Section_L_Base_Paving_2015-02-09.pdf
PDF 500 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOLICITATION TAFB PAVING IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8101-15-R-0001
About this file
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 1
SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS,
AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
1.0 PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVE
The Government plans to award a single Paving contract. The Paving contract program is an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract required to accomplish a broad range of construction, repair, and maintenance of paving systems at Tinker AFB, OK.
Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation, in accordance with the factors and subfactors in this solicitation. Award will be made to the contractor that provides the best value to the Government over the entire period of performance.
The Government reserves the right to award without discussions.
Funding will be obligated for the Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for each individual delivery order. The awarded contract will have a one-year base period and three, one year option periods.
2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS/INFORMATION
2.1 General Information
This section of the instructions to offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered ineligible for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work (SOW) and appendices. Nonconformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation or rejection of the proposal in its entirety.
The proposal shall be clear, concise, and with sufficient detail for effective evaluation and substantiation of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the
Government's requirements, but shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 2
2.2 Acceptance Period
The proposal acceptance period is specified in Section A of the model contract/solicitation. The offeror shall make a clear statement in Section A of the proposal documentation volume that the proposal is valid for the period of 240 calendar days from the date for receipt of offers.
2.3 Retainability/Disposal
In accordance with (IAW) FAR Subpart 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all proposals. Unless an offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies.
2.4 Point of Contact
The Contracting Officer (CO) and the Contract Manager (CM) listed below are the only points of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the aforementioned individuals. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO or the CS at the following email addresses:
Ms Elizabeth Fikes, Contracting Officer, elizabeth.fikes@us.af.mil
A1C Regine Hazelett, Contract Specialist, regine.hazelett@us.af.mil
2.5 Debriefings
The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range. IAW FAR 15.505, offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a preaward debriefing, or choose to delay the briefing until after award. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors IAW FAR 15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing, following procedures IAW FAR 15.505 or 15.506.
2.6 Discrepancies
If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing. The notification shall include supporting rationale and remedies the offeror requests the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.
2.7 Electronic Reference Documents
All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities
(FBO) web site at http://www.fbo.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe to e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.
2.8 Oral Presentation
The Government will not utilize oral presentations.
mailto:elizabeth.fikes@us.af.mil mailto:regine.hazelett@us.af.mil http://www.fbo.gov/
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 3
2.9 Amendments to the Solicitation
If this request for proposal (RFP) solicitation is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror’s proposal. Any unacknowledged amendments in the offeror’s proposal are subject to solicitation provision FAR
52.215-1(c).
2.10 Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals
Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes or packages in paper media and electronic media addressed to the CO at the address shown in Section A of the model contract/solicitation. The envelope or package must specify the time and date for receipt, solicitation number, and name/address of the offeror.
2.11 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits
2.11.1 Title Page
The title page of each volume must include the solicitation number, name of person authorized to commit the company, address, telephone, and facsimile numbers of the offeror and e-mail address, if available.
2.11.2 Team List
A team list of the offeror’s primary point of contacts (POC) shall be submitted in each volume using the format shown in Attachment ITO – 1.0 of the ITO.
2.11.3 Proposal Organization
The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the proposal organization table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and number of copies. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table below.
Table 2.11.3. Proposal Organization
Volume
ITO
Paragraph
Number
Volume Title
Hard
Copies/
Disk
Copies*
Page
Limit
I 3.0 Technical Volume 4/1 25
2.11.1 Title Page (not included in volume page limit) 1
2.11.2 Team List (Attachment ITO – 1.0, not included in
volume page limit)
Unlimited
2.11.6 Cross Reference Matrix (Attachment ITO – 1.7) 1
2.11.7 Table of Contents Unlimited
2.11.8 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 4
II 4.0 Past Performance Volume 4/1 Unlimited
2.11.1 Title Page 1
2.11.2 Team List (Attachment ITO – 1.0) 5
2.11.6 Cross Reference Matrix (Attachment ITO – 1.7) 1
4.3.1 Past Performance Information Sheets (PPIS)
(Attachment ITO – 1.1)
Unlimited
4.1 Consent Letter (Attachment ITO – 1.4) Unlimited
4.1 Client Authorization Letters (Attachment ITO –
1.5)
Unlimited
4.2 Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment ITO
– 1.2)
Tab Only
4.3.2 Relevant Contract Narrative Max 5
pages per contract
4.3.3 Organizational Structure Change History 2
III 5.0 Price Volume 2/2 Unlimited
2.11.1 Title Page 1
2.11.6 Cross Reference Matrix (Attachment ITO – 1.7) 1
5.1 Narrative Unlimited
5.2.1.1 Line Item Pricing Matrix (Attachment ITO – 1.6) Unlimited
IV 6.0 Contract Documentation 2/1 Unlimited
2.11.1 Title Page (SF33) 1
2.11.2 Team List (Attachment ITO – 1.0) 5
2.11.7 Table of Contents Unlimited
2.11.10 List of Tables and Figures Unlimited
2.11.8 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited
2.11.2 Team List, Arrangements, and/or Letters of Intent Unlimited
6.1 Model Contract (Sections A-J) N/A
6.1.4 Representations and Certifications (Section K) N/A
6.3.1 Authorized Offeror Personnel Unlimited
6.4 Bid Guarantee and Surety Letter Unlimited
6.5 Initial Delivery Order SOW Requirements Unlimited
* One copy marked as original. If discrepancies occur between the original and copies, the original takes precedence.
