pavement Repair (over 50 SY ea)

X028 – 9" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X029 – 9” PCC Pavement Repair (over 50 SY ea)

X030 – 9" TO 14" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X031 – 9" to 14" PCC Pavement Repair (over 50 SY ea)

X032 – 15" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X033 – 15" PCC Pavement Repair (over 50 SY ea)

X034 – 18" to 24" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X035 – 18" to 24" PCC Pavement Repair (Less than 50 SY ea)

X036 – Soil stabilization

X037 – Site Preparation

X038 – Stabilized Aggregate Base

X039 – 6" PCC Airfield Pavement Construction

X040 – 9" PCC Airfield Pavement Construction

X041 – 12" PCC Airfield Pavement Construction

X042 – 18" PCC Airfield Pavement Construction

X043 – 8" PCC Street Pavement

X044 – 6" PCC Street Pavement

X045 – PCC Sidewalk (Construction & Repair)

X046 – Handicap Ramps, Type “A”

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

X047 – Handicap Ramps, “Type “B”

X048 – P.C. Concrete Flume

X049 – PCC Speed Table

X050 – PCC Curb & Gutter Removal

X051 – PCC Curb and Gutter, Replacement and New

X052 – PCC Expansion Joints (pavement 9" or less)

X053 – PCC Expansion Joints (pavement greater than 9")

X054 – PCC Sawed Joints

X055 – Crack Sealing

X056 – Joint Repair

X057 – Crack Sealing, Airfield

X058 – Joint Resealing Airfield

X059 – PCC Patching

X060 – 6" Subdrainage Piping

X061 – Cast Iron Curb Inlet

X062 – Precast Concrete Manhole

X063 – Additional Depth in Manhole

X064 – Storm Sewer Inlet Adjustment

X065 – Storm Sewer Inlet Modification

X066 – Manhole Adjustment

X067 – Valve Box Adjustment

X068 – 12" RCP

X069 – 15" RCP

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

X070 – 18" RCP

X071 – 24" RCP

X072 – 6” Dia. Fixed Bollard

X073 – 6” Dia. Removable Bollard

X074 – Striping (Paint)

X075 – Striping (Thermoplastic)

X076 – Painting Handicap Symbols

X077 – Standard 7 foot Concrete Bumper Blocks

X078 – Pavement Markers, Class “C” Type 1 & 2 (Amber & Crystal)

X079 – Traffic Signs Installation (New)

X080 – Relocate Existing Traffic Signs

X081 – Topsoil, 4" deep (Agriculturally suitable for supporting grass)

X082 – Sodding

X083 – Seeding

X084 – Saw Cutting Asphalt Pavements

X085 – Saw Cutting Concrete Pavements

X086 – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Measures (SWPPM)

X087 – Controlled Low-Strength Material, CLSM (Flowable Fill)

X088 – Reinforcing Steel

X089 – Traffic Control and Phasing

X090 – Sweeper

X091 – Grinding PCC Pavement

X092 – PCC Manhole Collars

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

Pre-Priced Line Item Structure (Lighting) X093 – Single Arm Light Pole (500-1000 Watt)

X094 – Twin Arm Lighting Posts (500-1000 Watt)

X095 – Remove/Reinstall Existing Light Poles

X096 – Trenching for Conduits <2" Diameter

X097 – Trenching for Conduits >2"&<4" Diameter

X098 – Pullboxes

X099 – Type EB Utility Duct (4" Diameter)

X100 – Type DB Utility Duct (4" Diameter)

X101 – Pavement Boring (For 6" Diameter Duct)

