FA8053-11-R-0002 0003 Released.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The follow ing amendment is to clarify langauge in the Request For Proposal.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-May-2011

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X

FA8053-11-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Apr-2011

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-May-2011

CODE

773 ESS/PKJ - ESG MEDICAL OL, WPAFB

POC: ANITA BAILEY

2776 C SUITE 200

BLDG 6 AREA B

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7401

FA8053 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA8053-11-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

M1 Program Structure. The sixth sentence has been modified.

From: The resulting contract from this acquisition will be an IDIQ Multiple Award Contract. The Government will use a Performance Price Trade-Off (PPT) source selection to conduct a 100% small business set-aside competition.

The resulting contracts will consist of a four-year ordering period with task orders that may include the following number of option periods: up to three 1-year option periods if awarded in the first year of the contract; up to two 1-year option periods if awarded in the second year of the contract; one 1-year option period if awarded in the third year of the contact; and no option periods if awarded in the fourth year of the contract. There is a program ceiling limit of $992M inclusive of all task orders under the multiple IDIQ contract awards. During CLASS contract competition, cross-teaming is prohibited (see Section L3.1). When questions arise between proposals where the same teaming partner or subcontractor is listed on multiple proposals, written documentation of teaming and subcontracting arrangements required as part of the business plan submission (see M3.1.1.1) will determine which of the proposals will be evaluated. If all proposals have written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, none of the proposals will be evaluated. If only one proposal has written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, the proposal with the written documentation will be evaluated. If none of the proposals have written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, none of the proposals will be evaluated.

To: The resulting contract from this acquisition will be an IDIQ Multiple Award Contract. The Government will use a Performance Price Trade-Off (PPT) source selection to conduct a 100% small business set-aside competition.

The resulting contracts will consist of a four-year ordering period with task orders that may include the following number of option periods: up to three 1-year option periods if awarded in the first year of the contract; up to two 1-year option periods if awarded in the second year of the contract; one 1-year option period if awarded in the third year of the contact; and no option periods if awarded in the fourth year of the contract. There is a program ceiling limit of $992M inclusive of all task orders under the multiple IDIQ contract awards. During CLASS contract competition, cross-teaming is prohibited (see Section L3.1). When questions arise between proposals where the same teaming partner or subcontractor is listed on multiple proposals, written documentation of teaming and subcontracting arrangements required as part of the business plan submission (see M3.1.1.2) will determine which of the proposals will be evaluated. If all proposals have written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, none of the proposals will be evaluated. If only one proposal has written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, the proposal with the written documentation will be evaluated. If none of the proposals have written documentation of teaming or subcontracting arrangements, none of the proposals will be evaluated.

M3.1.1.2, Business Approach. The first sentence has been modified.

From: Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the Contractor demonstrates, through formal written business and/or teaming arrangements with partners and subcontractors identified in Attachment L-1 Contractor

Team Organization, the capacity and capability to submit qualified proposals 85% of the time on MTF clinical service requirements and establish formal control processes in those agreements to ensure the prime Contractor remains responsible for all aspects of contract performance.

To: Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the Contractor Offeror demonstrates, through formal written documentation (e.g., letter signed by both parties or signature page of agreement) of the business and/or teaming arrangements with partners and subcontractors identified in Attachment L-1 Contractor Team Organization, the capacity and capability to submit qualified proposals 85% of the time on MTF clinical service requirements and establish formal control processes in those agreements to ensure the prime Contractor remains responsible for all aspects of contract performance.

M3.1.1.3, Recruitment of Health Care Workers. The first sentence has been modified.

From: Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the Contractor’s method for recruiting health care workers, which includes finding (e.g., advertising, database searches, use of internal/external recruiters, professional associations); applying prescreening criteria against the preliminary Government minimum requirements for education, experience, certifications, and licensure; obtaining initial background checks; and, obtaining the necessary qualifying documentation are tied to timelines and/or flowcharts with key milestones to meet the 20-day requirement for both credentialed and non-credentialed HCWs. This method is demonstrated through a complete process from issuance of a Letter of Intent to Award to submission of qualifying documentation.

To: Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the Contractor’s Offeror’s method for recruiting health care workers, which includes finding (e.g., advertising, database searches, use of internal/external recruiters, professional associations); applying prescreening criteria against the preliminary Government minimum requirements for education, experience, certifications, and licensure; obtaining initial background checks; and, obtaining the necessary qualifying documentation are tied to timelines and/or flowcharts with key milestones to meet the 20-day requirement for both credentialed and non-credentialed HCWs. This method is demonstrated through a complete process from issuance of a Letter of Intent to Award to submission of qualifying documentation

M3.3.5, IDIQ Contract References. Added sentence to end of paragraph.

(Note: this paragraph was previously revised as part of Amendment 0002).

From: The Contractor shall determine the mix of contracts to best represent depth and breadth of past performance through relevant contracts. Indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts will typically demonstrate more depth and breadth than a single task order or single contract. References on indefinite delivery contracts submitted as individual task/delivery orders will only be counted as one past performance reference regardless of the quantity of task orders submitted for the same contract. Likewise, references for the same contract but different option periods will be evaluated as a single past performance reference.

To: The Contractor shall determine the mix of contracts to best represent depth and breadth of past performance through relevant contracts. Indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts will typically demonstrate more depth and breadth than a single task order or single contract. References on indefinite delivery contracts submitted as individual task/delivery orders will only be counted as one past performance reference regardless of the quantity of task orders submitted for the same contract. Likewise, references for the same contract but different option periods will be evaluated as a single past performance reference. Note: Offerors may include performance information from multiple task orders against the same contract number as part of an individual past performance reference if desired; however the entire submission will only count as one past performance reference.

M3.3.6, Past Performance References. Last sentence in paragraph has been modified.

(Note: this paragraph was previously revised as part of Amendment 0002).

From: The evaluation for the Past Performance section will ensure the offeror provided a record of relevant and recent past performance on at least five (5), but no more than eight (8) previous/current contracts, with a minimum of three (3) being for the offeror‟ s performance as a prime Contractor and/or subcontractor. The evaluation will ensure that past performance information is provided for each teaming partner/subcontractor identified on

Attachment L-1 Contractor Team Organization. The Government will use data provided by each offeror in this section and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation. If more than eight (8) past performance references are submitted, the Government will only consider information provided for the first 8 references (Tabs 1-8) of the past performance volume. If the Government determined an offeror submitted less than the required number of references, the offeror will have failed to meet the minimum number of past performance references and the proposal will be determined unawardable. If the Government determined an offeror submitted less than the required number of references, the offeror will have failed to meet the minimum number of past performance references and the proposal will be determined unawardable.

To: The evaluation for the Past Performance section will ensure the offeror provided a record of relevant and recent past performance on at least five (5), but no more than eight (8) previous/current contracts, with a minimum of three

(3) being for the offeror‟ s performance as a prime Contractor and/or subcontractor. The evaluation will ensure that past performance information is provided for each teaming partner/subcontractor identified on Attachment L-1

Contractor Team Organization. The Government will use data provided by each offeror in this section and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation. If more than eight (8) past performance references are submitted, the

Government will only consider information provided for the first 8 references (Tabs 1-8) of the past performance volume. If the Government determined an offeror submitted less than the required number of references, the offeror will have failed to meet the minimum number of past performance references and the proposal will be determined unawardable. If the Government determined an offeror submitted less than the required number of references, the offeror will have failed to meet the minimum number of past performance references and the proposal will be determined unawardable it may impact the offeror's overall performance confidence assessment

(End of Summary of Changes)