2.11.4 Page Limitations
Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Page limitations may also be placed on responses
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 5 to evaluation notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors. Each page shall be counted except blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, indexes, glossaries, and those noted in the proposed organization chart as unlimited.
2.11.5 Pricing Information
All pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the price and contract documentation volumes.
2.11.6 Cross Referencing
Offerors shall write each volume on a stand-alone basis so that the Government may evaluate its contents without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation, which is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted when its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.
The offeror shall complete the cross-reference matrix provided in Attachment ITO 1.7 that will indicate the corresponding proposal volume and paragraph in which addresses the referenced item. The offerors cross reference matrix shall include the proposal reference information as it relates to the SOW contents, Section L – Instructions to Offerors, Section M – Evaluatin Factors for Award or other solicitation documents.
2.11.7 Table of Contents/Indexing
Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Include an indexed list of tables and figures.
2.11.8 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each.
2.11.9 Page Size and Format
A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5” x 11”, not including foldouts. Page line spacing shall be 1.5 lines. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be Times New Roman in no less than 12-point font.
Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1” margins on the top and bottom and ¾” side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. These page format restrictions shall apply to responses to ENs. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 6
2.11.10 Tables, Charts, Figures
Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated and shall not exceed 11” x 17” in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics, not for pages of text. For the technical volume, text intended for evaluation within all figures, charts, tables, and graphs, to include imbedded images, shall be no less than Times New Roman 8-point font. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals. Any text within figures, charts, tables, and graphs that do not meet this requirement will not be considered in the evaluation.
2.11.11 Binding and Labeling
Each volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a three-ring, loose-leaf binder permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror’s name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red or other applicable security designation colors. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and
FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.
2.11.12 Electronic Offers
The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. When discrepancies exist between the written hard copies and those provided in electronic format, the written hard copies will take precedence in all cases. For electronic copies, indicate on each
Compact Disc Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, required plans, exhibits, appendices, and attachments, if any. The offeror shall submit volumes I through IV in electronic format.
Each volume shall be submitted on a separate CD. Electronic files submitted in any compressed format will not be considered in the evaluation. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Word 2007/2010, MS Excel 2007/2010, MS-
Project 2007/2010, and MS-Power Point 2007/2010, or Microsoft Office XP as applicable.
2.12 Distribution
The "original" proposal shall be clearly identified. Proposals shall be addressed to the
Contracting Officer and mailed or dropped off to:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AFSC/PZIOC
ATTN: Elizabeth Fikes
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 7
7858 5 th
Street
Tinker AFB, OK 73145-3020
Telephone: 405-739-3517 elizabeth.fikes@tinker.af.mil
3.0 FACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL
3.1 General
The technical volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the technical subfactors defined in
Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing or satisfying these subfactors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is neither necessary nor desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.
3.2 Format and Specific Content
In the technical volume, address your proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical subfactor.
3.2.1 Volume Organization
The technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:
Team List Attachment ITO – 1.0
Table of Contents
List of Table and Drawings
Glossary
Subfactor 1 – Project Development and Execution of Sample Project
Subfactor 2 – Bonding
3.2.2 Subfactor 1: Project Development and Execution of Sample Project
The Offeror shall describe an overall approach for technical capability and project execution of the attached sample project documents (SMPL-1, SMPL-2 and SMPL-3) and comply with the sample project SOW, SMPL-1. As a minimum, the offerors approach must include a narrative of how the work will be accomplished and a completed bid sheet using the appropriate line items and quantities from the line item pricing matrix from Attachment ITO – 1.6.