X102 – Concrete Encased Ductbank

X103 – Drilled Pier < 10 VLF; 24" Diameter

X104 – Drilled Pier < 10 VLF; 36" Diameter

X105 – 4 Bolt Pattern, L TYPE, Anchor Bolt Set: 1" Diameter x 24" Long

X106 – 1" Electrical Conduit

X107 – Wiring for Electrical Conduit #10 THWN

X108 – Wiring for Electrical Conduit #8 THWN

X109 – Wiring for Electrical Conduit #6 THWN

X110 – Wiring for Electrical Conduit #6 Copper

* NOTE: All Line Items Above are Fixed Price

XNP101 – Non-PrePriced Line Items

XNP102 – Non-PrePriced Line Items

Review and Approval of Submittals prior to

Commencement of Work

Daily Inspections at Worksites

Weekly Project Progress Meetings led by Contractor

Evaluations in Contractor Performance Assessment

Reporting System (CPARS)

TAFB PAVING IDIQ

Contract Oversight

Repair Rapcon Road from Reserve Road to Patrol Road

Full depth repair of Rapcon Road

Two Phases

Phase 1 - Patrol Road to Vet Clinic

Phase 2 – Vet Clinic to Reserve Road

Sample Project

Sample Project

Engineering Overview

Submit Questions 19 March to

SrA Regine Hazelett regine.hazelett@us.af.mil and

Lt Brandon Stout brandon.stout.5@us.af.mil

Stephen Palmer

Contracting Officer

AFSC/PZIOC

Procurement

Acquisition

Overview

Procurement Overview

Acquisition Overview TAFB Paving IDIQ

Draft Solicitation and supporting documents on FBO

FA8101-15-R-0001

Deadline for submitting questions for the solicitation or for this conference will be 19 Mar 15 by 3:00 pm CST

Competitive 8(a), NAICS 237310, $36.5M Threshold

Single Award IDIQ FP w/ EPA Line Items

Period of Performance: 1 Year Base Period, 3 One-Year-Option

Periods (4 Years Total)

Trade-off Source Selection, Between Past Performance & Price

Rules of Engagement Communication – Elizabeth Fikes (elizabeth.fikes@us.af.mil) , & Lt

Brandon Stout (brandon.stout.5@us.af.mil) & SrA Regine Hazelett

(regine.hazelett@us.af.mil)

CLIN 0001

BASIC YEAR - PAVING IDIQ

SUB-CLIN 0001AA

STREET, SIDEWALK, BRIDGE AND AIRPORT RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION - FP w/EPA

The Tinker AFB Paving IDIQ Contract Program work may involve a broad range of maintenance, repair, alteration and construction of streets, roads, airport runways, public sidewalks, bridges and other paving methods. The work to be performed under the terms of the proposed basic contract and project delivery orders will consist of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, tools, materials, transportation and incidentals necessary to construct, repair, and maintain paving methods on Tinker AFB and shall meet the SOS requirements for the basic contract and the individual project delivery orders. Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) provides for the upward and downward revision of the TAFB Paving IDIQ fixed price line items based on material cost changes beyond the Contractor’s control. The procedures set forth in FAR Clause 52.216-4 shall be used for submission and approval of economic price adjustments under this contract. IAW FAR 52.216-4(c)(1)(ii) the only materials subject to the adjustments are the petroleum-based products listed on the TAFB Paving Line Item Pricing Matrix (Attachment ITO-1.6 of Section L) as follows: Line Item Numbers 0001–0008, 0011–0013, 0016–0022, 0025, 1001–1008, 1011–1013, 1016–1022, 1025, 2001–2008, 2011–2013, 2016–2022, 2025, 3001–3008, 3011–3013, 3016–3022, and 3025. IAW FAR 52.216-4(c)(4) the aggregate increase in the above line items unit price shall not exceed 10% of original base or the current option year price.

NSN: Y1LB-15-PAV-IDIQ

Same for CLIN 1001; 1001AA; 2001; 2001AA; 3001; 3001AA Option Years

Contract Line Item Numbering – Basic Year; Sub-CLIN 0001AA

CLIN 0001

BASIC YEAR - PAVING IDIQ

SUB-CLIN 0001AB

POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND STURCTURAL CONSTRUCTION FP w/EPA

The TAFB Paving IDIQ Contract Program work may involve a broad range of maintenance, repair, alteration and construction of foundations, footings, structural elements and other paving methods. The work to be performed under the terms of the proposed basic contract and project delivery orders will consist of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, tools, materials, transportation and incidentals necessary to construct, repair, and maintain paving methods on Tinker AFB and shall meet the SOS requirements for the basic contract and the individual project delivery orders. Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) provides for the upward and downward revision of the TAFB Paving IDIQ fixed price line items based on material cost changes beyond the Contractor’s control. The procedures set forth in FAR Clause 52.216-4 shall be used for submission and approval of economic price adjustments under this contract. IAW FAR 52.216-4(c)(1)(ii) the only materials subject to the adjustments are the petroleum-based products listed on the TAFB Paving Line Item Pricing Matrix (Attachment 1.6 of Section L) as follows: Line Item Numbers 0001–0008, 0011–0013, 0016– 0022, 0025, 1001–1008, 1011–1013, 1016–1022, 1025, 2001–2008, 2011–2013, 2016–2022, 2025, 3001–3008, 3011–3013, 3016– 3022, and 3025. IAW FAR 52.216-4(c)(4) the aggregate increase in the above line items unit price shall not exceed 10% of original base or the current option year price.

NSN: Z2QA-15-PAV-IDIQ

Same for CLIN 1001; 1001AB; 2001; 2001AB; 3001; 3001AB Option Years

Contract Line Item Numbering – Basic Year; Sub-CLIN 0001AB

Minimum Guarantee Payment Contract Line Item Number – This will be utilized to meet the contract minimum guarantee. It will be a single firm fixed price payment as the initial delivery order (DO) to meet the solicitation attachment Initial DO Statement of Work INT-1 requirements.

CLIN 0002

MINIMUM GUARANTEE PAYMENT - FFP

The awardee will receive an initial delivery order for the TAFB Paving IDIQ for the minimum guarantee. The minimum guarantee will be the fixed amount of $5,000.00 to accomplish the requirements of the initial delivery order statement of work. A post award conference will be conducted approximately 14 days after contract award and will be held at Base Construction Contracting in building 3, Tinker AFB OK, 73145. The Government will provide the post award conference date approximately seven days after contract award.

NSN: Y1LB-15-PAV-IDIQ

Pre-Priced Line Items will be utilized for the Total Evaluated Price and as an attached exhibit for pricing each awarded delivery order.

Example of Pre-Priced Line Items structure that will be in the Information to Offerors as attachment ITO #1.6 to be filled in by offerors in Volume 3.

Offerors will only input unit cost column to include all construction, direct and incidental costs, overhead, profit, and bonds.

Draft RFP w/Attachments on FBO 03 Sep 14

FA8101-14-R-0004

Issue Formal RFP on FBO 11 Feb 15

FA8101-15-R-0001

RFP Amendment 1 – Change date of 26 Feb 15 Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit

Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit 12 Mar 15

Receive Questions 19 Mar 15

Receive Proposals 30 Mar 15

Award Date 21 Jul 15

Post Award Conference 28 Jul 15

Above dates are estimated and not binding upon the

Government and may change as necessary.

SMALL

BUSINESS

INFORMATION

Ms. Tracy Nicholson

AFSC/SB

Small Business Office

(405) 739-2601 www.tinker.af.mil/sbo.asp

TEAM TINKER

AIR FORCE SUSTAINMENT

CENTER

OVERVIEW

AF SMALL BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

TEAMING AGREEMENTS

JOINT VENTURES

MENTOR PROTÉGÉ

LIMITATION ON SUB CONTRACTING

DIRECTOR OF THE AIR FORCE OFFICE OF

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

SAF/SB Mission Statement:

Create and deliver strategies that bring innovative, agile and efficient small business solutions to the Air Force…our vision is to reach beyond government-mandated statistical goals to make small business the solution of choice when meeting the needs of Air Force mission requirements.

SAF/SB Small Business Programs:

The Air Force Office of Small Business Programs is attuned to small business needs. We're organized to use policy, programs, strategy, assistance and operations to ensure the

Air Force benefits from all that small business have to offer to meet mission requirements.