3.2.3 Subfactor 2: Bonding
The Offeror shall provide proof of bonding and shall furnish a bid guarantee for the sample project IAW FAR clause 52.228-1. Additionally, offerors are required to provide a letter from a surety guaranteeing the offeror is eligible to be bonded for a minimum of $10 million.
mailto:elizabeth.fikes@tinker.af.mil
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 8
4.0 FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE
4.1 General
Each offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information sheets (Attachment ITO – 1.1), consent letter (Attachment ITO – 1.4) executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, and client authorization letters (Attachment ITO – 1.5). This information is required for the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform the work on this requirement. The Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.
4.2 Early Proposal Information
As soon as practicable, offerors shall complete section 1 of the attached past performance questionnaire (ITO – 1.2) and e-mail it and the performance questionnaire letter (Attachment
ITO – 1.3) to all POCs the offeror has listed in the past performance information sheets
(Attachment ITO – 1.1). The POCs will complete the questionnaires and forward them by email, directly to the Past Performance Evaluation Team (PPET) at brandon.stout.5@us.af.mil and regine.hazelett@us.af.mil . Respondents to the questionnaires shall not send the completed information sheets back to the offeror. Offerors shall not follow-up with respondents to ensure they have completed the questionnaires. The PPET will conduct such follow-up with any POC, as necessary.
4.3 Relevant Contracts
4.3.1 General
Offerors should submit past performance information sheets (PPIS) (Attachment ITO – 1.1) on up to five recent contracts you consider most relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort.
Also, submit PPIS on up to five recent contracts performed by each of your teaming partners and significant subcontractors. Please only submit information on subcontractors and teaming partners performing key or critical portions of the proposed effort. The maximum number of
PPIS forms allowed per team is 10. Offerors are requested to limit responses to those efforts necessary for evaluation and relevant to the proposed effort. Offerors shall include rationale supporting the assertion of relevance. For a description of the characteristics or aspects the
Government will consider in determining recency and relevancy, see Section M. Offerors shall complete a table similar to the one below, identifying what each team member is proposed to perform. NOTE: The requested number of PPIS forms for the prime and subcontractors are preferences, and not requirements. Offerors who submit less than the preferred number of PPIS forms are not automatically assigned an “Unknown Confidence” rating. Fewer numbers may be mailto:brandon.stout.5@us.af.mil mailto:regine.hazelett@us.af.mil
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 9 acceptable if the Government determines there is sufficient information to determine a confidence rating.
Prime/Subcontractor
Name
Subfactor 1-Team
Organization &
Internal Controls
Subfactor 2- Project
Development &
Execution of Sample
Project
4.3.2 Specific Content
Offerors shall provide a narrative explaining what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. This may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a limited or no confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror shall clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a higher confidence candidate. For example, submittal of quality performance indicators or other management indicators that clearly support that an Offeror has overcome past problems.
4.3.3 Organizational Structure Change History
Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between the conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, offerors shall include a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of the offeror’s company. A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganizations may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the offeror(s), the
"roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts identified, yet general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources.
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 10
5.0 FACTOR 3 – PRICE
5.1 General
These instructions are to assist you in submitting information required to evaluate the reasonableness and balance of your proposed pricing. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to comply may result in your proposal being ineligible for award.
Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to support your price position. All information relating to the proposed price including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the price volume. Under no circumstances shall this information and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.
After the title page for this volume, include a narrative describing the general pricing data used in determining a line item unit cost and the percent of escalation from the basic used for each option year .
5.2 Pricing Information Requirements
Proposed pricing will be evaluated as Factor 3 for price reasonableness and balanced pricing.
The following information is required to enable evaluation of price reasonableness and balanced pricing.
5.2.1 Total Evaluated Price (TEP)
The TEP will be the total proposed “Contract Period Estimated Total Price” for the base year plus the three (3), one-year option years. The specific pricing for the sample project is not included as part of the TEP, however, the sample project pricing will be contractually binding should the offeror receive the contract award.
5.2.1.1 Line Item Pricing Matrix
The TEP will be automatically calculated using the Line Item Pricing Matrix (Attachment ITO –
1.6) provided in the solicitation. All required proposed unit costs shall be inserted into the Line
Item Pricing Matrix spreadsheet. Evaluation quantities have been established for all line items and are not to be changed.
5.2.1.1.1 Line Item Price Rounding
All proposed line item unit cost amounts shall be rounded to two decimal points to reflect cents.
The extended line item total cost shall be rounded to the nearest dollar. If any pricing proposal deviates from this format, the Government will apply the specified format to determine the extended pricing and TEP.
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 11
5.2.1.1.2 Annual Price Changes
Proposed price increases greater than 5% per option period shall be verified and addressed for reasonableness in this section. Explain and provide support for any annual pricing changes that exceed 5% escalation rates per year.