Mr. Mark Teskey

Director

AFSC/SB

Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) Small Business Office (SBO)

AFSC/SB Director*

Ms. Tracy Nicholson

DSN 339-2601 Com (405) 739-2601

AFSC/SB-OLR Director

Ms. Debbie Jackson

DSN 468-5873 Com (478) 926-5873

Mr. Fred Anderson

Small Business Specialist

DSN 468-5872 Com (478) 926-5872

Mr. Ken Burke

Source Development Specialist

DSN 468-5871 Com (478) 926-5871

Ms. Rosemary Foskey

DSN 468-9526 Com (478) 926-9526

AFSC/SB -OLT Director*

Ms. Tracy Nicholson

DSN 339-2601 Com (405) 739-2601

Mr. Joe N. Roop

Source Development Specialist

DSN 339-7243 Com (405) 739-7243

Ms. Renaye Tyce

Small Business Specialist

DSN 339-2604 Com (405) 739-2604

Mr. Richard D. Scroggins

Small Business Specialist

DSN 339-5242 Com (405) 739-5242

AFSC/SB-OLH Director

Mr. James Dean

DSN 777-4143 Com (801) 777-4143

Ms. Sandra Ropelato

DSN 777-3447 Com (801) 777-3447

Mr. Michael Cottam

Source Development Specialist

DSN 777-2211 Com (801) 777-2211

Ms. Mary Ann Flinders

DSN 777-9993 Com (801) 777-9993

* Dual Hatted 26

AFSC/SB RESPONSIBILITIES

• Track AFSC Small Business Performance Expectations

• Source Selection Participation

• Market Research

• Acquisition Plan Review

• Liaison between Government and all businesses

• Small Business Training Internal and External

• Acquisition Review

• Subcontracting Plans/SB Participation Plans

• Source Approval Requests

• Sources Sought Synopsis

• Outreach

TEAMING AGREEMENTS

• Two or more companies form partnership or joint venture as a prime contractor; or

• A prime contractor agrees with one or more others subcontractors

TEAMING AGREEMENTS

• Teaming arrangements creates unique business agreements

• Seek Legal Counsel before entering

• See FAR 9.6 for additional information on

Teaming Agreements

JOINT VENTURE

• Approved by SBA

• Purpose of performing one or more specific 8(a) contracts

SBA JOINT VENTURE

Permissible only where an 8(a) concern lacks the necessary capacity

See 13 Code of Federal Regulations starting at 124.513 for addition information

SBA local contact:

Vanessa Woodfork (405 609-8029) or email

(vanessa.woodfork@sba.gov)

MENTOR PROTÉGÉ

•The Air Force Mentor Protégé Program is not accepting new applicants at this time

MENTOR PROTÉGÉ

See 13 Code of Federal Regulations starting at 124.520 for addition information

Vanessa Woodfork (405 609-8029) or email (vanessa.woodfork@sba.gov)

LIMITATIONS ON SUB-

CONTRACTING

• SB prime contractor must perform specified minimum amounts of work when the contract is a set aside for SB, 8a, HUBZones and SDVOSB

• Services 50% of work with own employees

CONTRACTING

• Supplies or products 50% of cost of manufacturing not including cost of materials

• General construction at least 15% with own employees not including cost of materials

CONTRACTING

• Special trade construction 25 % with own employees not including cost of materials

• References:

• FAR 52.219-14

• 13 CFR 124.510

• 13 CFR 125.6

CONTRACTING

FY13 NDAA

Part IV - Transparency in Subcontracting SEC 1651- Limitations on Subcontracting

SEC 46- Limitations on Subcontracting

(b)- Similarly Situated Entities

GAO’s decision, B-409001 (Jan. 6, 2014)

Terri Shook (405 609-8026) or email

(Teresa.SHOOK@sba.gov)

HOW DO WE FIND YOU

• Request for Information

• Sources Sought Synopsis

• SAM

HOW DO WE FIND YOU

• Internet Search

• Dynamic Small Business Search

• NAICS

• Capabilities Narrative (Keyword)

• Past Performance

QUESTIONS

Van Garmon

AFMC AFSC/PZCAB

734-3815

Source

Selection

Training

AIR FORCE

SUSTAINMENT CENTER

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

TEAM TINKER

Best Value

Trade-off possibilities

Past Performance

Price award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and the

Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determines that the technically acceptable proposal and superior past performance of the higher priced offeror, outweighs the price difference with lower priced offerors.

The Government reserves the right to….

Technical Proposals

Evaluated as

Acceptable or

Unacceptable

PERFORMANCE – PRICE TRADE-OFF SOURCE SELECTION

Source Selection

Main Members Source Selection Authority (SSA)

Makes the award decision

Selects which proposal or proposals represent the best value to the Government

Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO)

Directs the evaluation of proposals

Source of all direct communication between the

Government and offerors

Source Selection Evaluation Team (SSET)

Evaluate Proposals

Assign ratings

Present evaluation results to the SSA

Source Selection

Evaluation

Offeror

A

Offeror

B Offeror

C

Offeror

A

Offeror

B

Offeror

C

EVALUATION

CRITERIA

SSET does not compare proposals against each other

SSET evaluates each proposal against the stated evaluation criteria

Request For Proposal

EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR

AWARD

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Criteria for award selection

Evaluation factors and subfactors, and order of importance in relation to each other

Factor rating definitions

Proposals will be evaluated against stated criteria

INSTRUCTIONS

TO

OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING PROPOSAL

CONTENT AND FORMAT

Describe technical approach

Provide past performance information

Provide pricing data

Includes format requirements, accepted document types, page limitations, etc.

Technical Factor

Evaluation Methodology

Phase 1

a. The Government evaluation team will evaluate the offerors technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings of acceptable or unacceptable. The proposals shall be evaluated against the criteria listed in paragraph 3.0 below. Any offeror who is determined to be technically unacceptable for subfactor 2:

Bonding, will not be evaluated for Factor 2 - Past Performance or Factor 3 - Price and will be ineligible for award.

b. Of those offerors determined to be technically acceptable in Factor 1-Technical, the Government will then conduct a past performance evaluation (Factor 2) against the criteria listed in paragraph 4.0 below and will also evaluate each offeror’s price in accordance with paragraph 5.0 below.

Agile Base and Worldwide Support 47

Phase 2

a. At the conclusion of Phase 1, offers will be ranked according to the total evaluated price (TEP), calculated by totaling the proposed base year plus the three (3), one-year option years according to the line item pricing matrix.

b. Next, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(f)(4) and FAR 15.306(c), for purposes of efficiency, the Government reserves the right to establish a competitive range composed of a number of offers determined to be sufficient for efficient evaluation and contract award. The Government may determine not to establish a competitive range based on pricing for purposes of efficiency at this point.

c. The SSA will then assess the final TEP and past performance ratings for all technically acceptable offers to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision.

Evaluation Methodology

Three Phases of

Source Selection

Initial Evaluation offeror’s proposal

ENs prepared and finalized

Evaluation of

EN responses

Follow-up ENs

Initial Ratings established

Ratings adjusted

Based on

EN responses

Release ENs to offerors

Request for

Final Proposal

Revisions (FPR)

Receive FPRs from offerors

Final evaluation of proposals

Final ratings established

SSA Best Value

Decision

INITIAL

EVALUATION

DISCUSSIONS

FINAL

EVALUATION

Evaluation Factors and Ratings

TECHNICAL

SUBFACTOR

LEVEL RATING

ACCEPTABLE

UNACCEPTABLE

FACTOR 1

PAST

PERFORMANCE

LEVELS OF

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

LIMITED

NO

UNKNOWN

FACTOR 2

PRICE

TOTAL

EVALUATED

REASONABLE

REALISM

BALANCE

FACTOR 3

TRADEOFF

Technical Rating

Definitions

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Evaluation

Each subfactor includes a list of criteria which defines the minimum requirements for that subfactor

1- Project Development and Execution of Sample Project

2- Bonding

In order to be rated “Acceptable” for the Technical Factor, the offeror must meet all criteria within each subfactor.

Failure to meet any element criteria will result in an “Unacceptable” rating for the corresponding subfactor.

An “Unacceptable” subfactor rating will result in an overall “Unacceptable” rating for the Technical Factor.

Performance Confidence

Assessment Rating

Measures the level of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s likelihood of successfully performing the proposed effort.

Rating is established through a review and analysis of the offeror’s recent, relevant, and past performance.

Performance evaluation focuses on portion of effort the offeror accomplished on previous/current contracts compared to the portion to be performed on the proposed effort.

Emphasis is on demonstrated performance

Confidence Definitions

NOTE: With regards to the best value award decision, all offerors rated as “Satisfactory

Confidence” will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor.

Rating Definition

Satisfactory

Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited

Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No

Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown

Confidence

(Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Recency

Recency, as stated in the RFP

The effort must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the current RFP

If any part of the performance falls within the recency timeframe, the contract in its entirety may be evaluated for past performance

For example, if a contract was completed within the recency timeframe, the Government may also consider the Phase-In portion of that contract, which may have occurred seven years ago.

Past Performance

Evaluation

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

Reflects how similar the contractor’s previous work is to the proposed acquisition

Describes how well the contractor performed the previous work

GREEN -- SATISFACTORY

YELLOW -- MARGINAL

RED -- UNSATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE RATING

RECENCY

RELEVANT

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT

NOT RELEVANT

Agile Base and Worldwide Support 56

R S

SUB 2

BD

SUB 1

PD

R S

SR S

$40M

(10 yr)

Government Program

F34601-99-C-9932 FFP/CR

R Y R S $30M

(8 yr)

Company A Excel Project Cost Plus

SR S

$5.3M

(5yr)

Company B Order 58CP T & M

ALPHA, INC.

DOLLAR

AMOUNT

PROGRAM

CONTRACT #

ALPHA, INC

$10M

(10 yr)

Company C N/A (G) FFP with Incentive

$25M

(9 yr)

Government Program

F09603-98-C-9950 CPFF

ZETA CORP

R S

R P S

R S

SR S

PRIME

SUBCONTRACTOR

R S

R Y

R S

Past Performance

Evaluation

N/A

N/A

Past Performance

Data Sources Past Performance volume of the offeror’s proposal

Contract Information Sheets (Prime and Subcontractors)

Provided by contractor as part of proposal

Questionnaires

Included as part of the RFP package

Completed by contractor references

Submitted directly to PCAG Evaluation Team

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

Government database of contractor performance records on government contracts

Price Evaluation

Reasonableness

Price proposal should address all RFP requirements

Competitive market should establish price reasonableness

PCO makes the determination of price reasonableness

Realism

Proposed prices should be realistic for work being performed

Price proposal should reflect clear understanding of requirement

Balance

Pricing for one or more CLINs is significantly overstated or understated

Increases performance risk & may result in unreasonable prices

Evaluation Summary

SSA’s Best Value Decision is based on comparison of all remaining offerors

Alpha, Inc.

Subfactor 1 Project Development and Execution of

Sample Project A

Subfactor 2 Bonding A

Past Performance

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Price $80.0M

Summary

Source Selection is a Subjective process

Source Selection Evaluation Team (SSET) strives for consistency with each offeror

SSET evaluation is based on stated factors and written criteria listed in the RFP, not a comparison of offeror proposals

SSA determines which offeror represents the best value to the Government based on a comparison of offerors against the evaluation criteria

Agile Base and Worldwide Support 61

Agile Base and Worldwide Support 62

Submit Questions by

19 March 2015 to

SrA Regine Hazelett regine.hazelett@us.af.mil and

Lt Brandon Stout brandon.stout.5@us.af.mil