5.2.2 Data Other than Cost or Pricing Data
FAR Part 15 applies regarding price analysis as a basis for determining reasonable and balanced pricing. In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b) (2) (i), normally adequate price competition establishes price reasonableness. Additional information that is not required is neither requested nor desired by the Government. However, if the offeror believes additional data other than certified cost or pricing data is necessary to justify or clarify proposed pricing, it may be included in this volume.
If, after receipt of proposals, the Contracting Officer determines there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 are considered sufficient to determine price reasonableness, the Offeror may be required to submit additional data other than cost or pricing data. Should such information be considered necessary it will be limited to the minimum amount of cost/pricing information required to support evaluation of reasonable and balanced pricing.
Should the Contracting Officer determine proposed prices appear unreasonable or the possibility an Offeror does not fully understand the requirement, the Offerors may be required to support price reasonableness/price realism via data other than cost or pricing data.
5.2.3 Other Supporting Documentation
Other documentation considered by Offerors to be essential for support of proposed prices shall be presented in this section.
5.2.4 Price Volume Organization
Provide pricing support information in the following organizational format.
5.2.4.1 Section 1 Pricing Support Information
Include under this section your explanation of proposed pricing: include your cost assumptions and basis of estimate used to develop proposed unit pricing. Also provide data other than cost or pricing data as considered necessary to support your proposed pricing. Provide your methodology used in the fair and reasonable determination of subcontractors’/vendors’ proposed pricing.
5.2.4.2 Section 2 Line Item Pricing Matrix
Complete the Line Item Pricing Matrix spreadsheet provided in Attachment ITO – 1.6. Provide complete proposed unit pricing for all line items as required.
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 12
6.0 CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION
6.1 Model Contract/Representations and Certifications
The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the model contract, and Sections A through K.
6.1.1 Solicitation/Contract Form (Section A)
Completion of blocks 14 – 20C of the SF1442. Signature by the offeror on the SF1442 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept. The "original" copy should be clearly marked under separate cover and should be provided without any punched holes. The proposal acceptance period is 240 calendar days for the date for receipt of offers. The offeror shall make a clear statement in the signed off (SF 1442 Block 17) that the proposal is valid until this period has passed.
6.1.2 Supplies or Services and Prices (Section B)
Section B will be the structure of the Contract Line Items (CLINs) and SubCLINs. Total evaluated price (TEP) will be determined using the Line Item Pricing Matrix in Attachment ITO
– 1.6 as described in paragraph 5.0 above.
6.1.3 Contract Clauses (Section I)
The offeror shall provide required information to complete clauses as required.
6.1.4 Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offerors (Section K)
The offeror must complete the annual representations and certification electronically via the
System for Award Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of this offer that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically are correct. Any missing information, or incorrect data entered as requested above (physically or electronic) may render a proposal non-responsive and ineligible for award. This becomes crucial if the Government determines to award without discussions.
6.2 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken.
Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 6.2.
http://www.sam.gov/
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 13
Table 6.2 - Solicitation Exceptions
Solicitation
Document
Page/
Paragraph
Requirement/
Portion Rationale
SOO, SOW, SPEC,
Model Contract, ITO, etc.
Applicable
Page and
Paragraph
Numbers
Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken
Describe why the requirement can/will not be met
6.3 Other Information Required
6.3.1 Authorized Offeror Personnel
Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.
6.3.2 Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations
Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code, CAGE code, and DUNS code. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.
6.3.3 Base Support Requirements
The Government plans to provide the support listed in Section 3 of the SOW, Government-
Furnished Property and Services.
6.4 Bid Guarantee
Offerors shall furnish a bid guarantee for the sample project IAW FAR clause 52.228-1.
Additionally, offerors are required to provide a letter from a surety guaranteeing the offeror is eligible to be bonded for a maximum of $10 million.
6.5 Initial Delivery Order SOW Requirements
Offerors shall furnish a narative of conference agenda requirements in paragraph 2.0 of
Attachment INT-1 Initial DO Statement of Work (SOW).
SECTION L FA8101-15-R-0001 (14 Pages) Page 14
7.0 SECTION L – ITO ATTACHMENTS
ITO – 1.0 Proposed Team List
ITO – 1.1 Past Performance Information Sheet
ITO – 1.2 Past Performance Questionnaire
ITO – 1.3 Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter
ITO – 1.4 Sample Consent Letter
ITO – 1.5 Sample Client Authorization Letter
ITO – 1.6 Line Item Pricing Matrix Spreadsheet
ITO – 1.7 Cross Reference Matrix
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .